Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları

YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ, Deniz; KOZAK, Nazmi

Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları

Nazmi KOZAK, (Anadolu Üniversitesi, Turizm ve Otelcilik İşletmeciliği Yüksek Okulu, Eskişehir, Türkiye)

Deniz YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ (Anadolu Üniversitesi, Turizm ve Otelcilik İşletmeciliği Yüksek Okulu, Eskişehir, Türkiye)

Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi

1 0

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 19 - 32 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları

Öz:

Çalışmanın amacı, kongre katılımcılarının tercih kriterlerini belirlemek ve bu tercih kriterlerinin katılımcıların davranışlarına ve demografik özelliklere göre farklılıklarını tanımlamaktır. Kongre tercih kriterlerinin belirlenmesi için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve gruplar arasındaki farklılıkları incelemek için ise t-testi kullanılmıştır. Veriler Türkiye’deki üniversitelerde çalışan ve ulusal ya da uluslararası bir kongreye katılmış 246 akademisyenden toplanmıştır. Verilerin elde edilmesinde yüz yüze ve e-posta ile anket tekniğinden yararlanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, boş zaman ve eğlence, kongre, maddi maliyet, altyapı, zaman maliyeti ve destinasyon kongre katılımını etkileyen faktörler olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, tercih kriterlerinin demografik özelliklere göre farklılıklar gösterdiği belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelime: akademisyenlerin tutumları katılım akademisyenler konferans

Conference preference criteria of faculty members

Öz:

The aim of the study to demonstrate the factors of conference attendees’ preference criteria, and to describe the differences according to demographic attributes and conference behaviors of attendance. The confirmatory factor analysis was employed to determine the criteria of conference preference, and t-test was used to analyze differentiations between attendees groups. The data was collected from 246 faculty members, attended to one of national or international conference, and have been working in Turkish universities. The face to face and e-mail survey techniques were utilized to obtain the data. In conclusion, leisure and entertainment, conference, monetary costs, infrastructure, time cost, and destination were occurred the effected factors of conference attendance. Moreover, it was obtained that the preference factors of attendance behaviors differ according to demographic variables.

Anahtar Kelime: participation academicians conference academician's attitudes

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. A comment. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3): 375-381.
Baloğlu, Ş., & Curtis, L. (2005). Association meeting planners' perceptions and intentions for five major us convention cities: the structured and unstructured images. Tourism Management, 26(5): 743-752.
Choi, J-J., & Boger, C. A. (2002). State association market: relationship between association characteristics and site selection criteria. Journal of Convention&Exhibition, 4(1): 55-73.
Crompton, J. (1992). Structure of vacation destination choice sets. Annals of Tourism Research, 19, 420-34.
Crouch, G., & Ritchie, B. (1998). Convention site selection research: A review, conceptual model and propositional framework. Journal of Convention & Exhibition Management, 1(1): 49-69.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1): 39-50.
Gnoth, J. (1998). Branding tourism destinations. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(3): 758-760.
Go, F. M., & Govers, R. (1999). The Asian perspective: Which international conference destinations in asia are the most competitive?, Journal of Convention & Exhibition Management, 1(4): 37-50.
Grant, Y. N. J., & Weaver, P. A. (1996). The Meeting selection process: A demographic profile of attendees clustered by criteria utilized in selecting meetings. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 20 (1): 57-71.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tahtam, R. L.& Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Jaekyoon, J., & McCleary, K. W. (1999). Classifying US association meeting planners based on international destination selection criteria: a case study of South Korea. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 18(2): 183-199.
Jago, L. K., & Deery, M. (2005). Relationships and factors influencing convention decision-making. Journal of Convention and Event Tourism, 7(1): 23–42.
Kotler, P.&Armstrong, G. (2004). Principles of Marketing. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., Bowen, J. ve Makens, J. (2006). Marketing for Hospitality and Tourism. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall.
Lee, M. J., & Back, K. J. (2005). A review of economic value drivers in convention and meeting management research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 17(5): 409-420.
Lee, M. J., & Back, K. J. (2007). Effects of destination image on meeting participation intentions: empirical findings from a professional association and its annual convention. The Service Industries Journal, 27(1): 59–73.
Lee, M., & Back, K. (2005). A review of convention and meeting management research 1990–2003: identification of statistical methods and subject areas. Journal of Convention and Event Tourism, 7(2): 1–12.
Mair, J., & Thompson, K. (2008). The UK association conference attendance decision-making process. Tourism Management, 30(3): 1-10.
Ngamsom, B., & Beck, J. (2000). A pilot study of motivations, inhibitors, and facilitators of association members in attending international conferences. Journal of Convention and Exhibition Management, 3(3): 45-62.
Oppermann, M. (1995). Professional conference attendees' and non-attendees' participation decision factors. İçinde K. S. Con (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1995 STTE Annual Conference, Society of Travel and Tourism Educators.
Oppermann, M., & Chon, K. S. (1997). Convention participation decision-making process. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(1): 178-191.
Oppermann, M. (1996). Convention destination images: analysis of association meeting planners' perceptions. Tourism Management, 17(3): 175-182.
Oppermann, M. (1998). Convention participation decision-making process. Annals of Tourism Research, 24(1): 178–191.
Oppermann, M., & Chon, K. S. (1995). Factors influencing professional conference participation by association members: A pilot study of convention tourism. Travel and Tourism Research Association Journal, 26, 254-259.
Price, C. (1993). An empirical study of the value of professional association meetings from the perspective of attendees.Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
Rittichainuwat, B. N., Beck, J. A., & Lalopa, J. (2001). Understanding motivations, inhibitors, and facilitators of association members in attending international conferences. Journal of Convention & Exhibition Management, 3(3): 45-62.
Schumacker R. E., & Lomax R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Severt, D., Wang, Y., Chen, P-J., & Breiter, D. (2007). Examining the motivation, perceived performance and behavioral intentions of convention attendees: Evidence from a regional conference. Tourism Management, 28, 399–408.
Um, S., & Crompton, J. L. (1990). Attitude determinants in tourism destination choice. Annals of Tourism Research, 17, 432-448.
Var, Turgut., Ceasario, C. F., & Mauser, G. (1985). Convention tourism modelling. Tourism Management, 6(3): 194-204.
Witt, S. F., Sykes, A. M., & Dartus, M. (1995). Forecasting international conference attending. Tourism Management, 16(8): 559–570.
UNWTO Tourism Highlights, Edition 2008. http://www.unwto.org/facts/menu.html.>(22.05.2009)
Yoo, J. J-E., & Weber, K. (2005). Progress in convention tourism research. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 29(2): 194-222.
Zhanga, H. Q., Leunga, V., & Qu, H. (2007). A refined model of factors affecting convention participation decision-making. Tourism Management, 28, 1123–1127.

APA	KOZAK N, YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ D (2011). Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. , 19 - 32.
Chicago	KOZAK Nazmi,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ Deniz Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. (2011): 19 - 32.
MLA	KOZAK Nazmi,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ Deniz Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. , 2011, ss.19 - 32.
AMA	KOZAK N,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ D Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. . 2011; 19 - 32.
Vancouver	KOZAK N,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ D Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. . 2011; 19 - 32.
IEEE	KOZAK N,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ D "Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları." , ss.19 - 32, 2011.
ISNAD	KOZAK, Nazmi - YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ, Deniz. "Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları". (2011), 19-32.

APA	KOZAK N, YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ D (2011). Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(2), 19 - 32.
Chicago	KOZAK Nazmi,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ Deniz Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11, no.2 (2011): 19 - 32.
MLA	KOZAK Nazmi,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ Deniz Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.11, no.2, 2011, ss.19 - 32.
AMA	KOZAK N,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ D Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 11(2): 19 - 32.
Vancouver	KOZAK N,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ D Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2011; 11(2): 19 - 32.
IEEE	KOZAK N,YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ D "Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları." Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11, ss.19 - 32, 2011.
ISNAD	KOZAK, Nazmi - YÜNCÜ KARAGÖZ, Deniz. "Akademisyenlerin kongre tercih unsurları". Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 11/2 (2011), 19-32.