Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 37 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 105 - 114 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441 İndeks Tarihi: 01-11-2022

Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System

Öz:
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the etiology of gliomas and determine the utility of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors. METHODS Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent surgery or were followed up for glial tumors between January 2017 and January 2020 and whose pathology reports indicated grade II-IV gliomas were included in the study. Patients with missing data, pathology results incompatible with grade II-IV gliomas, and unavail- able standard molecular/genetic tumor profiles were excluded from the study. RESULTS The results of the standard histopathological and molecular/genetic analyses were evaluated retrospec- tively without any additional examinations. Data from 259 patients were evaluated. Of these, 8 patients who did not meet the criteria for glioma pathology and 27 patients with not otherwise specified molecu- lar pathological examination results were excluded from the study. Patients were evaluated in detail re- garding demographic and admission data, pathology analysis, potential risk factors, and survival results. CONCLUSION Many factors, particularly high blood glucose levels, sedentary lifestyle, and radiofrequency elec- tromagnetic field exposure, appear to have a relationship with glioma etiology. There is a major het- erogeneity and lack of standardized efficient laboratory procedures that may interfere with reliable standard molecular results. “False positive” molecular markers consist a major classification issue and methods that reflect the requirements of the WHO classification may themselves be inadequate to es- tablish a profile with adequate sensitivity. The development of more practical and accessible methods in addition to standardized, rapid, and reliable methods for testing multiple markers at an acceptable cost is urgently needed.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Fulop J, Liu M, Blanda R, Kromer C, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro Oncol 2015;17(Suppl 4):iv1–iv62.
  • 2. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK. WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Revised 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2016. p. 10–122.
  • 3. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Fi- garella-Branger D, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23(8):1231–51.
  • 4. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2011. National Cancer Institute. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011. Ac- cessed Jul 11, 2021.
  • 5. Goodenberger ML, Jenkins RB. Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genet 2012;205(12):613–21.
  • 6. Sadetzki S, Bruchim R, Oberman B, Armstrong GN, Lau CC, Claus EB, et al. Description of selected char- acteristics of familial glioma patients - results from the Gliogene Consortium. Eur J Cancer 2013;49(6):1335– 45.
  • 7. Linet MS, Slovis TL, Miller DL, Kleinerman R, Lee C, Rajaraman P, et al. Cancer risks associated with exter- nal radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62(2):75–100.
  • 8. Grell K, Frederiksen K, Schüz J, Cardis E, Armstrong B, Siemiatycki J, et al. The intracranial distribution of gliomas in relation to exposure from mobile phones: analyses from the INTERPHONE study. Am J Epi- demiol 2016;184(11):818–28.
  • 9. Moore SC, Rajaraman P, Dubrow R, Darefsky AS, Koebnick C, Hollenbeck A, et al. Height, body mass index, and physical activity in relation to glioma risk. Cancer Res 2009;69(21):8349–55.
  • 10. Wang P, Hou C, Li W, Zhou D. Dietary nitrite and ni- trate is not associated with adult glioma risk: a meta analysis. Int J ClinExp Med 2016;9:8334–40.
  • 11. Chaichana KL, McGirt MJ, Woodworth GF, Datoo G, Tamargo RJ, Weingart J, et al. Persistent outpatient hyperglycemia is independently associated with sur- vival, recurrence and malignant degeneration follow- ing surgery for hemispheric low grade gliomas. Neurol Res 2010;32(4):442–8.
  • 12. Gonzalez CA, Riboli E. Diet and cancer prevention: Contributions from the European Prospective Inves- tigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Eur J Cancer 2010;46(14):2555–62.
  • 13. Li HX, Peng XX, Zong Q, Zhang K, Wang MX, Liu YZ, et al. Cigarette smoking and risk of adult glioma: a meta-analysis of 24 observational studies involving more than 2.3 million individuals. Onco Targets Ther 2016;9:3511–23.
  • 14. Amirian ES, Ostrom QT, Armstrong GN, Lai RK, Gu X, Jacobs DI, et al. Aspirin, NSAIDs, and Glioma Risk: Original data from the glioma international case- control study and a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019;28(3):555–62.
  • 15. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, Brat DJ, Verhaak RG, Aldape KD, Yung WK, Salama SR, et al. Comprehensive, integrative genomic analy- sis of diffuse lower-grade gliomas. N Engl J Med 2015;372(26):2481–98.
  • 16. Eseonu CI, Eguia F, ReFaey K, Garcia O, Rodriguez FJ, Chaichana K, et al. Comparative volumetric analysis of the extent of resection of molecularly and histolog- ically distinct low grade gliomas and its role on sur- vival. J Neurooncol 2017;134(1):65–74.
  • 17. Delev D, Heiland DH, Franco P, Reinacher P, Mader I, Staszewski O, et al. Surgical management of lower- grade glioma in the spotlight of the 2016 WHO classi- fication system. J Neurooncol 2019;141(1):223–33.
  • 18. Clark KH, Villano JL, Nikiforova MN, Hamilton RL, Horbinski C. 1p/19q testing has no significance in the workup of glioblastomas. Neuropathol Appl Neuro- biol 2013;39(6):706–17.
  • 19. Ballester LY, Huse JT, Tang G, Fuller GN. Molecu- lar classification of adult diffuse gliomas: conflicting IDH1/IDH2, ATRX, and 1p/19q results. Hum Pathol 2017;69:15–22.
  • 20. Huse JT, Diamond EL, Wang L, Rosenblum MK. Mixed glioma with molecular features of composite oligodendroglioma and astrocytoma: a true “oligoas- trocytoma”?. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129(1):151–3.
  • 21. Reuss DE, Sahm F, Schrimpf D, Wiestler B, Capper D, Koelsche C, et al. ATRX and IDH1-R132H immuno- histochemistry with subsequent copy number analy- sis and IDH sequencing as a basis for an “integrated” diagnostic approach for adult astrocytoma, oligo- dendroglioma and glioblastoma. Acta Neuropathol 2015;129(1):133–46.
  • 22. Tabouret E, Nguyen AT, Dehais C, Carpentier C, Du- cray F, Idbaih A, et al. Prognostic impact of the 2016 WHO classification of diffuse gliomas in the French POLA cohort. Acta Neuropathol 2016;132(4):625–34.
  • 23. Rogers TW, Toor G, Drummond K, Love C, Field K, Asher R, et al. The 2016 revision of the WHO Clas- sification of Central Nervous System Tumours: retro- spective application to a cohort of diffuse gliomas. J Neurooncol 2018;137(1):181–9.
  • 24. Scheie D, Meling TR, Cvancarova M, Skullerud K, Mørk S, Lote K, et al. Prognostic variables in oligoden- droglial tumors: a single-institution study of 95 cases. Neuro Oncol 2011;13(11):1225–33.
  • 25. Pekmezci M, Rice T, Molinaro AM, Walsh KM, Decker PA, Hansen H, et al. Adult infiltrating gliomas with WHO 2016 integrated diagnosis: additional prog- nostic roles of ATRX and TERT. Acta Neuropathol 2017;133(6):1001–16.
  • 26. Yeaney GA, Brat DJ. What every neuropathologist needs to know: Update on cIMPACT-NOW. J Neu- ropathol Exp Neurol 2019;78(4):294–6.
  • 27. Louis DN, Wesseling P, Paulus W, Giannini C, Batch- elor TT, Cairncross JG, et al. cIMPACT-NOW update 1: Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) and Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC). Acta Neuropathol 2018;135(3):481– 4.
  • 28. Mellai M, Annovazzi L, Senetta R, Dell’Aglio C, Maz- zucco M, Cassoni P, et al. Diagnostic revision of 206 adult gliomas (including 40 oligoastrocytomas) based on ATRX, IDH1/2 and 1p/19q status. J Neurooncol 2017;131(2):213–22.
APA Al-Beyati E, TETİK B, Buyuktepe M, Tokdemir N, güner y, Güney Y, Ugur H (2022). Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. , 105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
Chicago Al-Beyati Eyyub S M,TETİK Bora,Buyuktepe Murat,Tokdemir Nurhan,güner yahya efe,Güney Yıldız,Ugur Hasan Caglar Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. (2022): 105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
MLA Al-Beyati Eyyub S M,TETİK Bora,Buyuktepe Murat,Tokdemir Nurhan,güner yahya efe,Güney Yıldız,Ugur Hasan Caglar Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. , 2022, ss.105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
AMA Al-Beyati E,TETİK B,Buyuktepe M,Tokdemir N,güner y,Güney Y,Ugur H Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. . 2022; 105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
Vancouver Al-Beyati E,TETİK B,Buyuktepe M,Tokdemir N,güner y,Güney Y,Ugur H Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. . 2022; 105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
IEEE Al-Beyati E,TETİK B,Buyuktepe M,Tokdemir N,güner y,Güney Y,Ugur H "Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System." , ss.105 - 114, 2022. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
ISNAD Al-Beyati, Eyyub S M vd. "Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System". (2022), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
APA Al-Beyati E, TETİK B, Buyuktepe M, Tokdemir N, güner y, Güney Y, Ugur H (2022). Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, 37(2), 105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
Chicago Al-Beyati Eyyub S M,TETİK Bora,Buyuktepe Murat,Tokdemir Nurhan,güner yahya efe,Güney Yıldız,Ugur Hasan Caglar Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi 37, no.2 (2022): 105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
MLA Al-Beyati Eyyub S M,TETİK Bora,Buyuktepe Murat,Tokdemir Nurhan,güner yahya efe,Güney Yıldız,Ugur Hasan Caglar Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, vol.37, no.2, 2022, ss.105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
AMA Al-Beyati E,TETİK B,Buyuktepe M,Tokdemir N,güner y,Güney Y,Ugur H Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi. 2022; 37(2): 105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
Vancouver Al-Beyati E,TETİK B,Buyuktepe M,Tokdemir N,güner y,Güney Y,Ugur H Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System. Türk Onkoloji Dergisi. 2022; 37(2): 105 - 114. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
IEEE Al-Beyati E,TETİK B,Buyuktepe M,Tokdemir N,güner y,Güney Y,Ugur H "Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System." Türk Onkoloji Dergisi, 37, ss.105 - 114, 2022. 10.5505/tjo.2021.3441
ISNAD Al-Beyati, Eyyub S M vd. "Epidemiological Markers in Adult Glial Tumors: A Single-Center Experience and The Utility of the Classification System". Türk Onkoloji Dergisi 37/2 (2022), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjo.2021.3441