Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites

KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU, SERRA; hubbezoglu, ihsan; Karaarslan, Ayşegül

doi:10.7126/cumudj.1160656

Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites

İhsan HUBBEZOĞLU, (Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Sivas, Türkiye)

Serra KUTLU, (Niğde Ağız ve Diş Merkezi, Niğde, Türkiye)

Ayşegül KARAARSLAN (Sivas Ağız ve Diş Merkezi, Sivas, Türkiye)

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

4 0

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 271 - 277 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.1160656 İndeks Tarihi: 15-12-2022

Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites

Öz:

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of self-cured universal adhesive system on shear bond strengths of two conventional and two bulk-fill composites to dentin. Materials and Methods: In this study, four groups were formed: two conventional condensable composites[G-aenial posterior(GC), Palfique Estelite Paste(Tokuyama)], and two bulk-fill composites[Estelite Bulk Fill Flow(Tokuyama), Beautifil Bulk Restorative(Shofu)]. Each group was divided into two subgroups; G-premio bond (control group) ve self-cured Universal Bond (Tokuyama). 32 human third molar human teeth were prepared to expose dentin surfaces. After the preparation, the teeth were randomly divided into 4 main groups and 2 subgroups (n = 8), composites were applied to the surfaces with the help of cylindrical silicone transparent mold with a diameter of 4 mm and a height of 4 mm. Results: In this study, when both adhesive systems are evaluated; the highest shear bond strength value was Palfique Estelite Paste, while the lowest shear bond strength value was Beautifil Bulk Restorative. While the difference between Palfique Estelite Paste and Estelite bulk-fill flow, Beautifil Bulk Restorative was found to be statistically significant, the difference with G-aenial posterior was not significant in both adhesive groups. The difference between G-aenial posterior and Beautifil Bulk Restorative was found to be statistically significant in both adhesive groups. When adhesive systems are compared; G-premio bond was found to be higher in all composite groups compared to self-cured Universal Bond, but the difference between them was statistically insignificant. Conclusions: While conventional composites exhibited high shear bond strengths, bulk-fill composites showed values close to these values. The self-cured adhesive system we used showed near values of shear bond strength to the light-polymerized adhesive system. It is advisable to use self-cured adhesive systems for use in areas where light can be difficult to access in clinical applications.

Anahtar Kelime: shear bond strength bulk-fill composites self-cured adhesive systems

Geleneksel ve Bulk-fill Kompozitlerin Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımlarına Işıksız Adeziv Sistemin Etkisi

Öz:

Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı, iki geleneksel ve iki bulk-fill kompozitlerin dentine makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarına ışıksız adeziv sistemin etkisinin incelenmesidir. Materyal-metod: Çalışmamızda iki geleneksel kondanse edilebilen kompozit [G-aenial posterior(GC), Palfique Estelite Paste(Tokuyama)], kütlesel yerleştirilebilen iki bulk-fill kompozit [Estelite Bulk Fill Flow(Tokuyama), Beautifil Bulk Restorative(Shofu)] olarak 4 grup oluşturuldu. Her grup iki alt gruba ayrıldı; G-premio bond (Kontrol grubu) ve ışıksız Universal Bond (Tokuyama). 32 adet insan üçüncü molar insan dişi dentin yüzeyleri açığa çıkacak şekilde prepare edildi. Preparasyonun ardından dişler rastgele 4 ana, 2 alt gruba ayrıldı(n=8), yüzeylere 4 mm çapında ve 4 mm yüksekliğindeki silindirik silikon şeffaf kalıp yardımıyla kompozitler uygulandı. Tüm grupların makaslama bağlanma değerleri universal test cihazında ölçüldü, kuvvet birimi ise “newton” (=N) olarak kalibre edildi. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda her iki adeziv sistem kullanıldığında da, en yüksek makaslama bağlanma dayanım değerini Estelite Paste gösterirken, en düşük makaslama bağlanma dayanım değerini Beautifil Bulk Restorative göstermiştir. Her iki adeziv sisteminde de Estelite paste ile Bulk-fill flow ve Beautifil Bulk Restorative arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunurken, G-aenial posterior ile arasındaki fark anlamsız bulunmuştur. Adezin gruplarının her ikisinde de G-aenial posterior ile Beautifil Bulk Restorative arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak önemli bulunmuştur. Adeziv sistemler kıyaslandığında; tüm kompozit gruplarında G-premio bond, Işıksız Universal Bonda göre daha yüksek bağlanma sağlarken, aralarındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamsız bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar: Geleneksel kompozitler, yüksek makaslama bağlanma dayanımları sergilerken, bulkfill kompozitler bu değerlere yakın değerler göstermiştir. Kullandığımız ışıksız adeziv sistem, ışıkla polimerize edilen adeziv sisteme yakın bağlanma değerleri sergilemiştir. Işıksız adeziv sistemler, klinik kullanımlarda ışığın zor olabileceği bölgelerde bağlanma dayanımı açısından kullanılması önerilebilir.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Hara AT, Pimenta LAF, Rodrigues Jr AL. Influence of cross- head speed on resin-dentin shear bond strength. Dent Mater 2001;17(2), 165-169.
2. Tekçe N. İn Vitro Bağlanma Dayanım Testleri ile Klinik Çalışmalar Arasındaki İlişki. 2013.
3. ISO, ISO. TS 11405: Dental materials testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization ISO Central Secretariat, 2003.
4. McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, Schultheisz CR. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin–polymer interfaces. Biomaterials 2002;23(17), 3603-3608.
5. Lassila LV, Tezvergil A, Dyer SR, Vallittu PKJJop. The bond strength of particulate filler composite to differently oriented fiber reinforced composite substrate. J Prosthodont 2007;16(1), 10-17.
6. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. J Dent 2013;41(5), 404-411.
7. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer UJ. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. J Dent 2014;42(7), 800-807.
8. Loguercio AD, Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, Reis A, Perdigão JJ. Does active application of universal adhesives to enamel in self-etch mode improve their performance? J Dent 2015;43(9), 1060-1070.
9. McLean DE, Meyers EJ, Guillory VL, Vandewalle KS. Enamel bond strength of new universal adhesive bonding agents. Oper Dent 2015;40(4), 410-417.
10. Lawson NC, Robles A, Fu C-C, Lin CP, Sawlani K, Burgess JOJ. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2015;43(10), 1229-1234.
11. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007;28(26), 3757-3585.
12. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KJ. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011;27(1), 17-28.
13. Carvalho RM, Mendonca J, Santiago S, Silveira R, Garcia F, Tay F, Pashley DH. Effects of HEMA/solvent combinations on bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 2003;82(8), 597-601.
14. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28(3), 215-235.
15. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005;24(1), 1-13.
16. Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater 2004;20(9), 789-795.
17. Saku S, Kotake H, Scougall-Vilchis RJ, Ohashi S, Hotta M, Horiuchi S, Hamada K, Asaoka K, Tanaka E, Yamamoto K. Antibacterial activity of composite resin with glass-ionomer filler particles. Dent Mater J 2010;29(2), 193-198.
18. Murayama R, Furuichi T, Yokokawa M, Takahashi F, Kawamoto R, Takamizawa T, Kurokawa H, Miyazaki M. Ultrasonic investigation of the effect of S-PRG filler- containing coating material on bovine tooth demineralization. Dent Mater J 2012;31(6), 954-959.
19. Benetti AR, Havndrup-Pedersen C, Honoré D, Pedersen MK, Pallesen U. Bulk-fill resin composites: polymerization contraction, depth of cure, and gap formation. Oper Dent 2015;40(2), 190-200.
20. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26(1), 1-20.
21. Kwong S, Cheung G, Kei L, Itthagarun A, Smales R, Tay F, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002;18(5), 359-369.
22. Giannini M, Carvalho RM, Martins L, Dias C, Pashley DH. The influence of tubule density and area of solid dentin on bond strength of two adhesive systems to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001.
23. Perinka L, Sano H, Hosoda H. Dentin thickness, hardness, and Ca-concentration vs bond strength of dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1992;8(4), 229-233.
24. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The bond of resin to different dentin surface characteristics. J Dent 2004;29, 333- 341.
25. 25.Blatz MB, Sadan A, Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89(3), 268-274.
26. Özyeşil A, Günal Ş, Belli S, Eskitaşcıoğlu GJSDFD. İki farklı bağlanma dayanımı testinin karşılaştırılması (Mikroshear ve Mikrotensile). Selcuk Dent J 2009;18(2), 118-121.
27. Melkumyan TV, Kakhkharova DJ, Dadamova AD, Kamilov NK, Siddikova SS, Rakhmatullaeva SI, Masouleh SM. Comparative analysis of in vitro performance of Total-etch and self-etch adhesives. Int J Biomed 2016;6(4), 283-286.
28. Colak H, Ercan E, Hamidi MM. Shear bond strength of bulk- fill and nano-restorative materials to dentin. Eur J Dent 2016;10(1), 40-45.
29. Almeida Junior L, Lula ECO, Penha KJS, Correia VS, Magalhaes FAC, Lima DM, Firoozmand LM. Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk Fill Composites and its Correlation with Bond Strength. Braz Dent J 2018;29(3), 261-267.
30. Fronza BM, Makishi P, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Sumi Y, Tagami J, Giannini M. Evaluation of bulk-fill systems: microtensile bond strength and non-destructive imaging of marginal adaptation. Braz Oral Res 2018;32, e80.
31. De Jesus Tavarez RR, Almeida Junior L, Guara TCG, Ribeiro IS, Maia Filho EM, Firoozmand LM. Shear bond strength of different surface treatments in bulk fill, microhybrid, and nanoparticle repair resins. Clin Cosmet Invest Dent 2017;9, 61-66.
32. Singla, MG, Relhan, N, Virdi I. Comparative Evaluation of Depth of Cure of Three High Viscosity Bulk Fill Composites versus Conventional Composite: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Prev Dent 2018;14(2), 145-151.
33. Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Depth of cure, flexural properties and volumetric shrinkage of low and high viscosity bulk-fill giomers and resin composites. Dent Mater J 2017;36(2), 205- 213.
34. Katsumata A, Saikaew P, Ting S, Katsumata T, Hoshika T, Sano H, Nishitani Y. Microtensile Bond Strength Bonded to Dentin of a Newly Universal Adhesive. J Oral Tissue Eng 2017;15(1), 18-24.

APA	hubbezoglu i, KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU S, Karaarslan A (2022). Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. , 271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
Chicago	hubbezoglu ihsan,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU SERRA,Karaarslan Ayşegül Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. (2022): 271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
MLA	hubbezoglu ihsan,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU SERRA,Karaarslan Ayşegül Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. , 2022, ss.271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
AMA	hubbezoglu i,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU S,Karaarslan A Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. . 2022; 271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
Vancouver	hubbezoglu i,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU S,Karaarslan A Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. . 2022; 271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
IEEE	hubbezoglu i,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU S,Karaarslan A "Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites." , ss.271 - 277, 2022. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
ISNAD	hubbezoglu, ihsan vd. "Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites". (2022), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1160656

APA	hubbezoglu i, KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU S, Karaarslan A (2022). Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 25(3), 271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
Chicago	hubbezoglu ihsan,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU SERRA,Karaarslan Ayşegül Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25, no.3 (2022): 271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
MLA	hubbezoglu ihsan,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU SERRA,Karaarslan Ayşegül Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.25, no.3, 2022, ss.271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
AMA	hubbezoglu i,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU S,Karaarslan A Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2022; 25(3): 271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
Vancouver	hubbezoglu i,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU S,Karaarslan A Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2022; 25(3): 271 - 277. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
IEEE	hubbezoglu i,KUTLU KATIRCIOĞLU S,Karaarslan A "Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 25, ss.271 - 277, 2022. 10.7126/cumudj.1160656
ISNAD	hubbezoglu, ihsan vd. "Effect of Self-cured Universal Adhesive System on Shear Bond Strengths of Conventional and Bulk-fill Composites". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25/3 (2022), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1160656