Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 131 - 136 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.1103381 İndeks Tarihi: 15-12-2022

EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS

Öz:
Purpose: This study evaluated the marginal adaptation and microleakage of the In-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia and Finesse press all-ceramic porcelain systems. Material and methods: Thirty maxillary central teeth extracted for periodontal reasons without caries and cracks were divided equally into three groups and there was no control group; only the three systems were compared. Sample teeth cemented were stored in distile water for 24 hours. Then, they were applied to a repeated thermal cycle for 500 times. The samples were left in 5% of basic fuchsin dye for 24 hours. For the marginal adaptation rankings, all of the sample teeth for which cross-sections were made were moved into the metal microscope (Scherr Turico St. James/Minn./USA) and the marginal adaptation degrees were measured in both the palatinal and vestibul regions by measuring twice with x10 enlargement at micron level. For the statistical evaluations of marginal adaptation and microleakage values, Kruskal Wallis test has been used. Results: The differences between the three all-ceramic porcelain systems are not significant. The Finesse porcelain system caused the least leakage in both regions. In second place in both regions was In-Ceram Alumina. In-Ceram Zirconia caused the most leakage in bothregions. The biggest magrin gap in the palatal region was seen in the Finesse porcelain system, In-Ceram Zirconia in second place. Theleast marginal gap was caused by the In- Ceram Alumina porcelain system. Conclusions: When the microleakage scores of the In-Ceram Alumina, In-Cream Zirconia and Finesse groups are compared, the differences between the groups are not significant. When the marginal adaptation values of the In-Ceram Alumina, In-Ceram Zirconia and Finesse groups are compared in terms of palatal and vestibular values, the differences are not statistically significant.
Anahtar Kelime: All ceramik porselain system, mikroleakage marginal adaptation

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
0
0
0
  • 1. Hondrum SO. A review of the strength properties of dental ceramics J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:859-865.
  • 2. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentİstry: Historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32.
  • 3. Davis DR. Comparison of adaptation of two types of alt ceramic crowm. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:12-16.
  • 4. Sulatman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, VVozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478- 484.
  • 5. Participants of CSP No. 147/242, Morris, HF: Department of veterans affairs Cooperative Studies Project No. 242. Quantitave and qualitative evaluation of the marginal adaptation of cast ceramic, porcelain-shoulder, and cast metal full crown margins. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:198-204.
  • 6. Hung SH, Hung KS, Eick JD, Chappell RP. Marginal adaptation of porcelain fussed to metal and two types of ceramic crown. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:26-31.
  • 7. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-590.
  • 8. Taylor M, Lynch E. Microleakage. J Dent 1992;20:3-10.
  • 9. Zaimoglu A Karaagaclioglu L, Uctasli S. Influence of porcelain material and composite luting resin on microleakage of porcelain laminate veneers. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:319-327.
  • 10. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001 Jan-Feb;26(l):60-69.
  • 11. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001 Jul;17(4):340-346.
  • 12. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Moura SK. Microleakage of four simplified adhesive Systems under thermal and mechanical stresses. Am J Dent 2002 Jun; 15(3): 164-168.
  • 13. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999;27:89-99 .
  • 14. ISO/TS 11405:2003. Dental materials - Testing of adhesion to tooth structure.
  • 15. Wendt SL, Innes, PM, Dickinson GL: The Effect of Thermocycling in Microleakage Analysis. Dent Mater 1992;8:181-184.
  • 16. Serensen JA, Strutz JM, Avera SP, Materdomini D. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dem 1992 Jan;67(l): 16-22.
  • 17. Schaerer P, Şato T, Wohlwend A. A comparison of the marginal adaptation of three cast ceramic crown Systems. J Prosthet Dent 1988 May;59(5):534-542.
  • 18. Holmes JR, Sulik WD, Holland GA, Bayne SC. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992 May;67(5):594-599.
  • 19. Gardner FM, Tillman-McCombs KW, Gaston ML, Runyan DA. In vitro failure load of metal-collar margins compared with porcelain facial margins of metal-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1997 Jul;78(l):l-4.
  • 20. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991 Dec;66(6):747-753.
APA Coşkun A, Yaluğ Ö (2022). EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. , 131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
Chicago Coşkun Akın,Yaluğ Ömer Suat EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. (2022): 131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
MLA Coşkun Akın,Yaluğ Ömer Suat EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. , 2022, ss.131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
AMA Coşkun A,Yaluğ Ö EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. . 2022; 131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
Vancouver Coşkun A,Yaluğ Ö EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. . 2022; 131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
IEEE Coşkun A,Yaluğ Ö "EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS." , ss.131 - 136, 2022. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
ISNAD Coşkun, Akın - Yaluğ, Ömer Suat. "EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS". (2022), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1103381
APA Coşkun A, Yaluğ Ö (2022). EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 25(2), 131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
Chicago Coşkun Akın,Yaluğ Ömer Suat EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25, no.2 (2022): 131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
MLA Coşkun Akın,Yaluğ Ömer Suat EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.25, no.2, 2022, ss.131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
AMA Coşkun A,Yaluğ Ö EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2022; 25(2): 131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
Vancouver Coşkun A,Yaluğ Ö EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2022; 25(2): 131 - 136. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
IEEE Coşkun A,Yaluğ Ö "EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 25, ss.131 - 136, 2022. 10.7126/cumudj.1103381
ISNAD Coşkun, Akın - Yaluğ, Ömer Suat. "EVALUATION OF MARGINAL ADAPTATION AND MICROLEAKAGE OF DIFFERANT ALL-CERAMIC PORCELAIN SYSTEMS". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25/2 (2022), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1103381