Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to investigate how the normal values of optic nerve sheath diameter are distributed in normal healthy volunteers in Turkish population. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was planned between November 15, 2019 and April 15, 2020. The study included 160 healthy volunteers who were over 18 years of age and didn’t have acute and chronic systemic disorders. The optic nerve sheath diameters (ONSD) of the subjects were measured from both eyes ultrasonographically. Results: ONSD means (median, IQR) of right and left eyes of the subjects were measured as 4.87 (0.41) mm and 4.86 (0.32) mm, respectively. Right and left eye ONSD measurements were detected lower in female gender than men, and this difference was statistically significant. (p = 0.017 and p = 0.031, respectively). Conclusion: Determination of ONSD optimal reference values in healthy individuals would benefit in predicting increase in intracranial pressure in clinical practice.

Anahtar Kelime: Optic nerve sheath diameter Ultrasonography Healthy volunteer

Türkiye'de Sağlıklı Erişkinlerde Optik Sinir Kılıfı Çapının Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:

Amaç: Biz bu çalışmada Türk populasyonundaki normal sağlıklı gönüllülerde optik sinir kılıf çapının normal değerlerinin nasıl dağıldığını araştırmak istedik. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu prospektif çalışma 15 Kasım 2019 ile 15 Nisan 2020 tarihleri arasında planlandı. Çalışmaya 18 yaş üstü ,akut ve kronik sistemik rahatsızlığı bulunmayan 160 sağlıklı gönüllü dahil edildi. Deneklerin her iki gözden ultrasonografik olarak ONSD’leri ölçüldü. Bulgular: Deneklerin sağ ve sol göz ONSD ortalamaları (median,IQR) sırasıyla 4,87 (0,41) mm ve 4,86 (0,32) mm olarak ölçüldü. Sağ göz ve sol göz ONSD ölçümleri bayan cinsiyette erkelere göre daha düşük saptandı ve bu fark istatiksel olarak anlamlıydı. (p=0,017 ve p=0,031, sırasıyla). Sonuç: Sağlıklı bireylerde ONSD optimal referans değerlerinin belirlenebilmesi klinik pratikte kafa içi basınç artışını öngörmede fayda sağlayacaktır.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Çökük A, Kozacı N, Ay MO, Açıkalın A, Seviner M, Satar S. Acil Servise Başvuran Kafa Travması Olgularının Değerlendirilmesi. Cukurova Medical Journal. 2013;38(1):63-71.
2. Dölen D, Sabanci PA. Kafa Travmasında Beyin Ödemi ve İntrakranyal Basınç Değişimleri. Türk Nöroşir Derg. 2020;30(2):187-193.
3. Kimberly HH, Shah S, Marill K, Noble V. Correlation of optic nerve sheath diameter with direct measurement of intracranial pressure. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(2):201-4.
4. Emmez ÖH, Egemen E. Kafa içi basınç artışı tedavisinde pratik yaklaşımlar. Yoğun Bakım Derg. 2010; 9(2):77-84.
5. Harary M, Dolmans RG, Gormley WB. Intracranial pressure monitoring—review and avenues for development. Sensors. 2018;18(2):465.
6. Changa AR, Czeisler BM, Lord AS. Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure: a Review. Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 2019;19(12):99.
7. Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(26):2471-81.
8. Aiolfi A, Benjamin E, Khor D, Inaba K, Lam L, Demetriades D. Brain trauma foundation guidelines for intracranial pressure monitoring: Compliance and effect on outcome. World J Surg. 2017;41(6):1543-9.
9. Hansen H, Helmke K. The subarachnoid space surrounding the optic nerves. An ultrasound study of the optic nerve sheath. Surg Radiol Anat. 1996;18(4):323-8.
10. Komut E, Kozacı N, Sönmez BM, Yılmaz F, Komut S, Yıldırım ZN, et al. Bedside sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter as a predictor of intracranial pressure in ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(6):963-7.
11. Rajajee V, Vanaman M, Fletcher JJ, Jacobs TL. Optic nerve ultrasound for the detection of raised intracranial pressure. Neurocrit Care. 2011;15(3):506-15.
12. Robba C, Santori G, Czosnyka M, Corradi F, Bragazzi N, Padayachy L, et al. Optic nerve sheath diameter measured sonographically as non-invasive estimator of intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(8):1284-94.
13. Chen H, Ding G-S, Zhao Y-C, Yu R-G, Zhou J-X. Ultrasound measurement of optic nerve diameter and optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy Chinese adults. BMC Neurol. 2015;15(1):106.
14. Goeres P, Zeiler FA, Unger B, Karakitsos D, Gillman LM. Ultrasound assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy volunteers. J Crit Care. 2016;31(1):168-71.
15. Maude RR, Hossain MA, Hassan MU, Osbourne S, Sayeed KLA, Karim MR, et al. Transorbital sonographic evaluation of normal optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy volunteers in Bangladesh. PloS one. 2013;8(12):e81013.
16. Bäuerle J, Lochner P, Kaps M, Nedelmann M. Intra and interobsever reliability of sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy adults. J Neuroimaging. 2012;22(1):42-5.
17. Sargsyan A, Blaivas M, Geeraerts T, Karakitsos D. Ocular ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Lumb P,Karakitsos D. Critical Care Ultrasound. Vol.1. Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders. 2014. p. 45-50.

APA	Gökçen E, Çaltekin İ, ALBAYRAK L, savrun a, ATİK D, Vural S, Kılıç N, Kuşdoğan M, KAYA H (2021). Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. , 85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
Chicago	Gökçen Emre,Çaltekin İbrahim,ALBAYRAK LEVENT,savrun atakan,ATİK Dilek,Vural Sevilay,Kılıç Nuray,Kuşdoğan Mikail,KAYA Hasan Burak Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. (2021): 85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
MLA	Gökçen Emre,Çaltekin İbrahim,ALBAYRAK LEVENT,savrun atakan,ATİK Dilek,Vural Sevilay,Kılıç Nuray,Kuşdoğan Mikail,KAYA Hasan Burak Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. , 2021, ss.85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
AMA	Gökçen E,Çaltekin İ,ALBAYRAK L,savrun a,ATİK D,Vural S,Kılıç N,Kuşdoğan M,KAYA H Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. . 2021; 85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
Vancouver	Gökçen E,Çaltekin İ,ALBAYRAK L,savrun a,ATİK D,Vural S,Kılıç N,Kuşdoğan M,KAYA H Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. . 2021; 85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
IEEE	Gökçen E,Çaltekin İ,ALBAYRAK L,savrun a,ATİK D,Vural S,Kılıç N,Kuşdoğan M,KAYA H "Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey." , ss.85 - 90, 2021. 10.31832/smj.787427
ISNAD	Gökçen, Emre vd. "Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey". (2021), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.787427

APA	Gökçen E, Çaltekin İ, ALBAYRAK L, savrun a, ATİK D, Vural S, Kılıç N, Kuşdoğan M, KAYA H (2021). Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, 11(1), 85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
Chicago	Gökçen Emre,Çaltekin İbrahim,ALBAYRAK LEVENT,savrun atakan,ATİK Dilek,Vural Sevilay,Kılıç Nuray,Kuşdoğan Mikail,KAYA Hasan Burak Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi 11, no.1 (2021): 85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
MLA	Gökçen Emre,Çaltekin İbrahim,ALBAYRAK LEVENT,savrun atakan,ATİK Dilek,Vural Sevilay,Kılıç Nuray,Kuşdoğan Mikail,KAYA Hasan Burak Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, vol.11, no.1, 2021, ss.85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
AMA	Gökçen E,Çaltekin İ,ALBAYRAK L,savrun a,ATİK D,Vural S,Kılıç N,Kuşdoğan M,KAYA H Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi. 2021; 11(1): 85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
Vancouver	Gökçen E,Çaltekin İ,ALBAYRAK L,savrun a,ATİK D,Vural S,Kılıç N,Kuşdoğan M,KAYA H Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey. Sakarya Tıp Dergisi. 2021; 11(1): 85 - 90. 10.31832/smj.787427
IEEE	Gökçen E,Çaltekin İ,ALBAYRAK L,savrun a,ATİK D,Vural S,Kılıç N,Kuşdoğan M,KAYA H "Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey." Sakarya Tıp Dergisi, 11, ss.85 - 90, 2021. 10.31832/smj.787427
ISNAD	Gökçen, Emre vd. "Assesment of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter in Healthy Adults in Turkey". Sakarya Tıp Dergisi 11/1 (2021), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.31832/smj.787427