Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 53 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 396 - 404 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5596 İndeks Tarihi: 29-03-2023

Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications

Öz:
Background/aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognosis of patients with laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana classification (LC), Revised LC, World Health Organization Dysplasia System (WHO-DS) 2005 and WHO-DS 2017. Materials and methods: Patients diagnosed with a laryngeal preneoplastic lesion in our clinic between 2005 and 2018 were included in the study. Biopsy preparations of patients were reexamined by the pathology unit and classified based on LC, Revised LC, WHO- DS 2005, and WHO-DS 2017. Patients with carcinoma were identified during follow-up. The prognosis of preneoplastic lesions was statistically analyzed based on carcinoma development and duration using these four different classifications. Results: Carcinoma developed in 16 of 142 patients after repeated biopsy. The risk for carcinoma development was found to be more statistically significant in atypical hyperplasia than in squamous cell hyperplasia and basal-parabasal cell hyperplasia according to LC (p: 0.027 and 0.035), no statistically significant difference was observed between squamous and basal-parabasal cell hyperplasia and CIS groups. The risk of carcinoma development was more statistically significant in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (SIL) than in low-grade SIL according to revised LC (p: 0.04); in severe hyperplasia than in other groups according to WHO-DS 2005; and in high- grade dysplasia than in low-grade dysplasia according to WHO-DS 2017 (p: 0.013). The Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the risk of developing carcinoma statistically increased with age in all classifications, independent of the severity of dysplasia (p < 0.01). According to Cox regression analysis, there was no effect of sex on carcinoma development. Conclusion: In revised classifications, such as the revised LC and WHO-DS 2017, it is seen that facilitating clinical use is achieved by reducing the number of subgroups by combining the subgroups that do not statistically differ in terms of carcinoma development.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
0
0
0
  • 1. Thompson LDR. Laryngeal dysplasia, squamous cell carcinoma, and variants. Surgical Pathology Clinics 2017;10(1):15-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.path.2016.10.003
  • 2. Gale N, Blagus R, El-Mofty SK, Helliwell T, Prasad ML et al. Evaluation of a new grading system for laryngeal squamous intraepithelial lesions-a proposed unified classification. Histopathology 2014;65(4):456-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/ his.12427
  • 3. Hellquist H, Ferlito A, Makitie AA, Thompson LDR, Bishop JA et al. Developing classifications of laryngeal dysplasia: The historical basis. Advances in Therapy 2020;37(6):2667-2677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01348-4
  • 4. Gallo A, de Vincentiis M, Della Rocca C, Moi R, Simonelli M et al. Evolution of precancerous laryngeal lesions: A clinicopathologic study with long-term follow-up on 259 patients. Head & Neck 2001;23(1):42-47. https:// d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / 1 0 9 7 - 0 3 4 7 ( 2 0 0 1 0 1 ) 2 3 : 1 < 4 2 : A I D - HED7>3.0.CO;2-1
  • 5. Sengiz S, Pabuççuoğlu U, Sarioğlu S. Immunohistological comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) and Ljubljana classifications on the grading of preneoplastic lesions of the larynx. Pathology Research and Practice 2004;200(3):181- 188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2003.11.002.
  • 6. Odell E, Eckel HE, Simo R, Quer M, Paleri V et al. European Laryngological Society position on laryngeal dysplasia Part I: aetiology and pathological classification. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 2021;278(6):1717-1722. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00405-020-06403-y
  • 7. Gale N, Michaels L, Luzar B, Poljak M, Zidar N et al. Current review on squamous intraepithelial lesions of the larynx. Histopathology 2009;54(6):639-656. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2559.2008.03111.x
  • 8. Gale N, Poljak M, Zidar N. Update from the 4th edition of the World Health Organization of head and neck tumours: What is new in the 2017 WHO blue book for tumours of the hypopharynx, larynx, trachea, and parapharyngeal space. Head and Neck Pathology 2017;11(1):23-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12105-017-0788-z
  • 9. Bouquot JE, Gnepp DR. Laryngeal precancer: A review of the literature, commentary, and comparison with oral leukoplakia. Head & Neck 1991;13(6):488-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/ hed.2880130604
  • 10. Lentsch EJ, Myers JN. New trends in the etiology, diagnosis, and management of laryngeal dysplasia. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2001;9(2):74-78. https://doi.org/10.1097/00020840-200104000-00003
  • 11. Gale N, Cardesa A, Hernandez-Prera JC, Slootweg PJ, Wenig BM et al. Laryngeal dysplasia: persisting dilemmas, disagreements and unsolved problems-A short review. Head and Neck Pathology 2020;14(4):1046-1051. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12105-020-01149-9
  • 12. Fleskens SA, Bergshoeff VE, Voogd AC, van Velthuysen ML, Bot FJ et al. Interobserver variability of laryngeal mucosal premalignant lesions: A histopathological evaluation. Modern Pathology 2011;24(7):892-898. https://doi.org/10.1038/ modpathol.2011.50
  • 13. Sarioglu S, Cakalagaoglu F, Elagoz S, Han U, Etit D et al. Inter- observer agreement in laryngeal pre-neoplastic lesions. Head and Neck Pathology 2010;4:276-280. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12105-010-0208-0
  • 14. Hellquist H, Cardesa A, Gale N, Kambic V, Michaels L. Criteria for grading in the Ljubljana classification of epithelial hyperplastic laryngeal lesions. A study by members of the Working Group on Epithelial Hyperplastic Laryngeal Lesions of the European Society of Pathology. Histopathology 1999;34(3):226-233. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 2559.1999.00581.x
  • 15. Sadri M, McMahon J, Parker A. Management of laryngeal dysplasia: A review. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 2006;263(9):843-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-006- 0078-y
  • 16. Karataylı-Ozgursoy S, Pacheco-Lopez P, Hillel AT, Best SR, Bishop JA et al. Laryngeal dysplasia, demographics, and treatment: A single-institution, 20-year review. JAMA Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2015;141(4):313-318. https:// doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.3736
  • 17. Zhang HK, Liu HG. Is severe dysplasia the same lesion as carcinoma in situ? 10-year follow-up of laryngeal precancerous lesions. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2012;132(3):325-328. https:// doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2011.642812
  • 18. Zidar N, Gale N. Update from the 5th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumors: Hypopharynx, Larynx, Trachea and Parapharyngeal Space. Head and Neck Pathology 2022;16(1):31-39. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12105-021-01405-6
  • 19. Weller MD, Nankivell PC, McConkey C, Paleri V, Mehanna HM. The risk and interval to malignancy of patients with laryngeal dysplasia; a systematic review of case series and meta-analysis. Clinical Otolaryngology 2010;35(5):364-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4486.2010.02181.x
  • 20. Spielmann PM, Palmer T, McClymont L. 15-year review of laryngeal and oral dysplasias and progression to invasive carcinoma. European Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 2010;267(3):423-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009- 1013-9
  • 21. Plch J, Pár I, Navrátilová I, Bláhová M, Zavadil M. Long term follow-up study of laryngeal precancer. Auris Nasus Larynx 1998;25(4):407-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0385- 8146(98)00041-8
  • 22. Theodosiou MG, Yiotakis J, Dikoglou C, Lazaris AC, Athanasiadis-Sismanis A et al. Laryngeal dysplasia: A long- term follow-up study. Journal of B.U.O.N. 2013;18(3):683-688.
APA DOGAN E, Boran C, CEVIZCI M, Sarioglu S (2023). Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. , 396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
Chicago DOGAN ERSOY,Boran Cafer,CEVIZCI MUSTAFA CÜNEYT,Sarioglu Sulen Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. (2023): 396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
MLA DOGAN ERSOY,Boran Cafer,CEVIZCI MUSTAFA CÜNEYT,Sarioglu Sulen Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. , 2023, ss.396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
AMA DOGAN E,Boran C,CEVIZCI M,Sarioglu S Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. . 2023; 396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
Vancouver DOGAN E,Boran C,CEVIZCI M,Sarioglu S Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. . 2023; 396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
IEEE DOGAN E,Boran C,CEVIZCI M,Sarioglu S "Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications." , ss.396 - 404, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
ISNAD DOGAN, ERSOY vd. "Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications". (2023), 396-404. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5596
APA DOGAN E, Boran C, CEVIZCI M, Sarioglu S (2023). Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53(1), 396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
Chicago DOGAN ERSOY,Boran Cafer,CEVIZCI MUSTAFA CÜNEYT,Sarioglu Sulen Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 53, no.1 (2023): 396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
MLA DOGAN ERSOY,Boran Cafer,CEVIZCI MUSTAFA CÜNEYT,Sarioglu Sulen Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.53, no.1, 2023, ss.396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
AMA DOGAN E,Boran C,CEVIZCI M,Sarioglu S Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 53(1): 396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
Vancouver DOGAN E,Boran C,CEVIZCI M,Sarioglu S Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2023; 53(1): 396 - 404. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
IEEE DOGAN E,Boran C,CEVIZCI M,Sarioglu S "Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 53, ss.396 - 404, 2023. 10.55730/1300-0144.5596
ISNAD DOGAN, ERSOY vd. "Comparison of the prognoses of laryngeal preneoplastic lesions based on Ljubljana and World Health Organization classifications". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 53/1 (2023), 396-404. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5596