Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 315 - 319 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972 İndeks Tarihi: 03-11-2022

Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?

Öz:
BACKGROUND: The 5-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5), which is the latest version of the Frailty Index, is a tool that calculates the risk of complications after treatment by scoring the comorbidity status of the patient. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the mFI-5 in predicting complications in geriatric patients with an ankle fracture. METHODS: A retrospective examination was made of a total of 94 patients aged >65 years who were treated for an ankle fracture in our hospital between 2015 and 2020. Weber type A, B, and C fractures were included in the study. For each patient, the mFI-5 was calculated for the comorbidity status of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, hypertension requiring drugs, and non-independent functional status. Multivariance logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the mFI-5 points as a predictor of negative outcomes. RESULTS: The mFI-5 was observed to be effective in the prediction of the complications of hospital re-admission, wound site infec- tion, life-threatening medical complications, and the presence of any complication (p<0.05). In the prediction of whether or not there was any complication, the mFI-5 was determined to be a more effective tool than body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiol- ogist, age, length of stay in hospital, and duration of operation (p<0.05, OR=2.726, 95% Confidence Interval=1.285–5.783). CONCLUSION: The mFI-5 is a sensitive tool for the prediction of complications which may develop following geriatric ankle frac- ture. The five comorbidities which constitute the mFI-5 are easily obtained from the patient anamnesis, and this renders it a practical clinical tool to identify high-risk patients, determine the preoperative risks, and improve the health-care service.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Jin K, Simpkins JW, Ji X, Leis M, Stambler I. The critical need to pro- mote research of aging and aging-related diseases to improve health and longevity of the elderly population. Aging Dis 2014;6:1–5.
  • 2. Kadakia RJ, Ahearn BM, Schwartz AM, Tenenbaum S, Bariteau JT. An- kle fractures in the elderly: Risks and management challenges. Orthop Res Rev 2017;9:45–50.
  • 3. Gauthé R, Desseaux A, Rony L, Tarissi N, Dujardin F. Ankle fractures in the elderly: Treatment and results in 477 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016;102:S241–4.
  • 4. Grütter R, Cordey J, Wahl D, Koller B, Regazzoni P. A biomechanical enigma: Why are tibial fractures not more frequent in the elderly? Injury 2000;31:C72–7.
  • 5. Guggenbuhl P, Meadeb J, Chalès G. Osteoporotic fractures of the proxi- mal humerus, pelvis, and ankle: Epidemiology and diagnosis. Joint Bone Spine 2005;72:372–5.
  • 6. Strauss EJ, Egol KA. The management of ankle fractures in the elderly. Injury 2007;38:S2–9.
  • 7. Lott A, Egol KA, Lyon T, Konda SR. Ability of a risk prediction tool to stratify quality and cost for older patients with operative ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2019;33:312–7.
  • 8. Makwana NK, Bhowal B, Harper WM, Hui AW. Conservative ver- sus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:525–9.
  • 9. Bariteau JT, Hsu RY, Mor V, Lee Y, DiGiovanni CW, Hayda R. Opera- tive versus nonoperative treatment of geriatric ankle fractures: A medi- care part A claims database analysis. Foot Ankle Int 2015;36:648–55.
  • 10. Aigner R, Salomia C, Lechler P, Pahl R, Frink M. Relationship of pro- longed operative time and comorbidities with complications after geriat- ric ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 2017;38:41–8.
  • 11. Simske NM, Benedick A, Kavanagh MD, Vallier HA. Predicting length of stay and readmissions after an ankle fracture using a risk stratification tool (STTGMA). J Orthop Trauma 2020;34:e407–13.
  • 12. Fu MC, Ondeck NT, Nwachukwu BU, Garcia GH, Gulotta LV, Verma NN, et al. What associations exist between comorbidity indices and post- operative adverse events after total shoulder arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019;477:881–90.
  • 13. Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, Peters D, Rubinfeld I. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: Its application to a national database. J Surg Res 2013;183:104–10.
  • 14. Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP, Divino CM. New 5-factor mod- ified frailty index using american college of surgeons NSQIP data. J Am Coll Surg 2018;226:173–81.e8.
  • 15. Traven SA, Reeves RA, Althoff AD, Slone HS, Walton ZJ. New five-fac- tor modified frailty index predicts morbidity and mortality in geriatric hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2019;33:319–23.
  • 16. Traven SA, Horn RW, Reeves RA, Walton ZJ, Woolf SK, Slone HS. The 5-factor modified frailty index predicts complications, hospital admis- sion, and mortality following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthrosco- py 2020;36:383–8.
  • 17. Traven SA, Reeves RA, Sekar MG, Slone HS, Walton ZJ. New 5-factor modified frailty index predicts morbidity and mortality in primary hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:140–4.
  • 18. Wilson JM, Holzgrefe RE, Staley CA, Schenker ML, Meals CG. Use of a 5-item modified frailty index for risk stratification in patients under- going surgical management of distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2018;43:701–9.
  • 19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical compli- cations: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.
  • 20. Beauchamp CG, Clay NR, Thexton PW. Displaced ankle fractures in pa- tients over 50 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65:329–32.
  • 21. Lynde MJ, Sautter T, Hamilton GA, Schuberth JM. Complications after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures in the elderly. Foot Ankle Surg 2012;18:103–7.
  • 22. McDonald MR, Sathiyakumar V, Apfeld JC, Hooe B, Ehrenfeld J, Obremskey WT, et al. Predictive factors of hospital length of stay in patients with operatively treated ankle fractures. J Orthop Traumatol 2014;15:255–8.
APA Akti S, zeybek h (2022). Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. , 315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
Chicago Akti Sefa,zeybek hakan Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. (2022): 315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
MLA Akti Sefa,zeybek hakan Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. , 2022, ss.315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
AMA Akti S,zeybek h Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. . 2022; 315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
Vancouver Akti S,zeybek h Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. . 2022; 315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
IEEE Akti S,zeybek h "Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?." , ss.315 - 319, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
ISNAD Akti, Sefa - zeybek, hakan. "Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?". (2022), 315-319. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
APA Akti S, zeybek h (2022). Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28(3), 315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
Chicago Akti Sefa,zeybek hakan Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28, no.3 (2022): 315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
MLA Akti Sefa,zeybek hakan Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.28, no.3, 2022, ss.315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
AMA Akti S,zeybek h Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(3): 315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
Vancouver Akti S,zeybek h Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(3): 315 - 319. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
IEEE Akti S,zeybek h "Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28, ss.315 - 319, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972
ISNAD Akti, Sefa - zeybek, hakan. "Is the 5-factor modified Frailty Index a prognostic marker in geriatric ankle fractures?". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28/3 (2022), 315-319. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.08972