THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS

Şengül, Muhammet

doi:10.7126/cumudj.999234

THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS

Muhammet ŞENGÜL (Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Fakülte Diş Hekimliği, Periodontoloji Anabilim Dalı, Sivas, Türkiye)

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

7 0

Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 361 - 370 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.999234 İndeks Tarihi: 03-11-2022

THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS

Öz:

Objectives: The objective of our study was to investigate the effect of the local humic acid application in addition to autogenous bone grafting on the premature new bone amount. Materials and Methods: 12-week-old 24 Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups. Two parietal bone defects with 5-mm diameter were constituted in each animal. All defects in each group were treated with only autogenous bone graft (n=6), autogenous bone graft combined with 100 mg/kg (n=6) or 200 mg/kg humic acid (n=6). Defects in one group remained empty as control (n=6). The laboratory animals were sacrificed on the 28th day following the procedure. Morphological properties of all experimental defects were evaluated using micro-computed tomography (Micro- CT). Results: The highest value among trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) and the ratio of the bone volume to the tissue volume (BV/ TV) was encountered in the autogenous graft group applied with 100mg/kg humic acid. The highest value in the bone volume (BV) variance was detected in the group to which only the autogenous graft was applied. A statistically significant difference was found between the control group and the only autogenous graft-applied group and the autogenous graft group applied with local 100mg/kg humic acid upon comparing the groups in pairs for bone surface area (BS) variance. BS/BV value was found higher in the autogenous graft group applied with local 200mg/kg humic acid than the autogenous group applied with local 100mg/kg humic acid. Conclusions: Humic acid application in addition to autogenous bone grafting caused a decrease in the bone volume value. However, the positive effect of the humic acid application was observed in trabecular thickness and bone volume/tissue volume values, dosage increase negatively impacted the same. The dosage increase negatively affected the bone surface area value. No positive effect of the humic acid application to bone surface/bone volume value was observed. The statistical significance between the control group and the other groups is considered to be autogenous graft.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik

1. Giannoudis P, Psarakis S, Kontakis GJI. Can we accelerate fracture healing?: A critical analysis of the literature. 2007;38(1): 81-89.
2. Gutierrez G, Lalka D, Garrett I, Rossini G, Mundy GJOi. Transdermal application of lovastatin to rats causes profound increases in bone formation and plasma concentrations. 2006;17(7):1033-42.
3. Urist MRJS. Bone: formation by autoinduction. 1965;150(3698):893-99.
4. Hollinger JO, Mark DE, Goco P, Quigley N, Desverreaux RW, Bach DEJCo . A comparison of four particulate bone derivatives. 1991;(267):255-63.
5. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S. et al. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:53-58.
6. Simon BI, Chiang TF, Drew HJ. Alternative to the gold standard for alveolar ridge augmentation: tenting screw technology. Quintessence Int 2010;41:379-86.
7. Senesi N, Miano TM, Provenzano MR, Brunetti G. Characterization, differentiation, and classification of humic substances by fluorescence spectroscopy. Soil Science, 1991;152(4):259-71.
8. Davies G. Properties and Functions of Humic Acids. Meeting Report. The Nucleus Febr, 1996:17.
9. Orlov D. Humic substances in the biosphere. Soros Educ J, 1997;(2):56-63.
10. Klöcking R, Helbig B. Medical aspects and applications of humic substances. Biopolymers for Medical and Pharmaceutical Applications WILEYVCH Verlag GmbH & C KGaA Weinheim, 2005:3-16.
11. Joone GK, van Rensburg CE. An in vitro investigation of the antiinflammatory properties of potassium humate. Inflammation. 2004;28(3):169-174.
12. Salz H. Salhumin-gel, a local therapeutic agent with hyperemic, antiphlogistic and analgesic effect. Med Monatsschr. 1974;28(12):548-550.
13. Yamada E, Ozaki T, Kimura M. Determination and behavior of humic substances as precursors of trihalomethane in environmental water. Anal Sci. 1998;14(2):327-332.
14. Ansorg R, Rochus W. Studies on the antimicrobial effect of natural and synthetic humic acids (author’s transl). Arzneimittelforschung 1978;28(12):2195-2198.
15. Klöcking R, Spro¨ssig M. Antiviral properties of humic acids. Experientia. 1972;28(5):607-608.
16. Klöcking R, Helbig B, Scho¨tz G, Schacke M, Wutzler P. AntiHSV-1 activity of synthetic humic acid-like polymers derived from p-diphenolic starting compounds. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2002;13(4):241-249.
17. Schepetkin I, Khlebnikov A, Kwon BS. Medical drugs from humus matter: focus on mumie. Drug Dv Res. 2002;57(3):140-159.
18. Feldkamp LA, Goldstein SA, Parfitt MA, Jesion G, Kleerekoper M. The direct examination of threedimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography. Journal of bone and mineral research, 1989;4(1), 3-11.
19. Kuhn J, Goldstein S, Feldkamp L, Goulet R, Jesson G. Evaluation of a microcomputed tomography system to study trabecular bone structure. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1990;8(6), 833-42.
20. Şahin FÜ, Topuz Ö. Diş hekimliği araştırmalarında mikrobilgisayarlı tomografi uygulamaları. Acta Odontologica Turcica, 2014;31(2), 114-20.
21. Gielkens PF, Schortinghuis J, de Jong JR, Huysmans MCD, van Leeuwen MBM, Raghoebar GM ve ark. A comparison of micro-CT, microradiography and histomorphometry in bone research. Archives of Oral Biology, 2008;53(6), 558-66.
22. Nazirkar G, Singh S, Dole V, Nikam A. Effortless effort in bone regeneration: a review. Journal of international oral health: JIOH.2014;6(3), 120.
23. Zimmermann G, Moghaddam A. Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes. Injury, 2011;42, 16-21.
24. Van Rensburg C, Snyman J, Mokoele T, Cromarty A. Brown coal-derived humate inhibits contact hypersensitivity; an efficacy, toxicity and teratogenicity study in rats. Inflammation, 2007;30(5): 148-52.
25. Van Rensburg CEJ, Naude PJ. Potassium humate inhibits complement activation and the production of inflammatory cytokines in vitro. Inflammation, 2009;32(4): 270-276.
26. Gau R-J, Yang H-L, Chow S-N, Suen J-L, Lu F-J. Humic acid suppresses the LPS-induced expression of cell-surface adhesion proteins through the inhibition of NF-κB activation. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2000;166(1): 59-67.
27. Botes ME, Dekker J, van Rensburg C. Phase I trial with oral oxihumate in HIV infected patients. Drug development research, 2002;57(1): 34-39.
28. Kreutz B, Schlikekewey W. Effects of implanted bovine calcium hydroxyapatite with humate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1992;111(5): 259-264.
29. Frame J. A convenient animal model for testing bone substitute materials. Journal of oral surgery (American Dental Association: 1965) 1980; 38(3):176- 180.
30. Prolo DJ, Gutierrez RV, DeVine JS, Okerlund SA. Clinical utility of allogeneic skull discs in human craniotomy. Neurosurgery, 1984;14(2):183-186.
31. Özeç İ, Kılıç E, Gümüş C, Göze F. Lokal olarak üç farklı dozda simvastatin uygulamasının kemik defekti iyileşmesi üze rine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2007;10(2):82-86.
32. Donos N, Graziani F, Mardas N, Kostopoulos L. The use of human hypertrophic chondrocytes derived extracellular matrix for the treatment of critical size calvarial defects. Clinical oral implants research.2011; 22(12):1346-1353.
33. Develioğlu H. Kritik boyutlu ve kritik boyutlu olmayan defektler. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak Derg, 2003;6(1): 60-63.
34. Takagi K, Urist MR. The role of bone marrow in bone morphogenetic protein-induced repair of femoral massive diaphyseal defects. Clinical orthopaedics and related research.1982;171:224-231.
35. Mulliken JB, Glowacki J. Induced osteogenesis for repair and construction in the craniofacial region. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 1980;65(5): 553- 560.
36. Glowacki J, Altobelli D, Mulliken JB. Fate of mineralized and demineralized osseous implants in cranial defects. Calcified tissue international. 1981; 33(1):71-76.
37. Prolo DJ, Pedrotti PW, Burres KP, Okerlund S. Superior osteogenesis in transplanted allogeneic canine skull following chemical sterilization. Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 1982;168: 230-242.
38. OU T. Rifamisin ile dekontamine edilen otojen blok kemiğin onley greft olarak kullanımının deneysel olarak incelenmesi. [Doktora Tezi], Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2011.
39. Y. B. Nitrik oksidin kemik iyileşmesinde rolü. [Uzmanlık Tezi], İstanbul Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Biyokimya Anabilim Dalı, 2000.
40. Gielkens PF, Schortinghuis J, de Jong JR, Huysmans MCD, van Leeuwen MBM, Raghoebar GM ve ark. A comparison of micro-CT, microradiography and histomorphometry in bone research. Archives of Oral Biology, 2008; 53(6): 558-566.
41. Kumasaka A, Iikubo M, Nishioka T, Kojima I, Shoji N, Sakamoto M ve ark. Insulin Like Growth Factor I Inhibits Alveolar Bone Loss Following Tooth Extraction in Rats. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2015;17(6):1174-1179.
42. Histing T, Andonyan A, Klein M, Scheuer C, Stenger D, Holstein J ve ark. Obesity does not affect the healing of femur fractures in mice. Injury, 2016;47(7):1435-1444.
43. King S, Baptiston Tanaka C, Ross D, Kruzic JJ, Levinger I, Klineberg I ve ark. A diet high in fat and fructose adversely affects osseointegration of titanium implants in rats. Clinical and experimental dental research, 2020;.6(1): 107-116.
44. Çalışır M, Akpınar A, Poyraz Ö, Göze F, Çınar Z. The histopathological and morphometric investigation of the effects of systemically administered humic acid on alveolar bone loss in ligature induced periodontitis in rats. Journal of Periodontal Research, 2016;51(4): 499-507.
45. Tkachenko S, Rutskiĭ V, Grachev I. under the effect of mumie-asyl. Ortopediia Travmatologiia I Protezirovanie [Ortop Travmatol Profitez], 1979:49-52.
46. Kel'ginbaev N, Sorokina V, Stefani A, Ismailova V. Treatment of long tubular bone fractures with Mumie Assil preparations in experiments and clinical conditions. Eksperimental'naia khirurgiia i anesteziologiia. 1973;18(4):31-35.
47. Durmuş K, Bora A, Doğan M, Özer H, Tuncer E, Altuntaş EE. Can local administration of humic acid shorten recovery time of mandibular fractures? Experimental study. ENT Updates, 2017;7(2):57-61.

APA	Şengül M (2021). THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. , 361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
Chicago	Şengül Muhammet THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. (2021): 361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
MLA	Şengül Muhammet THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. , 2021, ss.361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
AMA	Şengül M THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. . 2021; 361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
Vancouver	Şengül M THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. . 2021; 361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
IEEE	Şengül M "THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS." , ss.361 - 370, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
ISNAD	Şengül, Muhammet. "THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS". (2021), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.999234

APA	Şengül M (2021). THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24(4), 361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
Chicago	Şengül Muhammet THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24, no.4 (2021): 361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
MLA	Şengül Muhammet THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.24, no.4, 2021, ss.361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
AMA	Şengül M THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(4): 361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
Vancouver	Şengül M THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2021; 24(4): 361 - 370. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
IEEE	Şengül M "THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 24, ss.361 - 370, 2021. 10.7126/cumudj.999234
ISNAD	Şengül, Muhammet. "THE EFFECT OF HUMIC ACID ON BONE REGENERATION IN RATS". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 24/4 (2021), 361-370. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.999234