Aim: The aim of this study is to compare the changes that can be seen in the periodontal tissue areas as a result of the restoration, with the measurements made in the digital panoramic radiographs taken before and after the restoration, and to examine the compliance with the ante rule. Material and methods: The study group consists of 18 patients aged between 30-68 who applied to our clinic for the removal of fixed bridge restoration, and the average prosthesis usage time is 5 years. Panoramic radiographs taken for control purposes and panoramic radiographs taken when they came to the clinic for bridge removal were examined, the duration of use of these restorations, whether the Ante rule was followed and the number of members were recorded. Shapiro Wilk test of normality and non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis (p=0.05). Results: As a result of the statistics, when the duration of use of the restorations was evaluated in terms of compliance with the Ante rule, the panoramic radiographs before and after the restoration were examined and the periodontal tissue changes of the abutment teeth were compared. According to the findings, no statistically significant difference could be found between the restoration that complies with the Ante rule and the restoration that does not comply with the Ante rule (p>0.05). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found in terms of the duration of use of the restorations or in terms of radiographic changes (p>0.05). Conclusion: According to the statistics obtained from the study, no significant results could be obtained between the before and after radiographs. The biggest factor here can be attributed to the short duration of the evaluation. More meaningful results can be obtained if longer periods are taken into consideration and the studies to be carried out are evaluated.