The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students

Yıl: 2010 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 35 - 50 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı bilişötesi dinleme stratejilerine yönelik eğitimin Türkiye’deki bir üniversitede öğrenim gören bir grup başlangıç düzeyi hazırlık öğrencisinin dinleme performansına olan etkisini araştırmaktır. Bu çalışmada 20 kişiden oluşan bir deney ve aynı sayıdaki bir kontrol grubu olmak üzere iki başlangıç düzeyi öğrenci grubu yer almıştır. Deney grubu dinleme derslerindeki ders kitabına dahil edilmiş beş hafta süren bir bilişötesi strateji eğitimi almıştır. Bu eğitimin sonunda, aynı ders kitabının öğretmen elkitabından seçilen bir dinleme sınavı her iki gruba da uygulanmıştır. Sınav sonuçlarının t-test kullanılarak yapılan analizi deney grubunun sınavda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ölçüde daha iyi sonuç aldığını ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu çalışmadan çıkarılabilecek sonuç öğrencilerin etkin dinleyiciler olmalarına yardımcı olmak için dinleme programlarına bilişötesi strateji eğitiminin dahil edilmesi gerekliliğidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim

-

Öz:
The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on the listening performance of a group of beginner preparatory school students at a university in Turkey. Two beginner groups, a control group (n: 20) and an experimental group (n: 20), were chosen as the participants of the study. The experimental group received five weeks of metacognitive strategy training embedded into a listening course book, while the other group did not. At the end of the training, a listening test taken from the teacher’s manual of the same course book was administered to both groups. The analysis of the test scores using t-test revealed that the experimental group did statistically better in the test. The implication of the study is that metacognitive strategy training should be incorporated into the regular listening teaching program to help students become more effective listeners.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Dil ve Dil Bilim
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. Modern Language Journal, 75, 460-472.
  • Anderson, N.J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest, April 2002, 3-4.
  • Chamot, A. U., & O`Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
  • Chamot, A.U., & Rubin, J. (1994). Comments on Janie Rees-Miller's 'A critical appraisal of learner training: theoretical bases and teaching implications': Two readers react. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 771-776.
  • Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P . B., Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook., NY: Longman.
  • Chamot, A.U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112–130.
  • Cohen, A. D. (2000). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  • Goh, C. C.M. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30(2), 185-206
  • Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive Instruction for Second Language Listening Development: Theory, Practice and Research Implications. Regional Language Centre Journal, 39(2), 188 -213.
  • Goh, C., & Yusnita, T. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal 60(3), 222–232
  • Hauck, M. (2005). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive strategies and CALL. In J. Egbert and G. Petrie (eds.), CALL research perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 65–86.
  • Jamieson, J., Grgurovic, M., & Becker, T. (2008). Using diagnostic information to adapt traditional textbook-based instruction. In C. A. Chapelle, Y.R. Chung, & J. Xu (Eds.), Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic language assessment (25-39). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
  • Luo-xian, S. (2005). Metacognitive Awareness and Second Language Listeners. Media in Foreign Language Instruction, 6, 55-59.
  • O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, R., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 285-296.
  • O' Malley, J.M., & Chamot, A.U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17, 235-247.
  • Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  • Rasekh, Z. E. & Ranjbary, R. (2003). Metacognitive strategy training for vocabulary learning. Retrieved May 18, 2007 from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESLEJ/ ej26/a5.html
  • Ridley, D.S., Schutz, P.A., Glanz, R.S. & Weinstein, C.E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: the interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education 60 (4), 293-306.
  • Seferoglu,G. & Uzakgören, S. (2004). Equipping learners with listening strategies in English language classes. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 27, 223-231.
  • Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-342.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387-409.
  • Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 54, 168-176.
  • Vandergrift, L. (2003). From prediction through reflection: Guiding students through the process of L2 listening. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 425-440.
  • Vandergrift, L. Goh, C.C.M., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire (MALQ): Development and Validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431-462.
  • Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 515-37.
  • Yang, C. (2009). A study of metacognitive strategies employed by English listeners. International Education Studies. 2(4), 134-139. http://www.nclrc.org/guides/HED/chapter1.html http://eslstrategy.elitebridge.net/metacognitionInstruction.html
  • National Capital Language Resource Center (NCLRC): http://www.nclrc.org/ http://calla.ws/overview.html
APA Coşkun A (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. , 35 - 50.
Chicago Coşkun Abdullah The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. (2010): 35 - 50.
MLA Coşkun Abdullah The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. , 2010, ss.35 - 50.
AMA Coşkun A The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. . 2010; 35 - 50.
Vancouver Coşkun A The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. . 2010; 35 - 50.
IEEE Coşkun A "The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students." , ss.35 - 50, 2010.
ISNAD Coşkun, Abdullah. "The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students". (2010), 35-50.
APA Coşkun A (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-Royal, 4(1), 35 - 50.
Chicago Coşkun Abdullah The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-Royal 4, no.1 (2010): 35 - 50.
MLA Coşkun Abdullah The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-Royal, vol.4, no.1, 2010, ss.35 - 50.
AMA Coşkun A The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-Royal. 2010; 4(1): 35 - 50.
Vancouver Coşkun A The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-Royal. 2010; 4(1): 35 - 50.
IEEE Coşkun A "The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students." Novitas-Royal, 4, ss.35 - 50, 2010.
ISNAD Coşkun, Abdullah. "The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students". Novitas-Royal 4/1 (2010), 35-50.