Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 28 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 599 - 606 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404 İndeks Tarihi: 07-11-2022

Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients

Öz:
BACKGROUND: Lactate and base deficit (BD) values are parameters evaluated as indicators of tissue perfusion and have been used as markers of severity of injury and mortality. Objectives: The aim of the study was to determine the relationship between combined score (CS) and blood transfusion need within 24 h and comparison of the variables between transfusion and non-transfusion group, correlation lactate with BD and with physiological, laboratory parameters, and determining the major risk factors of patients for the need for blood transfusion. METHODS: The study included a total of 359 patients (245 males, median age: 40, min–max: 18–95) with blunt multi-trauma. Demographics data, laboratory parameters (hemoglobin [Hb], hematocrit [Htc], lactate, BD, pH), physiologic parameters (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], heart rate [HR], respiratory rate [RR]), shock index (SI), and revised trauma score (RTS) were recorded. Logistic regression method was used to create the CS formula using lactate and BD values. According to this formula, the probability value of 0.092447509 was calculated for the need for blood transfusion within 24 h. If CS was higher than the probability value, the need for blood transfusion within 24 h was considered. Furthermore, univariate analysis was used to determine major risk for blood transfusion need in 24 h, and the receiver operating characteristic curves were performed to compare CS, lactate, BD, SI and RTS. RESULTS: The comparison between transfusion and non-transfusion group there was significance between SBP, DBP, HR, RR, SpO2, Glasgow coma scale, Hb, Htc, lactate, BD, pH, SI and RTS (for each p<0.05). Lactate value has a positive correlation with SI, HR and has a negative correlation with BD, RTS, SBP, and DBP. BD values has a positive correlation with RTS, SBP, DBP, Hb, and Htc and has a negative correlation with SI, HR, and RR. The main risks for blood transfusion need were SI, lactate, BD, SBP, and SpO2%. CS was >0.09 in 100 (27.85%) patients and 41 with high CS had blood transfusion within 24 h (p<0.001; OR21.803, sensitivity 83.7%, specificity 81%,positive predictive value 41%, and negative predictive value 96.9%). A ROC curve showed that CS (AUC: 86.) was more significant than SI and RTS for the need for blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: CS is effective for predicting blood necessity in 24 h for blunt multi-trauma patients.
Anahtar Kelime:

Künt çoklu travma hastalarında kan transfüzyonunu ihtiyacını tahmin etmek için laktat ve baz defisiti kombinasyon skoru

Öz:
AMAÇ: Laktat ve baz defisiti (BD) değerleri, doku perfüzyonunun göstergeleri olarak değerlendirilen parametrelerdir ve yaralanma ve ölüm şiddetinin belirteçleri olarak kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın amacı kombine edilmiş skor ile kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacı arasındaki ilişkiyi 24 saat içinde belirlemek ve transfüzyon ile transfüzyon yapılamayan grup arasındaki değişkenlerin karşılaştırılması, laktatın, BD, fizyolojik ve laboratuvar parametreleri ile korelasyonu ve kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacı için başlıca risk faktörlerinin belirlenmesidir. GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmaya künt çoklu travmalı toplam 359 hasta (245 erkek, medyan yaş: 40, min-maks: 18–95) dahil edildi. Demografik veriler, laboratuvar parametreleri (hemoglobin, hematokrit, laktat, BD, pH), fizyolojik parametreler (sistolik kan basıncı: SBP; Diyastolik kan basıncı: DBP; kalp hızı: HR; solunum hızı: RR), Glascow Koma Ölçeği (GCS), şok indeksi (SI) ve Revize travma skoru (RTS) kaydedildi. Laktat ve BD değerleri kullanarak elde edilen kombine skoru (CS) formülü oluşturmak için logistik regresyon yöntemi kullanıldı. Bu formüle göre 24 saat içinde kan transfüzyon ihtiyacı için olasılık değeri 0.092447509 hesaplandı. Elde edilen CS, olasılık değerinden daha yüksek ise, 24 saat içinde kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacı olacağı düşünüldü. Ayrıca, 24 saat içinde kan transfüzyonu gereksinimi için majör riskleri belirlemede tek değişkenli analiz kullanıldı ve kombine edilmiş skor, laktat, BD, SI ve RTS’yi kendi aralarında karşılaştırmak için alıcı ROC analizi yapıldı. BULGULAR: Transfüzyon ve transfüzyon yapılmayan gruplar arasındaki karşılaştırmasında SBP, DBP, HR, RR, SpO2, GCS, hemoglobin, hematokrit, laktat, BD, pH, SI ve RTS arasında farklılık anlamlı idi (her biri için p<0.05). Laktat değeri, SI, HR ile pozitif, BD, RTS, SBP, DBP ile negatif korelasyon gösterdiği tespit edildi. BD değeri, RTS, SBP, DBP, Hb ve Htc ile pozitif korelasyona, SI, HR ve RR ile negatif korelasyon tespit edildi. Kan transfüzyon ihtiyacı için major riskler SI, laktat, BD, SBP ve SpO2 idi. CS, 100 hastada (%27.85) 0.092447509 değerinden yüksek idi ve yüksek CS’li 41 hastada 24 saat içinde kan transfüzyonu gerçekleştirildiği tespit edildi (p<0.001; OR: 21.803, duyarlılık %83.7, özgüllük %81, pozitif prediktif değer %41, negatif prediktif değer %96.9). ROC eğrisi, kan transfüzyonu ihtiyacı için CS’nin (AUC: 86). SI ve RTS’den daha anlamlı olduğunu gösterdi. TARTIŞMA: CS, künt çoklu travmalı hastalar için 24 saat içinde kan ihtiyacının öngörülmesinde etkilidir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Frutiger A, Ryf C, Bilat C, Rosso R, Furrer M, Cantieni R, et al. Five years’ follow-up of severely injured ICU patients. J Trauma 1991;31:1216–25; discussion 1225–6.
  • 2. Curry N, Hopewell S, Dorée C, Hyde C, Brohi K, Stanworth S. The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 2011;15:R92.
  • 3. Holcomb JB, Jenkins D, Rhee P, Johannigman J, Mahoney P, Mehta S, et al. Damage control resuscitation: Directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma. J Trauma 2007;62:307–10.
  • 4. Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Repine T, Beekley AC, et al. The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma 2007;63:805–13.
  • 5. Jansen TC, van Bommel J, Bakker J. Blood lactate monitoring in critically ill patients: A systematic health technology assessment. Crit Care Med 2009;37:2827–39.
  • 6. Cevik AA, Dolgun H, Oner S, Tokar B, Acar N, Ozakin E, Kaya F. Elevated lactate level and shock index in nontraumatic hypotensive patients presenting to the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med 2015;22:23– 8.
  • 7. Cerovic O, Golubović V, Spec-Marn A, Kremzar B, Vidmar G. Relationship between injury severity and lactate levels in severely injured patients. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:1300–5.
  • 8. Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Knoblich BP, Jacobsen G, Muzzin A, Ressler JA, et al. Early lactate clearance is associated with improved outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1637–42.
  • 9. Davis JW, Shackford SR, Mackersie RC, Hoyt DB. Base deficit as a guide to volume resuscitation. J Trauma 1988;28:1464–7.
  • 10. Davis JW, Parks SN, Kaups KL, Gladen HE, O’Donnell-Nicol S. Admission base deficit predicts transfusion requirements and risk of complications. J Trauma 1996;41:769–74.
  • 11. Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, Nienaber U, Maegele M, Bouillon B. Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the TraumaRegister DGU: The revised injury severity classification, version II. Crit Care 2014;18:476.
  • 12. Regnier MA, Raux M, Le Manach Y, Asencio Y, Gaillard J, Devilliers C, et al. Prognostic significance of blood lactate and lactate clearance in trauma patients. Anesthesiology 2012;117:1276–88.
  • 13. Middleton P, Kelly AM, Brown J, Robertson M. Agreement between arterial and central venous values for pH, bicarbonate, base excess, and lactate. Emerg Med J 2006;23:622–4.
  • 14. Treger R, Pirouz S, Kamangar N, Corry D. Agreement between central venous and arterial blood gas measurements in the intensive care unit. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:390-4.
  • 15. Wijaya R, Ng JH, Ong L, Wong AS. Can venous base excess replace arterial base excess as a marker of early shock and a predictor of survival in trauma? Singapore Med J 2016;57:73–6.
  • 16. Arnold TD, Miller M, van Wessem KP, Evans JA, Balogh ZJ. Base deficit from the first peripheral venous sample: A surrogate for arterial base deficit in the trauma bay. J Trauma 2011;71:793–7; discussion 797.
  • 17. Rudkin SE, Kahn CA, Oman JA, Dolich MO, Lotfipour S, Lush S, et al. Prospective correlation of arterial vs venous blood gas measurements in trauma patients. Am J Emerg Med 2012;30:1371–7.
  • 18. Abou-Khalil B, Scalea TM, Trooskin SZ, Henry SM, Hitchcock R. Hemodynamic responses to shock in young trauma patients: Need for invasive monitoring. Crit Care Med 1994;22:633–9.
  • 19. Eastridge BJ, Salinas J, McManus JG. Hypotension begins at 110 mm Hg: Redefining “hypotension” with data. J Trauma 2007;63:291–7; discussion 297–9.
  • 20. Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Faul M, Sugerman D, Pearson WS, Dulski T, et al. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the national expert panel on field triage. MMWR Recomm Rep 2009;58:1– 35.
  • 21. Galvagno SM Jr., Nahmias JT, Young DA. Advanced trauma life support (R) update 2019: Management and applications for adults and special populations. Anesthesiol Clin 2019;37:13–32.
  • 22. Rady MY, Smithline HA, Blake H, Nowak R, Rivers E. A comparison of the shock index and conventional vital signs to identify acute, critical illness in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24:685–90.
  • 23. El-Menyar A, Goyal P, Tilley E, Latifi R. The clinical utility of shock index to predict the need for blood transfusion and outcomes in trauma. J Surg Res 2018;227:52–59.
  • 24. Vandromme MJ, Griffin RL, Kerby JD, McGwin G Jr., Rue LW 3rd, Weinberg JA. Identifying risk for massive transfusion in the relatively normotensive patient: Utility of the prehospital shock index. J Trauma 2011;70:384–8; discussion 388–90.
  • 25. Mitra B, Fitzgerald M, Chan J. The utility of a shock index >/= 1 as an indication for pre-hospital oxygen carrier administration in major trauma. Injury 2014;45:61–5.
  • 26. Galvagno SM Jr., Massey M, Bouzat P, Vesselinov R, Levy MJ, Millin MG, et al. Correlation between the revised trauma score and injury severity score: Implications for prehospital trauma triage. Prehosp Emerg Care 2019;23:263–70.
  • 27. Jung K, Lee JC, Park RW, Yoon D, Jung S, Kim Y, et al. The best prediction model for trauma outcomes of the current Korean population: A comparative study of three injury severity scoring systems. Korean J Crit Care Med 2016;31:221–8.
  • 28. Chien CY, Yan JL, Han ST, Chen JT, Huang TS, Chen YH, et al. Inferior vena cava volume is an independent predictor of massive transfusion in patients with trauma. J Intensive Care Med 2021;36:428–35.
  • 29. Ozakin E, Yazlamaz NO, Kaya FB, Karakilic EM, Bilgin M. Perfusion index measurement in predicting hypovolemic shock in trauma patients. J Emerg Med 2020;59:238–45.
  • 30. Cancio LC, Wade CE, West SA, Holcomb JB. Prediction of mortality and of the need for massive transfusion in casualties arriving at combat support hospitals in Iraq. J Trauma 2008;64 Suppl 2:S51–5; discussion S55–6.
  • 31. Broder G, Weil MH. Excess lactate: An index of reversibility of shock in human patients. Science 1964;143:1457–9.
  • 32. Vandromme MJ, Griffin RL, Weinberg JA, Rue LW 3rd, Kerby JD. Lactate is a better predictor than systolic blood pressure for determining blood requirement and mortality: Could prehospital measures improve trauma triage? J Am Coll Surg 2010;210:861–7, 867–9.
  • 33. Callaway DW, Shapiro NI, Donnino MW, Baker C, Rosen CL. Serum lactate and base deficit as predictors of mortality in normotensive elderly blunt trauma patients. J Trauma 2009;66:1040–4.
  • 34. Kaplan LJ, Kellum JA. Initial pH, base deficit, lactate, anion gap, strong ion difference, and strong ion gap predict outcome from major vascular injury. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1120–4.
  • 35. Guyette F, Suffoletto B, Castillo JL, Quintero J, Callaway C, Puyana JC. Prehospital serum lactate as a predictor of outcomes in trauma patients: A retrospective observational study. J Trauma 2011;70:782–6.
  • 36. Pal JD, Victorino GP, Twomey P, Liu TH, Bullard MK, Harken AH. Admission serum lactate levels do not predict mortality in the acutely injured patient. J Trauma 2006;60:583–9.
  • 37. Abramson D, Scalea TM, Hitchcock R, Trooskin SZ, Henry SM, Greenspan J. Lactate clearance and survival following injury. J Trauma 1993;35:584–8; discussion 588–9.
  • 38. Rixen D, Raum M, Bouillon B, Lefering R, Neugebauer E, Arbeitsgemeinschaft “Polytrauma” of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Unfallchirurgie. Base deficit development and its prognostic significance in posttrauma critical illness: An analysis by the trauma registry of the Deutsche Gesellschaft fur unfallchirurgie. Shock 2001;15:83–9.
APA ozakin e, Özcan yazlamaz N, Baloğlu Kaya F, Canakci M, Bilgin M (2022). Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. , 599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
Chicago ozakin engin,Özcan yazlamaz Nazli,Baloğlu Kaya Filiz,Canakci Mustafa Emin,Bilgin Muzaffer Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. (2022): 599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
MLA ozakin engin,Özcan yazlamaz Nazli,Baloğlu Kaya Filiz,Canakci Mustafa Emin,Bilgin Muzaffer Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. , 2022, ss.599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
AMA ozakin e,Özcan yazlamaz N,Baloğlu Kaya F,Canakci M,Bilgin M Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. . 2022; 599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
Vancouver ozakin e,Özcan yazlamaz N,Baloğlu Kaya F,Canakci M,Bilgin M Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. . 2022; 599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
IEEE ozakin e,Özcan yazlamaz N,Baloğlu Kaya F,Canakci M,Bilgin M "Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients." , ss.599 - 606, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
ISNAD ozakin, engin vd. "Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients". (2022), 599-606. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
APA ozakin e, Özcan yazlamaz N, Baloğlu Kaya F, Canakci M, Bilgin M (2022). Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28(5), 599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
Chicago ozakin engin,Özcan yazlamaz Nazli,Baloğlu Kaya Filiz,Canakci Mustafa Emin,Bilgin Muzaffer Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28, no.5 (2022): 599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
MLA ozakin engin,Özcan yazlamaz Nazli,Baloğlu Kaya Filiz,Canakci Mustafa Emin,Bilgin Muzaffer Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, vol.28, no.5, 2022, ss.599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
AMA ozakin e,Özcan yazlamaz N,Baloğlu Kaya F,Canakci M,Bilgin M Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(5): 599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
Vancouver ozakin e,Özcan yazlamaz N,Baloğlu Kaya F,Canakci M,Bilgin M Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi. 2022; 28(5): 599 - 606. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
IEEE ozakin e,Özcan yazlamaz N,Baloğlu Kaya F,Canakci M,Bilgin M "Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients." Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 28, ss.599 - 606, 2022. 10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404
ISNAD ozakin, engin vd. "Lactate and base deficit combination score for predicting blood transfusion need in blunt multi-trauma patients". Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi 28/5 (2022), 599-606. https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2021.02404