Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 47 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 9 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0128.4262 İndeks Tarihi: 23-03-2023

Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye

Öz:
Animal Genetic Resources (AnGR) are a warranty for future unknown conditions and needs. Due to this fact, sustainable use and conservation of AnGR have special importance, and to achieve reliable programs for these goals, the risk status of AnGR should be estimated accurately. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk status for three widely used domesticated livestock species of cattle, sheep, and goat in animal production: 6 cattle, 33 sheep, and 15 goat breeds were included in the analysis. Extinction probability (z) was taken as a criterion for the risk status of each breed. Data collection based on survey realized with 215 farmers, field observations and personal interviews were performed for different provinces between 2014 and 2017. Extinction probabilities estimated were ranged from 0.53 to 0.90 with an average of 0.71 for native cattle breeds. Çine Çaparı sheep and Abaza goat had the highest extinction probabilities of 0.97 and 0.87, respectively, while Kıl goat and İvesi sheep breeds had the lowest probabilities of 0.37 and 0.40, respectively. Present study demonstrated that risk analyses of survey data sets may provide useful information concerning the decision-making on conservation efforts for endangered breeds. It should be monitored risk status for breeds to create efficient conservation investments. Considering the limited resources, it is undeniable that while some breeds continued to protect, some others would be removed from conservation programs. To make this task an appropriate manner extinction probability may be used as a criterion for decision-making.
Anahtar Kelime: Animal genetic resources extinction probability genetic diversity sustainability

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Zeder MA. Domestication and early agriculture in the Mediterranean Basin: Origins. diffusion. and impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2008; 105 (33): 11597-11604. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.080131710
  • 2. Ruane JA. Framework for prioritizing domestic animal breeds for conservation purposes at the national level: A Norwegian case study. Conservation Biology 2000: 14 (5): 1385-1393. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99276.x
  • 3. Rege JEO, Gibson JP. Animal genetic resources and economic development: issues in relation to economic valuation. Ecological economics 2003; 45 (3): 319-330. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00087-9
  • 4. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations). The Management of Global Animal Genetic Resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 1992; 104. FAO, Rome-Italy.
  • 5. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations). The second report on the state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. 2015; Rome-Italy.
  • 6. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations). World watch list for domestic animal diversity 2020; Rome-Italy.
  • 7. Alderson L. Breeds at risk: definition and measurement of the factors which determine endangerment. Livestock Science 2009; 123 (1): 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.10.001
  • 8. Gandini GC, Ollivierb L, Danellc B, Distld O, Georgoudise A et al. Criteria to assess the degree of endangerment of livestock breeds in Europe. Livestock Production Science 2004; 91 (1-2): 173-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.08.001
  • 9. Karslı T, Demir E, Fidan HG, Aslan M, Karslı BA et al. Determination of genetic variability, population structure and genetic differentiation of indigenous Turkish goat breeds based on SSR loci. Small Ruminant Research 2020; 190: 106147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106147
  • 10. Verrier E, Audiot A, Bertrand C, Chapuis H, Charvolin E et al. Assessing the risk status of livestock breeds: a multi- indicator method applied to 178 French local breeds belonging to ten species. Animal Genetic Resources 2015; 57: 105-118. doi:10.1017/S2078633615000260
  • 11. Reist MSB, Simianer H, Gibson J, Hanotte O, Rege JEO. Weitzman’s approach and conservation of breed diversity: an application to African Cattle Breeds. Conservation Biology 2003; 17 (5): 1299- 1311. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01587.x
  • 12. Gizaw S, Komen H, Windig JJ, Hanotte O, Van Arendonk JAM. Conservation priorities for Ethiopian sheep breeds combining threat status, breed merits and contributions to genetic diversity. Genetic Selection Evolution 2008; 40: 433- 447. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-40-4-433
  • 13. Anonymus. Regulation on animal breed registration. Official Gazette 28150, Ankara, Türkiye 2011.
  • 14. SPSS, 2010. Applications guide, version 19.0. SPSS. Inc., Chicago, IL, USA.
  • 15. Anonymus. National strategy and action plan for animal genetic resources. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, Ankara, Türkiye 2015.
  • 16. Anonymous. Domestic Animal Genetic Resources in Turkey. Animal Breed Registration Committee, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Ankara, Turkey 2011.
  • 17. Carson A, Elliott M, Groom J, Winter A, Bowles D. Geographical isolation of native sheep breeds in the UK— Evidence of endemism as a risk factor to genetic resources. Livestock Science 2009; 123 (2-3): 288-299. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.livsci.2008.11.026
  • 18. Zander KK, Signorello G, De Salvo M, Gandini G, Drucker AG. Assessing the total economic value of threatened livestock breeds in Italy: Implications for conservation policy. Ecological Economics 2013; 93: 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2013.06.002
  • 19. Gandini G, Maltecca C, Pizzi F, Bagnato A, Rizzi R. Comparing local and commercial breeds on functional traits and profitability: The case of Reggiana Dairy Cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 2007; 90 (4): 2004-2011.https://doi.org/10.3168/ jds.2006-204
  • 20. Collado DM, Diaz C, Tanila AM, Colinet F, Duclos D et al. The use of SWOT analysis to explore and prioritize conservation and development strategies for local cattle breeds. Animal 2013; 7 (6): 885-894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S175173111200242X
  • 21. Ruane J. Selecting breeds for conservation. In Oldenbroek J.K. (Ed.), Gene banks and the conservation of farm animal genetic resources, 3rd edn. Institute for Animal Science and Health, Lelystad, The Netherlands. 2002; 59-73.
  • 22. Özşensoy Y, Kurar E, Doğan E, Bulut Z, Altunok V et al. Türkiye’de bulunan bazı yerli sığır ırklarının STR markörler ile genetik karakterizasyonu. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 2010; 3 (1): 163-171 (in Turkish).
  • 23. Öner Y, Yılmaz O, Eris C, Ata N, Unal C et al. Genetic diversity and population structure of Turkish native cattle breeds. South African Journal of Animal Science 2019; 49: 628-635. DOI: 10.4314/sajas.v49i4.4
  • 24. Togan İ, Demirci S, Açan C, Baştanlar EK, Acar H et al. Genetic diversity of Turkish native sheep in conservation studies. RBI 8th Global Conference on the Conservation of Animal Genetic Resources Tekirdağ, Turkey; 4 - 8 October 2011. pp. 101-106.
  • 25. Kırıkcı M, Cam MA, Mercan L. Genetic diversity and relationship among indigenous Turkish Karayaka sheep subpopulations. Archives Animal Breeding 2020; 63: 269-275. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-63-269-2020
  • 26. Özmen O, Kul S, Gok T. Determination of genetic diversity of the Akkaraman sheep breed from Türkiye. Small Ruminant Research 2020; 182: 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. smallrumres.2019.10.009
  • 27. Anonymus. Animal-Production-Statistics. Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK) June- 2020 Ankara, Turkey. 28. Gül S, Yılmaz O, Gündüz Z, Keskin M, Cemal I et al. The genetic structure of the goat breeds belonging to northwest part of fertile crescent. Small Ruminant Research 2020; 182: 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.09.009
APA YILDIRIR M, Koncagül S, Öner Y, Akın A (2023). Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. , 1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
Chicago YILDIRIR Mesut,Koncagül Seyrani,Öner Yasemin,Akın Ayşe Oya Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. (2023): 1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
MLA YILDIRIR Mesut,Koncagül Seyrani,Öner Yasemin,Akın Ayşe Oya Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. , 2023, ss.1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
AMA YILDIRIR M,Koncagül S,Öner Y,Akın A Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. . 2023; 1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
Vancouver YILDIRIR M,Koncagül S,Öner Y,Akın A Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. . 2023; 1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
IEEE YILDIRIR M,Koncagül S,Öner Y,Akın A "Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye." , ss.1 - 9, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
ISNAD YILDIRIR, Mesut vd. "Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye". (2023), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0128.4262
APA YILDIRIR M, Koncagül S, Öner Y, Akın A (2023). Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 47(1), 1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
Chicago YILDIRIR Mesut,Koncagül Seyrani,Öner Yasemin,Akın Ayşe Oya Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 47, no.1 (2023): 1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
MLA YILDIRIR Mesut,Koncagül Seyrani,Öner Yasemin,Akın Ayşe Oya Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, vol.47, no.1, 2023, ss.1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
AMA YILDIRIR M,Koncagül S,Öner Y,Akın A Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2023; 47(1): 1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
Vancouver YILDIRIR M,Koncagül S,Öner Y,Akın A Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 2023; 47(1): 1 - 9. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
IEEE YILDIRIR M,Koncagül S,Öner Y,Akın A "Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye." Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 47, ss.1 - 9, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0128.4262
ISNAD YILDIRIR, Mesut vd. "Analysis for prioritizing risk status and sustainable utilization of cattle, sheep, and goat breeds in Türkiye". Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 47/1 (2023), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0128.4262