Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture

oguzkaya, sinan; Eken, Gokay; Özçamdallı, Mustafa; Kızkapan, Turan bilge; uzun, erdal; Misir, Abdulhamit

doi:10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560

Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture

Turan Bilge Kızkapan, (Bursa Çekirge Devlet Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bursa-Türkiye)

Abdulhamit Misir, (Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi, İstanbul-Türkiye)

Gökay EKEN, (Bursa Acıbadem Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bursa-Türkiye)

Sinan OĞUZKAYA, (Sivas Şarkışla Devlet Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Sivas-Türkiye)

Mustafa Özçamdallı, (Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Başakşehir Çam ve Sakura Şehir Hastanesi, İstanbul-Türkiye)

Erdal Uzun (Erciyes Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, Kayseri-Türkiye)

Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi

2 0

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 308 - 314 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560 İndeks Tarihi: 03-11-2022

Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture

Öz:

BACKGROUND: Harris hip score (HHS), modified HHS (MHHS), and Oxford hip score (OHS) were designed to determine the functional outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between MHHS, HHS, and OHS in different populations of arthroplasty such as primary THA, revision THA, THA for Crowe Type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), and hip hemiarthroplasty (HA). METHODS: A total of 399 patients (254 females and 145 males) that included 128 cases of primary THA, 36 of revision THA, 200 of HA, and 35 of THA with femoral shortening osteotomy with a minimum of 24 months of follow-up were included. HHS, MHHS, and OHS were calculated for each patient and the correlation between theses scores was evaluated for each subgroup. RESULTS: The overall mean age was 67.5±14.3 years. The mean HHS, MHHS, and OHS were 74.9±17.9, 75.7±18.7, and 38.7±12.5, respectively. A very strong correlation was observed between HHS and MHHS (r=0.995, p=0.000) as well as between HHS and OHS (r=0.845, p=0.003) in the general study population. In subgroup analysis, there was a very strong correlation between HHS and MHHS in primary THA, revision THA, THA in hip HA, and Crowe Type IV DDH groups (r=0.984, p=0.000; r=0.977, p=0.000; r=0.984, p=0.000; and r=0.995, p=0.000; respectively). However, there was a significant correlation between HHS and OHS in these groups except revision THA group (r=0.851, p=0.023; r=0.587, p=0.069; r=0.989, p=0.002; and r=0.965, p=0.000; respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to investigate the usefulness of MHHS and OHS in hip HA and THA in patients with Crowe Type IV DDH. Our findings suggest that MHHS and OHS are useful for evaluating functional outcomes with HA, primary and revision THA, and THA with femoral shortening osteotomy for Crowe type IV DDH.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

. Putananon C, Tuchinda H, Arirachakaran A, Wongsak S, Narinsorasak T, Kongtharvonskul J. Comparison of direct anterior, lateral, posterior and posterior-2 approaches in total hip arthroplasty: Network me- ta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018;28:255–67.
2. Katz JN, Wright EA, Wright J, Malchau H, Mahomed NN, Stedman M, et al. Twelve-year risk of revision after primary total hip replacement in the U.S. Medicare population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1825–32.
3. Zagra L. Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: What is justified? EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:171–8.
4. Singh JA. Epidemiology of knee and hip arthroplasty: A systematic re- view. Open Orthop J 2011;5:80–5.
5. Gwam CU, Mistry JB, Mohamed NS, Thomas M, Bigart KC, Mont MA, et al. Current epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: National inpatient sample 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:2088–92.
6. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:780–5.
7. Veldman HD, Heyligers IC, Grimm B, Boymans TA. Cemented versus cementless hemiarthroplasty for a displaced fracture of the femoral neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current generation hip stems. Bone Joint J 2017;99:421–31.
8. Klassbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol 2003;32:46–51.
9. Garbuz DS, Xu M, Sayre EC. Patients’ outcome after total hip arthro- plasty: A comparison between the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities index and the Oxford 12-item hip score. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:998–1004.
10. Aprato A, Jayasekera N, Villar RN. Does the modified Harris hip score reflect patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopy? Am J Sports Med 2012;40:2557–60.
11. Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P. Outcome of total hip replacement: A comparison of different measurement methods. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;390:163–72.
12. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D. Questionnaire on the per- ceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:185–90.
13. Dawson J, Jameson-Shortall E, Emerton M, Flynn J, Smith P, Gundle R, et al. Issues relating to long-term follow-up in hip arthroplasty sur- gery: A review of 598 cases at 7 years comparing 2 prostheses using re- vision rates, survival analysis, and patient-based measures. J Arthroplasty 2000;15:710–7.
14. Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Or- thopedic Surgeons (AAOS) hip and knee questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63 Suppl 11:S200–7.
15. Sharma S, Shah R, Draviraj KP, Bhamra MS. Use of telephone inter- views to follow up patients after total hip replacement. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:211–4.
16. Byrd JW, Jones KS. Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2000;16:578–87.
17. Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Roos EM, Crossley KM. Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for hip arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med 2013;41:2065–73.
18. Edwards PK, Queen RM, Butler RJ, Bolognesi MP, Barnes CL. Are range of motion measurements needed when calculating the harris hip score? J Arthroplasty 2016;31:815–9.
19. Kumar P, Sen R, Aggarwal S, Agarwal S, Rajnish RK. Reliability of mod- ified harris hip score as a tool for outcome evaluation of total hip replace- ments in Indian population. J Clin Orthop Traum 2019;10:128–30.
20. Çelik D, Can C, Aslan Y, Ceylan HH, Bilsel K, Ozdincler AR. Transla- tion, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Turkish version of the harris hip score. HIP Int 2014;24:473–9.
21. Tuğay BU, Tuğay N, Güney H, Hazar Z, Yüksel İ, Atilla B. Cross-cultur- al adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of Oxford hip score. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015;135:879–89.
22. Lovelock TM, Broughton NS, Williams CM. The popularity of outcome measures for hip and knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:273–6.
23. Taheriazam A, Saeidinia A. Cementless one-stage bilateral total hip ar- throplasty in osteoarthritis patients: Functional outcomes and complica- tions. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2017;9:6897.
24. Buttaro MA, Slullitel PA, Mansilla AM, Carlucci S, Comba FM, Zanotti G, et al. Long-term outcome of unconstrained primary total hip arthro- plasty in ipsilateral residual poliomyelitis. Orthopedics 2017;40:e255– 61.
25. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care 1996;5:81–8.
26. Parsons NR, De Souza RM, Oni T, Achten J, Krikler SJ, Costa ML. A comparison of harris and oxford hip scores for assessing outcome after resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: Can the patient tell us everything we need to know? HIP Int 2010;20:453–9.
27. Yang B, Lin X, Yin XM, Wen XZ. Bipolar versus unipolar hemiarthro- plasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elder patient: A system- atic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2015;25:425–33.
28. Langslet E, Frihagen F, Opland V, Madsen JE, Nordsletten L, Figved W. Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: 5-year followup of a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:1291–9.
29. Frihagen F, Grotle M, Madsen JE, Wyller TB, Mowinckel P, Nordsletten L. Outcome after femoral neck fractures: A comparison of Harris Hip Score, Eq-5d and Barthel Index. Injury 2008;39:1147–56.
30. Zhang J, Ang ML, Kwek EB. Who will walk again? Effects of rehabil- itation on the ambulatory status in elderly patients undergoing hemi- arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2015;6:168–72.
31. Skinner D, Tadros BJ, Bray E, Elsherbiny M, Stafford G. Clinical out- come following primary total hip or knee replacement in nonagenarians. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016;98:258–64.
32. Guo CY, Liang BW, Sha M, Kang LQ, Wang JZ, Ding ZQ. Cementless arthroplasty with a distal femoral shortening for the treatment of crowe Type IV developmental hip dysplasia. Indian J Orthop 2015;49:442– 6.

APA	Kızkapan T, Misir A, Eken G, oguzkaya s, Özçamdallı M, uzun e (2022). Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. , 308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
Chicago	Kızkapan Turan bilge,Misir Abdulhamit,Eken Gokay,oguzkaya sinan,Özçamdallı Mustafa,uzun erdal Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. (2022): 308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
MLA	Kızkapan Turan bilge,Misir Abdulhamit,Eken Gokay,oguzkaya sinan,Özçamdallı Mustafa,uzun erdal Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. , 2022, ss.308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
AMA	Kızkapan T,Misir A,Eken G,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. . 2022; 308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
Vancouver	Kızkapan T,Misir A,Eken G,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. . 2022; 308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
IEEE	Kızkapan T,Misir A,Eken G,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e "Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture." , ss.308 - 314, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
ISNAD	Kızkapan, Turan bilge vd. "Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture". (2022), 308-314. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560

APA	Kızkapan T, Misir A, Eken G, oguzkaya s, Özçamdallı M, uzun e (2022). Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28(3), 308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
Chicago	Kızkapan Turan bilge,Misir Abdulhamit,Eken Gokay,oguzkaya sinan,Özçamdallı Mustafa,uzun erdal Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28, no.3 (2022): 308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
MLA	Kızkapan Turan bilge,Misir Abdulhamit,Eken Gokay,oguzkaya sinan,Özçamdallı Mustafa,uzun erdal Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.28, no.3, 2022, ss.308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
AMA	Kızkapan T,Misir A,Eken G,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(3): 308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
Vancouver	Kızkapan T,Misir A,Eken G,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(3): 308 - 314. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
IEEE	Kızkapan T,Misir A,Eken G,oguzkaya s,Özçamdallı M,uzun e "Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28, ss.308 - 314, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560
ISNAD	Kızkapan, Turan bilge vd. "Correlation between Harris, modified Harris hip, and Oxford hip scores of patients who underwent hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28/3 (2022), 308-314. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.74560