Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 36 - 42 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.970768 İndeks Tarihi: 15-12-2022

Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements

Öz:
Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic and composite thickness on polymerization hardness of five different dual-cure resin cements. Materials and Methods: A total of 100 disc-shaped spacer, 10-mm in diameter and five varying thicknesses (1.0mm, 2.0mm, 3.0mm, 4.0mm, 5.0mm) were fabricated from ceramic and composite materials. Dual-cure resin cement specimens with 8-mm diameter were prepared using metal brass mold and activated by light beneath the composite and ceramic disc shaped spacers. A total of 100 specimens of five different dual-cure resins (RelyX, Variolink, NX3, Calibra, Panavia F2.0) were prepared. Knoop hardness of each dual-cure resin cement was measured at five different point using a microhardness device with a 500 gm load, after 1 hr, 1 day, and 1 week polymerization. All data were statistically evaluated using one-way ANOVA. Results: Multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant differences in hardness of specimens dual-cured under composite resin or ceramic spacers and different time intervals (P<.001). Specimens cured through composite resin spacers showed less hardness values than ceramic spacers, with increasing thickness of the spacer. Also increasing the thickness of the composite or ceramic spacers produced a statistically significant decrease in microhardness of the dual-cure cements (P<.05). Conclusions: Hardness values significantly reduced when composite spacers were thicker than 2 mm and ceramic spacers thicker than 3 mm. Dual-cured resin cements are needed to be improved to achieve sufficient degree of hardening under composite and ceramic restorations. Different commercially available brands have different polymerization properties.
Anahtar Kelime: Composite inlay ceramic inlay dual-cure resin luting cement microhardness. Composite inlay, ceramic inlay, dual-cure resin luting cement, microhardness

Kompozit veya Seramik Kalınlığının 5 Farklı Dual-Cure Resin Yapıştırıcı Simanın Polimerizasyon Sertliği Üzerine Etkisi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, seramik ve kompozit kalınlığının beş farklı dual-cure rezin simanının polimerizasyon sertliği üzerindeki etkisini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Seramik ve kompozit malzemelerden, 10 mm çapında ve beş farklı kalınlıkta (1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, 3.0 mm, 4.0 mm, 5.0 mm) toplam 100 adet disk şeklinde örnek hazırlanmıştır. 8 mm çapında dual-cure rezin siman numuneleri metal pirinç kalıp kullanılarak hazırlanmış ve kompozit ve seramik disk şeklindeki örnekler altında ışıkla polimerize edilmiştir. Beş farklı dual-cure rezin simandan (RelyX Universal, Variolink DC, NX3, Calibra Universal, Panavia F2.0) toplam 100 numune hazırlanmıştır. Her bir dual-cure rezin simanın Knoop sertlik değerleri, polimerizasyondan 1 saat, 1 gün ve 1 hafta sonra, 500 gr kuvvet uygulayan mikrosertlik ölçüm cihazı ile 5 farklı noktadan ölçülerek elde edilmiştir. Tüm veriler tek yönlü ANOVA kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Çok değişkenli varyans analizi, kompozit veya porselen örnekler altında polimerize edilen dual-cure rezin simanların sertliklerinde, farklı zaman aralıklarında ölçüldüklerinde önemli farklılıklar olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Kompozit örnekler altındaki dual-cure rezin simanların, kalınlık arttıkça seramik örnekler altındaki dual cure rezin simanlara göre sertlik değerinin daha düşük olduğu gözlenmiştir. Ayrıca, kompozit veya seramik örneklerin kalınlığı arttıkça dual-cure rezin simanların mikrosertlik değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir azalma olmuştur. Kompozit örnekler 2 mm'den kalın olduğunda ve porselen örnekler 3 mm'den kalın olduğunda sertlik değerleri önemli ölçüde azalmıştır. Sonuçlar: Kompozit ve seramik restorasyonlar altında yeterli derecede sertleşme elde etmek için dual-cure rezin simanların iyileştirilmesi gerekmektedir. Piyasada bulunan markaların polimerizasyon özellikleri birbirinden farklıdır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • 1. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Caughman WF. The curing potential of light-activated composite resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:512-18.
  • 2. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF. The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 1993; 18:48-55.
  • 3. Uctasli S, Hasanreisoglu U, Wilson HJ. The attenuation of radiation by porcelain and its effect on polymerization of resin cements. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21:565-75.
  • 4. El-Badrawy WA, El-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual-curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:515-24.
  • 5. Braga RR, Ballaster RY, Carrilho MRO. Pilot study on the early shear strength of the porcelain-dentin bonding using dual-cure cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:285-89.
  • 6. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Meerbeek BV, Lambrechts P, Bream M and Vanharle G. Dual-cure luting composites. Part I: Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20:133-46.
  • 7. Meerbeek BV, Inokoshi S, Davidson CL, De Gee AJ, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanharle G. Dual-cure luting composites-Part II: Clinically related properties. J Oral Rehabil 1994; 21:57-66.
  • 8. Peutzfeldt A. Dual-cured resin cements:in vitro wear and effect of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume and light curing. Acta Odontol Scand 1995; 53:29-34.
  • 9. Darr AH, Jacobsen PH. Conversion of dual cure luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22:43-7.
  • 10. Hoffman N, Papsthart G, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Comparison of photo-activation versus chemical or dual-curing of resin based luting cements regarding flexural strength, modulus and surface hardness. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28:1022-28.
  • 11. Rasetto FH, Driscoll CF, von Fraunhofer JA. Effect of light source and time on the polymerization of resin cement through ceramic venners. J Prosthodont 2001; 10:133-9.
  • 12. Rasetto FH, Driscoll CF, Prestipino V, Masri R, von Fraunhofer JA. Light transmission through all-ceramic dental materials: apilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91:441-6.
  • 13. Warren K. An investigation into the microhardness of a light cured composite when cured through varying thicknesses of porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 7:327-34.
  • 14. Blackman R, Barghi N and Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:295-300.
  • 15. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66:187-92.
  • 16-Yazici AR, Kugel G, Gül G. The knoop hardness of a composite resin polymerized with different curing lights and different modes. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007; 8:52–9. [PubMed: 17277827]
  • 17-Alpöz AR, Ertugrul F, Cogulu D, Ak AT, Tanoglu M, Kaya E. Effects of light curing method and exposure time on mechanical properties of resin based dental materials. Eur J Dent. 2008; 2:37–42. [PMCID: PMC2633152] [PubMed: 19212507]
  • 18- De Araújo CS, Schein MT, Zanchi CH, Rodrigues SA, Jr, Demarco FF. Composite resin microhardness: The influence of light curing method, composite shade, and depth of cure. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008; 9:43–50. [PubMed: 18473026]
  • 19-Cardash HS, Baharav H, Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. The effect of porcelain color on the hardness of luting composite resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:620-23.
  • 20- Myers ML, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA. Effect of restoration composition, shade and thickness on the cure of a photoactivated resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 3:149-57.
  • 21- El-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH, El-Badrawy WA. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent 1999;24; 38-44.
  • 22- El-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH. Influence of composite inlay/onlay thickness on hardening of dual-cured resin cements. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66:147.
  • 23-Jung H, Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Furch H, Bernhart S, Schmalz G. Polymerization efficiency of different photocuring units through ceramic discs. Oper Dent 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):68-77
  • 24- Chan KC and Boyer DB. Curing Light-activated composite cement through porcelain. J Dent Rest 1989;68: 476-80.
  • 25. Sjögren G, Molin M, Van Dijken Jan WV. A 5-Year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual- cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56:263-267.
  • 26. Kamada K, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Early bond strength and durability of bond between a ceramic material and chemically-cured or dual-cured resin luting agent.Am J Dent 2001;14:85-88.
APA ATEŞ G, HERSEK N (2022). Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. , 36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
Chicago ATEŞ GÜL,HERSEK NUR EMEL Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. (2022): 36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
MLA ATEŞ GÜL,HERSEK NUR EMEL Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. , 2022, ss.36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
AMA ATEŞ G,HERSEK N Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. . 2022; 36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
Vancouver ATEŞ G,HERSEK N Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. . 2022; 36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
IEEE ATEŞ G,HERSEK N "Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements." , ss.36 - 42, 2022. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
ISNAD ATEŞ, GÜL - HERSEK, NUR EMEL. "Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements". (2022), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.970768
APA ATEŞ G, HERSEK N (2022). Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 25(1), 36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
Chicago ATEŞ GÜL,HERSEK NUR EMEL Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25, no.1 (2022): 36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
MLA ATEŞ GÜL,HERSEK NUR EMEL Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.25, no.1, 2022, ss.36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
AMA ATEŞ G,HERSEK N Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2022; 25(1): 36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
Vancouver ATEŞ G,HERSEK N Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2022; 25(1): 36 - 42. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
IEEE ATEŞ G,HERSEK N "Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 25, ss.36 - 42, 2022. 10.7126/cumudj.970768
ISNAD ATEŞ, GÜL - HERSEK, NUR EMEL. "Effect of Composite or Ceramic Thickness on the Polymerization Hardness of 5 Different Dual-cured Resin Luting Cements". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25/1 (2022), 36-42. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.970768