Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 269 - 276 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.31196/huvfd.1141341 İndeks Tarihi: 27-12-2022

Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri

Öz:
İnsanların beslenmesinde, güvenli ve kaliteli protein kaynakları sağlamak için, sürdürülebilir kanatlı eti ve yumurta üretimi oldukça önemlidir. Tavukların gastrointestinal (Gİ) yolu, besinlerin sindirilmesi, emilimi, bağışıklık sisteminin uyarılmasında ve patojen mikroorganizmaların dışlanmasında önemli bir rol oynayan karmaşık bir mikrobiyotayı barındırır. Son yıllarda bu konu hakkında yapılan araştırmalar mikrobiyotanın, konağın sağlık ve hastalık durumu üzerine büyük bir öneme sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Bu makale, tavuk GI mikrobiyotanın oluşumu, fonksiyonu ve çeşitliliği hakkındaki mevcut bilgiler ile mikrobiyotanın çeşitliliğini etkileyen faktörleri gözden geçirilerek tanı yöntemleri hakkında genel bir bilgi niteliği taşımaktadır. Gelecekte mikrobiyotanın fonksiyonunun daha iyi anlaşılması, bize kanatlı sağlığı ve üretiminin iyileştirilmesi için yeni fırsatlar sağlayacaktır.
Anahtar Kelime: kümes hayvanları bağırsak mikrobiyotası mikrobiyom 16S rRNA

Digestive System Microbiota in Chickens and Its Importance

Öz:
The gastrointestinal tract of chickens harbors the microbiota, which plays a vital role in the digestion and absorption of nutrients, the development of the immune system, and the exclusion of pathogenic microorganisms. This microbiota, containing more than 900 bacterial species, is thought to be affected by the age and sex of the chicken, its location in the digestive system, and the feed consumed by the chicken. Research on this subject in recent years has shown that microbiota significantly impacts the host's health and disease status. A better understanding of the function of the digestive microbiota will provide new opportunities for improving poultry health and production in the future. This article reviews general information about the formation, function, and diversity of the chicken gastrointestinal microbiota and the factors affecting the microbiota, referring to the existing literature.
Anahtar Kelime: Gut health Microbiome Microbiota Chickens

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Agunos A, Gow SP, Léger DF, Carson CA, Deckert AE, Bosman AL, Reid-Smith RJ, 2019: Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance Indicators-Integration of Farm-Level surveillance data from broiler chickens and turkeys in British Columbia, Front Vet Sci, 6, 131.
  • Alvarez-Sieiro P, Montalbán-López M, Mu D, Kuipers OP, 2016: Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: extending the family. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 100 (7), 2939- 2951.
  • Apajalahti J, Kettunen A, Graham,H, 2004: Characteristics of the gastrointestinal microbial communities, with special reference to the chicken. Worlds Poult Sci J, 60 (2), 223-232.
  • Aruwa CE, Pillay C, Nyaga MM, Sabiu S, 2021: Poultry gut health–microbiome functions, environmental impacts, microbiome engineering and advancements in characterization technologies. J Anim Sci Biotechnol, 12 (1), 1-15.
  • Barrow P, 1991: Experimental infection of chickens with Salmonella enteritidis. Avian Pathol, 20 (1), 145-153.
  • Baurhoo B, Phillip L, Ruiz-Feria C, 2007: Effects of purified lignin and mannan oligosaccharides on intestinal integrity and microbial populations in the ceca and litter of broiler chickens. Poult Sci, 86 (6), 1070-1078.
  • Bjerrum L, Pedersen K, Engberg R, 2005: The influence of whole wheat feeding on Salmonella infection and gut flora composition in broilers. Avian Dis, 49 (1), 9-15.
  • Brisbin JT, Gong, J, Parvizi P, Sharif, S, 2010: Effects of lactobacilli on cytokine expression by chicken spleen and cecal tonsil cells. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 17 (9), 1337-1343.
  • Broom LJ, 2017: The sub-inhibitory theory for antibiotic growth promoters. Poult Sci, 96 (9), 3104-3108.
  • Carter AJ, Adams MR, Woodward MJ, La Ragione RM, 2009: Control strategies for Salmonella colonization of poultry: The probiotic perspective. Food Sci Technol, 5, 103-115.
  • Chambers JR, Gong, J, 2011: The intestinal microbiota and its modulation for Salmonella control in chickens. Food Res Int, 44(10), 3149-3159.
  • Clavijo V. Flórez MJV, 2018: The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: a review. Poult Sci, 97 (3), 1006-1021.
  • Diker KS, 2017: Hayvanlarda mikrobiyom-hayvan mikrobiyomu. Vet Hekim Der Derg, 88 (2), 122-132.
  • Dziva F, Hauser H, Connor TR, van Diemen PM, Prescott G, Langridge GC, Mellata, M, 2013: Sequencing and functional annotation of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli serogroup O78 strains reveal the evolution of E. coli lineages pathogenic for poultry via distinct mechanisms. Infect Immun, 81(3), 838-849.
  • Ewers C, Li G, Wilking H, Kieβling S, Alt K, Antáo EM, Homeier T. (2007). Avian pathogenic, uropathogenic, and newborn meningitis-causing Escherichia coli: how closely related are they? Int J Med Microbiol, 297 (3), 163-176.
  • Golder H, Geier M, Forder R, Hynd P, Hughes R, 2011: Effects of necrotic enteritis challenge on intestinal micro-architecture and mucin profile. Br Poult Sci, 52 (4), 500-506.
  • Goldstein DL, 1989: Absorption by the cecum of wild birds: is there interspecific variation? J Exp Zool, 252 (S3), 103-110.
  • Huang Y, Lv H, Song Y, Sun C, Zhang Z, Chen S, 2021: Community composition of cecal microbiota in commercial yellow broilers with high and low feed efficiencies. Poult Sci, 100 (4), 100996.
  • Humphrey S, Chaloner G, Kemmett K, Davidson N, Williams N, Kipar A, Wigley, P, 2014: Campylobacter jejuni is not merely a commensal in commercial broiler chickens and affects bird welfare. MBio, 5 (4), e01364-01314.
  • Johansen CH, Bjerrum L, Pedersen K, 2007: Impact of salinomycin on the intestinal microflora of broiler chickens. Acta Vet Scand, 49 (1), 1-8.
  • Kers JG, Velkers FC, Fischer EA, Hermes GD, Stegeman JA, Smidt H, 2018: Host and environmental factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in chickens. Front Microbiol, 9, 235.
  • Keyburn AL, Bannam TL, Moore RJ, Rood JI, 2010: NetB, a pore-forming toxin from necrotic enteritis strains of Clostridium perfringens. Toxins, 2 (7), 1913-1927.
  • Kuda T, Yokota Y, Shikano A, Takei M, Takahashi H, Kimura B, 2017: Dietary and lifestyle disease indices and caecal microbiota in high fat diet, dietary fibre free diet, or DSS induced IBD models in ICR mice. J Funct Foods, 35, 605-614.
  • Kumar S, Shang Y, Kim WK, 2019: Insight into dynamics of gut microbial community of broilers fed with fructooligosaccharides supplemented low calcium and phosphorus diets. Front Vet Sci, 6, 95.
  • Landman W, Heuvelink A,Van Eck J, 2013: Reproduction of the Escherichia coli peritonitis syndrome in laying hens. Avian Pathol, 42 (2), 157-162.
  • Liljebjelke KA, Hofacre CL, Liu T, White DG, Ayers S, Young S, Maurer JJ, 2005: Vertical and horizontal transmission of Salmonella within integrated broiler production system. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 2 (1), 90- 102.
  • Lu J, Idris U, Harmon B, Hofacre C, Maurer JJ, Lee MD, 2003: Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol, 69 (11), 6816-6824.
  • Lumpkins B, Batal A, Lee M, 2008: The effect of gender on the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Poult Sci, 87 (5), 964-967.
  • Luo Q, Cui H, Peng X, Fang J, Zuo Z, Deng J, Deng Y, 2016: Dietary high fluorine alters intestinal microbiota in broiler chickens. Biol Trace Elem Res, 173 (2), 483- 491.
  • Macpherson AJ, Uhr T, 2004: Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria. Science, 303 (5664), 1662-1665.
  • Mahmood T, Guo Y, 2020: Dietary fiber and chicken microbiome interaction: Where will it lead to? Anim Nutr, 6 (1), 1-8.
  • Marmion M, Ferone M, Whyte P, Scannell A, 2021: The changing microbiome of poultry meat; from farm to fridge. Food Microbiol, 99, 103823.
  • Mitsuhiro F, Jun-ichi O, 1994: Nutritional and physiological characteristics in germ-free chickens. Comp Biochem Physiol, 109 (3), 547-556.
  • Neumann A, Suen G, 2015: Differences in major bacterial populations in the intestines of mature broilers after feeding virginiamycin or bacitracin methylene disalicylate. J Appl Microbiol, 119 (6), 1515-1526.
  • Ngunjiri JM, Taylor KJ, Abundo MC, Jang H, Elaish M, Kc M, Johnson TJ, 2019: Farm stage, bird age, and body site dominantly affect the quantity, taxonomic composition, and dynamics of respiratory and gut microbiota of commercial layer chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol, 85 (9), e03137-03118.
  • Noy Y, Sklan D (1995). Digestion and absorption in the young chick. Poult Sci, 74 (2), 366-373.
  • Oakley BB, Lillehoj HS, Kogut MH, Kim WK, Maurer JJ, Pedroso A, Cox, NA, 2014: The chicken gastrointestinal microbiome. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 360 (2), 100-112.
  • Pan D, Yu Z, 2014: Intestinal microbiome of poultry and its interaction with host and diet. Gut Microbes, 5 (1), 108-119.
  • Razmyar J, Peighambari SM, Zamani AH, 2017: Detection of a newly described bacteriocin, perfrin, among Clostridium perfringens isolates from healthy and diseased ostriches and broiler chickens in Iran. Avian Dis, 61 (3), 387-390.
  • Rehman HU, Vahjen W, Awad WA, Zentek J, 2007: Indigenous bacteria and bacterial metabolic products in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Arch Anim Nutr, 61 (5), 319-335.
  • Ricke S, 2015: Potential of fructooligosaccharide prebiotics in alternative and nonconventional poultry production systems. Poult Sci, 94 (6), 1411-1418.
  • Sekelja M, Rud I, Knutsen S, Denstadli V, Westereng B, Naes T, Rudi K, 2012: Abrupt temporal fluctuations in the chicken fecal microbiota are explained by its gastrointestinal origin. Appl Environ Microbiol, 78 (8), 2941-2948.
  • Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R, 2016: Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol, 14 (8), e1002533.
  • Shang Y, Kumar S, Oakley B, Kim WK, 2018: Chicken gut microbiota: importance and detection technology. Front Vet Sci, 5, 254.
  • Smith JM, 2014: A review of avian probiotics. J Avian Med Surg, 28 (2), 87-94.
  • Simpson JM, McCracken VJ, Gaskins HR, Mackie RI, 2000: Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of 16S ribosomal DNA amplicons to monitor changes in fecal bacterial populations of weaning pigs after introduction of Lactobacillus reuteri strain MM53. Appl Environ Microbiol, 66 (11), 4705-4714.
  • Sommer F, Bäckhed F, 2013: The gut microbiota—masters of host development and physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol, 11 (4), 227-238.
  • Sood U, Gupta V, Kumar R, Lal S, Fawcett D, Rattan S, Lal R, 2020: Chicken gut microbiome and human health: past scenarios, current perspectives, and futuristic applications. Indian J Microbiol, 60 (1), 2-11.
  • Stanley D, Geier MS, Hughes RJ, Denman SE, Moore RJ, 2013: Highly variable microbiota development in the chicken gastrointestinal tract. PLoS One, 8 (12), e84290.
  • Stanley D, Hughes RJ, Moore RJ, 2014: Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 98 (10), 4301-4310.
  • Stern N, Clavero M, Bailey J, Cox N, Robach M, 1995: Campylobacter spp. in broilers on the farm and after transport. Poult Sci, 74 (6), 937-941.
  • Tellez G, Higgins S, Donoghue A, Hargis B, 2006: Digestive physiology and the role of microorganisms. J Appl Poult Res, 15 (1), 136-144.
  • Torok V, Dyson C, McKay A, Ophel -Keller K, 2013: Quantitative molecular assays for evaluating changes in broiler gut microbiota linked with diet and performance. Anim Prod Sci. 53 (12), 1260-1268.
  • Uni Z, Noy Y, Sklan D, 1999: Posthatch development of small intestinal function in the poult. Poult Sci, 78 (2), 215-222.
  • Wei S, Morrison M, Yu Z, 2013: Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome. Poult Sci, 92 (3), 671-683.
  • Xu Z, Hu C, Xia M, Zhan X, Wang M, 2003: Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of male broilers. Poult Sci, 82 (6), 1030-1036.
  • Yapıcıer ÖŞ, Sareyyüpoğlu B, 2022: Prevalence and rapid identification of Salmonella Infantis in broiler production in Turkey. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg, 69 (1), 1-8.
APA TETİK K, SAREYYUPOGLU B (2022). Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. , 269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
Chicago TETİK KÜRŞAT,SAREYYUPOGLU BARIS Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. (2022): 269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
MLA TETİK KÜRŞAT,SAREYYUPOGLU BARIS Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. , 2022, ss.269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
AMA TETİK K,SAREYYUPOGLU B Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. . 2022; 269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
Vancouver TETİK K,SAREYYUPOGLU B Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. . 2022; 269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
IEEE TETİK K,SAREYYUPOGLU B "Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri." , ss.269 - 276, 2022. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
ISNAD TETİK, KÜRŞAT - SAREYYUPOGLU, BARIS. "Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri". (2022), 269-276. https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.1141341
APA TETİK K, SAREYYUPOGLU B (2022). Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
Chicago TETİK KÜRŞAT,SAREYYUPOGLU BARIS Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 11, no.2 (2022): 269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
MLA TETİK KÜRŞAT,SAREYYUPOGLU BARIS Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.11, no.2, 2022, ss.269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
AMA TETİK K,SAREYYUPOGLU B Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 11(2): 269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
Vancouver TETİK K,SAREYYUPOGLU B Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri. Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 11(2): 269 - 276. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
IEEE TETİK K,SAREYYUPOGLU B "Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri." Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, ss.269 - 276, 2022. 10.31196/huvfd.1141341
ISNAD TETİK, KÜRŞAT - SAREYYUPOGLU, BARIS. "Tavuklarda Sindirim Sistemi Mikrobiyotası: Önemi ve Tanı Yöntemleri". Harran Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi 11/2 (2022), 269-276. https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.1141341