DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 363 - 376 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.54688/ayd.1111357 İndeks Tarihi: 06-01-2023
DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD
Öz: Digitalization plays a significant role in the economic growth and development of countries. The attempts at digitalization made by some countries can influence the type of digitalization strategies, economic activities, and digital readiness initiatives that other countries of the world apply. This study aimed to determine the digital readiness levels of 38 OECD member countries. The CRITIC-based ARAS method, a multiple-criteria decision making method, was used to calculate their digital readiness levels and rank them accordingly. In calculating the significance weights with the CRITIC method, Basic Needs was identified as the most important criterion, followed by Business and Government Investment, Human Capital, Start-up Environment, Ease of Doing Business, Technology Adoption and Technology Infrastructure, in respective order of importance. From the results of the analyses conducted with the ARAS method using the weights determined through the CRITIC method, the rankings of the OECD member countries in terms of their digital readiness levels were obtained. According to these results, the top five countries for digital readiness levels were Luxembourg, the USA, Switzerland, Korea, and Iceland, while Costa Rica, Greece, Turkey, Colombia, and Mexico were the lowest ranked countries.
Anahtar Kelime: CRITIC TABANLI ARAS YÖNTEMİ İLE OECD ÜLKELERİNİN DİJİTAL HAZIRLIK DÜZEYLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ
Öz: Ülkelerin ekonomik olarak büyümesinde ve iyileşmesinde dijitalleşme, önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Ülkelerin dijitalleşmeye geçiş sürecindeki girişimleri diğer ülkelerin dijitalleşme konusundaki stratejilerini, ekonomik faaliyetlerini ve dijital hazırlık girişimlerini etkileyebilmektedir. Çalışmada OECD’ ye üye olan otuz sekiz ülkenin dijital hazırlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla Çok Kriterli Karar Verme yöntemlerinden CRITIC tabanlı ARAS yöntemi ile hesaplamalar yapılarak OECD ülkelerine ilişkin sıralama belirlenmiştir. Önem ağırlıklarının belirlenmesinde CRITIC yöntemiyle yapılan hesaplamalar sonucunda en önemli kriterin Temel İhtiyaçlar olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu kriteri sırasıyla İşletme ve Devlet Yatırımları, Beşeri Sermaye, Start-up Çevresi, İş Yapma Kolaylığı, Teknolojiyi Benimseme ve Teknolojik Altyapı kriterleri izlemektedir. CRITIC yöntemiyle belirlenen ağırlıklar kullanılarak ARAS yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen analizler sonucunda OECD’ye üye olan ülkelerin dijital hazırlık düzeylerine ilişkin sıralamalar elde edilmiştir. Bu sonuçlara göre ilk beş ülkenin Lüksemburg, ABD, İsviçre, Kore ve İzlanda olduğu son beş ülkenin ise Kosta Rika, Yunanistan, Türkiye, Kolombiya ve Meksika olduğu belirlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Altıntaş, F. F. (2021). G20 ülkelerinin dijital hazırlık performanslarının analizi: Entropi tabanlı vikor yöntemi ile bir uygulama. Akademik Hassasiyetler Dergisi, 8 (17), 401-427.
- Blayone, T., Mykhailenko, O., Kavtaradze, M., Kokhan, M., van Oostveen, R. & Barber, W. (2008). Profiling the digital readiness of higher education students for transformative online learning in the post-Soviet nations of Georgia and Ukraine. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15 (37), 1-22.
- Çelen, A. İ. (2021). CISCO dijital hazırlık endeksinde Türkiye için persfektifler. USBAD Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi, 5 (5), 68-103.
- Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G. & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers & Operations Research, 22 (7), 763-770.
- Ersöz, B. & Özmen, M. (2020). Dijitalleşme ve bilişim teknolojilerinin çalışanlar üzerindeki etkileri. Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, 11 (42), 170-179.
- Fabregas, A., Gapasin, A. R., Inovero, C., Albano, G. M. & Canlas, R. (2021). Digital readiness of faculty and students at the state university using modified general technology competency and use model with rule-based algorithm: Basis for teaching and learning delivery mode policy. International Journal of Computing Sciences Research, 5 (1), 629-643.
- Hong, A. & Kim, H. (2018). College students’ digital readiness for academic engagement DRAE Scale: Scale development and validation. Asia Pacific Edu Res, 27 (4), 303-312.
- Kireyeva, A. A., Satpayeva, T. Z. & Urdabayev, T. M. (2022). Analysis of the digital readiness and the level of the ICT development in Kazakhstan’s regions. Economy of Regions, 18 (2), 464-478.
- Nit, B., Kobashi, Y., Vory, S., Lim, S., Chea, S., Ito, S. & Tsubokura, M. (2021). The introduction of telemedicine is required immediately in Cambodia barriers and lessons from covid-19. Journal of Global Health, 11, 1-3.
- OECD (2018). Going digital in a multilateral world. 8 Aralık 2021, https://www.oecd.org/going-digital/C-MIN 2018-6-en.pdf.
- Parida, V. (2018). Digitalization. In J. Frishammer and A. Ericson (Ed.), Adressing Societal Challenges (pp. 23- 38). Lulea University of Technology, Sweden.
- Rodriguez-Moreno, J., Ortiz-Colon, A. M., Cordon-Pozo, E. & Agreda-Montoro, M. (2021). The influence of digital tools and social networks on the digital competence of university students during covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (6), 1-18.
- Sánchez, M. A. & Zuntini, J. I. (2018). Organizational readiness for the digital transformation: A case study research. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia, 18 (2), 70-99.
- Sivrikova, N. V., Harlanova, E. M., Stolbova, E. A. & Ageev, A. A. (2019). Interacting with participants of youth organizations through social networks: Commitment and digital readiness of educators. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 108, 1-19.
- Stolterman, E. & Fors, A. C. (2004). Information technology and the good life. In B. Kaplan., D. Truex., D. Wastel., T. Wood-Harver and J. Degross (Ed.), (pp. 687-692). Information Systems Research.
- Yıldırım, B. F. (2015). Çok kriterli karar verme problemlerinde aras yöntemi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (9), 285-296.
- Zalite, G. G. & Zvirbule, A. (2020). Digital readiness and competitiveness of the EU higher education institutions: The covid-19 pandemic impact. Emerging Science Journal, 4 (4), 297-304.
- Zavadskas, E. K. & Turskis, Z. (2010). A new additive ratio assessment method in multicriteria decision making, Ukio Technologinis ir Ekonominis Vystymas, 16 (2), 159-172.
| APA | Arıkan KARGI V (2022). DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. , 363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| Chicago | Arıkan KARGI V. Sinem DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. (2022): 363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| MLA | Arıkan KARGI V. Sinem DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. , 2022, ss.363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| AMA | Arıkan KARGI V DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. . 2022; 363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| Vancouver | Arıkan KARGI V DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. . 2022; 363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| IEEE | Arıkan KARGI V "DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD." , ss.363 - 376, 2022. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| ISNAD | Arıkan KARGI, V. Sinem. "DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD". (2022), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| APA | Arıkan KARGI V (2022). DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 13(2), 363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| Chicago | Arıkan KARGI V. Sinem DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi 13, no.2 (2022): 363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| MLA | Arıkan KARGI V. Sinem DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, vol.13, no.2, 2022, ss.363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| AMA | Arıkan KARGI V DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi. 2022; 13(2): 363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| Vancouver | Arıkan KARGI V DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD. Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi. 2022; 13(2): 363 - 376. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| IEEE | Arıkan KARGI V "DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD." Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 13, ss.363 - 376, 2022. 10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
| ISNAD | Arıkan KARGI, V. Sinem. "DETERMINING DIGITAL READINESS LEVELS OF THE OECD COUNTRIES WITH CRITIC-BASED ARAS METHOD". Akademik Yaklaşımlar Dergisi 13/2 (2022), 363-376. https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1111357 |
