Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 58 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 932 - 950 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073 İndeks Tarihi: 16-05-2023

A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices

Öz:
This research investigates three approaches to determine the best model for identifying risk in Brent oil prices: Value at Risk, Monte Carlo Simulations, and Conditional Value At Risk (CVaR). The study also aims to contribute to the literature by examining whether it is possible to measure risk in advance for Brent oil prices and compares the performance of various risk measurement models to determine the best-performing method in measuring risk. Our findings show that the VaR model underestimated risk at the 95% confidence level. This may be due to the non-normal distribution of returns. Our results on conditional value at risk (CVaR) indicate that CVaR produced superior results compared to VaR in cases where the distribution of returns was highly skewed or had fat tails. This is because the expected shortfall measure takes into account expected loss beyond the VaR threshold.
Anahtar Kelime: VaR Monte Carlo Simulation CVAR Expected Shortfall Risk Management Asset Management

Brent Petrol Fı̇yatları Üzerı̇ne Pratı̇k Bı̇r Rı̇sk Analı̇zı̇

Öz:
Bu çalışma, Brent petrol fiyatlarındaki riski ölçmek için en iyi modeli belirlemek amacı ile üç yaklaşımı incelemektedir: Riske Maruz Değer, Monte Carlo Simülasyonları ve Koşullu Riske Maruz Değer (CVaR). Çalışma ayrıca Brent petrol fiyatları için riskin önceden ölçülmesinin mümkün olup olmadığını inceleyerek literatüre katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamakta ve risk ölçümünde en iyi performans gösteren yöntemi belirlemek için çeşitli risk ölçüm modellerinin performansını karşılaştırmaktadır. Bulgularımız VaR modelinin %95 güven düzeyinde riski olduğundan daha düşük tahmin ettiğini göstermektedir. Bu durum, getirilerin normal olmayan dağılımından kaynaklanıyor olabilir. Koşullu riske maruz değer (CVaR) ile ilgili elde ettiğimiz sonuçlar, getiri dağılımının yüksek oranda çarpık olduğu veya kalın kuyruklu (fat tailed) olduğu durumlarda CVaR'ın VaR'a kıyasla daha üstün sonuçlar ürettiğini göstermektedir. Bunun nedeni, Koşullu Riske Maruz Değer (CVAR) ölçütünün VaR eşiğinin ötesinde, beklenen kaybı da dikkate almasından kaynaklanmaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime: Riske Maruz Değer Monte Carlo Simülasyonları Koşullu Riske Maruz Değer Varlık Yönetimi

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abbas, Q., Hussain, M., Shahzad, K., & Nasir, M. (2021). Risk management of crude oil using GARCH model and VaR and CVaR measures. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(1), 1-7.
  • Acerbi, C and D Tasche (2001): “On the coherence of expected shortfall”, Journal of Banking & Finance · July 2002
  • Acerbi, C., Nordio, C., & Sirtori, C. (2001). Expected shortfall as a tool for financial risk management. arXiv preprint cond-mat/0102304.
  • Alexander, C. (2004). Normalized Estimation of Expected Shortfall. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2(3), 378-416.
  • Alexander, G. J., & Baptista, A. M. (2004). A comparison of VaR and CVaR constraints on portfolio selection with the mean-variance model. Management Science, 50(9), 1261-1273.
  • Altay, S. Kucukozmen, C (2006) An assessment of value-at-risk (VaR) and expected tail loss (ETL) under a stress testing framework for Turkish stock market Proceedings of ICBME
  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1997). Characterization of measures of risk. Cornell University Operations Research and Industrial Engineering.
  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. M., & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent measures of risk. Mathematical finance, 9(3), 203-228.
  • Bai, Y., Cheng, W., & Li, J. (2020). A Hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer Based Approach for Portfolio Optimization with CVaR and VaR Constraints. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(2), 541-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01518-9
  • Bouri, E., Gupta, R., Lau, C.K.M., Roubaud, D., & Wohar, M.E. (2021). On the performance of extreme value theory and copulas in estimating the risk of emerging markets portfolios. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 79, 261-274.
  • Chen, Z., Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2020). Portfolio optimization under Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk constraints: a hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106106
  • Gnanadesikan, R. (1972). Methods for Statistical Data Analysis of Multivariate Observations. Wiley.
  • Jorion, P. (1997) Value at Risk: The Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk. McGraw-Hill, Chicago.
  • Jorion, P. (2000), “Value At Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk”, New York, USA: McGraw-Hill
  • Jorion, P. (2001), Value at Risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk, second edn, McGraw-Hill
  • Kemp, A. W. (2011). Visualizing and interpreting data. Taylor & Francis
  • Kuchuk-Iatsenko, S., Chavez-Rodriguez, M.F., Zareipour, H., & Rosehart, W.D. (2021). Monte Carlo simulation of electricity spot prices with extreme value theory and generalized Pareto distribution. Electric Power Systems Research, 190, 106773.
  • Kupiec, P. (1995). Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Management Models. Journal of Derivatives, (3):73.
  • Longin, Francois M. "Beyond the VaR." The Journal of Derivatives 8.4 (2001): 36-48.
  • Nguyen, K. T., Kallio, M., & Pykäläinen, J. (2019). Risk management of renewable energy investments under VaR and CVaR constraints. Renewable Energy, 139, 1070-1079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.063
  • Nieppola, F. (2009). Comparison of VaR models and portfolio optimization methods. Journal of Risk Finance, 10(1), 11-30. doi: 10.1108/15265940910927852.
  • Nieppola, O. (2009). Backtesting value-at-risk models. Journal of Risk Finance, 10(5), 494-507. doi: 10.1108/15265940910982892.
  • Ou, Y., Peng, Y., & He, X. (2020). Multi-period mean-CVaR portfolio optimization with transaction costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(2), 691-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.029
  • Pflug, G. C. (2000). A flexible clustering framework for parallel data mining. Parallel Computing, 26(5-6), 591-616. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8191(00)00018-9.
  • Pflug, G. C. (2000). Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. In Probabilistic constrained optimization (pp. 272-281). Springer, Boston, MA.
  • Reiss, M., & Thomas, M. (2007). Statistical analysis of extreme values: with applications to insurance, finance, hydrology and other fields (3rd ed.). Springer.
  • Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of risk, 2, 21-42.
  • Samanta, G. P., and C. G. Nard. "Selecting value at risk models for the government of India fixed income securities." Proceedings of an International Conference on Business & Finance held at the ICFAI University, Hyderabad. 2003.
  • van den Goorbergh, R. W., & Vlaar, P. J. (1999). Value-at-Risk analysis of stock returns historical simulation, variance techniques or tail index estimation?. De Nederlandsche Bank NV.
  • Wang, Y., Wang, J., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2020). A new hybrid ARIMA-GARCH-VaR model for forecasting stock market volatility. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 556, 124663.
  • White, H., Kim, T. H., & Manganelli, S. (2015). VAR for VaR: Measuring tail dependence using multivariate regression quantiles. Journal of Econometrics, 187(1), 169-188.
  • Yoon, K, J., Kang, B. S. (2007). Finite element analysis and modeling of structure with bolted joints. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31(5), 895-911.
  • Zhang et al. (2020) Zhang, Z., Wu, X., & Zhu, F. (2020). Research on the cryptocurrency price bubble based on complexity theory. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11(1), 425-435.
APA toguc n, KARALİNÇ T (2023). A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. , 932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
Chicago toguc nurhan,KARALİNÇ TURGAY A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. (2023): 932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
MLA toguc nurhan,KARALİNÇ TURGAY A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. , 2023, ss.932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
AMA toguc n,KARALİNÇ T A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. . 2023; 932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
Vancouver toguc n,KARALİNÇ T A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. . 2023; 932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
IEEE toguc n,KARALİNÇ T "A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices." , ss.932 - 950, 2023. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
ISNAD toguc, nurhan - KARALİNÇ, TURGAY. "A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices". (2023), 932-950. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
APA toguc n, KARALİNÇ T (2023). A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 58(1), 932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
Chicago toguc nurhan,KARALİNÇ TURGAY A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi 58, no.1 (2023): 932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
MLA toguc nurhan,KARALİNÇ TURGAY A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, vol.58, no.1, 2023, ss.932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
AMA toguc n,KARALİNÇ T A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi. 2023; 58(1): 932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
Vancouver toguc n,KARALİNÇ T A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices. Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi. 2023; 58(1): 932 - 950. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
IEEE toguc n,KARALİNÇ T "A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices." Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi, 58, ss.932 - 950, 2023. 10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073
ISNAD toguc, nurhan - KARALİNÇ, TURGAY. "A Practical Risk Analysis of The Brent Oil Prices". Üçüncü Sektör Sosyal Ekonomi 58/1 (2023), 932-950. https://doi.org/10.15659/3.sektor-sosyal-ekonomi.23.03.2073