Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 289 - 302 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5584 İndeks Tarihi: 29-03-2023

Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology

Öz:
Background/aim: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of reduced injected tracer activities on the quantitative image metrics and the visual image quality in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI with TOF capability in pediatric oncology. Materials and methods: Seventy-seven PET/MRI examinations of 54 patients were analyzed (standard injected activity: 1.9 MBq/kg, standard PET scan duration: 5 min per bed position). Lower activity PET images (1.2 MBq/kg and 0.9 MBq/kg) were retrospectively simulated from the originally acquired list-mode data sets. Quantitative parameters were assessed by measuring the SUV metrics, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), and textural features in each PET data set. PET images were also evaluated visually for image quality by using a scoring system. Results: SNRs were found as significantly different among PET data sets (p < 0.001) and showed increasing image noise with decreasing activities. CNR values did not show significant differences among PET data sets. The mean relative percentage changes in SUV metrics were found to be lower in 1.2 MBq/kg data set compared to 0.9 MBq/kg data set. Lesion SUVmax, SUVmean, SULpeak, and textural features were significantly different in 0.9 MBq/kg data set compared to the original data set (p < 0.05 for all). However, SUV metrics and textural features did not show a significant difference between the original and 1.2 MBq/kg data sets. While, the mean visual scores in 0.9 MBq/kg data set were significantly different compared to the original data set (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference between the original and 1.2 MBq/kg data sets in terms of general image quality and image sharpness. Conclusion: Our analyses showed that the reduction of injected activity to 1.2 MBq/kg may be feasible in pediatric oncological PET/ MRI, with a smaller relative percentage change in quantitative parameters and with similar image quality to the original data set.
Anahtar Kelime: PET/MRI 18F-FDG pediatric tracer activity texture analysis

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Franzius C. FDG-PET/CT in pediatric solid tumors. Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2010; 54 (4): 401-410.
  • 2. Franzius C, Juergens KU. PET/CT in paediatric oncology: indications and pitfalls. Pediatric Radiology 2009; 39 (Suppl 3): 446-449. https://doi: 10.1007/s00247-009-1175-z
  • 3. Kluge R, Kurch L, Montravers F, Mauz-Körholz C. FDG PET/CT in children and adolescents with lymphoma. Pediatric Radiology 2013; 43 (4): 406-417. https://doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2559-z
  • 4. Ricard F, Cimarelli S, Deshayes E, Mognetti T, Thiesse P et al. Additional benefit of F-18 FDG PET/CT in the staging and follow-up of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 2011; 36 (8): 672-677. https://doi: 10.1097/ RLU.0b013e318217ae2e
  • 5. Chawla SC, Federman N, Zhang D, Nagata K, Nuthakki S et al. Estimated cumulative radiation dose from PET/CT in children with malignancies: a 5-year retrospective review. Pediatric Radiology 2010; 40 (5): 681-686. https://doi: 10.1007/s00247- 009-1434-z
  • 6. Nievelstein RAJ, van Ufford HMEQ, Kwee TC, Bierings MB, Ludwig I et al. Radiation exposure and mortality risk from CT and PET imaging of patients with malignant lymphoma. European Radiology 2012; 22 (9): 1946-1954. https://doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2447-9
  • 7. Bailey DL, Pichler BJ, Gückel B, Barthel H, Beer AJ et al. Combined PET/MRI: from status quo to status go. Summary report of the fifth international workshop on PET/MR imaging; February 15–19, 2016; Tübingen, Germany. Molecular Imaging and Biology 2016; 18 (5): 637-650. https://doi: 10.1007/s11307- 016-0993-2
  • 8. Uslu-Beşli L, Atay Kapucu LÖ, Karadeniz C, Akdemir ÜÖ, Pınarlı FG et al. Comparison of FDG PET/MRI and FDG PET/CT in Pediatric Oncology in Terms of Anatomic Correlation of FDG-positive Lesions. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/ Oncology 2019; 41 (7): 542-550. https://doi: 10.1097/ MPH.0000000000001465
  • 9. Fahey FH. Dosimetry of pediatric PET/CT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009; 50 (9): 1483-1491. https://doi: 10.2967/ jnumed.108.054130
  • 10. Treves ST, Falone AE, Fahey FH. Pediatric nuclear medicine and radiation dose. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 2014; 44 (3): 202-209. https://doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2014.03.009
  • 11. Schäfer JF, Gatidis S, Schmidt H, Gückel B, Bezrukov I et al. Simultaneous whole-body PET/MR imaging in comparison to PET/CT in pediatric oncology: initial results. Radiology 2014; 273 (1): 220-231. https://doi: 10.1148/radiol.14131732
  • 12. Grant AM, Deller TW, Khalighi MM, Maramraju SH, Delso G et al. NEMA NU 2 2012 performance studies for the SiPM based ToF PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system. Medical Physics 2016; 43 (5): 2334-2343. https://doi: 10.1118/1.4945416
  • 13. Gatidis S, Schmidt H, Gücke B, Bezrukov I, Seitz G et al. Comprehensive oncologic imaging in infants and preschool children with substantially reduced radiation exposure using combined simultaneous 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: a direct comparison to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Investigative Radiology 2016; 51 (1): 7-14. https://doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000200
  • 14. Oehmigen M, Ziegler S, Jakoby BW, Georgi JC, Paulus DH et al. Radiotracer dose reduction in integrated PET/MR: implications from national electrical manufacturers association phantom studies. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2014; 55 (8): 1361-1367. https://doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.139147
  • 15. Sekine T, Delso G, Zeimpekis KG, de Galiza Barbosa F, Ter Voert EEGW et al. Reduction of 18F-FDG dose in clinical PET/MR imaging by using silicon photomultiplier detectors. Radiology 2018; 286 (1): 249-259. https://doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162305
  • 16. Gatidis S, Schmidt H, La Fougere C, Nikolaou K, Schwenzer NF et al. Defining optimal tracer activities in pediatric oncologic whole-body 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2016; 43 (13): 2283- 2289. https://doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3503-5
  • 17. Zucchetta P, Branchini M, Zorz A, Bodanza V, Cecchin D et al. Quantitative analysis of image metrics for reduced and standard dose pediatric 18F-FDG PET/MRI examinations. British Journal of Radiology 2019; 92 (1095): 20180438. https:// doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180438
  • 18. Schmall JP, Surti S, Otero HJ, Servaes S, Karp JS et al. Investigating Low-Dose Image Quality in Whole-Body Pediatric 18F-FDG Scans Using Time-of-Flight PET/MRI. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2021; 62 (1): 123-130. https://doi: 10.2967/ jnumed.119.240127
  • 19. Levin CS, Maramraju SH, Khalighi MM, Deller TW, Delso G et al. Design features and mutual compatibility studies of the time-of-flight PET capable GE SIGNA PET/MR system. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2016; 35 (8): 1907-1914. https://doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2537811
  • 20. Seith F, Schmidt H, Kunz J, Küstner T, Gatidis S et al. Simulation of tracer dose reduction in 18F-FDG PET/MRI: effects on oncologic reading, image quality, and artifacts. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2017; 58 (10): 1699-1705. https://doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.184440
  • 21. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2009; 50 (Suppl 1): 122S-150S. https://doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307
  • 22. Yan J, Schaefferkoetter J, Conti M, Townsend D. A method to assess image quality for low-dose PET: analysis of SNR, CNR, bias and image noise. Cancer Imaging 2016; 16 (1): 1-12. https://doi: 10.1186/s40644-016-0086-0
  • 23. Sah B-R, Ghafoor S, Burger IA, Ter Voert EEGW, Sekine T et al. Feasibility of 18F-FDG dose reductions in breast cancer PET/ MRI. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2018; 59 (12): 1817-1822. https://doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.209007
  • 24. Nioche C, Orlhac F, Boughdad S, Reuzé S, Goya-Outi J et al. LIFEx: a freeware for radiomic feature calculation in multimodality imaging to accelerate advances in the characterization of tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Research 2018; 78 (16): 4786- 4789. https://doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0125
  • 25. Stabin MG, Siegel JA. RADAR dose estimate report: a compendium of radiopharmaceutical dose estimates based on OLINDA/EXM version 2.0. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2018; 59 (1): 154-160. https://doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.196261
  • 26. Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B, Ladebeck R, Ganter C et al. Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2011; 52 (12): 1914-1922. https://doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092726
  • 27. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, Van Stiphout RG et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. European Journal of Cancer 2012; 48 (4): 441-446. https://doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.036
  • 28. Tourassi GD. Journey toward computer-aided diagnosis: role of image texture analysis. Radiology 1999; 213 (2): 317-320. https://doi: 10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv49317
  • 29. Cheng N-M, Fang Y-HD, Lee L-y, Chang JT-C, Tsan D-L et al. Zone-size nonuniformity of 18F-FDG PET regional textural features predicts survival in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2015; 42 (3): 419-428. https://doi: 10.1007/s00259- 014-2933-1
  • 30. Kirienko M, Cozzi L, Antunovic L, Lozza L, Fogliata A et al. Prediction of disease-free survival by the PET/CT radiomic signature in non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing surgery. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2018; 45 (2): 207-217. https://doi: 10.1007/s00259- 017-3837-7
  • 31. Branchini M, Zorz A, Zucchetta P, Bettinelli A, De Monte F et al. Impact of acquisition count statistics reduction and SUV discretization on PET radiomic features in pediatric 18F-FDG- PET/MRI examinations. Physica Medica 2019; 59: 117-126. https://doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.005
APA Aydos U, BALCI E, gülbahar ateş s, AKDEMİR Ü, Karadeniz C (2023). Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. , 289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
Chicago Aydos Uguray,BALCI ERDEM,gülbahar ateş seda,AKDEMİR Ümit,Karadeniz Ceyda Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. (2023): 289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
MLA Aydos Uguray,BALCI ERDEM,gülbahar ateş seda,AKDEMİR Ümit,Karadeniz Ceyda Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. , 2023, ss.289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
AMA Aydos U,BALCI E,gülbahar ateş s,AKDEMİR Ü,Karadeniz C Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. . 2023; 289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
Vancouver Aydos U,BALCI E,gülbahar ateş s,AKDEMİR Ü,Karadeniz C Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. . 2023; 289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
IEEE Aydos U,BALCI E,gülbahar ateş s,AKDEMİR Ü,Karadeniz C "Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology." , ss.289 - 302, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
ISNAD Aydos, Uguray vd. "Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology". (2023), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5584
APA Aydos U, BALCI E, gülbahar ateş s, AKDEMİR Ü, Karadeniz C (2023). Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53(1), 289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
Chicago Aydos Uguray,BALCI ERDEM,gülbahar ateş seda,AKDEMİR Ümit,Karadeniz Ceyda Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 53, no.1 (2023): 289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
MLA Aydos Uguray,BALCI ERDEM,gülbahar ateş seda,AKDEMİR Ümit,Karadeniz Ceyda Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.53, no.1, 2023, ss.289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
AMA Aydos U,BALCI E,gülbahar ateş s,AKDEMİR Ü,Karadeniz C Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 53(1): 289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
Vancouver Aydos U,BALCI E,gülbahar ateş s,AKDEMİR Ü,Karadeniz C Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 53(1): 289 - 302. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
IEEE Aydos U,BALCI E,gülbahar ateş s,AKDEMİR Ü,Karadeniz C "Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53, ss.289 - 302, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0144.5584
ISNAD Aydos, Uguray vd. "Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 53/1 (2023), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5584