Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 146 - 151 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906 İndeks Tarihi: 03-02-2023

Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain

Öz:
Aim: To investigate the frequency of anatomical variations on the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and reveal their clinical importance by distinguishing the findings that mimic sacroiliitis in patients referred to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for low back pain. Material and Method: This retrospective study included all SIJ MRI examinations performed in our hospital with patients ≥18 and <65 years of age for 24 months. According to the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria, data collection consisted of the patients’ age at the imaging time, gender, and the presence of active and chronic sacroiliitis. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) was classified according to the Castellvi classification system. Moreover, all images were assessed for the presence of major sacroiliac joint variations described in the literature. Structural and edematous changes were also noted. Results: 1020 MRI examinations were included, and SIJ variations were identified in 323 of them. The frequency order of anatomical variants of SIJs are as follows: 1) LSTV (114 patients, 12.2%), 2) Accessory sacroiliac joint (80 patients, 7.8%), 3) Iliosacral complex (66 patients, 6.4%), 4) Sacral defect (61 patients, 5.9%), and 5) Isolated synostosis (2 patients, 0.2%). Structural and edematous findings were frequently observed in LSTV and accessory SIJ. Conclusion: We conclude that the lumbosacral transition segments and various anatomical SIJ variations are common in the low back pain population, especially in women. Moreover, these variations may be associated with degenerative and edematous signal intensity changes that mimic sacroiliitis.
Anahtar Kelime: magnetic resonance imaging sacroiliac joint anatomy low back pain

Bel Ağrısı Olan Hastalarda Manyetik Rezonans Görüntülemede Sakroiliak Eklem Varyasyonları

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada, bel ağrısı nedeniyle Manyetik Rezonans Görüntüleme (MRG)’ye başvuran hastalarda sakroiliyak eklemin (SİE) anatomik varyasyonlarının sıklığını araştırmak ve sakroiliiti taklit eden bulguları ayırt ederek klinik önemini ortaya koymak amaçlanmıştır. Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmamızda, 24 ay boyunca ≥18 ve <65 yaş arasındaki tüm olguların SIE MRG’leri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Uluslararası Spondiloartrit Değerlendirmesi Derneği (ASAS) kriterlerine göre olguların verileri, görüntüleme sırasındaki yaşı, cinsiyeti, aktif ve kronik sakroiliit varlığı açısından analiz edildi. Tüm görüntüler Lumbosakral transizyonel vertebra (LSTV) varlığı ve major sakroiliak eklem varyasyonları açısından Castellvi sınıflandırma sistemi ile literatürde belirtilen kriterlere göre kategorize edilerek bu varyasyonlara eşlik eden yapısal ve ödematöz değişiklikler kaydedildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilen 1020 MRG’nin 323’ünde SİE varyasyonları tespit edildi. SİE’lerin anatomik varyasyonlarının sıklık sırası şu şekildedir: 1) LSTV (114 hasta, %12,2), 2) Aksesuar sakroiliak eklem (80 hasta, %7,8), 3) İliyosakral kompleks (66 hasta, %6,4), 4) Sakral defekt (61 hasta, %5,9) ve 5) İzole sinostoz (2 hasta, %0,2). Ayrıca LSTV ve aksesuar SİE varyasyonuna, yapısal ve ödematöz bulgular sıklıkla eşlik ediyordu. Sonuç: Bel ağrısı şikayeti ile başvuran ve SİE MRG planlanan özellikle kadın hastalarda, lumbosakral transizyonel vertebra ve sakroiliak eklem anatomik varyasyonları sıklıkla karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Ayrıca bu varyasyonlar, sakroiliiti taklit eden dejeneratif ve ödematöz sinyal değişikliklerine de yol açabileceğinden her zaman göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır.
Anahtar Kelime: manyetik rezonans görüntüleme sakroiliak eklem anatomi bel ağrısı

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Miceli-Richard C. Enthesitis: The clue to the pathogenesis of spondyloarthritis?. Joint Bone Spine. 2015;82(6):402–405.
  • 2. Hoffstetter P, Al Suwaidi MH, Joist A, Benditz A, Fleck M, Stroszczynski C, Dornia C. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Axial Skeleton in Patients With Spondyloarthritis: Distribution Pattern of Inflammatory and Structural Lesions. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;29;10.
  • 3. Canella C, Schau B, Ribeiro E, Sbaffi B, Marchiori E. MRI in seronegative spondyloarthritis: imaging features and differential diagnosis in the spine and sacroiliac joints. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(1):149–157.
  • 4. M Rudwaleit, AG Jurik, KGA Hermann, R Landewe, D van der Heijde, X Baraliakos, H Marzo-Ortega, M Østergaard, J Braun, J Sieper. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:777–783.
  • 5. Chou D, Samartzis D, Bellabarba C, et al. Degenerative magnetic resonance imaging changes in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(21 Suppl):S43–S53.
  • 6. Arnbak B, Leboeuf-Yde C, Jensen TS. A systematic critical review on MRI in spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14(2):R55.
  • 7. Postacchini R, Trasimeni G, Ripani F. Morphometric anatomical and CT study of the human adult sacroiliac region. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017;39:85–94.
  • 8. Demir M, Mavi A, Gümüsburun E, Bayram M, Gürsoy S, Nishio H. Anatomical variations with joint space measurements on CT. Kobe J Med Sci. 2007;53(5):209–217.
  • 9. Ehara S, el-Khoury GY, Bergman RA(1988)The accessory sacroiliac joint: a common anatomic variant. AJR Am J Roentgenol 150:857–859.
  • 10. Prassopoulos PK, Faflia CP, Voloudaki AE, Gourtsoyiannis NC. Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variants on CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999;23(2):323–327.
  • 11. El Rafei M, Badr S, Lefebvre G, et al. Sacroiliac joints: anatomical variations on MR images. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(12):5328–5337.
  • 12. Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, Willard FH. The Sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012;221:537–567.
  • 13. Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(5):493–495.
  • 14. Campos-Correia D, Sudoł-Szopińska I, Diana Afonso P. Are we overcalling sacroiliitis on MRI? Differential diagnosis that every rheumatologist should know - Part I. Acta Reumatol Port. 2019;44(1):29–41.
  • 15. Ravikanth R, Majumdar P. Bertolotti’s syndrome in low-backache population: Classification and imaging findings. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;31(2):90–95.
  • 16. Rosa Neto NS, Vitule LF, Gonçalves CR, GoldensteinSchainberg C. An accessory sacroiliac joint. Scand J Rheumatol. 2009;38(6):496.
  • 17. Ehara S, el-Khoury GY, Bergman RA. The accessory sacroiliac joint: A common anatomic variant. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150(4):857–859.
  • 18. Fortin JD, Ballard KE. The frequency of accessory sacroiliac joints. Clin Anat. 2009;22(8):876–877.
  • 19. Eno JJ, Boone CR, Bellino MJ, Bishop JA. The prevalence of sacroiliac joint degeneration in asymptomatic adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(11):932–936.
  • 20. Brault JS, Smith J, Currier BL. Partial lumbosacral transitional vertebra resection for contralateral facetogenic pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(2):226–229.
  • 21. Quinlan JF, Duke D, Eustace S. Bertolotti’s syndrome. A cause of back pain in young people. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(9):1183–1186.
  • 22. Mahato NK. Complexity of neutral zones, lumbar stability and subsystem adaptations: probable alterations in lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) subtypes. Med Hypotheses. 2013;80(1):61–64.
  • 23. Egund N, Jurik AG. Anatomy and histology of the sacroiliac joints. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2014;18(3):332–339.
  • 24. Benz RM, Daikeler T, Mameghani AT, Tamborrini G, Studler U. Synostosis of the sacroiliac joint as a developmental variant, or ankylosis due to sacroiliitis? Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66(9):2367.
APA OZBALCI A (2022). Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. , 146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
Chicago OZBALCI AYSU BASAK Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. (2022): 146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
MLA OZBALCI AYSU BASAK Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. , 2022, ss.146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
AMA OZBALCI A Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. . 2022; 146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
Vancouver OZBALCI A Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. . 2022; 146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
IEEE OZBALCI A "Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain." , ss.146 - 151, 2022. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
ISNAD OZBALCI, AYSU BASAK. "Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain". (2022), 146-151. https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
APA OZBALCI A (2022). Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(2), 146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
Chicago OZBALCI AYSU BASAK Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 12, no.2 (2022): 146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
MLA OZBALCI AYSU BASAK Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.12, no.2, 2022, ss.146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
AMA OZBALCI A Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022; 12(2): 146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
Vancouver OZBALCI A Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain. Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi. 2022; 12(2): 146 - 151. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
IEEE OZBALCI A "Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain." Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 12, ss.146 - 151, 2022. 10.5505/kjms.2022.30906
ISNAD OZBALCI, AYSU BASAK. "Sacroiliac Joint Variations on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Low Back Pain". Kafkas Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi 12/2 (2022), 146-151. https://doi.org/10.5505/kjms.2022.30906