Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 416 - 468 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 08-11-2022
Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale
Öz: Objective: Research on simulation-based experience focuses primarily on the student's level of knowledge, skills, self-confidence, and satisfaction. There is only one scale in Turkish that can be used to measure satisfaction with the simulation experience. The aim of this study was to establish the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES). Methods: The study sample consisted of 130 nursing students from two universities. Data were collected using a student information form, the Turkish version of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale (SSES-TR) and the Scale of Student Satisfaction and Confidence in Learning (SSSCL). The original SSES was translated into Turkish. Thirteen academics, who were experts in nursing and simulation, were consulted for content validity. Expert feedback was collected in a form to determine the content validity ratio using Lawshe's technique. The Turkish adaptation of the SSES was performed by four linguists to ensure linguistic validity. The correlation between the SSES-TR and SSSCL was determined using concurrent validity and Pearson’s Correlation. Internal consistency tests were used to test reliability. The SSES-TR was administered to 35 students as a test-retest with an interval of two weeks to determine its consistency across time. Construct validity was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: The scale had a content validity index (CVI) of 0.86. The SSES-TR had a Cronbach’s alpha (α) of 0.928. The correlation between SSES-TR items and total and subscale scores ranged from 0.492 to 0.749. Test-retest reliability coefficients showed that the SSES-TR total score and subscale scores were compatible. The fit statistics of the 3-factor scale structure according to CFA are at the level of "acceptable fit" according to RMSEA (0.095) and SRMR (0.090). Conclusions: The SSES-TR is a reliable and valid measure that can be used to assess nursing students’ satisfaction with simulation-based experience.
Anahtar Kelime: Simülasyon Deneyimi Memnuniyet Ölçeğinin Türkçe Geçerlik Güvenirliği
Öz: Amaç: Simülasyona dayalı eğitimle ilgili çalışmaların çoğu öğrencilerin bilgi ve beceri edinme, özgüven ve memnuniyet ölçüm sonuçlarına odaklanmaktadır. Simülasyon deneyiminde memnuniyeti ölçen sadece bir Türkçe ölçek vardır. Bu çalışmanın amacı “Simulasyon Deneyimi Memnuniyet Ölçeği’nin” Türkçe geçerlik güvenirliğini yapmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmanın örneklemini iki farklı üniversitenin Hemşirelik bölümünde öğrenim gören 130 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Veriler Öğrenci Tanıtım Formu, Simulasyon Deneyimi Memnuniyet Ölçeği (SDMÖ), Öğrenmede Öğrenci Memnuniyeti ve Özgüven Ölçeği (ÖÖMÖÖ) kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Türkçe çevirisi yapılan ölçek kapsam geçerliği için hemşirelik alanında uzman, simülasyon uygulamaları yapan 13 akademisyenin görüşüne sunuldu. Uzmanların görüşleri Lawshe Tekniği kullanılarak tek bir formda birleştirilerek kapsam geçerlilik oranı belirlendi. SDMÖ’nin dil geçerliğini sağlamak amacıyla Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışmaları dört dil uzmanı tarafından gerçekleştirildi. ÖÖMÖÖ ile SDMÖ arasındaki ilişki eş zaman geçerliliği yöntemi uygulanarak Pearson Korelasyonu ile değerlendirildi. Ölçeğin güvenirliği iç tutarlılık testleri ile değerlendirildi. Ölçeğin zaman göre değişmezliğini incelemek için 35 öğrenciye 2 hafta ara ile SDMÖ ölçeği tekrar uygulandı. Yapı geçerliliği, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: SDMÖ kapsam geçerlilik indeksi (CVI) 0.86'dır. Ölçeğin Cronbach Alfa katsayısı 0.928 olarak elde edildi. SDMÖ maddeleri ile ölçek toplam puan ve ilgili alt boyut puanı arasındaki korelasyon katsayıları 0.492 ile 0.749 arasında değişmektedir. Ölçeğin test-tekrar test güvenirliği incelendiğinde, ÖÖMÖÖ toplam puanı ve alt boyutları için puanların uyumlu olduğu görülmüştür. DFA’ya göre 3 faktörlü ölçek yapısının uyum istatistikleri, RMSEA (0,095) ve SRMR'ye (0.090) göre “kabul edilebilir uyum” düzeyindedir. Sonuç: SDMÖ hemşirelik öğrencilerinin simülasyon temelli deneyimden memnuniyetlerini değerlendirmek için kullanılabilecek güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçüm aracıdır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Herron EK, Powers K, Mullen L, Burkhart B. Effect of case study versus video simulation on nursing students' satisfaction, self-confidence, and knowledge: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today 2019; 79:129-134.
- 2. Fawaz MA, Hamdan-Mansour AM. Impact of high-fidelity simulation on the development of clinical judgment and motivation among Lebanese nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2016; 46: 36-42.
- 3. Smiley RA. Survey of Simulation Use in Prelicensure Nursing Programs: Changes and Advancements, 2010- 2017. J Nurs Regul 2019; 9(4):48-61.
- 4. Bolstad AL, ShenJ, Covelli M, Torpey M. Reliability of standardized patients used in a communication study on international nurses in the United States of America. Nurs Health Sci. 2012; 14: 67-73.
- 5. Zigmont JJ, Kappus LJ, Sudikoff SN. The 3D model of debriefing: defusing, discovering, and deepening. Semin perinatol 2011;35(2): 52-58.
- 6. Kelly MA, Hager P, Gallagher R. What matters most? Students’ rankings of simulation components that contribute to clinical judgment. J Nurs Educ 2014; 53(2): 97-101.
- 7. Weaver A. The effect of a model demonstration during debriefing on students' clinical judgment, self- confidence, and satisfaction during a simulated learning experience. Clin Simul Nurs 2015; 11(1): 20-26.
- 8. Oh P-J, Jeon KD, Koh MS. The effects of simulation-based learning using standardized patients in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today 2015; 35(5): 6-15.
- 9. Andrea J, Kotowski P. Using standardized patients in an undergraduate nursing health assessment class. Clin Simul Nurs 2017;13(7): 309-313.
- 10. Beaird G, Nye C, Thacker II LR. The use of video recording and standardized patient feedback to improve communication performance in undergraduate nursing students. Clin Simul Nurs 2017; 13(4), 176-185.
- 11. Unver V, Basak T, Watts P, Gaioso V, Moss J, Tastan S, Iyigun E, Tosun N. The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: the student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning scale, simulation design scale, and educational practices questionnaire. Contemp Nurse, 2017; 53(1): 60-74.
- 12. Levett-Jones T, McCoy M, Lapkin S, Noble D, Hoffman K, Dempsey J, . . . Roche J. The development and psychometric testing of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. Nurse Educ Today 2011; 31(7), 705-710.
- 13. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research. In P. D.F. & B. C.T (Eds.), Assessing Measurement Quality in Quantitative Studies (Eight Edition. ed., pp. 449- 473): Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2008
- 14. Yurdugül H. Ölçek geliştirme çalışmalarında kapsam geçerliği için kapsam geçerlik indekslerinin kullanılması. XIV Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi. 2005;1:771-774.
- 15. Cantürk C, Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Intercultural Scale Adaptation Stages, Language and Culture Adaptation:Updated Guideline. FNJN 2018; 26(3): 199-210.
- 16. Şencan, H. Validity and reliability in social and behavioral measurements. In: Ankara: Turkey; 2005.
- 17. Esin N. Data Collection Methods and Tools & Reliability and Validity of Data Collection Tools. In N. N. Semra Erdoğan, Nihal Esin (Ed.), Nursing Research. Istanbul, Turkey; 2014.
- 18. Kline RB. Hypothesis Testing. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011.
- 19. Büyüköztürk Ş. Statistic, research design, SPSS applications and comment. In Data analysis handbook for social sciences: 23rd Edition. Ankara: Turkey. 2017.
- 20. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6(1): 1-55.
- 21. Marsh HW, Hocevar D. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull 1985; 97(3): 562.
- 22. Schreiber JB, Nora A, Stage FK, Barlow EA, King J. Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. J Educ Res 2006; 99(6): 323-338.
- 23. Bremner MN, Aduddell K, Bennett DN, VanGeest JB. The use of human patient simulators: Best practices with novice nursing students. Nurse Educ 2006; 31(4): 170-174.
- 24. Williams B, Dousek S. The satisfaction with simulation experience scale (SSES): a validation study. J Nurs Educ Pract 2012; 2(3): 74.
- 25. Kwon H-J, Yoou S-K. Validation of a Korean version of the satisfaction with simulation experience scale for paramedic students. Korean J Emerg Med Serv 2014; 18(2), 7-20.
- 26. Harrington D. Assessing Confirmatory Factor Analysis Model Fit and Model Revision. Confirmatory Factor Analysis. 1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009. p.1-11, 52-3.
- 27. Karagöz Y. SPSS 21.1 Uygulamalı Biyoistatistik Tıp, Eczacılık, Diş hekimliği ve sağlık bilimleri için. Nobel yayıncılık, 1.baskı, Ankara, 2014.
- 28. Burns N, Grove S. Understanding nursing research (ed.). St Louis: Wb Saunders Company 2003; 265-307.
| APA | Tuzer H, KOCATEPE V, Yılmazer T, İnkaya B, ÜNVER V, Levett-Jones T (2022). Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. , 416 - 468. |
| Chicago | Tuzer Hilal,KOCATEPE Vildan,Yılmazer Tuba,İnkaya Bahar,ÜNVER Vesile,Levett-Jones Tracy Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. (2022): 416 - 468. |
| MLA | Tuzer Hilal,KOCATEPE Vildan,Yılmazer Tuba,İnkaya Bahar,ÜNVER Vesile,Levett-Jones Tracy Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. , 2022, ss.416 - 468. |
| AMA | Tuzer H,KOCATEPE V,Yılmazer T,İnkaya B,ÜNVER V,Levett-Jones T Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. . 2022; 416 - 468. |
| Vancouver | Tuzer H,KOCATEPE V,Yılmazer T,İnkaya B,ÜNVER V,Levett-Jones T Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. . 2022; 416 - 468. |
| IEEE | Tuzer H,KOCATEPE V,Yılmazer T,İnkaya B,ÜNVER V,Levett-Jones T "Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale." , ss.416 - 468, 2022. |
| ISNAD | Tuzer, Hilal vd. "Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale". (2022), 416-468. |
| APA | Tuzer H, KOCATEPE V, Yılmazer T, İnkaya B, ÜNVER V, Levett-Jones T (2022). Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ, 14(3), 416 - 468. |
| Chicago | Tuzer Hilal,KOCATEPE Vildan,Yılmazer Tuba,İnkaya Bahar,ÜNVER Vesile,Levett-Jones Tracy Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ 14, no.3 (2022): 416 - 468. |
| MLA | Tuzer Hilal,KOCATEPE Vildan,Yılmazer Tuba,İnkaya Bahar,ÜNVER Vesile,Levett-Jones Tracy Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ, vol.14, no.3, 2022, ss.416 - 468. |
| AMA | Tuzer H,KOCATEPE V,Yılmazer T,İnkaya B,ÜNVER V,Levett-Jones T Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ. 2022; 14(3): 416 - 468. |
| Vancouver | Tuzer H,KOCATEPE V,Yılmazer T,İnkaya B,ÜNVER V,Levett-Jones T Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale. KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ. 2022; 14(3): 416 - 468. |
| IEEE | Tuzer H,KOCATEPE V,Yılmazer T,İnkaya B,ÜNVER V,Levett-Jones T "Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale." KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ, 14, ss.416 - 468, 2022. |
| ISNAD | Tuzer, Hilal vd. "Turkish Validity and Reliability of the Satisfaction with Simulation Experience Scale". KONURALP TIP DERGİSİ 14/3 (2022), 416-468. |
