Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 353 - 369 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 İndeks Tarihi: 19-10-2022
Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences
Öz: Biophilia is hypothesized as one of the defining concepts guiding human preferences of everyday life. Although “biophilia” has been well integrated as a design approach in Architectural and Urban Design, it is yet to develop in industrial design. Employing a two-staged approach, we aimed to define the biophilic characteristics of a product multidimensionally and examine their effects on the users’ preferences. The first stage consisted of empirical studies to describe the biophilic dimensions. This endeavor yielded a word set (N=78) that qualifies the biophilic dimensions (N=6). The words obtained consisted of biophilic design values and the hypothetical biophilic product dimensions that were proposed by researchers. Also, we obtained a set of product images (N=18) to be used throughout the study. The second stage was designed to explore the effects of biophilia on user preferences. An expert group (N=120) assessed the associations between the words and product sets. Also, a user group (N=1.206) rated how much they preferred these products. The data obtained from the experts and the users were analyzed to examine how the biophilic dimensions predicted the user preferences by regression analyses conducted on SPSS 27. The results revealed that the functional dimension has a significant effect on user preferences in both biophilic and non-biophilic/ biophobic cases while the psychological dimension has a significantly negative effect on user preferences just in non-biophilic/biophobic cases.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Appleton, J. (1975). The experience of landscape. John Wiley & Sons.
- Arvay, C. G. (2018). The biophilia effect: A scientific and spiritual exploration of the healing bond between humans and nature (V. Goodrich-Graham, Trans.). Sounds True. (Original work published 2015)
- Bailey, D. H., & Geary, D. C. (2009). Hominid brain evolution: Testing climatic, ecological, and social competition models. Human Nature, 20, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-008- 9054-0
- Barrett, H. C. (2016). Adaptations to predators and prey. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Volume 1: Foundations (2nd ed., pp. 246-263). John Wiley & Sons.
- Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign. Telos Press. Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R.
- (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52(2), 336–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. geb.2004.06.010
- Biro, D., Haslam, M., & Rutz, C. (2013). Tool use as adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368: 20120408. http://dx.doi. org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0408
- Boradkar, P. (2010). Designing things: A critical introduction to the culture of objects. Berg.
- Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2016). Intuitive ontologies and domain specificity. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Volume 1: Foundations (2nd ed., pp. 161-180). John Wiley & Sons.
- Boztepe, S. (2007). User value: Competing theories and models. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 55-63.
- Bracha, H. S. (2004). Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint: Adaptationist perspectives on the acute stress response spectrum. CNS Spectrums, 9, 679–685. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S1092852900001954
- Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J.O. (2014). 14 patterns of biophilic design: Improving health & well-being in the built environment. Terrapin Bright Green, LLC. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen. com/reports/14-patterns/
- Buettel, J. C., & Brook, B. W. (2016). Egress! How technophilia can reinforce biophilia to improve ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 24(6), 843– 847. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12387 Chudek, M., Muthukrishna, M., &
- Henrich, J. (2016). Cultural Evolution. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Volume 2: Integrations (2nd ed., pp. 749-769). John Wiley & Sons.
- Dean, J., Shanahan, D., Bush, R., Gaston, K., Lin, B., Barber, E., Franco, L., & Fuller, R. A. (2018). Is nature relatedness associated with better mental and physical health? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1371. http://dx. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071371
- Desmet, P. M. A., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57-66.
- Fragazsy, D. M., Biro, D., Eshchar, Y., Humle, T., Izar, P., Resende, B., & Visalberghi, E. (2013). The fourth dimension of tool use: temporally enduring artefacts aid primates learning to use tools. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368: 20120410. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0410
- Frondizi, R. (1971). What is value? Open Court Publishing.
- Gochman, S. (n.d.). Seeking parks, plazas, and spaces: The allure of biophilia in cities. Terrapin Bright Green, LLC. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen.com/ wp-content/uploads/2016/06/seeking_ parks_plazas_spaces_2MB.pdf
- Harraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.
- Heerwagen, J. H. (2003, January 1). Bio-inspired design: What can we learn from nature? BioInspire. https://bioinspired.sinet.ca/ files/bioinspired/e-magazine/BioInspire. 1-01.15.03.pdf
- Heerwagen, J. H., & Gregory, B. (2008). Biophilia and sensory aesthetics. In S. R. Kellert, J. H. Heerwagen, & M. L. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life (pp. 227-242). John Wiley & Sons.
- Heerwagen, J. H., & Hase, B. (2001, March 8). Building biophilia: Connecting people to nature in building design. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.454.4959&rep=rep1&- type=pdf
- Heskett, J. (2002, September/October). Waiting for a new design. Form, 185, 92-98.
- Holbrook, M. B. (Ed.). (1999). Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research. Routledge.
- Joye, Y. (2007). Architectural lessons from environmental psychology: The case of biophilic architecture. Review of General Psychology, 11(4), 305-328. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089- 2680.11.4.305
- Kahn Jr., P. H., (2011). Technological nature: Adaptation and the future of human life. The MIT Press.
- Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Oxford University Press. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., & Ryan, R. L. (1998). With people in mind: Design and Management of everyday nature. Island Press.
- Kaplan, S. (1992). Environmental preference in a knowledge seeking, knowledge-using organism. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 581–598). Oxford University Press.
- Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S.
- R. Kellert, & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 42-70). Island Press.
- Kellert, S. R. (1997). Kinship to mastery: Biophilia in human evolution and development. Island Press.
- Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for life: Designing and understanding the human- nature connection. Island Press.
- Kellert, S. R. (2008). Dimensions, elements, and attributes of biophilic design. In S. R. Kellert, J. H. Heerwagen, & M. L. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life (pp. 3-19). John Wiley & Sons.
- Kellert, S. R., & Calabrese, E. F. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. https://www.biophilic-design.com.
- Kwint, M. (1999). Material memories: Design and evocation. Berg.
- Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published in 1999)
- Margolin, V. (1997). Getting to know the user. Design Studies, 18(3), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0142-694X(97)00001-X
- Norman, D. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books.
- Orians, G. H. (1980). Habitat selection: General theory and applications to human behavior. In J. S. Lockard (Ed.), The evolution of human social behavior (pp. 49-66). Elsevier.
- Orians, G. H., & Heerwagen, J. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.) The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555-579). Oxford University Press.
- Petroski, H. (1992). The evolution of useful things: How everyday artifacts -from forks and pins to paper clips and zippers- came to be as they are. Vintage Books.
- Ryan, C. O., Browning, W. D., Clancy, J. O., Andrews, S. L., & Kallianpurkar, N. B. (2014). Biophilic design patterns: Emerging nature-based parameters for health and well-being in the built environment. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(2), 62-76. https://archnet. org/publications/9767
- Salingaros, N. A. (with Ryan, C. O.). (2015). Biophilia and healing environments: Healthy principles for designing the built world. Terrapin Bright Green,
- LLC. https://www.terrapinbrightgreen. com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ Biophilia-Healing-Environments-Salingaros- p.pdf
- Salingaros, N. A., & Masden II, K. G. (2008). Neuroscience, the natural environment, and building design. In S. R. Kellert, J. H. Heerwagen, & M. L. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life (pp. 59-83). John Wiley & Sons.
- Ulrich, R. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85–125). Plenum.
- Ulrich, R. (1986). Human response to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169- 2046(86)90005-8
- Ulrich, R. (2008). Biophilic theory and research for healthcare design. In S. R. Kellert, J. H. Heerwagen, & M. L. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life (pp. 87-106). John Wiley & Sons.
- Whiten, A., Hinde, R. A., Laland, K. N., & Stringer, C. B. (2011). Culture evolves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 366, 938-948. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0372
- Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.
- Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Vintage Books.
- Wilson, E. O. (2008). The nature of human nature. In S. R. Kellert, J. H. Heerwagen, & M. L. Mador (Eds.), Biophilic design: The theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life (pp. 21-25). John Wiley & Sons. Appendix
- [Cradle]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl. at/krtA1
- [Cube-formed salt and pepper container]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/ irxJN
- [Cutipol Cutlery]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/jEW15
- [Farmhouse kitchen faucet]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/cnyX2
- [Finn Juhl Lobby Chair]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/iqHLU
- [Geometric salt and pepper container]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/horzA
- [JOSEPH JOSEPH Catcher Citrus Reamer]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/ ilosE
- [Juice Bruce Lemon Squeezer]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/bAFKS [Leafy Faucet]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/vDTV1
- [One Piece Knife]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/rCHT1
- [Quetzal Chair]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/wHM23
- [Rose gold faucet]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/fgpAJ
- [Salt and pepper pinch bowls]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/tGXY1
- [Sieve]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/ jrJMY
- [Silver cutlery set]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/bjBT0
- [Terri Kern Salt and Pepper Shakers]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/oqFJ2
- [The Diatom Chair]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/gDZ04
- [Wooden chair]. (n.d.). Pinterest, shorturl.at/muLP6
| APA | BOĞA M, TURAN G, ÇETİNKAYA H (2022). Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. , 353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| Chicago | BOĞA Miray,TURAN Gülname,ÇETİNKAYA Hakan Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. (2022): 353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| MLA | BOĞA Miray,TURAN Gülname,ÇETİNKAYA Hakan Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. , 2022, ss.353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| AMA | BOĞA M,TURAN G,ÇETİNKAYA H Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. . 2022; 353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| Vancouver | BOĞA M,TURAN G,ÇETİNKAYA H Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. . 2022; 353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| IEEE | BOĞA M,TURAN G,ÇETİNKAYA H "Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences." , ss.353 - 369, 2022. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| ISNAD | BOĞA, Miray vd. "Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences". (2022), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| APA | BOĞA M, TURAN G, ÇETİNKAYA H (2022). Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(2), 353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| Chicago | BOĞA Miray,TURAN Gülname,ÇETİNKAYA Hakan Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 19, no.2 (2022): 353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| MLA | BOĞA Miray,TURAN Gülname,ÇETİNKAYA Hakan Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.19, no.2, 2022, ss.353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| AMA | BOĞA M,TURAN G,ÇETİNKAYA H Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(2): 353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| Vancouver | BOĞA M,TURAN G,ÇETİNKAYA H Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(2): 353 - 369. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| IEEE | BOĞA M,TURAN G,ÇETİNKAYA H "Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, ss.353 - 369, 2022. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
| ISNAD | BOĞA, Miray vd. "Biophilic dimensions of products and their effects on user preferences". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 19/2 (2022), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.76892 |
