Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 249 - 263 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263 İndeks Tarihi: 13-01-2023

The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load

Öz:
Determination of the structural behavior of historical monuments under different loading types is a crucial task for the preservation and conservation of these structures for transferring to future generations. In this study, the behavior of 800 years old historical Erzurum Çobandede bridge under flood load is investigated. To determine the flood load subjected to the bridge, the best probability distribution model was selected for the observed data obtained from flow gauging stations in the nearby Kağızman Basin and then flood data at different return periods were estimated with this model. The behavior of the bridge under maximum flood load is determined. It is specified that the bridge will not suffer serious damage under the possible maximum flood load in different return periods.
Anahtar Kelime: Çobandede bridge Historical bridge behavior Flood load Annual maximum flow Probability distribution

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1] International Union of Railways: Improving Assessment, Optimization of Maintenance and Development of Database for Masonry Arch Bridges. http://orisoft.pmmf.hu/masonry/. Accessed 26 April 2018.
  • [2] Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Highways: Bridges inventory data. http://www.kgm.gov.tr. Accessed 26 April 2018.
  • [3] Republic of Turkey General Directorate of National Roads and Buildings: Department of Arts. http://www.kgm.gov.tr. Accessed 26 April 2018.
  • [4] Ural A, Oruc S, Dogangun A, Tuluk OI (2008) Turkish historical arch bridges and their deteriorations and failures. Engineering Failure Analysis 15:43-53.
  • [5] Türker T (2014) Structural evaluation of Aspendos (Belkıs) masonry bridge. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 50(4):419-439.
  • [6] Liao KW, Hoang ND, Gitomarsono JA (2018) Probabilistic safety evaluation framework for multi-hazard assessment in a bridge using SO-MARS learning model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 22:903-915.
  • [7] Proske D, Hübl J (2007) Historical arch bridges under horizontal loads. In: 5th International Conference on Arch Bridges. Madeira, Portugal.
  • [8] Cook W, Barr PJ, Halling MW (2015) Bridge failure rate. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities-ASCE 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000571.
  • [9] Yue S, Kundzewicz ZW, Wang L (2012) Changes in Flood Risk in Europe. CRC Press and IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, pp. 387-408.
  • [10] Kendall MG (1975) Rank Correlation Methods. Charless Griffin, London.
  • [11] Ratzinger K, Proske D (2010) Historical stone arch bridges under horizontal debris flow impact. In: 6th International Conference on Arch Bridges. Fuzhou, China.
  • [12] Park JH, Sok C, Park CK, Kim YD (2016) A study on the effects of debris accumulation at sacrificial piles on bridge pier scour: I. Experimental results. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20(4):1546-1551.
  • [13] Rahimi E, Qaderi K, Rahimpour M, Ahmadi MM (2018) Effect of debris on piers group scour: An experimental study. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 22(4):1496-1505.
  • [14] Can I, Tosunoglu F (2013) Estimating T-year flood confidence intervals of rivers in Çoruh Basin, Turkey. Journal of Flood Risk Management 6:186-196.
  • [15] Anilan T, Satilmis U, Kankal M, Yuksek O (2016) Application of artificial neural networks and regression analysis to L-moments based regional frequency analysis in the Eastern Black Sea Basin, Turkey. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20(5):2082-2092.
  • [16] Ahmadi F, Radmaneh F, Parham GA, Mirabbasi R (2017) Comparison of the performance of power law and probability distributions in the frequency analysis of flood in Dez Basin, Iran. Natural Hazards 87:1313-1331.
  • [17] Heidarpour B, Saghafian B, Yazdi J, Azamathulla HM (2017) Effect of extraordinary large floods on at-site flood frequency. Water Resource Management 31:4187–4205.
  • [18] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). LRFD bridge design specifications (2010) Washington DC, USA.
  • [19] Soylu H (1997) Geographical location and importance of Çobandede Bridge. Çobandede Bridge in Our History and Culture Life Panel, Erzurum.
  • [20] Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Highways. 12th Regional Directorate of Highways Historical Bridges Booklet, Erzurum.
  • [21] ANSYS, Finite Element Analysis Program (2020) ANSYS, Inc., Southpointe, 2600 Ansys Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317, USA.
  • [22] Willam KJ, Warnke ED (1975) Constitutive model for the triaxial behavior of concrete. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering 19(3):1-30.
  • [23] Kazaz İ, Kocaman İ (2018) Seismic load capacity evaluation of stone masonry mosques. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 33(2):543-558.
  • [24] Kocaman İ, Kazaz İ, Kazaz E (2020) Seismic load capacity of historical masonry mosques by rigid body kinetics. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14(6):849-869.
  • [25] Kocaman İ, Kazaz İ, Okuyucu D (2018) Investigation of the structural behavior of the historical Erzurum Yakutiye Madrasah. Dokuz Eylul University Journal of Science and Engineering 20(58):36-51.
  • [26] Kazaz İ, Yakut A, Gülkan P (2006) Numerical simulation of dynamic shear wall tests: A benchmark study. Computers & Structures 84(8-9):549-562.
  • [27] Özkaya GS (2019) Estimation of earthquake behavior of masonry bridges with nonlinear static methods, Ph.D. Thesis, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum.
  • [28] Bayraktar A, Birinci F, Altunisik AC (2009) Finite element model updating of Senyuva historical arch bridge using ambient vibration tests. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 4(4):177-185.
  • [29] Gharib A, Davies EGR, Goss GG, Faramarzi M (2017) Assessment of the combined effects of threshold selection and parameter estimation of generalized Pareto distribution with applications to flood frequency analysis. Water 9(9):692.
  • [30] Ashkar F, Aucoin F, Choulakian V, Vautour C (2013) Cramer-von Mises and Anderson-Darling goodness-of-fit tests for the two-parameter kappa distribution. Hydrological Sciences Journal 62(7):1167-1180.
  • [31] Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6).
  • [32] Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. The Analysis of Statistics 6:461-464.
  • [33] Karaoglu M (2014). Agricultural meteorological properties of Aras Basin in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Research 1:1-8.
  • [34] Daneshkhah A, Parham G, Chatrabgoun O, Jokar M (2016) Approximation multi-variate distribution with pair copula using the orthonormal polynomial and Legendre multi-wavelets basis functions. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation 45(2):389-419.
  • [35] Tosunoglu F, Singh V (2018) Multivariate modeling of annual instantaneous maximum flows using copulas. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 23(3).
  • [36] Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13(3):245-259.
  • [37] Ljung GM, Box GEP (1978) On a measure of a lack of fit in time series Models. Biometrika 65(2):297-303.
APA KOCAMAN İ, Yılmaz M, Tosunoglu F, Kazaz İ (2022). The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. , 249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
Chicago KOCAMAN İRFAN,Yılmaz Muhammet,Tosunoglu Fatih,Kazaz İlker The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. (2022): 249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
MLA KOCAMAN İRFAN,Yılmaz Muhammet,Tosunoglu Fatih,Kazaz İlker The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. , 2022, ss.249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
AMA KOCAMAN İ,Yılmaz M,Tosunoglu F,Kazaz İ The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. . 2022; 249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
Vancouver KOCAMAN İ,Yılmaz M,Tosunoglu F,Kazaz İ The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. . 2022; 249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
IEEE KOCAMAN İ,Yılmaz M,Tosunoglu F,Kazaz İ "The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load." , ss.249 - 263, 2022. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
ISNAD KOCAMAN, İRFAN vd. "The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load". (2022), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
APA KOCAMAN İ, Yılmaz M, Tosunoglu F, Kazaz İ (2022). The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), 5(4), 249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
Chicago KOCAMAN İRFAN,Yılmaz Muhammet,Tosunoglu Fatih,Kazaz İlker The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online) 5, no.4 (2022): 249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
MLA KOCAMAN İRFAN,Yılmaz Muhammet,Tosunoglu Fatih,Kazaz İlker The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), vol.5, no.4, 2022, ss.249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
AMA KOCAMAN İ,Yılmaz M,Tosunoglu F,Kazaz İ The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online). 2022; 5(4): 249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
Vancouver KOCAMAN İ,Yılmaz M,Tosunoglu F,Kazaz İ The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online). 2022; 5(4): 249 - 263. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
IEEE KOCAMAN İ,Yılmaz M,Tosunoglu F,Kazaz İ "The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load." Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online), 5, ss.249 - 263, 2022. 10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263
ISNAD KOCAMAN, İRFAN vd. "The behavior of the historical Çobandede bridge under flood load". Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics (Online) 5/4 (2022), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.31462/jseam.2022.04249263