Legator while alive, as the sales and donations regarding immovable assignment of saving the simulation is due to land registry of cancellation and reserved with a stake and not the plaintiff heirs on behalf of shareholders of the lawsuits filed for the registration of the deed in the rate, is called Fictitious Transaction of the Testator case. Supreme Court Case Law Merge Large General Assembly, the decision of joint on April 1, 1974; apparently the sale of simulation is due, the forgiveness secret is invalid because of irregularities in shape, whether stored principled, this invalidity can be argued alone each heir, demanded the correction of the land register and decide to sue. The resolution of this regulation, has only to do so under the provisions of the inheritance heirs’ share who brought the case. May 22, 1987 date and 1/2 number of Merge In Decision; He jurisprudence; assignment of saving the heirs of the victims left his heritage; action for reduction case with the gradual or after openning the action of reduction case, with a separate petition, per 18th article of the Law of Obligations, reason of fictitious transaction of the testator, able to open up a cancel-registration case, was decided. Reserved for non-share heirs claiming the fictitious transaction of real estate sales, recognition of the right to request the cancellation of the land register, establishing a connection between old Law of Obligations and new Turkish Law of Obligations and Turkish Civil Code, under certain conditions, the application of the two provisions of the law stipulating, 7th article of Turkish Civil Law provision of means, of goods to the law of the land registry dominant negative and positive effects of inheritance law, reserved share of the provisions relating to the protection and inheritance leavers are contrary to savings freedom principles. Especially between the date of construction of the assigned savings and the date of death of testator of these cases for many years past, if the new owners have created an economic value on real estate during this period, it is illegal within the meaning of misuse of the right to claim the fictitious transaction of the testator. For all these reasons; which it is still in force in the opposite direction, precedent decisions of the assembly dated 1974 and 1987, must be completely eliminated with reasons.