Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties

Fazıl HACIMÜFTÜOĞLU, (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, Erzurum, Türkiye)
Mustafa Y. CANBOLAT (Atatürk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü, Erzurum, Türkiye)
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
0 1
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 536 - 549 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.55730/1300-011X.3024 İndeks Tarihi: 02-12-2022

Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties

Öz:
This study was carried out to investigate the impacts of bacterial inoculation on texturally different soil samples under greenhouse conditions. Sandy loam (SL), clay loam (CL), and clay (C) textured soils were inoculated with Bacillus arenosi K64 (B. arenosi), Bacillus megaterium M3 (B. megaterium), and Bacillus subtilis OSU 142 (B. subtilis) isolates and then incubated at 5 different periods [I (20 days), II (40 days), III (60 days), IV (80 days), and V (100 days)]. Soil physical properties, including bulk density, total porosity, mean weight diameter, and intrinsic permeability, were evaluated. It was found that bacterial inoculation caused a decrease in soil bulk density and intrinsic permeability, increased porosity, and mean weight diameter. In sum, the most effective results were noticed in the soils inoculated with B. subtilis.
Anahtar Kelime: Soil physic bacterial inoculation soil structure

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abiven S, Menasseri S, Angers DA, Leterme P (2007). Dynamics of aggregate stability and biological binding agents during decomposition of organic materials. European Journal of Soil Science 58: 239-247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00833.x
  • Abiven S, Menasseri S, Chenu C (2009): The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability - A literature analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 41: 1-12. doi: 10.5167/uzh-10151
  • Akoğuz H, Çelik Z, Çelik S, Barış Ö (2018). The observation into the effect of Viridibacillus arenosi bacteria on soil environment in biological ımprovement of soils. Bayburt University Journal of Science 1 (1): 42-52 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Artyszak A, Gozdowski D (2020). The effect of growth activators and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on the soil properties, root yield, and technological quality of sugar beet. Agronomy 10 (9): 1262. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10091262
  • Bandyopadhyay KK, Hati KM, Singh R (2009). Management options for ımproving soil physical environment for sustainable agricultural production: A Brief Review. Journal of Agricultural Physics 9: 1-8.
  • Barabesi C, Galizzi A, Mastromei G, Rossi M, Tamburini E, Perito B (2007). Bacillus subtilis gene cluster involved in calcium carbonate biomineralization. Journal of Bacteriology 189: 228- 235. doi: 10.1128/JB.01450-06
  • Barea JM, Pozo MJ, Azcon R, Azcon-Aguilar C (2005). Microbial co- operation in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany 56 (417): 1761-1778. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri197
  • Bilen S, Bilen M, Turan V (2019). Relationships between cement dust emissions and soil properties. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 28 (5): 1-10. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/92521
  • Bilen S, Özgül M, Özlü E, Bilen M (2021). Impacts of Gümüşhane cement dust emissions on soil elemental compositions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 45 (6): 766-774. doi: 10.3906/tar-2004-30
  • Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986). Bulk density. In A. Klute (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monographs. 9. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 363-382.
  • Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005). Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124: 3-22. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005
  • Cakmakci R, Kantar F, Şahin F (2001). Effect of N2 -fixing bacterial inoculations on yield of sugar beet and barley. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 164: 527-531. doi: 10.1002/1522- 2624
  • Canbolat MY, Bilen S, Cakmakci R, Sahin F, Aydin A (2006). Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria and soil compaction on barley seedling growth, nutrient uptake, soil properties and rhizosphere microflora. Biology and Fertility of Soils 42 (4): 350-357. doi: 10.1007/s00374-005-0034-9
  • Carminati A, Benard P, Ahmed MA, Zarebanadkouki M (2017). Liquid bridges at the root-soil interface. Plant and Soil 417 (1- 2): 1-15. doi: 10.1007/s11104-017-3227-8
  • Cassel DK, Nielsen DR (1986). Field capacity and available water capacity. In A. Klute (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. 2nd ed. Agronomy Monographs. 9. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp. 901-926.
  • Cazorla F, Romero D, Pérez-García A, Lugtenberg B, Vicente AD et al. (2007). Isolation and characterization of antagonistic Bacillus subtilis strains from the avocado rhizoplane displaying biocontrol activity. Journal of Applied Microbiology 103 (5): 1950-1959. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03433.x.
  • Celik I, Ortas I, Kilic S (2004). Effects of compost, mycorrhiza, manure and fertilizer on some physical properties of a Chromoxerert soil. Soil and Tillage Research 78 (1): 59-67. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(04)00049-2
  • Chan KY, Heenan DP, So HB (2003). Sequestration of carbonand changes in soil quality under conservation tillage on light- textured soils in Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43: 325–334. doi: 10.1071/EA02077
  • Chandran H, Meena M, Swapnil P (2021). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as a green alternative for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability, 13: 10986. doi: 10.3390/su131910986
  • Charman P, Murphy B (2007). Soils: Their Properties and Management, third ed. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 461.
  • Collins DP, Jacobsen BJ (2003). Optimizing a Bacillus subtilis isolate for biological control of sugar beet Cercospora leaf spot. Biological Control 26 (2): 153-161. doi: 10.1016/S1049- 9644(02)00132-9
  • Costa OYA, Raaijmakers JM, Kuramae EE (2018). Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: Ecological function and impact on soil aggregation. In Frontiers in Microbiology 9 (1636): 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01636
  • Dar A, Zahir ZA, Iqbal M, Mehmood A, Javed A et al. (2021). Efficacy of rhizobacterial exopolysaccharides in improving plant growth, physiology, and soil properties. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, pp. 193-515. doi: 10.1007/s10661- 021-09286-6
  • De Belie N, Wang J (2015). Bacteria-based repair and self-healing of concrete. Journal of Sustainable Cement-Based Materials 5 (1): 35-56. doi: 10.1080/21650373.2015.1077754
  • Dong C (2021). Effects of biological metabolism of metasequoia glyptostroboides on nutrient element content and enzyme activity in seedling soil. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 45: 642-650. doi:10.3906/tar-2106-17
  • Dowdy S, Wearden S (1983). Statistics for Res. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. USA Elazar Volk
  • Erktan A, Cécillon L, Graf F, Roumet C, Legout C et al. (2015). Increase in soil aggregate stability along a Mediterranean successional gradient in severely eroded gully bed ecosystems: combined effects of soil, root traits and plant community characteristics. Plant and Soil 398 (1-2): 121-137. doi: 10.1007/ s11104-015-2647-6
  • Fang M, Kremer RJ, Motavalli PP, Davis G (2005). Bacterial diversity in rhizospheres of nontransgenic and transgenic corn. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71: 4132-4136. doi: 10.1128/ AEM.71.7.4132-4136.2005
  • FAO (2014). World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Reports, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resources Reports, No.106. FAO, Rome.
  • Garbeva P, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD (2004). Microbial diversity in soil: Selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. Annual Review of Phytopathology 42: 243-270. doi: 10.1146/annurev. phyto.42.012604.135455
  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986). Particle-size analysis. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd edition. American Society of Agronomy. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 383-411.
  • Germida JJ (1993). Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Chapter 27 Cultural Methods for Soil Microorganisms. Edited by Martin R. Carter. Canadian Society of Soil Science. Levis Publishers. USA, pp:263-275.
  • Glick BR (2012). Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica p. 963401. doi: 0.6064/2012/963401
  • Griffiths BS, Hallett PD, Kuan HL, Gregory AS, Watts CW, Whitmore AP (2008). Functional resilience of soil microbial communities depends on both soil structure and microbial community composition. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44 (5): 745-754. doi: 10.1007/s00374-007-0257-z
  • Hacımüftüoğlu F, Canbolat MY (2020). The Effect of Polyvinyl Alcohol Application on Soil Physical Properties and Development of Corn Plants (Zea mays L.). Atatürk University Agriculture Faculty. Journal of Faculty 51 (1): 32-43 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). doi: 10.17097/ataunizfd.585918
  • Harris RH, Mitchell R (1973). The role of polymers ın microbial aggregation. Annual Review of Microbiology 27 (1): 27-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.27.100173.000331
  • Hoorman JJ, Sa JCM, Reeder RC (2011). The biology of soil compaction (Revised & Updated), Journal of No-till Agriculture 9 (2): 583-587.
  • Hou Y, Li P, Wang J (2021). Review of chemical stabilizing agents for improving the physical and mechanical properties of loess. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 80 (12): 9201-9215. doi: 10.1007/s10064-021-02486-x
  • Hua X, Han H, Tigabu M, Cai L, Meng F et al. (2019). Changes in soil physico-chemical properties following vegetation restoration mediate bacterial community composition and diversity in Changting, China. Ecological Engineering 138: 171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.07.031
  • Indoria AK, Rao CS, Sharma KL, Reddy KS (2017). Current science association conservation agriculture-a panacea to improve soil physical health. Current Science 112 (1): 52-61.
  • Ingham ER (2009). Soil Biology Primer, Chapter 4: Soil Fungus. Ankeny IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society, pp. 22-23.
  • Joshi S, Goyal S, Mukherjee A, Reddy MS (2017). Microbial healing of cracks in concrete: a review. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 44 (11): 1511-1525. doi: 10.1007/s10295-017-1978-0
  • Kemper WD, Rosenau RC (1986). Aggregate stability and size distribution. Methods of soil analysis. Physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd edition. Agronomy 9: 425-442.
  • Kennedy AC, Smith KL (1995). Soil microbial diversity and the sustainability of agricultural soils. Plant and Soil 170: 75-86.
  • Kibblewhite MG, Ritz K, Swift MJ (2008). Soil health in agricultural systems. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363: 685-701. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2178
  • Kihara J, Martius C, Bationo A, Thuita M, Lesueur D et al. (2012). Soil aggregation and total diversity of bacteria and fungi in various tillage systems of sub-humid and semi-arid Kenya. Applied Soil Ecology 58: 12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.03.004
  • Klute A, Dirksen C (1986). Hydraulic Conductivity and Diffusivity: Laboratory Methods. Methods of Soil Analysis.Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition. Agronomy 9: 687-734, 1188 p. Madison, Wisconsin USA. doi: 10.2136/ sssabookser5.1.2ed.c28
  • Kroener E, Zarebanadkouki M, Kaestner A, Carminati A (2014). Nonequilibrium water dynamics in the rhizosphere: How mucilage affects water flow in soils. Water Resources Research 50: 6479-6495. doi: 10.1002/2013WR014756
  • Kroener E, Holz M, Zarebanadkouki M, Ahmed M, Carminati A (2018). Effects of mucilage on rhizosphere hydraulic functions depend on soil particle size. Vadose Zone Journal 17 (1): 1-11. doi: 10.2136/vzj2017.03.0056
  • Kumar R, Saurabh K, Kumawat N, Sundaram PK, Mishra JS et al. (2021). Sustaining productivity through ıntegrated use of microbes in agriculture. Role of Microbial Communities for Sustainability 29: 109-145. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9912-5_5
  • Li CH, Ma BL, Zhang TQ (2002). Soil bulk density effects on soil microbial populations and enzyme activities during the growth of maize (Zea mays L.) planted in large pots under field exposure. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 82 (2): 147-154.
  • Lian B, Hu Q, Chen J, Ji J, Teng HH (2006). Carbonate biomineralization induced by soil bacterium Bacillus megaterium, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 70 (22): 5522-5535. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2006.08.044
  • Martin PJ (1944). Microorganisms and Soil Aggregation: I. Origin and nature of some of the aggregating substances. Soil Science, Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station 59: 163-174
  • Martin JP, Ervin JO, Shepherd RA (1965). Decomposition and binding action of polysaccharides from azotobacter indicus (Beijerincka) and other bacteria in soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 29: 397-400.
  • McLean EO (1982). Soil pH and Lime Requirement. In: Page, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition. Agronomy 9, pp. 199- 224.
  • Nakajima T, Shrestha RK, Jacinthe PA, Lal R, Bilen S, Dick W (2016). Soil organic carbon pools in ploughed and no till alfisols of central Ohio. Soil Use and Management 32 (4): 515-524. doi: 10.1111/sum.12305
  • Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini M, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003). Microbial diversity and soil functions. European Journal of Soil Science 54: 655-670. doi: 10.1111/ejss.3_12398
  • Nelson RE (1982). Carbonate and gypsum. In: Page, A. (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd edition. Agronomy, pp. 181-197.
  • Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page, A. (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison, 2nd edition. Agronomy 9: 539-579, 1159 p. Wisconsin USA.
  • Obalum SE, Chibuike GU, Peth S, Ouyang Y (2017). Soil organic matter as sole indicator of soil degradation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, pp. 189-176. doi: 10.1007/s10661- 017-5881-y
  • Ozlu E, Gozukara G, Acar M, Bilen S, Babur E (2022). Field-scale evaluation of the soil quality index as influenced by dairy manure and ınorganic fertilizers. Sustainability 14 (13), 7593. doi: 10.3390/su14137593
  • Özgül M (2003). Classifying and mapping of great soil groups commonly found in Erzurum. Atatürk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Soil Science, PhD Thesis, Erzurum, Türkiye. (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
  • Popelářová E, Voříšek K, Strnadová S (2008). Relations between activities and counts of soil microorganisms. Plant Soil Environment 54 (4): 163-170.
  • Rabot E, Wiesmeier M, Schlüter S, Vogel HJ (2018). Soil structure as an indicator of soil functions: A review. Geoderma 314: 122- 137. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.11.009
  • Rasch D, Pilz J, Verdooren R, Gebhardt A (2011). Optimal experimental design with R. Taylor and Francis Group. A Chapman and Hall Book, pp. 80-81.
  • Radhakrishnan R, Hashem A, Abd Allah EF (2017). Bacillus: A biological tool for crop improvement through bio-molecular changes in adverse environments. Frontiers in Physiology 8: 667. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00667
  • Rhoades JD (1982a). Soluble salts. In: Page, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. 2nd Edition. Agronomy 9: 167-178, 1159 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed
  • Rhoades JD (1982b). Cation Exchange Capacity. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. In A.L. Page et al. (ed.). 2nd Edition. Agronomy 9: 149-157, 1159 p, Madison, Wisconsin USA. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed. c8
  • Rowse HR, Stone DA (1981). Deep cultivation of a sandy clay loam. II. Effects on soil hydraulic properties and on root growth, water extraction and water stress in 1977, especially of broad beans. Soil and Tillage Research 1 (2): 173-185.
  • Saikia J, Sarma RK, Dhandia R et al. (2018) Alleviation of drought stress in pulse crops with ACC deaminase producing rhizobacteria isolated from acidic soil of Northeast India. Scientific Reports 8 (1): 3560. doi: :10.1038/s41598-018- 21921-w
  • Schoeneberger PJ, Wysocki DA, Benham EC (2012). Soil Survey Staff, field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 3.0. Natural Resources Conservation Service, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE.
  • Scott J, Robert J (2006). Soil texture and nitrogen mineralization potential across a riparian toposequence in a semi-arid savanna. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38 (6): 1325-1333. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.028
  • Seki K, Miyazaki T, Nakano M (1998). Effects of microorganisms on hydraulic conductivity decrease in infiltration. European Journal of Soil Science 49 (2): 231-236. doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 2389.1998.00152.x
  • SPSS (2011). SPSS for Windows, Version 20, SPSS Inc., USA. Stein T (2005). Bacillus subtilis antibiotics: structures, syntheses and specific functions. Molecular Microbiology 56 (4): 845-857. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04587.x
  • Tang J, Mo Y, Zhang J, Zhang R (2011). Influence of biological aggregating agents associated with microbial population on soil aggregate stability. Applied Soil Ecology 47: 153-159. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.01.001
  • Totsche KU, Amelung W, Gerzabek MH, Guggenberger G, Klumpp E et al. (2018). Microaggregates in soils. In Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 181 (1): 104-136. doi: 10.1002/ jpln.201600451,
  • Tsukanova K, Сhеbоtаr VK, Meyer JJM, Bibikova TN (2017). Effect of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria on plant hormone homeostasis. South African Journal of Botany 113: 91-112. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2017.07.007
  • Tuo D, Xu M, Li Q, Liu S (2017). Soil Aggregate stability and associated structure affected by long-term fertilization for a loessial soil on the loess plateau of China. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 26 (2): 827-835. doi: 10.15244/pjoes/66716
  • Umer MI, Rajab SM (2012). Correlation between aggregate stability and microbiological activity in two Russian soil types. In Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 1: 45-50.
  • USDA (1999). United States Department Of Agriculture. Soil Taxonomy, A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Second Edition.
  • Vardharajula S, Ali SZ (2014). Exopolysaccharide production by drought tolerant Bacillus spp. and effect on soil aggregation under drought stress. Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Food Sciences 4: 51-57. doi: 10.15414/jmbfs.2014.4.1. 51- 57
  • Varmazyari A, Baris O (2022). Rapid biosynthesis of cadmium sulfide (cds) nanoparticles using culture supernatants of Viridibacillus arenosi K64. BioNanoScience 12: 191–202. doi: 10.1007/s12668-021-00922-6
  • Vitinotes (2006). Measuring organic carbon in soil. Cooperative Research Centre for Viticulture, Adelaide, South Australia.
  • Volk E, Iden SC, Furman A, Durner W, Rosenzweig R (2016). Biofilm effect on soil hydraulic properties: Experimental investigation using soil grown real biofilm. Water Resources Research 52 (8): 5813-5828. doi: 10.1002/2016WR018866
  • Wang X, Sharp CE, Jones GM, Grasby SE, Brady AL et al. (2015). Stable-isotope probing identifies uncultured planctomycetes as primary degraders of a complex heteropolysaccharide in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 81: 4607-4615. doi: 10.1128/aem.00055-15
  • Yang Y, Wu Y, Lu Y, Shi M, Chen W (2021). Microorganisms and their metabolic activities affect seepage through porous media in groundwater artificial recharge systems: A review. Journal of Hydrology 598: 126256. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126256
  • Yilmaz E, Sönmez M (2017). The role of organic/bio-fertilizer amendment on aggregate stability and organic carbon content in different aggregate scales. Soil and Tillage Research 168: 118–124. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2017.01.003
  • Zhang L, Gadd GM, Li Z (2021). Microbial biomodification of clay minerals. In Advances in Applied Microbiology 114: 111-139. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2020.07.002
APA Hacımüftüoğlu F, CANBOLAT M (2022). Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. , 536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
Chicago Hacımüftüoğlu Fazıl,CANBOLAT MUSTAFA YILDIRIM Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. (2022): 536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
MLA Hacımüftüoğlu Fazıl,CANBOLAT MUSTAFA YILDIRIM Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. , 2022, ss.536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
AMA Hacımüftüoğlu F,CANBOLAT M Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. . 2022; 536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
Vancouver Hacımüftüoğlu F,CANBOLAT M Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. . 2022; 536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
IEEE Hacımüftüoğlu F,CANBOLAT M "Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties." , ss.536 - 549, 2022. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
ISNAD Hacımüftüoğlu, Fazıl - CANBOLAT, MUSTAFA YILDIRIM. "Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties". (2022), 536-549. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3024
APA Hacımüftüoğlu F, CANBOLAT M (2022). Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 46(4), 536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
Chicago Hacımüftüoğlu Fazıl,CANBOLAT MUSTAFA YILDIRIM Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 46, no.4 (2022): 536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
MLA Hacımüftüoğlu Fazıl,CANBOLAT MUSTAFA YILDIRIM Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, vol.46, no.4, 2022, ss.536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
AMA Hacımüftüoğlu F,CANBOLAT M Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2022; 46(4): 536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
Vancouver Hacımüftüoğlu F,CANBOLAT M Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2022; 46(4): 536 - 549. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
IEEE Hacımüftüoğlu F,CANBOLAT M "Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties." Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 46, ss.536 - 549, 2022. 10.55730/1300-011X.3024
ISNAD Hacımüftüoğlu, Fazıl - CANBOLAT, MUSTAFA YILDIRIM. "Effects of bacterial inoculation on soil physical properties". Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 46/4 (2022), 536-549. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-011X.3024
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 4:45

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları