Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 197 - 210 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 İndeks Tarihi: 29-09-2022
Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present
Öz: Architecture has been at the center of discussions on “originality” with the abundance and distribution of knowledge. The neologism “original-copy” now arises as a crucial clue in understanding the paradigm shift and as a path in the deconstruction of originality in architecture. Architectural manifestos, which have dominated architectural thought for almost a century, provide a valuable source of texts for this deconstruction. The neologisms of evolving approaches to design are added to architectural jargon by architectural manifestos: the newly coined word “original-copy” is a recent example. The purpose of this article is to deconstruct the neologism of original-copy, reveal its essential values to architectural thought, and unravel its layers of meaning. The methodology of the article consists of a discourse analysis that focuses on the words “original” and “copy” and is conducted through the texts of the 20th century architectural manifestos till today in order to stratify the neologism into its semantic layers. The fact that “original-copy” is both an oxymoron and a neologism in terms of the bond it makes with Derrida’s binary oppositions is a crucial foundation in the fulfillment of this deconstruction.In the study, it has been noted how the words are modified in a way that leads to the formation of a neologism such as “original-copy,” and the meaning of the “original” and the “copy” today is opened to discussion by recombining the data collected through discourse analysis.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Artun, A. (2010). Manifesto, Avangard Sanat ve Eleştirel Düşünce [Blog] Ali Artun. Available at http://www.aliartun.com/yazilar/manifesto-avangard-sanat-ve-elestirel-dusunce/ (Accessed: August 2020)
- Bosker, B. (2013). Original copies: Architectural mimicry in contemporary China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
- Bosker, B. (2014). Original copies: Inside China’s imitation binge. MAS Context, 21, 187-198.
- Buckley, C. (Ed) (2016). After the manifesto. After the Manifesto, Columbia Books on Architecture and the City, New York: Columbia University Press.
- Cabré Castellví, M.T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, Methods and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.
- Caws, M.A. (2001). Manifesto: A century of isms. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, Xxiii.
- Colomina, B. (2014). Manifesto architecture: The ghost of Mies. Critical Spatial Practice 3, Berlin: Sternberg Press, 1-23.
- Conrads, U. (1964). Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-century Architecture. Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press.
- Çağlayan, A. (2019). İkinci Yeni Şiirinde Örneklerle Oksimoronun Yapısal ve Anlambilimsel Özellikleri. (Dissertation). T.C. Giresun University, Giresun.
- Derrida, J. (1997). Architecture where the desire may live. L. Neill(Ed.) Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory, London and New York: Routhledge, 304-305.
- Derrida, J. (2014). Gramatoloji, First Edition:1967, Ankara: Bilgesu Publishing, 14,17,24,209.
- Docherty, L. J. (2008). Original copies: Gilbert Stuart’s companion portraits of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. American Art, 22(2), 85-105, Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/591171.
- Doesburg, T. V. (1924). Towards a plastic architecture. Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-century Architecture, Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 78-81
- Emecan, N. (1998). 1960’tan Günümüze Türkçe Bir Sözlük Denemesi. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Publishing, 22.
- Google Ngram Viewer.(2020). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3opIVQ2
- Grau, U. & Goberna, C. (2014). Repeat with me: manifesto from Fake Industries Architectural Agonism, MAS Context, 21, 198-204.
- Güngör, A. (2014). İkirciklem (Oksimoron) Uyumsuzluğun Uyumu. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (21), 102-121, Doi: https://doi.org/10.17498/ kdeniz.20037.
- Jencks, C. & Kropf, K. (1997). Theories and manifestoes of contemporary architecture. Great Britain: Academy Editions.
- Kongar, E. (2011). Oksimoron üzerine öneriler ve düşünceler. [Blog] Emre Kongar. Available at https://www. kongar.org/diger/oksimoron.php (Ac cessed: August 2020)
- Korn, A. (1923). Analytical and utopian. Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-century Architecture, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 76-78.
- Lederer, R. (1990). Oxymoronology. Word Ways: The Journal of Recreational Linguistics, Available at: http://www. funwithwords.com/oxym_oxymoronolog (Accessed: 15.04.2020)
- Lucy, N. (2012). Derrida sözlüğü. Ankara: Bilgesu Publishing, 98-100.
- Matoré, G. (1953). La Méthode en lexicologie. Paris: M. Didier, 41.
- Mc Guirk, J. (Ed). (2007). Manifesto Issue: 50 Most Influential Architects and Designers. Icon Eye Magazine, 50th Edition, Retrieved from https:// www.iconeye.com/manifestos
- Muthesius, H., & Van de Velde, H. (1914). Werkbund theses and antitheses. Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-century Architecture, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 28-32.
- Poelzig, H. (1906). Fermentation in architecture. Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-century Architecture, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 14-18.
- Sant’Elia, A., & Marinetti, F. (1914). Futurist manifesto. Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-century Architecture, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. 34-39.
- Tanyeli, U. (2001). Biz hep taklit mi ederiz?. Arredamento Mimarlık, 06.
- The Why Factory, Maas,W., Madrazo, F., Hulsman, B. (Eds.). (2018). Copy Paste: Badass Copy Guide. Belgium: Nai010 Publishers, 81-102.
- Uz, F. (2014). Hukukçular Sitesi as the stage of everyday life, Places of Memory, İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Publishing, 134-144.
- Van de Velde, H. (1949). Forms (excerpt). Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture, Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press. 152-154.
- Vidler, A. (2016). From manifesto to discourse. After the Manifesto, Ed: Craig Buckley, Columbia Books on Architecture and the City, Columbia University Press: New York
- Wigley, M. (2011, November 18). What happened to the architectural manifesto?. [Symposium]. GSAPP Columbia University, New York. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=ESG6Tr60OaA&t=1369s.
- Young, E. (1759). Conjectures on Original Composition. E.J. Morley(Ed), 1918, London: Manchester The University Press; New York: Longmans, Green & co..
- Yücel, A. (1990). Türkçe baskıya önsöz. 20. Yüzyıl Mimarisinde Program ve Manifestolar, Ed: U. Conrads,
| APA | TUNAY Z, UZ F (2022). Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. , 197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| Chicago | TUNAY Zeynep Gül Söhmen,UZ Funda Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. (2022): 197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| MLA | TUNAY Zeynep Gül Söhmen,UZ Funda Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. , 2022, ss.197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| AMA | TUNAY Z,UZ F Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. . 2022; 197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| Vancouver | TUNAY Z,UZ F Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. . 2022; 197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| IEEE | TUNAY Z,UZ F "Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present." , ss.197 - 210, 2022. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| ISNAD | TUNAY, Zeynep Gül Söhmen - UZ, Funda. "Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present". (2022), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| APA | TUNAY Z, UZ F (2022). Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| Chicago | TUNAY Zeynep Gül Söhmen,UZ Funda Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 19, no.1 (2022): 197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| MLA | TUNAY Zeynep Gül Söhmen,UZ Funda Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.19, no.1, 2022, ss.197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| AMA | TUNAY Z,UZ F Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(1): 197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| Vancouver | TUNAY Z,UZ F Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(1): 197 - 210. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| IEEE | TUNAY Z,UZ F "Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, ss.197 - 210, 2022. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
| ISNAD | TUNAY, Zeynep Gül Söhmen - UZ, Funda. "Deconstructing “original-copy” in architectural manifestos from 20th century to present". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 19/1 (2022), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.78889 |
