Background: Age estimation is one of the important issues in the field of Forensic Medicine. The age of the individual is decisive in terms of the functioning and conclusion of the legal proceedings. The most common method for age estimation is radiological estimation of bone age. Age estimation assessments are requested to determine whether individuals legally have criminal responsibilities or not, legal rights of individuals, or the verdict to be given by the judicial system according to the person who has been harmed by the crime. Materials and Methods: In our study; information about identity age, the age at which they say they were married, whether they have children, the reason for requesting age estimation of 81 refugee cases, who were referred to our outpatient clinic of Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine between 2019-2020 with the request of age estimation by the relevant judicial authorities, was examined. Radiological bone ages of all cases were evaluated according to Greulich-Pyle and Gilsanz-Ratib Atlas. Results: Age estimation of 81 cases, including 74 female and 7 male cases, was conducted in this study. Age estimation could not be evaluated in 2 cases due to pregnancy. It was observed that the registration records of 53 cases were compatible with bone ages. It was observed that 8 of the cases were younger and 18 of the cases were older than the recorded age at register. When the reasons for referral for age estimation of the cases were evaluated; It was observed that all women and most men (85.7%) asked for age estimation due to sexual abuse. Conclusions: e fact that almost all of the cases evaluated in our study were children under the legal age of marriage, shows the alarming point of child abuse among refugees. Childhood marriages and related child abuse should be prevented, awareness about this topic should be increased and these children should be monitored in terms of public health.