Administration science in the world has developed in theory and practice. The Administration Science, which is one of the fastest changing sciences among the humanities, is a branch of science that states follow in order to improve themselves and increase their power. In addition to the development of administration as a science, it is vital for states to make a positive contribution to the applicable scale in order not to remain outside the system. Some concepts in these developments in management science, act as triggers and the states that provide them to operate gain an advantage in the race. Democracy and autonomy are two of these concepts that developing states attach importance to. It is no coincidence that the states that have adopted democracy have a strong and confident structure at the local level. Of course, being strong at the local level it is not about being in constant friction with the central level administration. At this point, the concept of administrative tutelage, which regulates the relations between central administration and local administration in the most effective way, comes to the for. With this work, it is aimed to compare the roles and effects of the State Supervisory Board and the Ombudsman Institution, which are in charge at the center, in the context of legislation and research and to compare them in the context of administrative tutelage after the Presidential Government System. Thus, the legal and actual tutelage practices of the two institutions that come to mind with the concept of tutelage on administrative organizations are compared. In the study, firstly, the theoretical and practical information about the tutelage concept and the tutelage supervision is given; Afterwards, structural and functional comparisons of the State Supervisory Board and the Ombudsman Institution were made and some evaluations were made.