Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides

Sınağ, Ali; donar, yusuf osman; bilge, selva; Karadağ, Ebru

doi:10.55730/1300-0527.3437

Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides

Ebru KARADAĞ, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Kimya Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Selva BİLGE, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Kimya Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Yusuf Osman DONAR, (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Kimya Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Ali SINAĞ (Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Fakültesi, Kimya Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Turkish Journal of Chemistry

3 0

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1306 - 1315 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0527.3437 İndeks Tarihi: 06-12-2022

Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides

Öz:

In this study, olive oil residue (OR) biomass was pyrolyzed in the presence of bulk MgO (B-MgO), nano-MgO (N-MgO), bulk ZnO (B-ZnO)), and nano-ZnO (N- ZnO) metal oxides at different temperatures (400, 600, and 800 ºC). Significant results were obtained in terms of synthesis gas formation and $CO_2$ reduction. The efficiency distribution of the products obtained as a result of the metal oxide-based pyrolysis process and the effects of metal oxides were examined in detail. Nanometal oxides were synthesized by the hydrothermal method. Characterization of metal oxides was carried out by Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), x-ray powder diffraction (XRD) analysis and scanning-electron microscopy-energy dispersive x-ray (SEM-EDX) techniques. The metal concentration of OR biomass was detected via the x-ray fluorescence (XRF) technique. Tar product properties were evaluated by gas chromatography- mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) analyzes. Analysis results show that pyrolytic tar is very similar to diesel and gasoline as it contains significant concentrations of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons in composition. In addition, the composition of noncondensable gaseous products was determined by micro gas chromatography (micro-GC) analysis.

Anahtar Kelime: Olive oil residue catalytic pyrolysis synthesis gas nanoparticles ZnO MgO

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Bartoli M, Rosi L, Giovannelli A, Frediani P, Frediani M. Characterization of bio-oil and bio-char produced by low-temperature microwave- assisted pyrolysis of olive pruning residue using various absorbers. Waste Management & Research 2020; 38 (2): 213– 25.
2. Ducom G, Gautier M, Pietraccini M, Tagutchou J-P, Lebouil D et al. Comparative analyses of three olive mill solid residues from different countries and processes for energy recovery by gasification. Renewable Energy 2020; 145: 180– 9.
3. Li C, Tang L, Jiang J, Zhu F, Zhou J et al. Alkalinity neutralization and structure upgrade of bauxite residue waste via synergistic pyrolysis with biomass. Journal of Environmental Sciences 2020; 93: 41– 47.
4. Wen C, Moreira CM, Rehmann L, Berruti F. Feasibility of anaerobic digestion as a treatment for the aqueous pyrolysis condensate (APC) of birch bark. Bioresource Technology 2020; 123199.
5. Yanik J, Stahl R, Troeger N, Sinag A. Pyrolysis of algal biomass. Journal of analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2013; 103: 134– 41.
6. Zhang X, Zhang P, Yuan X, Li Y, Han L. Effect of pyrolysis temperature and correlation analysis on the yield and physicochemical properties of crop residue biochar. Bioresource Technology 2020; 296: 122318.
7. Sınağ A, Yumak T, Uçar S, Mısırlıoğlu Z, Canel M. Comparative pyrolysis of polyolefins (PP and LDPE) and PET. Polymer Bulletin 2010; 64 (8): 817– 34.
8. Ismail TM, Banks SW, Yang Y, Yang H, Chen Y et al. Coal and biomass co-pyrolysis in a fluidized-bed reactor: Numerical assessment of fuel type and blending conditions. Fuel 2020; 275: 118004.
9. Vikrant K, Roy K, Goswami M, Tiwari H, Giri BS et al. The Potential Application of Biochars for Dyes with an Emphasis on Azo Dyes: Analysis Through an Experimental Case Study Utilizing Fruit-Derived Biochar for the Abatement of Congo Red as the Model Pollutant. In: Biochar Applications in Agriculture and Environment Management Springer 2020: 53– 76.
10. Mathiarasu A, Pugazhvadivu M. Studies on microwave pyrolysis of tamarind seed. In: AIP Conference Proceedings AIP Publishing LLC 2020: 225; 40002.
11. Weber JL, Krans NA, Hofmann JP, Hensen EJM, Zecevic J et al. Effect of proximity and support material on deactivation of bifunctional catalysts for the conversion of synthesis gas to olefins and aromatics. Catalysis Today 2020; 342: 161– 6.
12. Donar YO, Sınağ A. Catalytic effect of tin oxide nanoparticles on cellulose pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2016; 119: 69– 74.
13. Zhu W, Fu J, Liu J, Chen Y, Li X et al. Tuning single atom-nanoparticle ratios of Ni-based catalysts for synthesis gas production from CO2. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 2020; 264: 118502.
14. Santamaria L, Arregi A, Lopez G, Artetxe M, Amutio M et al. Effect of La2O3 promotion on a Ni/Al2O3 catalyst for H2 production in the in-line biomass pyrolysis-reforming. Fuel 2020; 262: 116593.
15. Huo E, Duan D, Lei H, Liu C, Zhang Y et al. Phenols production form Douglas fir catalytic pyrolysis with MgO and biomass-derived activated carbon catalysts. Energy 2020; 117459.
16. Cho S-H, Jung S, Park Y-K, Tsang YF, Ryu C et al. Synergistic effects of CO2 on ex situ catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass over a Ni/SiO2 catalyst. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2020; 101182.
17. Bilge S, Donar YO, Sınağ A. Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on the evolution of valuable gaseous products during pyrolysis of Turkish low-rank coal. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 2018; 136: 242– 7.
18. Gökdai Z, Sınağ A, Yumak T. Comparison of the catalytic efficiency of synthesized nano tin oxide particles and various catalysts for the pyrolysis of hazelnut shell. Biomass and Bioenergy 2010; 34 (3): 402– 10.
19. Shao S, Xiang X, Li X, Zhang H, Xiao R et al. Synergy in the Selective Production of Ketone Platform Compounds from Biomass Pyrolysis Vapors over CeO2 Catalysts. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 2020; 59 (14): 6460– 9.
20. Sinaǧ A, Gülbay S, Uskan B, Uçar S, Özgürler SB. Production and characterization of pyrolytic oils by pyrolysis of waste machinery oil. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2010; 173 (1– 3): 420– 6.
21. Yuan C, Jiang D, Wang S, Barati B, Gong X et al. Study on catalytic pyrolysis mechanism of seaweed polysaccharide monomer. Combustion and Flame 2020; 218: 1– 11.
22. Barzegari F, Kazemeini M, Farhadi F, Rezaei M, Keshavarz A. Preparation of mesoporous nanostructure NiO–MgO–SiO2 catalysts for syngas production via propane steam reforming. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2020; 45 (11): 6604– 20.
23. Deng T, Yu Z, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Chen L et al. Catalytic co-pyrolysis behaviors and kinetics of camellia shell and take-out solid waste using pyrolyzer–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and thermogravimetric analyzer. Bioresource Technology 2020; 297: 122419.
24. Zhou L, Yang H, Wu H, Wang M, Cheng D. Catalytic pyrolysis of rice husk by mixing with zinc oxide: Characterization of bio-oil and its rheological behavior. Fuel Processing Technology 2013; 106: 385– 91.
25. Abed C, Fernández S, Elhouichet H. Studies of optical properties of ZnO: MgO thin films fabricated by sputtering from home-made stable oversize targets. Optic 2020; 164934.
26. Sınağ A, Yumak T, Balci V, Kruse A. Catalytic hydrothermal conversion of cellulose over SnO2 and ZnO nanoparticle catalysts. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids 2011; 56 (2): 179– 85.
27. Uzun BB, Pütün AE, Pütün E. Rapid pyrolysis of olive residue. 1. Effect of heat and mass transfer limitations on product yields and bio-oil compositions. Energy & Fuels 2007; 21 (3): 1768– 76.
28. Bhoi PR, Ouedraogo AS, Soloiu V, Quirino R. Recent advances on catalysts for improving hydrocarbon compounds in bio-oil of biomass catalytic pyrolysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020; 121: 109676.
29. Svensson EE, Nassos S, Boutonnet M, Järås SG. Microemulsion synthesis of MgO-supported LaMnO3 for catalytic combustion of methane. Catalysis Today 2006; 117 (4): 484– 90.
30. Gupta A, Bhatti HS, Kumar D, Verma NK, Tandon dan RP. Nano and bulk crystals of ZnO: synthesis and characterization. Digest Journal of nanomaterials and biostructures 2006; 1 (1): 1– 9.
31. Hauli L, Wijaya K, Syoufian A. Hydrocracking of LDPE Plastic Waste into Liquid Fuel over Sulfated Zirconia from a Commercial Zirconia Nanopowder. Oriental Journal of Chemistry 2019; 35 (1): 128– 33.
32. Li J, Yan R, Xiao B, Liang DT, Du L. Development of nano-NiO/Al2O3 catalyst to be used for tar removal in biomass gasification. Environmental Science & Technology 2008; 42 (16): 6224– 9.
33. Myrén C, Hörnell C, Björnbom E, Sjöström K. Catalytic tar decomposition of biomass pyrolysis gas with a combination of dolomite and silica. Biomass and Bioenergy 2002; 23 (3): 217– 27.
34. Giltrap DL, McKibbin R, Barnes GRG. A steady state model of gas-char reactions in a downdraft biomass gasifier. Solar Energy 2003; 74 (1): 85– 91.
35. Shen Y. Chars as carbonaceous adsorbents/catalysts for tar elimination during biomass pyrolysis or gasification. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 43: 281– 95.
36. Zhang J, Hou D, Shen Z, Jin F, O’Connor D et al. Effects of excessive impregnation, magnesium content, and pyrolysis temperature on MgO-coated watermelon rind biochar and its lead removal capacity. Environmental Research 2020; 183: 109152. doi: 10.1016/j. envres.2020.109152
37. Islam MW. A review of dolomite catalyst for biomass gasification tar removal. Fuel 2020; 267: 117095. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117095
38. Sang S, Zhao Z, Tian H, Sun Z, Li H et al. Promotional role of MgO on sorption enhanced steam reforming of ethanol over Ni/CaO catalysts. AIChE Journal 2020; 66 (4): 16877.
39. Han D, Kim Y, Cho W, Baek Y. Effect of Oxidants on Syngas Synthesis from Biogas over 3 wt% Ni-Ce-MgO-ZrO2/Al2O3 Catalyst. Energies 2020; 13 (2): 297.
40. Li H, Zhou N, Dai L, Cheng Y, Cobb K et al. Effect of lime mud on the reaction kinetics and thermodynamics of biomass pyrolysis. Bioresource Technology 2020; 123475.
41. Guo W, Wang Z, Wang X, Wu Y. General Design Concept for Single-Atom Catalysts toward Heterogeneous Catalysis. Advanced Materials 2021; 33 (34): 27– 9.
42. Xiong H, Datye AK, Wang Y. Thermally stable single-atom heterogeneous catalysts. Advanced Materials 2021; 33 (50): 1– 19.
43. Julkapli NM, Bagheri S. Graphene supported heterogeneous catalysts: An overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2015; 40 (2): 948– 79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.129
44. Smith BC. IR Spectral Interpretation Workshop. The Infrared Spectroscopy of Alkenes. Spectroscopy 2016; 31 (11): 28.
45. Nandimath M, Bhajantri RF. Dominant role of pyronin B on structural, optical and fluorescence properties of chemically synthesized ZnO loaded PVA polymer nanocomposites. Optical Materials 2020; 105: 109892.
46. Meng F, Ma S, Muhammad Y, Li J, Sahibzada M et al. Analysis of Virgin Asphalt Brands via the Integrated Application of FTIR and Gel Permeation Chromatography. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 2020; 1– 11.
47. Amin MT, Alazba AA, Shafiq M. Effective adsorption of methylene blue dye using activated carbon developed from the rosemary plant: Isotherms and kinetic studies. Desalination and Water Treatment 2017; 74: 336– 45.
48. Gawad J, Bonde C. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 6-(trifluoromethyl)-N-(4-oxothiazolidin-3-yl)quinazoline- 2-carboxamide derivatives as a potential DprE1 inhibitors. Journal of Molecular Structure 2020; 1217: 128394. doi:10.1016/j. molstruc.2020.128394
49. Kumar S, Roat P, Hada S, Chechani B, Kumari N et al. Catalytic Approach for Production of Hydrocarbon Rich Bio-Oil from a Red Seaweed Species. In: Biotechnology for Biofuels: A Sustainable Green Energy Solution 2020; 109– 33.

APA	Karadağ E, bilge s, donar y, Sınağ A (2022). Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. , 1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
Chicago	Karadağ Ebru,bilge selva,donar yusuf osman,Sınağ Ali Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. (2022): 1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
MLA	Karadağ Ebru,bilge selva,donar yusuf osman,Sınağ Ali Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. , 2022, ss.1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
AMA	Karadağ E,bilge s,donar y,Sınağ A Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. . 2022; 1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
Vancouver	Karadağ E,bilge s,donar y,Sınağ A Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. . 2022; 1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
IEEE	Karadağ E,bilge s,donar y,Sınağ A "Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides." , ss.1306 - 1315, 2022. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
ISNAD	Karadağ, Ebru vd. "Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides". (2022), 1306-1315. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0527.3437

APA	Karadağ E, bilge s, donar y, Sınağ A (2022). Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 46(4), 1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
Chicago	Karadağ Ebru,bilge selva,donar yusuf osman,Sınağ Ali Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. Turkish Journal of Chemistry 46, no.4 (2022): 1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
MLA	Karadağ Ebru,bilge selva,donar yusuf osman,Sınağ Ali Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, vol.46, no.4, 2022, ss.1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
AMA	Karadağ E,bilge s,donar y,Sınağ A Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. Turkish Journal of Chemistry. 2022; 46(4): 1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
Vancouver	Karadağ E,bilge s,donar y,Sınağ A Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides. Turkish Journal of Chemistry. 2022; 46(4): 1306 - 1315. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
IEEE	Karadağ E,bilge s,donar y,Sınağ A "Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides." Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 46, ss.1306 - 1315, 2022. 10.55730/1300-0527.3437
ISNAD	Karadağ, Ebru vd. "Catalytic pyrolysis of olive oil residue to produce synthesis gas: the effect of bulk and nano metal oxides". Turkish Journal of Chemistry 46/4 (2022), 1306-1315. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0527.3437