QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Umut YILDIRIM, (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Sürmene Deniz Fakültesi Bilimler, Trabzon, Türkiye)
Furkan ŞÜKÜR, (Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Sürmene Deniz Bilimleri Fakültesi, Trabzon, Türkiye)
Gani Mustafa İNEGÖL (Kocaeli Üniversitesi, Karamürsel Meslek Yüksekokulu, Kocaeli, Türkiye)
Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi
7 0
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 236 - 264 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.18613/deudfd.1058625 İndeks Tarihi: 30-12-2022

QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING

Öz:
It is crucial to implement quality standards systems to achieve and maintain the educational and training requirements in the maritime field stipulated by the International Maritime Organization and Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping Convention and Code. In the study, the quality criteria for maritime education were determined and examined. For this purpose, in line with the literature review and expert opinions, 38 subcriteria were determined under five main criteria, and these criteria were prioritised using the Best Worst Method through the agency of 10 experts. The results of the study showed that the most fundamental criteria in the quality of maritime education and training are professional and personal development, sense of professional ethics, publication and research, and compliance with and effective use of course hours, respectively. The results of the study have also enabled educational institutions to evaluate their strengths and weaknesses in terms of quality.
Anahtar Kelime:

DENİZCİLİK EĞİTİM VE ÖĞRETİMİNDE KALİTE KRİTERLERİ

Öz:
Uluslararası Denizcilik Örgütü ve Gemiadamlar ının E ğitim, Belgelendirme ve Vardiya Tutma Standartları Hakkında Sözleşme ve Kodu’nun öngördüğü denizcilik eğitim ö ğretim gereklerine ulaşmak ve sürdürebilmek için kalite standartları sistemlerinin uygulanması son derece önemlidir. Çalışmada denizcilik e ğitimi için kalite ölçütleri belirlenmiş ve irdelenmiştir. Bu amaçla yapılan literatür taraması ve uzman görüşleri doğrultusunda 5 ana kriter altında 38 alt kriter belirlenmiş ve 10 uzmanın yardımıyla En İyi-En K ötü Metodu kullanılarak kriterlerin önem s ıralaması yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar denizcilik e ğitim ve ö ğretiminin kalitesinde en önemli ölçütlerin s ırasıyla, akademik personel ve danışmanlık hizmetleri ana başlığı altında bulunan mesleki ve ki şisel geli şim, meslek eti ği anlay ışı, yay ın ve araştırma yapılması ve ders saatlerine uyum ve etkin kullanım olduğunu göstermiştir. Çalışma sonuçları aynı zamanda e ğitim kurumlarının kalite için güçlü ve zay ıf yanlar ını değerlendirebilmelerini sağlamaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abramo, G. D’Angelo, C. A. and Di Costa, F. (2011). Research productivity: Are higher academic ranks more productive than lower ones? Scientometrics, 88 (3), 915–928.
  • Adolf, K.Y.N., Anita C.K. and Ho W.C.J. (2009). The motivations and added values of embarking on postgraduate Professional education: Evidences from the Maritime industry. Transport Policy, 16, 251–258.
  • Ahmad, W.N.K., Rezaei, J. Sadaghiani, S. and Tavasszy, L.A. (2017). Evaluation of The External Forces Affecting the Sustainability of Oil and Gas Supply Chain Using Best–Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 242-252.
  • Ahmadi, H.B., Sarpong, S.K. and Rezaei, J. (2017). Assessing the Social Sustainability of Supply Chains Using Best–Worst Method. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 126, 99–106.
  • Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P.K. and Ragavan, N.A. (2016). Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image and loyalty? A Study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 24 (1), 70–94.
  • Altinpinar, I. and Başar, E. (2018). Comparison of the safety cultures of Turkish aviation and maritime transportation worker. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 24, 1-10.
  • Arsu, T. and Arsu, Ş.U. (2021). Personel seçim sürecinde kullanılan kriterlerin best-worst metodu (BWM) ile değerlendirilmesi. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi Dergisi, 56 (3), 1949-1967.
  • Aşan, H. and Ayçin, E. (2020) Kurumsal kaynak planlama sistemlerinin seçimindeki kriterlerin best-worst metodu ile değerlendirilmesi. Akademik İzdüşüm Dergisi, 5 (2), 114-124.
  • Barnett, M., Gatfield, D., Overgaard, B., Pekcan, C. and Graveson, A. (2006). Barriers to progress or windows of opportunity? A study in career path mapping in the maritime industries. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 5 (2), 127-142.
  • Barnett, M.L. (2005). Searching for the root causes of maritime casualties. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 4 (2), 131-145.
  • Basak, S.K. (2017). A Framework on the factors affecting to implement maritime education and training system in educational institutions: A review of the literature. Procedia Engineering, 194, 345 – 350.
  • Baylon, A. and Santos, E. (2015). Attractions, Problems, Challenges, Issues and Coping Strategies of the Seafaring Career: MAAP Seafarers Perspectives, in Weintrit, A. and Neumann, T. (Eds.), Safety of Marine Transport, pp. 21-30. Leiden: CRC Press.
  • Brunner, J.J. (2013). On the classification of universities Pensamiento Educativo: Revista de Investigacion Educacional Latinoamericana, 50 (1), 115-129.
  • Carp, D. (2004). A network of excellence in maritime training. IAMU Journal, 3 (1), 69–77.
  • Cavanaugh, C. (2002). Distance Education Quality: Success Factors for Resources, Practice and Results. Jacksonville, FL: Ideal Group.
  • Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann. J.P. and Langard, B. (2013). Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 59, 26-37.
  • Charlesworth, D. (2006). Identifying communication apprehension levels in upper-level information systems majors: A pilot study. Issues in Information Systems, 7 (1), 319-323.
  • Cooper, G.T., Lewarn B. and Otway NJ. (2003). Trends in the quality assurance of maritime education: A case study from the Australian Maritime College. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Association of Maritime Universities General Assembly and Conference. Alexandria, Egypt.
  • Cunningham, S.B. (2015). The relevance of maritime education and training at the secondary level, M.Sc. Thesis, World Maritime University, Malmö.
  • Çakır, E. and Can, M. (2019). Best-Worst yöntemine dayalı ARAS yöntemi ile dış kaynak kullanım tercihinin belirlenmesi: Turizm sektöründe bir uygulama. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23 (3), 1273-1300.
  • Dotchin, J.A. and Oakland, J.S. (1994). Total quality management in services: Part 1: Understanding and classifying services. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 11 (1), 9–26.
  • Dinwoodie, J. (2000). The perceived importance of employment considerations in the decisions of students to enrol on undergraduatecourses in maritime business in Britain. Maritime Policy and Management, 27 (1), 17–30.
  • Emad G. and Roth W.M. (2008). Contradictions in the practices of training for and assessment of competency. Education + Training, 50 (3), 260–272.
  • EMSA (2020). Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents, Lisboa. http://www.emsa.europa.eu/newsroom/latest-news/item/4266- annual-overview-of-marine-casualties-and-incidents-2020.html, Access Date: 12.04.2022.
  • ENQA (2018). European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. European dimension of quality assurance in higher education, https://enqa.eu, Access Date 16.04.2022.
  • EOQC (2020). European Organization for Quality. https://www.eoq.org/about-quality/, Access Date: 15.04.2022. Erol, S. and Başar, E. (2015). The analysis of ship accident occurred in Turkish search and rescue area by using a decision tree. Maritime Policy and Management, 42 (4), 377–388.
  • ESG (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in The European Higher Education Era. European Standards and Guidelines. https://enqa.eu/index.php/home/esg/, Access Date 15.04.2022.
  • ESU (2017). European Students’ Union. Strategic priorities 2018–2020. https://www.esu-online.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/BM73_7a_ Strategic-Priorities-2018-20.pdf, Access Date 16.04.2022.
  • European Commission (2018). Quality assurance for school development. guiding principles for policy development on quality assurance in school education, Directorate-General Education. https://www.schooleducationgateway.eu/downloads/Governance/2018- wgs2-quality-assurance-school_en.pdf, Access Date 15.04.2022.
  • Evangelista P. and Morvillo A. (1998). The role of training in developing entrepreneurship: the case of shipping in Italy. Maritime Policy and Management, 25 (1), 81–96.
  • Finch, D.J., Peacock, M., Levallet, N. and Foster, W. (2016). A dynamic capabilities view of employability: Exploring the drivers of competitive advantage for university graduates. Education+ Training, 58 (1), 61-81.
  • Gardner, B.M., Marlow, P.B., Naim, M.M., Nair, R. and Pettit, S.J. (2007). The policy implications of market failure for the land-based jobs market for British seafarers. Marine Policy, 31 (2), 117–124.
  • Ghobadian, A., Speller, S. and Jones, M. (1994). Service quality concepts and models. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 11 (1), 43–66.
  • Glanville, H. (2006). Quality Assurance in Higher Education. Croatian Science and Higher Education Agency. Crotia: ASHE.
  • Grewal, D. and Haugstetter, H. (2007). Capturing and sharing knowledge in supply chains in the maritime transport sector: Critical issues. Maritime Policy and Management, 34 (2), 169–183.
  • Gruber, T., Fuß, S., Voss, R. and Glaser-Zikuda, M. (2010). Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: using a new measurement tool. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23 (2), 105-123.
  • Gupta, H. and Barua, M.K. (2016). Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best–worst multi criteria decision making method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 107, 69- 79.
  • Hamalainen, K. (2003). Common standards for programme evaluations and accreditations. European Journal of Education, 38 (3), 291-300.
  • Harvey, L. and Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18 (1), 9-34.
  • Haun, E. (2014). The Rise of Primary and Secondary Maritime Schools. https://www.marinelink.com/news/secondary-maritime371915, Access Date: 12.04.2022.
  • Jelena, L. (2010). Determinants of service quality in higher education, Interdisciplinary Management Research, 6, 631-647.
  • IMO (2011). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, including 2010 Manila Amendments, STCW Convention and STCW Code. London: IMO. International Chamber of Shipping. (2020). Shipping and World Trade: Global Supply and Demand for Seafarers. https://www.icsshipping. org/shipping-facts/shipping-and-world-trade/global-supply-anddemand- for-seafarers, Access Date: 05.11.2021.
  • Kharub, M. and Sharma, R. (2020). An integrated structural model of QMPs, QMS and firm’s performance for competitive positioning in MSMEs. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31, 312-341.
  • Kınalı, H., Yıldırım, U. and Toygar, A. (2022). A quantitative study on the mental health of Turkish seafarers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 1-26.
  • Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2014). Teachers’ Professional Development. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  • Lewarn, B. (2002), Maritime education and training - The future is now! IAMU Journal, 2 (1), 19–24.
  • Mahmood, H.K., Hashmi, M.S., Shoaib, M., Danish, R. and Abbas, J. (2014). Impact of TQM practices on motivation of teachers in secondary schools’ empirical evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 4 (6), 1–8.
  • Manuel, M.E., Nakazawa, T. and Kreta, S. (2013). Balancing vocational and academic education: A global profiling of maritime universities reviewed by their curricula and instructor qualifications. Research report. International Association of Maritime Universities, Tokyo.
  • Ng, A.K.Y., Koo, A.C. and Pallis, A.A. (2011). Professionalization of the shipping industry via postgraduate education. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54 (5), 364–373.
  • Oblinger, G.D., Barone, A.C. and Hawkins, L.B. (2001). Distributed Education: Challenges, Choices, and a New Environment for the American Council on Education. Washington: American Council on Education.
  • Owlia, M. and Aspinwall, E. (1996). A framework for the dimensions of quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 4 (2), 12-20.
  • Paine-Clemes, B. (2006). What is quality in a maritime education? IAMU Journal, 4 (2), 23–30.
  • Pallis A. and Adolf, K.Y.N.G. (2011). Pursuing maritime education: An empirical study of students’ profiles, motivations and expectations. Maritime Policy and Management, 38 (4), 369–393.
  • Pring, R. (2001). Education as a moral practice, Journal of Moral Education, 30 (2). 101-112.
  • Ren, J., Liang, H. and Chan, F.T. (2017). Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for Eco-City: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best worst method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 29–39.
  • Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57.
  • Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130.
  • Salimi, N. and Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66, 147- 155.
  • Shah, A., Treby, E., May, V. and Walsh, P. (2007). Bridging the divide between academia and practitioners: Training coastal zone managers. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50 (11–12), 859–871.
  • Shaw, A. and McAndrew, J. (2008). Advancing apprentices: Developing progression routes into higher education through the development of a pilot higher level apprenticeship scheme. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 60 (1), 133–47.
  • Sletner, T.C. (2000). Quality system for the implementation of STCW-95 in higher maritime education in Norway, Maritime Policy and Management, 27 (1), 89-100.
  • Stephenson, J. (2012). The Concept of Capability and Its Importance in Higher Education, in Stephenson, J. and Yorkei, M. (Eds.), Capability and Quality in Higher Education, pp. 1-13, London: Routledge.
  • Stukalina, Y. (2010). Using quality management procedures in education: Managing the learner centered educational environment, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16 (1), 75-93.
  • Subrahmanyam, A. (2017). Relationship between service quality, satisfaction, motivation and loyalty: A multi-dimensional perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 25 (2), 171-188.
  • Tan, W. and Simpson, K. (2008). Overseas educational experience of Chinese students an evaluation of service quality experience in New Zealand. Journal of Research in International Education, 7 (1), 93-112. Tanggaard, L. (2005). Collaborative teaching and learning in the workplace. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 57 (1), 109- 122.
  • Taussik, J. (1998). Interdisciplinary education: The masters programme in coastal and marine resource management at the University of Portsmouth, UK. Ocean and Coastal Management, 41, 115–122. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2002). Planet, 6 (1), 32-37.
  • Theotokas, I. (2007). Top of World Shipping: Greek Shipping Companies: Organization and Management, in: Pallis, A.A. (ed.) Maritime Transport: The Greek Paradigm, pp: 63–93. Elsevier: London.
  • Thomas, G., Harte, D. and Pointing, D. (2013). Developing student skills through industry-aligned and team focussed design projects. In: The Education and Professional Development of Engineers in the Maritime Industry. Singapore.
  • Tobias, R. (2003). Continuing professional education and professionalization: travelling without a map or compass? International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22 (5), 445–456.
  • Toygar, A., Yildirim, U. and İnegöl, G.M. (2022). Investigation of empty container shortage based on SWARA-ARAS methods in the COVID-19 era. European Transport Research Review, 14 (1), 1-17.
  • UNESCO (2020). Quality of Learning. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/gefi/priorities/quality-of-learning/, Access Date: 12.10.2021.
  • United Nations (UN) (2020). Quality Education. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/education/, Access Date: 10.09.2021.
  • World Higher Education Database (2020). About. https://www.whed.net/About.html, Access Date: 15.04.2022
  • Wiek, A., Withycombe, L. and Redman, C.L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6 (2), 203-218.
  • Wu, B. (2004). Participation in the global labour market: Experience and responses of Chinese seafarers. Maritime Policy and Management, 31 (1), 69–82.
  • Van Berkel, H. and Wynand, W. (2010). Accreditation in the Netherlands: Does Accountability Improve Educational Quality?. Research in Comparative and International Education, 5 (1), 88-97.
  • Vinichenko, M.V., Makushkin, S.A., Melnichuk, A.V., Frolova, E.V. and Kurbakova, S.N. (2016). Student employment during college studies and after career start. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6 (5s), 23-29.
  • Yamamoto, H. (2002). The analysis and assessment of the current reality and the future needs of the maritime education and training system, as well as the certification system in the international maritime society. IAMU Journal, 2, 65-72.
  • Yıldırım, U., Başar, E. and Uğurlu, O. (2019). Assessment of collisions and grounding accidents with human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS) and statistical methods. Safety Science, 119, 412–425.
  • Yıldırım, U., Toygar, A. and Tunçel, A.L. (2021). Effects of power distance on organizational commitment: A study on maritime faculty students, Journal of ETA Maritime Science, 9 (4), 256-265.
  • Yoo, S., Jung, D., Yang, H., Moon, E. and Hwang, Y. (2019). Seeking the meaning of quality education: Paradigm changes from the 1960s to the 2010s. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 16 (2), 107-122.
  • Zilahy, G. and Huisingh, D. (2009). The roles of academia in regional sustainability initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17 (12), 1057- 1066.
APA YILDIRIM U, ŞÜKÜR F, İnegöl G (2022). QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. , 236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
Chicago YILDIRIM Umut,ŞÜKÜR Furkan,İnegöl Gani Mustafa QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. (2022): 236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
MLA YILDIRIM Umut,ŞÜKÜR Furkan,İnegöl Gani Mustafa QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. , 2022, ss.236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
AMA YILDIRIM U,ŞÜKÜR F,İnegöl G QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. . 2022; 236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
Vancouver YILDIRIM U,ŞÜKÜR F,İnegöl G QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. . 2022; 236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
IEEE YILDIRIM U,ŞÜKÜR F,İnegöl G "QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING." , ss.236 - 264, 2022. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
ISNAD YILDIRIM, Umut vd. "QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING". (2022), 236-264. https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1058625
APA YILDIRIM U, ŞÜKÜR F, İnegöl G (2022). QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
Chicago YILDIRIM Umut,ŞÜKÜR Furkan,İnegöl Gani Mustafa QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 14, no.2 (2022): 236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
MLA YILDIRIM Umut,ŞÜKÜR Furkan,İnegöl Gani Mustafa QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.14, no.2, 2022, ss.236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
AMA YILDIRIM U,ŞÜKÜR F,İnegöl G QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 14(2): 236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
Vancouver YILDIRIM U,ŞÜKÜR F,İnegöl G QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 14(2): 236 - 264. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
IEEE YILDIRIM U,ŞÜKÜR F,İnegöl G "QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING." Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, ss.236 - 264, 2022. 10.18613/deudfd.1058625
ISNAD YILDIRIM, Umut vd. "QUALITY CRITERIA IN MARITIME EDUCATION AND TRAINING". Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi 14/2 (2022), 236-264. https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1058625
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 5:7

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları