Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery

Kaplan, Volkan; Bazyel, Zeynep Dilan; ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM, Saadet; CİĞERİM, Levent; Dinç, Gönül

Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery

Volkan Kaplan, (Tekirdağ Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, Tekirdağ, Türkiye)

Levent Ciğerim, (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi AD, Van, Türkiye)

Saadet Çınarsoy Ciğerim, (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi AD, Van, Türkiye)

Zeynep Dilan Bazyel, (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi AD, Van, Türkiye)

Gönül Dinç (Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı, Van, Türkiye)

Van Tıp Dergisi

8 2

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 412 - 420 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 02-10-2022

Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery

Öz:

Objective: This study aimed to examine the differences between 12 metric swelling evaluation methods in patients undergoing impacted lower third molar surgery. Material ve Methods: This study was conducted on the patients indicated for the extraction of impacted lower third molar teeth due to orthodontic reasons. Twenty-six patients aged between 18-40 were included in the study. Swelling levels after surgery were measured using anatomic landmarks used for the methods, and the distances between landmarks were measured before the operation, and on days 2 and 7 afterward. The measurements were done using thread and a millimeter ruler while patients were seated. The distances between the anatomical landmarks were evaluated by 12 different methods. Results: According to the results of the measurements performed on twenty-six patients, (15 male and 11 female) with a mean age of 23.85±6.06 years, male had more swelling than female and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) although age, and measurement methods had no significant effect on swelling (p>0.05). Conclusion: As a result of the present study; twelve swelling evaluation methods showed significantly similar results and the authors recommended using Method 1 and 5 for convenient clinical evaluation which could be performed with a smaller number of anatomical points.

Anahtar Kelime:

Üçüncü Molar Diş Cerrahisi Sonrası Şişlik Değerlendirilmesinde Çeşitli Ölçüm Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Öz:

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, gömülü alt yirmi yaş dişi operasyonu geçiren hastalarda eş zamanlı olarak farklı 12 çevresel şişlik değerlendirme yöntemi kullanılarak, bu yöntemler arasında fark bulunup bulunmadığının tespit edilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma, gömülü alt üçüncü molar dişlerin ortodontik nedenlerle çekilme endikasyonu olan hastalarda yapılmıştır. Çalışmaya 18-40 yaş arasındaki 26 hasta dahil edilmiştir. Operasyondan sonra şişlik seviyeleri anatomik noktalar arasındaki mesafeler, operasyondan önce ve operasyondan sonra 2. ve 7. günlerde ölçülmüştür. Değerlendirmeler milimetrik cetvel ile hastalar otururken yapılmıştır. Anatomik noktalar arasındaki mesafeler 12 farklı yöntemle değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 23,85±6,06 yıl olan 26 hastada (15 erkek ve 11 kadın) yapılan ölçüm sonuçlarına göre, erkeklerde (3,156±0,119) kadınlara (2,452±0,140) göre daha fazla ödem görülürken (p<0,05) yaş ve şişlik ölçüm yönteminin şişlik üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığı görülmüştür. Sonuç: Bu çalışmada, 12 farklı çevresel ödem değerlendirme yönteminin benzer sonuçlar verdiği görülmüştür. Bu sebeple bu yöntemler arasında, daha az sayıda anatomik nokta arasındaki mesafenin ölçülmesini içeren yöntem 1 ve yöntem 5 klinik kullanım için daha kolay değerlendirme tekniği olarak önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Micó-Llorens JM, Satorres-Nieto M, Gargallo-Albiol J, Arnabat-Domínguez J, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Efficacy of methylprednisolone in controlling complications after impacted lower third molar surgical extraction. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2006;62(9):693-698.
2. Markovic A, Todorovic L. Effectiveness of dexamethasone and low-power laser inminimizing oedema after third molar surgery: a clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36(3):226-229.
3. Kissane JM. Anderson‟s Pathology. 9th ed. Volume 1, Mosby Company St. Louis, 1990. p 67-90.
4. Brochner AC, Toft P. Pathophysiology of the systemic inflammatory response after major accidental trauma. Scan J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2009;17(1):43.
5. Bui CH, Seldin EB, Dodson TB. Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61(12):1379- 1389.
6. Uçok C. Stereophotogrammetric assessment of the effect of tenoxicam on facial swelling subsequent to third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26(5):380-382.
7. Llewelyn J, Ryan M, Santosh C. The use of magnetic resonance imaging to assess swelling after the removal of third molar teeth. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;34(5):419-423.
8. Cigerim L, Kaplan V. Evaluation of the analgesic efficacies of Dexketoprofen Trometamol and Dexketoprofen Trometamol Thiocolchicoside combinationsin the impacted third molar surgery: Randomised clinical trial. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2019;24(1):e114- e122.
9. Ulu M, Akçay H. Ödemin Değerlendirilmesinde Yüz Tarama Sistemi ile Pletismografik Ölçüm Yöntemin Karşılaştırılması. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 2019;10(1):48-52.
10. Afat İM, Akdoğan ET, Gönül O, Göker M. Evaluation of correlation between patients subjective VAS edema scores and surgeons measurement scores on face after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Yeditepe J Dent 2018;14(1):25-30.
11. Carrillo SJ, Calatayud J, Manso JF, Barberia E, Martinez MJ, Donado M. A randomized double-blind clinical trial on effectiveness of helium-neon laser in the prevention of pain, swelling and trismus after removal of impacted third molars. Int Dent J 1990;40(1):31-36.
12. Koyuncu BÖ, Zeytinoğlu M, Tetik A, Gomel MM. Effect of tube drainage compared with conventional suturing on postoperative discomfort after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;53(1):63-67.
13. Koçer G, Yuce E, Tuzuner Oncul A, Dereci O, Koskan O. Effect of the route of administration of methylprednisolone on oedema and trismus in impacted lower third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;43(5):639-643.
14. Peterson LJ, Ellis E, Hupp JR, Tucker MR. Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery. 4th ed. St. Louis, Mosby; 2003. 15. Fragiskos FD. Oral Surgery. 1st ed. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg; 2007. p 181- 203.
16. De Santana-Santos T, De Souza-Santos JAS, Martins-Filho PRS, da Silva LCF, De Oliveira e Silva ED, Gomes ACA. Prediction of postoperative facial swelling, pain and trismus following third molar surgery based on preoperative variables. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013;18(1):e65-e70.
17. Silva LD, Reis EN, Faverani LP, Bassi AP. The efficacy of etodolac and ibuprofen, regarding gender, on pain, edema and trismus after impacted lower third molar surgery: A randomized prospective clinical split-mouth study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2020;26(2):e136-e140.
18. Bamgbose BO, Akinwande JA, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Arotiba GT, Ogunlewe MO. Effects of co-administered dexamethasone and diclofenac potassium on pain, swelling andtrismus following third molar surgery. Head Face Med 2005;1:11.
19. Pallagatti S, Sheikh S, Puri N, Mittal A, Singh B. To evaluatethe efficacy of ultrasonography compared to clinicaldiagnosis, radiography and histopathological findingsin the diagnosis of maxillofacial swellings. Eur J Radiol 2012;81(8):1821-1827.
20. Maal TJ, van Loon B, Plooij JM, Rangel F, Ettema AM, Borstlap WA, et al. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68(10):2391-2401.
21. Van Gool AV, Ten Bosch JJ, Boering G. A photographic method of assessing swelling following third molar removal. Int J Oral Surg 1975;4(3):121-129.
22. Cathcart RA. Inflammatory swellings of the head and neck. Surgery (Oxford) 2015;33(12):600-606.
23. Yamamoto S, Miyachi H, Fujii H, Ochiai S, Watanabe S, Shimozato K. Intuitive facial imaging method for evaluation of postoperative swelling: a combination of 3-dimensional computed tomography and laser surface scanning in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74(12):2506.e1-2506.e10.
24. Siegert R. Ultrasonography of Inflammatory Soft Tissue Swellings of the Head and Neck. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45(10):842-846.
25. Harrison JA, Nixon MA, Fright WR, Snape L. Use of hand-held laser scanning in the assessment of facial swelling: a preliminary study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;42(1):8-17.
26. Chaudhary M, Singh M, Singh S, Singh SP, Kaur G. Primary and secondary closure techniquefollowing removal of impacted mandibular third molars: A comparative study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2012;3(1):10-14.
27. Absi EG, Shepherd JP. A comparison of morbidity following the removal of lower third molars by the lingual split and surgical bur methods. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993;22(3):149-153.
28. Mantovani E, Arduino PG, Schierano G, Ferrero L, Gallesio G, Mozzati M, et al. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower impacted third molar tooth removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;72(10):1890- 1897.

APA	Kaplan V, CİĞERİM L, ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM S, Bazyel Z, Dinç G (2021). Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. , 412 - 420.
Chicago	Kaplan Volkan,CİĞERİM Levent,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM Saadet,Bazyel Zeynep Dilan,Dinç Gönül Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. (2021): 412 - 420.
MLA	Kaplan Volkan,CİĞERİM Levent,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM Saadet,Bazyel Zeynep Dilan,Dinç Gönül Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. , 2021, ss.412 - 420.
AMA	Kaplan V,CİĞERİM L,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM S,Bazyel Z,Dinç G Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. . 2021; 412 - 420.
Vancouver	Kaplan V,CİĞERİM L,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM S,Bazyel Z,Dinç G Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. . 2021; 412 - 420.
IEEE	Kaplan V,CİĞERİM L,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM S,Bazyel Z,Dinç G "Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery." , ss.412 - 420, 2021.
ISNAD	Kaplan, Volkan vd. "Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery". (2021), 412-420.

APA	Kaplan V, CİĞERİM L, ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM S, Bazyel Z, Dinç G (2021). Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. Van Tıp Dergisi, 28(3), 412 - 420.
Chicago	Kaplan Volkan,CİĞERİM Levent,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM Saadet,Bazyel Zeynep Dilan,Dinç Gönül Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. Van Tıp Dergisi 28, no.3 (2021): 412 - 420.
MLA	Kaplan Volkan,CİĞERİM Levent,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM Saadet,Bazyel Zeynep Dilan,Dinç Gönül Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. Van Tıp Dergisi, vol.28, no.3, 2021, ss.412 - 420.
AMA	Kaplan V,CİĞERİM L,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM S,Bazyel Z,Dinç G Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2021; 28(3): 412 - 420.
Vancouver	Kaplan V,CİĞERİM L,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM S,Bazyel Z,Dinç G Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery. Van Tıp Dergisi. 2021; 28(3): 412 - 420.
IEEE	Kaplan V,CİĞERİM L,ÇINARSOY CİĞERİM S,Bazyel Z,Dinç G "Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery." Van Tıp Dergisi, 28, ss.412 - 420, 2021.
ISNAD	Kaplan, Volkan vd. "Comparison of Various Measurement Methods in the Evaluation of Swelling After Third Molar Surgery". Van Tıp Dergisi 28/3 (2021), 412-420.