Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 91 - 163 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı

Öz:
Küreselleşme olgusuna rağmen politika ve hukuk halen temelde ulus devletlertarafından düzenlenmektedir. Rekabet Hukuku da temel olarak ulus devlettarafından düzenlenmekte ve konunun uluslararası boyutu eksik kalmaktadır.Ulusal rekabet kanunları, sınır ötesi aktivitelerle ancak ülke içerisinde ciddi biretki doğurmaları halinde ilgilenmektedir. Bu durumun rekabete aykırıdavranışlar için uygun bir ortam yarattığı gözlemlemek mümkündür. Sonzamanlarda devletler, rekabet hukuku sorunları ile ilgili işbirliği anlaşmalarıakdetme arayışına girmektedir. Bunun sonucu olarak ise bir uluslarası rekabethukuku anlaşmasının gerekliliği konusu gündeme gelmiştir. Çalışmamızda,uluslararası rekabet hukukundaki mevcut durumun iyileştirilmesi yollarısorgulanmaktadır. Kanaatimizce içerik bakımından üye devletlerinegemenlikleri ile uyumlu plurilateral bir uluslararası anlaşmanın imzalanmasıhem Uluslararası Ticaret hem de rekabet hukuku açısından faydalı olacaktır.DTÖ ise böyle bir anlaşmanın akdedilmesi için en uygun kurumsal yapıyısağlayacaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş Siyasi Bilimler İşletme Kamu Yönetimi Hukuk İktisat İşletme Finans Uluslararası İlişkiler

Contribution in the search of a legal framework for a more effective international competition law

Öz:
Despite globalisation, law and politics are still organised primarily on the basisof nation9states. Competition law is one form of such regulation. Domesticcompetition laws are not usually concerned with activity beyond territorialborders unless it has significant domestic effects. This approach has created asuitable environment for the anti9competitive activities. More recently, Stateshave sought to negotiate co9operation agreements in relation to competition lawmatters. As a result, attention has turned to the possibility of negotiating aninternational agreement on competition law. So, in our thesis, we examine thepossibility of increasing the efficiency in international competition law. As ananswer to it, we are arguing that a plurilateral competition agreement with theappropriate content would be beneficial for both international trade andcompetition and the WTO would provide the optimal institutional vehicle for it.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: İş Siyasi Bilimler İşletme Kamu Yönetimi Hukuk İktisat İşletme Finans Uluslararası İlişkiler
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ABDELGAWAD, W. (2001), «Jalons de l’internationalisation du droit de la concurrence: vers l’éclosion d’un ordre juridique mondial de la lex economica»,
  • RIDE, 2001/2, s. 161 196.
  • ABRAHAM FROIS, G. (2004), Introduction à la micro économie, Economica, Paris.
  • BEGG, D., S. FISCHER ve R. DORNBUSCH (2002), Micro économie, 2ème ed. Dunod, Paris.
  • BERNIER, B. ve H.L. VEDIE (2005), Initiation à la microéconomie, Dunod 2e ed. Paris.
  • BORK, R. H. (1959), "Ancillary Restrains and the Sherman Act", 15 ABA Antitrust Section 211, s. 213 214.
  • BRADFORD (PIILOLA), A. (2007), “International Antitrust Negotiations and the False Hope of the WTO”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 48, summer 2007, s. 383 440. BRAULT, D. (1997), Droit et la politique de la concurrence, Economica, Paris.
  • BRAULT, D. (2004), Politique et pratique du droit de la concurrence en France, LGDJ, Paris.
  • BROBERG, M.P. (2000), “The European Commission's Extraterritorial Powers in Merger Control The Court of First Instance's Judgment in Gencor v. Commission”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 49, No. 1. (Jan.2000), s. 172 182.
  • CARREAU, D. ve P. JUILLLARD (2007), Droit international économique, Dalloz 3e édition, Paris.
  • CHABRIT, N. (2002), Le droit de la concurrence et le secteur public, L’Harmattan.
  • CHAREYRE DE BEAUMONT, A. (2006), Droit de la concurrence et globalisation, Doktora Tezi, Paris II Panthéon Assas Üniversitesi, Fransa.
  • CLAUDEL, E. (2004), «Vers un droit international de la concurrence ?», dans Droit de l’économie internationale, DAILLIER P., de LA PRADELLE G., GHERARI H. (dir.), Editions Pedone, Paris, s. 405 420.
  • CNUCED (1996), La politique de concurrence et les pratiques commerciales restrictives, Groupe intergouvernemental d’experts des pratiques commerciales restrictives, TD/B/RBP/INF.36, 29 Ocak 1996.
  • COASE, R. H. (1993), “Law and Economics at Chicago”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.36, No.1, University of Chicago Press, s. 239 254.
  • COLIN, F. (2005), Droit public économique, Gualino, Paris.
  • COTTIER, T. ve N.S. KRISTA (1997), “Non violation Complaints in WTO/GATT Dispute Settlement: Past, Present and Future”, in International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, ed.
  • PETERSMANN Ernst Ulrich, Kluwer law International, London, s. 145 183.
  • DAILLIER, P. ve A. PELLET (2002), Droit international public, 7e éd. LGDJ, Paris.
  • DE LEON, I. (2002), “The Dilemma of Regulating International Competition under the WTO System”, International Economic Regulation, Ed.
  • KELSEY, Jane, Dartmouth, s.355 370.
  • DESAUTELS STEIN, J. (2008), “Extraterritoriality, Antitrust, and the Pragmatist Style”, Emory International Law Review, Vol. 22, s. 499 570.
  • DOMKE, M. (1955), “The United Nations Draft Convention on Restrictive Business Practices”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 4, No.1, s. 129 140.
  • DUNFEE, T.W. ve A.S. FRIEDMAN (1984), “The Extra Territorial Application of United States Antitrust Laws: A Proposal for An Interim Solution”, OSLJ Vol. 45, Fall 1984, s. 883 932.
  • EVANS, D.S. (2009), “Why Different Jurisdictions Do Not (and Should Not) Adopt the Same Antitrust Rules”, Chicago Journal of International Law, Forthcoming, 16 [ubat 2009. FARJAT, G. (2000), «Les pouvoirs privés économiques», Souveraineté étatique et marché internationaux à la fin du 20e siècle. À propos de 30 ans de recherche du CREDIMI, Mélanges en l’honneur de Philippe KAHN, Litec, s. 613 661.
  • FARJAT, G. (2004), Pour un droit économique, PUF, Paris.
  • FINCKENSTEIN, K.V. (2002), “International Antitrust Policy and the International Competition”, in International Antitrust Law&Policy, Fordham Corp. L. Institute HAWK Barry (Ed.), s. 37 46.
  • FOX, E.M. (1997), “Toward World Antitrust and Market Access”, American Journal of International Law, Vol.91, No.1, s. 1 25.
  • FOX, E.M. (1999), “Competition Law and Millennium Round”, JIEL Vol.2, Issue 4, s. 665 -679.
  • FOX, E.M. (1998), “International Antitrust: Against Minimum Rules; For Cosmopolitan Principles”, Antitrust Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 1, March 1998, s. 5 13.
  • FRIEDEL SOUCHU, E. (1994), Extraterritorialité du droit de la concurrence aux Etats Unis et dans la Communauté européenne, LGDJ, Paris.
  • FRISON ROCHE, A. M. ve S. BONFILS (2005), Les grands questions du droit économique, Ed.PUF, Paris.
  • FRISON ROCHE, A. M. ve M. PAYET (2006), Droit de la concurrence, 1er éd. Dalloz, Paris.
  • GAVALDA, C. ve G. PARLEANI (2006), Droit des affaires de l’Union européenne, 5ème ed. Litec, Paris.
  • GERADIN, D. (2009), “The Perils of Antitrust Proliferation The Process of 'Decentralized Globalization' and the Risks of Over Regulation of Competitive Behaviour”, Forthcoming in Chicago Journal of International Law. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1327688
  • GERBER, D.J. (2006), «Les doctrines européenne et américaine du droit de la concurrence» dans la Modernisation du droit de la concurrence, sous la direction de CANIVET Guy, L.G.D.J. Paris, s.106 131.
  • GERBER, D.J. (2010), Global Competiiton: Law, Markets and Globalization, Oxford University Press.
  • GERBERT, P., V. Y. GHEBALI ve M. R. MOUTON (1996), Le rêve d’un ordre mondial de la Société des Nations à Organisations des Nations Unies, éd. Imprimerie Nationale Paris.
  • GRAHAM, E.M. ve D.J. RICHARDSON (1997), Global Competition Policy, Institute for International Economics.
  • HEINEMANN, A. (2004), «La nécessité d’un droit mondial de la concurrence» Revue International de Droit Economique, s.293 324.
  • IDOT, L. (2002), «Mondialisation, liberté et régulation de la concurrence: le contrôle des concentrations», Revue Internationale de Droit Economique, Vol. XVI, No.2 3, s. 175 205. ITOH, M. ve S. NAGAOKA (1997), “VERs, VIEs and Global Competition”, Global Competition Policy, GRAHAM E.M. ve RICHARDSON D.J. (Eds). , Institute for International Economics, s.475 499.
  • JACKSON, J.H (1990), The World Trading System, Law and Policy of International Economic Relations, The MIT press.
  • JACKSON, J.H. (1997), “ Reflections on Constitutional Changes to the Global Trading System”, dans Public Policy and Global Technological Integration,
  • ABBOTT F. ve GERBER D. (Ed.) , Kluwer Law International, London, The Hague, Boston, s.185 193.
  • JACKSON, J.H., W.J. DAVEY ve A.O. SYKES (2002), Legal Problems of International Economic Relations: Cases, Materials and Text, 4th. Ed. American Casebook Series, West Group.
  • JACQUET, J. M., P. DELEBECQUE ve S. CORNELOUP (2007), Droit du commerce international, 1e Dalloz, Paris.
  • JENNY, F. (2001), «L’environnement économique international et les autorités de concurrence», dans Rapport Public 2001 Les autorités administratives indépendantes. La Documentation Française, Paris, s.441 462.
  • KARAKOÇ, O. (2003), Rekabet Kurallarının Uluslararasıla$ma Süreci ve Uluslararası Örgütlerin Politikaları, Rekabet Kurumu Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara.
  • KAZZI, H. (2007), Le contrôle des pratiques anticoncurrentielles et des concentrations entre les entreprises dans une économie mondialisée: Contribution à l’étude de l’application international du droit économique, Presse Universitaire d’Aix Marseille.
  • KESKIN, A.C. (2003), Les aspects communs et différents de droit de la concurrence américain et européen, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Galatasaray Üniversitesi, Istanbul.
  • KESKĐN, A.C. (2007), «Evolution de la jurisprudence américaine et européenne vers la théorie de l’effet dans l’application unilatérale du droit de la concurrence», Galatasaray Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 2007/1,s. 83 107.
  • KLEIN, J.I. (1996), “A note of Caution With Respect to a WTO Agenda on Competition Policy”, Presented at The Royal Institute of International Affairs Chatham House London, Kasım 18, 1996; http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/public/speeches/0998.htm.
  • LE MIRE, P. (2006), Droit de l’Union européenne et politiques communes, 4ème éd. Dalloz Paris. LEVASSEUR, A. (1994), Droit des Etats Unis, Dalloz, Paris.
  • LIGNEUL, N. (2001), L’élaboration d’un droit international de la concurrence entre les entreprises, Bruylant, Bruxelles.
  • LOCHMANN, M.W. (1996), “The Japanese Voluntary Restraint on Automobile Exports: An Abandonment of the Free Trade Principles of the GATT and the Free Market Principles of the US Antitrust Law”, Harward International Law Journal, Vol.27, s. 99 157.
  • LUFF, D. (2004), Le droit de l’Organisation mondial du Commerce, L.G.D.J. Bruylant.
  • MATSUSHITA, M. (1993), International Trade and Competition Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • MERKT, B. (2000), Harmonisation internationale et entraide administrative internationale en droit de la concurrence, Editions Peter Lang, Neuchâtel.
  • MONTINI, M. (1999), "Globalisation and International Antitrust Co operation", FEEM Working Paper No. 69.99., Eylül 1999, Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/ abstract= 200611 visite dernier le 29 [ubat 2008.
  • MOUSSERON, J. M., J. RAYNARD, R. FABRE ve J. L. PIERRE (2003), Droit du commerce international, 3e ed. Litec, Paris.
  • PAASMAN, B. (1999), Multilateral Rules on Competition Policy: An Overview of the Debate, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Division of Trade and Development Finance, International Trade Unit. OCDE (2003), «Les objectifs du droit et la politique de la concurrence», Revue de l’OCDE sur le droit et la politique de la concurrence, Vol.5, no.1, s. 17.
  • OKIEMY, B. (2001), «L’O.M.C. face à la problématique de l’institution d’un droit international de la concurrence», dans, l’Organisation mondial du commerce : Vers un droit mondial du commerce ?, sous la direction d’OSMAN Filali, Bruylant Bruxelles, s. 61 86.
  • OMC (2004), Le Rapport du Conseil consultatif à M.Supachi Panitchpakdi, Directeur général, Sutherland P., Bhagwati J., Botchwey K., Fitzgerlad N., Hamada K., Jackson J., Lafer C., Montbrial de T., OMC 2004.
  • PAYET, M. S. (2001), Droit de la concurrence et droit de la consommation, Dalloz, Paris.
  • PETERSMANN, E. U. (1997), “ International Competition Rules for Governments and for Private Business: A “Trade Law Approach” for Linking Trade and Competition Rules in the WTO”, dans Public Policy and Global
  • Technological Integration, ABBOTT F. ve GERBER D. (Ed.) , Kluwer Law International, London, The Hague, Boston, s. 221 255.
  • PIILOLA, A. (2003), “Assessing Theories of Global Governance: A Case Study of International Antitrust Regulation”, SJIL Vol.39 s. 207 252.
  • PONS, J. F. (2003), “Is it time for an international agreement on antitrust ?”, in The future of transnational antitrust : from comparative to common competition law, ed. by DREXL J., Staempfli, Berne, s. 349 362.
  • PRAGER, J. C. ve F. VILLEROY de GALHAU (2006), 18 leçons sur la politique économique : À la recherche de la régulation, 2e ed. Seuil, Paris.
  • PRIETO, C. (2005), «Quelle concurrence face à la mondialisation économique ? L’Europe entre audace et ralliement », Concurrences Revues des droits de la concurrence, No.1, s. 20 31. RAHL, J. (1950), "Conspiracy and the Anti Trust Laws ", Illinois Law Review No.44., s. 745 768.
  • RIOUX, M. (2004), «Culture de concurrence: Les limites de l’antitrust international face à la concurrence globalisée », Cahiers de recherche CEIM (04 04), Groupe de recherche sur l’intégration continentale (GRIC), Université du Québec à Montréal, septembre 2004.
  • RIOUX, M. (1999), «Vers un droit mondial de concurrence ?», Cahiers de recherche CEIM (99 08), Centre études internationales et mondialisation, Groupe de recherche sur l’intégration continentale (GRIC), Université du Québec à Montréal, décembre 1999.
  • ROSIAK, P. (2003), Les transformations du droit international économique, L’Harmattan, Paris.
  • ROWLEY, W.J. ve O.K. WAKIL (2001), “The Internationalisation of Antitrust: The Need for a Global Competition Forum”, article présenté lors de conférence organisée par le Burreau de la concurrence canadienne, Canadian Competition Policy: Preparing for the Future entre le 19 et 20 Haziran 2001, s. 11 12.
  • RUIZ FABRI, H. ve J. M. SOREL (2005), «Organisation du commerce international», dans le Traité de doit du commerce international, dir. BEGUIN J./MENJUCQ M., Litec Paris, s.65 161.
  • SAADA, E. (2004), «La politique de la concurrence», dans La politique économique et ses instruments, dir. FERRANDON B., Les notices de La Documentation Française, s.73-79.
  • SAMUELSON, P.A. ve W.D. NORDHAUS (1995), Micro économie 14e édition, les éditions d’organisation, Paris.
  • SCHERER, F.M. (1994), Competition Policies for an Integrated World Economy, Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC.
  • SINGH, A. (2002), Competition and Competition Policy in Emerging Markets: International and Developmental Dimensions, G 24 Discussion Paper Series, UNCTAD/GDS/MDPB/G24/18, Genève.
  • SIROEN, J. M. (2002), «Politique(s) de la concurrence dans une économie globale», dans Les Nouvelles Approches de la Concurrence, (dir.)
  • BIENAYME A., Economica, Paris, s.123 144.
  • SMITHERMAN, C.W. (2004), “The Future of Global Competition Governance: Lessons From the Transatlantic”, AUILR, Vol.19, s.769 881.
  • SOKOL, D.D. (2009), “Change and Continuity in International Antitrust under an Obama Administration” (January 12, 2009). Global Competition Policy Magazine, University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 2009 13, Ocak 2009.
  • SOUTY, F. (2007), «Une commissaire canadienne à la tête du RIC: Sheridan Scott », Concurrences N° 3, s.6 12.
  • SWEENEY, B. (2004), “Globalisation of Competition Law and Policy: Some Aspects of the Interface Between Trade and Competition”, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol.5 No.2, October 2004, s. 375 434.
  • SWEENEY, B. (2009), “International Competition Law and Policy: A Work in Progress”, Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol.10, p. 58 70.
  • TAYLOR, M. (2006), International Competition Law: A New Dimension for the WTO?, Cambridge University Press.
  • TERHORST, G. (2000), "The reformation of the EC Competition Policy on Vertical Restraints", Northwestern Journal of International Law&Business, Vol.21, s.343 378.
  • TRITELL, R. (1999), “Bilan de l’application de la législation antitrust américaine aux sociétés étrangères”, Perspectives économiques, Vol. 4 No.1, [ubat 1999, s.14 17.
  • TURNER, C. (1983), “Voluntary Export Restraints on Trade Going to the United States”, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 49, No. 3, January 1983, s. 793-803.
  • ULRICH, H. (2003), «L’ordre concurrentiel : Rapport de synthèse ou variations sur un thème de Nice», ULLRICH H., «L’ordre concurrentiel: Rapport de synthèse ou «variations sur un thème de Nice», L’ordre concurrentiel Mélanges en l’honneur d’Antoine PIROVANO, Editions Frison Roche, Paris, s. 663 686.
  • VARIAN, H.R. (2006), Introduction à la microéconomie, 6e éd. De Boeck, Bruxelles.
  • YOUNG, M.K. (2001), “Lessons from the Battlefront: US Japan Trade Wars and their Impact on the Multilateral Trading System”, George Washington International Law Review, Vol. 33, s. 753 -789.
APA KESKİN A (2011). Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. , 91 - 163.
Chicago KESKİN ALİ CENK Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. (2011): 91 - 163.
MLA KESKİN ALİ CENK Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. , 2011, ss.91 - 163.
AMA KESKİN A Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. . 2011; 91 - 163.
Vancouver KESKİN A Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. . 2011; 91 - 163.
IEEE KESKİN A "Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı." , ss.91 - 163, 2011.
ISNAD KESKİN, ALİ CENK. "Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı". (2011), 91-163.
APA KESKİN A (2011). Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. Rekabet Dergisi, 12(2), 91 - 163.
Chicago KESKİN ALİ CENK Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. Rekabet Dergisi 12, no.2 (2011): 91 - 163.
MLA KESKİN ALİ CENK Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. Rekabet Dergisi, vol.12, no.2, 2011, ss.91 - 163.
AMA KESKİN A Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. Rekabet Dergisi. 2011; 12(2): 91 - 163.
Vancouver KESKİN A Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı. Rekabet Dergisi. 2011; 12(2): 91 - 163.
IEEE KESKİN A "Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı." Rekabet Dergisi, 12, ss.91 - 163, 2011.
ISNAD KESKİN, ALİ CENK. "Daha etkin bir uluslararası rekabet için Hukuki çerçeve arayışı". Rekabet Dergisi 12/2 (2011), 91-163.