Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 118 - 168 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993 İndeks Tarihi: 21-10-2022

YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME)

Öz:
Yapay zekâ, hayatlarımızı değiştirmeye devam ediyor. Ancak toplum içinde işlevi artarken yapay zekânın belirsiz ve öngörülemez karakteri, her bilimsel gelişmeden farklı olarak hukuk için yeni bir mücadele alanı da yaratıyor. Yaptığımız değerlendirmede, yapay zekânın hukuki kişiliğinin ve statüsünün belirlenmesinde, tüzel kişilik ve elektronik kişilik kavramlarının geliştirilmesi üzerinde durulması gerektiğini düşünüyoruz. Öte yandan yapay zekâ türleri geliştikçe ve yapay zekâ kendi farkındalığına vardıkça daha karmaşık hukuki sorunlar oluşabilecektir. Makalenin üzerinde durduğu konulardan biri, her bilimsel gelişmede olduğu gibi yapay zekâ teknolojisi karşısında hukukun, zamanlama ve içerik konusunda içinde bulunduğu ikilemdir. Hukukun buradan çıkış bulabilmesi için bir yol haritası oluşturulması gereklidir. Diğer hukuk dalları gibi idare hukukunun da yapay zekâ gelişmelerinden soyutlanamayacağı çalışmamızda ortaya konulmaktadır. İdare hukuku hem görev alanı hem de kurum ve kavramları itibariyle yapay zekâdaki gelişmelerden etkilenecektir. Bu nedenle organik ve fonksiyonel anlamda idarenin yapay zekâ etkisi ile kendi içinde dönüştüreceği konuları hiç de az değildir. Yapay zekânın verdiği zararlar sebebiyle idarenin sorumluluğu alanında, kusursuz sorumluluk ilkesinin uyarlanması veya yeni bir ilke geliştirilmesini düşünmek gerekir. İdare hukukunun içtihadi karakteri sayesinde, yapay zekâ alanındaki gelişmelere yeterli ve zamanında cevaplar üretilmesi mümkündür. Ayrıca, idare hukuku ve yapay zekâ arasında kurulacak ilişki, idari usul yasasına olan ihtiyacı tekrar gündeme getirebilecektir.
Anahtar Kelime: Yapay Zekâ Hukuki Kişilik Hukuki Statü İdare Hukuku Dijital Dönüşüm

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW (AN ASSESSMENT FROM TODAY TO THE FUTURE)

Öz:
Artificial intelligence continues to change our lives. However, while artificial intelligence increases its function in society, the uncertain and unpredictable character of artificial intelligence also creates a new challenge for law, unlike every scientific development. In our assessment, we think that the concepts of electronic personality and legal personality should be emphasized in determining the legal personality and legal status of artificial intelligence. On the other hand, as the types of artificial intelligence develop and the artificial intelligence becomes aware of itself, more complex legal problems will come to the agenda. One of the issues the article focuses on is the dilemma of the law regarding timing and content against artificial intelligence technology, as in every scientific development. For the law to find its way out, a road map should be created. In our study, it is revealed that administrative law, like other branches of law, cannot be abstracted from artificial intelligence developments. Administrative law will be affected by developments in artificial intelligence, with its mandate, institution, and concepts. For this reason, there are not a few issues that the organic and functional administration will transform within itself with the effect of artificial intelligence. In the field of responsibility of the administration due to the damages caused by artificial intelligence, it is necessary to consider the adaptation of the strict liability principle or the development of a new one. Thanks to the jurisprudence character of administrative law, it is possible to produce adequate and timely responses to developments in the field of artificial intelligence. In addition, the relationship to be established between administrative law and artificial intelligence may bring the need for administrative procedure act back into the agenda.
Anahtar Kelime: Artificial Intelligence Legal Personality Legal Status Administrative Law Digital Transformation

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AKDAĞ, Şükrü Yakup, “Yapay Zekanın Sorumluluğu Üzerine Düşünceler”, Sorumluluk Hukuku Seminerler 2018, Ed. BAYSAL, Başak, İstanbul, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2019.
  • AKKURT, Sinan Sami, “Yapay Zekânın Otonom Davranışlarından Kaynaklanan Hukukî Sorumluluk”, Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi, Sayı: 13, 2019.
  • ALEXANDRE, Filipe Maia, The Legal Status of Artificially Intelligent Robots: Personhood, Taxation and Control, 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2985466 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • ARF, Cahit, “Makine Düşünebilir mi ve Nasıl Düşünebilir?”, Atatürk Üniversitesi 1958-1959 Öğretim Yılı Halk Konferansları, Atatürk Üniversitesi – Üniversite Çalışmalarını Muhite Yayma ve Halk Eğitimi Yayınları Konferanslar Serisi No: 1, Erzurum, 1959.
  • BASSINI, Marco/GREGORIO, Giovanni De/MACCHIA, Marco vd., The Ethics and Law of AI, La Fondazione Leonardo - Civiltà delle Macchine, yy., https://fondazioneleonardocdm.com/site/assets/files/2450/fle1_booklet_conferenza_eng_gar_311019.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • BAYAMLIOĞLU, Emre, “Akıllı Yazılımlar ve Hukuki Statüsü: Yapay Zeka ve Kişilik Üzerine Bir Deneme”, Uğur Alacakaptan’a Armağan, Cilt II, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul, 2008.
  • BIZONY, Piers, “Focus: #1 The First Law: A Robot May Not Injure a Human Being, or, through Inaction, Allow a Human being to Come to Harm”, Engineering & Technology, Volume: 10, No. 6, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/et.2015.0621 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • BOZKURT YÜKSEL, Armağan Ebru /BAK, Başak, “Yapay Zeka”, Futurist Hukuk, Aristo Yayınevi, İstanbul, 2018.
  • BUCHANAN, Bruce G., “A (Very) Brief History of Artificial Intelligence”, AI Magazine, Volume: 26, No. 4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v26i4.1848 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • BUOSO, Elena, “Fully Automated Administrative Acts in the German Legal System”, European Review of Digital Administration & Law-Erdal, Volume: 1, Issue: 1-2, 2020.
  • CALO, Ryan, “Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw”, California Law Review, Volume: 103, No. 3, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2402972 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • CHOPRA, Samir/WHITE, Laurance, “Artificial Agents: Personhood in Law and Philosophy”, Proceedings of the 16th Eureopean Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI’2004, 2004, http://www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/~schopra/agentlawsub.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • COSTANTINO, Fulvio, “Public Officials and the Design of Algorithms Lessons. from the Italian Experience”, European Review of Digital Administration & Law-Erdal, Volume: 1, Issue: 1-2, 2020.
  • ČERKA, Paulius/GRIGIENĖ, Jurgita/SIRBIKYTĖ, Gintarė, “Is it possible to grant legal personality to artificial intelligence software systems?”, Computer Law & Security Review, Volume: 33, Issue: 5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.03.022 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • DURAL, Mustafa/ÖĞÜZ Tufan, Türk Özel Hukuku, Kişiler Hukuku, Cilt II, 18. Basım, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2017.
  • DURAN, Lütfi, İdare Hukuku Ders Notları, Fakülteler Matbaası, İstanbul, 1982.
  • EASTERBROOK, Frank H., “Cyberspace and the Law of the Horse”, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1996, https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2147&context=journal _articles (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • ERCAN, Cannur, “Robotların Fiillerinden Doğan Hukuki Sorumluluk Sözleşme Dışı Sorumluluk Hallerinde Çözüm Önerileri”, Türkiye Adalet Akademisi Dergisi, Yıl: 11, Sayı: 40, 2019.
  • ERDÉLYI, Olivia J./GOLDSMITH, Judy, “Regulating Artificial Intelligence Proposal for a Global Solution”, AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 2018, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3278721.3278731 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • ERSOY, Çağlar, Robotlar, Yapay Zekâ ve Hukuk, İstanbul, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, 2019.
  • GASPARETTO, Alessandro, “Robots in History: Legends and Prototypes from Ancient Times to the Industrial Revolution”, Explorations in the History of Machines and Mechanisms, History of Mechanism and Machine Science, Ed. LÓPEZ-CAJÚN, Carlos/CECCARELLI, Marco, Volume: 32, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 31184-5_5 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • GEDİK, Gülşen, “Robotlara Karşı Gerçek Kişilerin Korunması Açısından Robot Vergisi Önerisi”, Marmara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 26, Sayı: 1, Haziran 2020.
  • GÖZLER, Kemal, İdare Hukuku, Cilt I, 3. Basım, Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa, 2019.
  • GUIHOT, Michael/Matthew, Anne F./Suzor, Nicolas, “Nudging Robots: Innovative Solutions to Regulate Artificial Intelligence”, Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law, Forthcoming, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, 2017, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3017004 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • HAGEMANN, Ryan/SKEES, Jennifer/THIERER, Adam D., “Soft Law for Hard Problems: The Governance of Emerging Technologies in an Uncertain Future”, Colorado Technology Law Journal, Volume: 17, No. 1, 2018, https://ctlj.colorado.edu/wp- content/uploads/2019/03/3-Thierer_3.18.19.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • HARARI, Yuval Noah, Homo Deus: Yarının Kısa Bir Tarihi, Çev. TANELİ, Poyzan Nur, Kolektif Kitap, İstanbul, 2016.
  • HINTZE, Arend, “Understanding The Four Types Of AI, From Reactive Robots To Self-Aware Beings”, The Conversation, 14.11.2016, https://theconversation.com/understanding-the- four-types-of-ai-from-reactive-robots-to-self- aware-beings-67616 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • HOBBES, Thomas, Leviathan (“Hobbes’s Leviathan reprinted from the edition of 1651), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1909, http://files.libertyfund.org/files/869/0161_Bk.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 21.05.2021).
  • İMRE, Zahit, Medeni Hukuka Giriş, 3. Basım, Fakülteler Matbaası, İstanbul, 1980.
  • KILIÇARSLAN, Seda Kara, “Yapay Zekanın Hukuki Statüsü ve Hukuki Kişiliği Üzerine Tartışmalar”, Yıldırım Beyazıt Hukuk Dergisi, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.33432/ybuhukuk.599224 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • KURZWEIL, Ray, “The Law of Accelerating Returns”, Alan Turing: Life and Legacy of a Great Thinker, Ed. Christof Teuscher, Springer, Heidelberg, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05642-4_16 (Erişim Tarihi: 16.11.2020).
  • LEHMAN-WILZIG, Sam, “Frankenstein Unbound: Towards A Legal Definition Of Artificial Intelligence”, Futures, Volume: 13, Issue: 6, 1981, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016- 3287(81)90100-2 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • LESSIG, Lawrence, “The Law of the Horse: What Cyberlaw Might Teach”, Harvard Law Review, Volume: 113, No. 2, 1999, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1342331 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • MCCARTHY, John, What is Artificial Intelligence?, 2007, http://www- formal.stanford.edu/jmc/whatisai.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • MCCARTHY, John/MINSKY Marvin L./ROCHESTER Nathaniel/CLAUDE E. Shannon, A Proposal for Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence, 1955, http://jmc.stanford.edu/articles/dartmouth/dartmouth.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • MEHR, Hila, Artificial Intelligence for Citizen Services and Government, 2017, https://ash.harvard.edu/files/ash/files/artificial_intelligence_for_citizen_services.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • NEFF, Gina/NAGY, Peter, “Talking to Bots: Symbiotic Agency and the Case of Tay”, International Journal of Communication, Volume: 10, 2016, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/6277 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • NILSSON, Nils J., The Quest for Artificial Intelligence: A History of Ideas and Achievements, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2010, https://ai.stanford.edu/~nilsson/QAI/qai.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • OPITZ, Paul, Civil Liability and Autonomous Robotic Machines: Approaches in the EU and US, TTLF Working Papers No. 43, Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum, 2019, https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/opitz_wp43.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 13.11.2020).
  • ÖZAY, İl Han, Günışığında Yönetim, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 2004.
  • ÖZSUNAY, Ergun, Medeni Hukukumuzda Tüzel Kişiler: Tüzel Kişilerin Genel Teorisi, Dernekler, Vakıflar (Tüzel Kişiler), 5. Basım, Sulhi Garan Matbaası, İstanbul, 1982.
  • PALIWALA, Abdul, “Rediscovering Artificial Intelligence and Law: An Inadequate Jurisprudence?”, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, Volume: 30, Issue: 3, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2016.1229651 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • PÉRENNOU, Thommas, “State of the Art on Legal Issues”, Ethicaa Project, Ethics and Autonomus Agents, Ağustos 2014, https://ethicaa.greyc.fr/media/files/ethicaa.delivrable.1.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • PRICE, Monroe E./VERHULST, Stefaan G., Self-Regulation and the Internet, Kluwer Law International, Hollanda, 2005.
  • RACHUM-TWAIG, Omri, “Whose Robot Is It Anyway?: Liability for Artificial-Intelligence- Based Robots”, University of Illinois Law Review, Volume: 2020, Issue: 4, 2020, https://illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Rachum-Twaig.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 13.11.2020).
  • REDDY, Trips, “Why it matters that AI is better than humans at games like Jeopardy”, 27.06.2017, https://www.ibm.com/blogs/watson/2017/06/why-it-matters-that-ai-is-better- than-humans-at-their-own-games/ (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • RICHARDS, Neil M./SMART, William D., How Should the Law Think About Robots?, 2013, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2263363 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • SCHERER, Matthew U., “Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies”, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Volume: 29, No. 2, 2015, http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v29/29HarvJLTech353.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • SILVER, David/SCHRITTWIESER Julian/SIMONYAN Karen vd., “Mastering the Game of Go without Human Knowledge”, Nature, Volume: 550, Issue: 7676, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24270 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • SOLUM, Lawrence B., “Legal Personhood for Artificial Intelligences”, North Carolina Law Review, Volume: 70, No. 4, 1992, https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3447&context=nclr (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • STANILA, Laura, “Living in the Future: New Actors in the Field of Criminal Law – Artificial Intelligence”, Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems II, Conference: The 7th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia, 2019, https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.7.2.24 (Erişim Tarihi: 13.11.2020).
  • STONE, Christopher D., “Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects”, Southern California Law Review, Volume: 45, 1972, https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/stone-christopher-d-should-trees-have- standing.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • STONE, Peter/BROOKS, Rodney/BRYNJOLFSSON Erik vd., “Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030”, One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2016, https://ai100.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj9861/f/ai_100_report_0831fnl.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • TAMER, Halil Yasin/ÖVGÜN Barış, “Yapay Zeka Bağlamında Dijital Dönüşüm Ofis”, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 75, Sayı: 2, 2020.
  • TEKİNAY, Selâhattin Sulhi, Medenî Hukukun Genel Esasları ve Gerçek Kişiler Hukuku, 6. Basım, Filiz Kitabevi, İstanbul, 1992.
  • TURGUT, Nükhet, “İhtiyat İlkesi”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 45, Sayı: 1-4, 1996.
  • TURING, Alan M., “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, Mind, Volume: 59, No. 236, 1950, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2251299 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • TURING, Alan M., “On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem”, Proceedings of Turing the London Mathematical Society, Series 2, Volume: 42, Issue: 1, 1937, https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/Turing_Paper_1936.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • WENG, Yueh-Hsuan/CHEN, Chien-Hsun/SUN, Chuen-Tsai, “The Legal Crisis of Next Generation Robots: On Safety Intelligence”, ICAIL '07: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1145/1276318.1276358 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • WILLICK, Marshal S., “Artificial Intelligence: Some Legal Approaches and Implications,”, Al Magazine, Volume: 4, No. 2, 1983, https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v4i2.392 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • “Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data”, 2016, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4838256/ (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • “AI technology and government decision making -recent Italian rulings”, 29.06.2020, https://iclg.com/ibr/articles/10731-ai-technology-and-professional-decision-making- recent-italian-rulings (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • Asociacion de Funcionarios y Abogados por los Derechos de los Animales y Otros Contra Gcba Sobre Amparo, Expte. A2174-2015/0, 21.10.2015, https://ijudicial.gob.ar/wp- content/uploads/2015/10/Sentencia-Orangutana.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • “Beijing Internet Court Launches AI Judge”, http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019- 06/27/c_138178826.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • Civil Liability Regime For Artificial Intelligence, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0276_EN.html (Erişim Tarihi: 15.05.2021).
  • Constitución Del Ecuador, https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/SERIAL/82263/89945/F253880992/Constitucion%2 0de%20Ecuador%202008.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • Dijital Dönüşüm Ofisi, Türk Beyin Projesi (TBP), https://cbddo.gov.tr/projeler/tbp/ (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • euRobotics, The European Robotics Coordination Action, Suggestion for a Green Paper on Legal Issues in Robotics, 2012, https://www.unipv-lawtech.eu/files/euRobotics-legal- issues-in-robotics-DRAFT_6j6ryjyp.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • Executive Office of the President National Science and Technology Council Committee on Technology, Preparing for the Future of Artificial Intelligence, 2016, https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/whitehouse_files/microsites/ostp /NSTC/preparing_for_the_future_of_ai.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • HAWKING, Stephen, “Science AMA Series: Stephen Hawking AMA Answers”, 2015, https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/3nyn5i/science_ama_series_stephen_hawkin g_ama_answers (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • High Court of Uttarakhand, Salim v. State of Uttarakhand, Writ Petition (PIL) No.126 of 2014, 20.03.2017, https://www.nonhumanrights.org/content/uploads/WPPIL-126-14.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • İstanbul Üniversitesi, “Robotik Cerrahi Cihazı ‘Da Vinci’ Yara İzi Bırakmıyor”, https://www.istanbul.edu.tr/tr/haber/robotik-cerrahi-cihazi-da-vinci-yara-izi-birakmiyor- 4D0077006C0069007A005600360071007000570049003100 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • “Meet the First-Ever Robot Citizen - A Humanoid Named Sophia that Once Said it Would ‘Destroy Humans’ ”, Business Insider, 27.10.2017, https://www.businessinsider.com/meet-the-first-robot-citizen-sophia-animatronic- humanoid-2017-10?r=UK (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • Nevada Revised Status Chapter 4822-Autonomous Vehicles, https://www.leg.state.nv.us/nrs/nrs- 482a.html (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • Non-Paper - Innovative and Trustworthy AI: Two Sides of the Same Coin, Position paper on behalf of Denmark, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Estonia, Ireland, Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain and Sweden on Innovative and Trustworthy AI, 2020, https://em.dk/media/13914/non-paper-innovative-and- trustworthy-ai-two-side-of-the-same-coin.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • Proposal for a Regulation Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial İntelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act), https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal- regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence-artificial-intelligence (Erişim Tarihi: 15.11.2021).
  • Report with Recommendations to The Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics, 2015/2103 (INL), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017- 0005_EN.html?redirect (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • ROSEN, Charles/NILSSON, Nils/RAPHAEL, Bertram, “Shakey”, Life, 1967, http://cyberneticzoo.com/cyberneticanimals/1967-shakey-charles-rosen-nils-nilsson- bertram-raphael-et-al-american/ (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • Te Awa Tupua (Whanganui River Claims Settlement) Act 2017, Public Act 2017, No. 7, 20.03.2017, http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2017/0007/latest/whole.html (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • “Tesla’s ‘Autopilot’ Shares Blame in 2016 Fatal Crash, U.S. Investigators Say”, The Wall Street Journal, 12.09.2017, https://www.wsj.com/articles/teslas-autopilot-shares-blame-in- 2016-fatal-crash-u-s-investigators-say-1505233891 (Erişim Tarihi: 14.05.2021).
  • “Two Die in Tesla Car Crash in Texas with ‘No One’ in Driver’s Deat, Police Day”, The Guardian, 19.04.2021, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2021/apr/19/two-die-in- tesla-crash-no-one-in-drivers-seat-police (Erişim Tarihi: 09.05.2021).
  • “Uber ‘Not Criminally Liable’ for Self-Driving Death”, BBC, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47468391 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
  • White Paper, On Artificial Intelligence - A European Approach to Excellence and Trust, https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/commission-white-paper-artificial-intelligence- feb2020_en.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 12.11.2020).
APA Kağıtcıoğlu M (2021). YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). , 118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
Chicago Kağıtcıoğlu Mutlu YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). (2021): 118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
MLA Kağıtcıoğlu Mutlu YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). , 2021, ss.118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
AMA Kağıtcıoğlu M YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). . 2021; 118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
Vancouver Kağıtcıoğlu M YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). . 2021; 118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
IEEE Kağıtcıoğlu M "YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME)." , ss.118 - 168, 2021. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
ISNAD Kağıtcıoğlu, Mutlu. "YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME)". (2021), 118-168. https://doi.org/10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
APA Kağıtcıoğlu M (2021). YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
Chicago Kağıtcıoğlu Mutlu YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11, no.1 (2021): 118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
MLA Kağıtcıoğlu Mutlu YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.11, no.1, 2021, ss.118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
AMA Kağıtcıoğlu M YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021; 11(1): 118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
Vancouver Kağıtcıoğlu M YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME). Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021; 11(1): 118 - 168. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
IEEE Kağıtcıoğlu M "YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME)." Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, ss.118 - 168, 2021. 10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993
ISNAD Kağıtcıoğlu, Mutlu. "YAPAY ZEKÂ VE İDARE HUKUKU (BUGÜNDEN GELECEĞE YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME)". Hacettepe Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 11/1 (2021), 118-168. https://doi.org/10.32957/hacettepehdf.874993