A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Yıl: 2021 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 18 - 21 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 İndeks Tarihi: 28-11-2022
A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Öz: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of leak compensated nasal SIMV (LCnSIMV) and leak synchronized nasal SIMV (LSnSIMV) modes in order to reduce the need for endotracheal intubation and associated complications in newborns with respiratory distress. This randomized, prospective study was conducted on 50 infants (25 per group) with gestational age below 34 weeks and/or below 2000 grams who have been admitted to NICU of Erciyes University Hospital because of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and need for mechanical ventilation. Infants with congenital heart disease, nasopharyngeal pathology (coanal atresia and cleft palate-lip) were excluded. Infants monitored on mechanical ventilator after surfactant were randomly assigned to LCnSIMV and LSnSIMV groups before extubation. SPO2/FiO2 (S/F), peak heart rate (PHR), respiration rate per minute (RRM), and arterial blood pressure (aBP) values of patients were recorded. Gestational age, birth weight, gender, RDS, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) requiring treatment, presence of intraventricular bleeding (IVH), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) were recorded. The patients enrolled in the study were female by 48% and male by 52%. There was not any statistically significant difference between groups for gender, postnatal age and birth weight. There was detected statistically significant difference between LCnSIMV and LSnSIMV groups for non-invasive ventilation period and re-intubation rate (p=0.04 and p=0.03, respectively). There was detected statistically significant difference between LCnSIMV and LSnSIMV groups for SpO2 and S/F rates at 60 minutes (p=0.03 and p=0.01, respectively). There was not any difference between groups for blood pressure, PDA, IVH, ROP, BPD, NEC, sepsis and air leak. It may be appropriate to prefer the LSnSIMV method in patients with respiratory distress syndrome who need non-invasive ventilation in the pre-extubation period by considering the patient-ventilator compliance for positive effect in terms of mechanical clinical variables
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Cummings JJ, Polin RA, COMMITTEE ON FETUS AND NEWBORN. Oxygen Targeting in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants. Pediatrics. 2016;138:e20161576. [CrossRef]
- 2. Cao H, Li H, Zhu X, et al. Three non-invasive ventilation strategies for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a propensity score analysis. Arch Med Sci. 2020;16:1319-1326. [CrossRef]
- 3. Perniciaro S, Casarin J, Nosetti L, et al. Early- and Late-Respiratory Outcome in Very Low Birth Weight with or without Intrauterine Inflammation. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37:S76-S83. [CrossRef]
- 4. Jeon GW. Respiratory support with heated humidified high flow nasal cannula in preterm infants. Korean J Pediatr. 2016;59:389- 394. [CrossRef]
- 5. Vendettuoli V, Bellù R, Zanini R, Mosca F, Gagliardi L; Italian Neonatal Network. Changes in ventilator strategies and outcomes in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F321-F324. [CrossRef]
- 6. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update. Neonatology. 2019;115:432-450. [CrossRef]
- 7. Greenough A, Lingam I. Invasive and non-invasive ventilation for prematurely born infants - current practice in neonatal ventilation. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10:185-192. [CrossRef]
- 8. Jasani B, Nanavati R, Kabra N, Rajdeo S, Bhandari V. Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post- extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:1546-1551. [CrossRef]
- 9. Ramaswamy VV, More K, Roehr CC, Bandiya P, Nangia S. Efficacy of noninvasive respiratory support modes for primary respiratory support in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55:2940-2963. [CrossRef]
- 10. Owen LS, Manley BJ. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants: Equipment, evidence, and synchronization. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21:146-153. [CrossRef]
- 11. Fischer HS, Bührer C. Avoiding endotracheal ventilation to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e1351-e1360. [CrossRef]
- 12. Fischer HS, Schmölzer GM, Cheung PY, Bührer C. Sustained inflations and avoiding mechanical ventilation to prevent death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27:180083. [CrossRef]
- 13. Waitz M, Mense L, Kirpalani H, Lemyre B. Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation for Preterm Neonates: Synchronized or Not?. Clin Perinatol. 2016;43:799-816. [CrossRef]
- 14. Chang HY, Claure N, D'ugard C, Torres J, Nwajei P, Bancalari E. Effects of synchronization during nasal ventilation in clinically stable preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2011;69:84-89. [CrossRef]
- 15. Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Kirpalani H. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD003212. [CrossRef]
- 16. Oto J, Chenelle CT, Marchese AD, Kacmarek RM. A comparison of leak compensation during pediatric noninvasive ventilation: a lung model study. Respir Care. 2014;59:241-251. [CrossRef]
| APA | Ozdemir A, Baştuğ O, Akın M, güneş t (2021). A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. , 18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| Chicago | Ozdemir Ahmet,Baştuğ Osman,Akın Mustafa Ali,güneş tamer A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. (2021): 18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| MLA | Ozdemir Ahmet,Baştuğ Osman,Akın Mustafa Ali,güneş tamer A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. , 2021, ss.18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| AMA | Ozdemir A,Baştuğ O,Akın M,güneş t A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. . 2021; 18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| Vancouver | Ozdemir A,Baştuğ O,Akın M,güneş t A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. . 2021; 18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| IEEE | Ozdemir A,Baştuğ O,Akın M,güneş t "A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome." , ss.18 - 21, 2021. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| ISNAD | Ozdemir, Ahmet vd. "A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome". (2021), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| APA | Ozdemir A, Baştuğ O, Akın M, güneş t (2021). A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The journal of pediatric academy (Online), 2(1), 18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| Chicago | Ozdemir Ahmet,Baştuğ Osman,Akın Mustafa Ali,güneş tamer A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The journal of pediatric academy (Online) 2, no.1 (2021): 18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| MLA | Ozdemir Ahmet,Baştuğ Osman,Akın Mustafa Ali,güneş tamer A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The journal of pediatric academy (Online), vol.2, no.1, 2021, ss.18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| AMA | Ozdemir A,Baştuğ O,Akın M,güneş t A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The journal of pediatric academy (Online). 2021; 2(1): 18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| Vancouver | Ozdemir A,Baştuğ O,Akın M,güneş t A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The journal of pediatric academy (Online). 2021; 2(1): 18 - 21. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| IEEE | Ozdemir A,Baştuğ O,Akın M,güneş t "A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome." The journal of pediatric academy (Online), 2, ss.18 - 21, 2021. 10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
| ISNAD | Ozdemir, Ahmet vd. "A Comparison of Leak Synchronized Nasal SIMV Methods and Leak Compensated Nasal SIMV in Newborns with Respiratory Distress Syndrome". The journal of pediatric academy (Online) 2/1 (2021), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.51271/jpea-2021-0094 |
