The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use

SUNGUR, Semra; KAHRAMAN, Nurcan

The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use

Nurcan KAHRAMAN, (Celal Bayar Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Manisa, Türkiye)

Semra SUNGUR (Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Ankara, Türkiye)

Eğitim ve Bilim

9 0

Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 160 Sayfa Aralığı: 3 - 10 Metin Dili: Almanca İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use

Öz:

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ilköğretim öğrencilerinin özyeterlik algıları ve hedef yönelimlerinin (ustalık yaklaşma, ustalık kaçınma, başarım yaklaşma, başarım kaçınma) Fen ve Teknoloji dersindeki üst-biliş strateji kullanımlarıyla olan ilişkisini araştırmaktır. Bu amaçla, 115 ilköğretim öğrencisine Hedef Yönelimi Anketi ve Öğrenmede Güdüsel Stratejiler Anketi uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, Fen ve Teknoloji dersinde başarılı olabilecekleri ve öğrenebileceklerine dair inançları yüksek olan ilköğretim öğrencileri ile derse öğrenmek,anlamak için çalışan ilköğretim öğrencilerinin (ustalık yaklaşma hedef yönelimine sahip öğrenciler) üst-biliş stratejilerini daha üst seviyelerde kullandığını göstermiştir. Sonuçlar doğrultusunda, ilköğretim öğrencilerinin Fen ve Teknoloji dersindeki motivasyonlarının ve üst-biliş strateji kullanımının geliştirilebilmesi için öğretmenlere önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Öğrencilerin güdüsel inançlarının üst-biliş strateji kullanımına katkısı

Öz:

This study aimed at investigating how well elementary students’ self-efficacy and achievement goals (mastery approach, mastery avoidance, performance approach, and performance avoidance goals) predict their metacognitive strategy use in science. For the specified purpose, Achievement Goal Questionnaire and Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire were administered to 115 elementary school students. Results showed that the elementary students who feel self-efficacious in science and study for the reasons of learning and understanding (mastery approach goals) the course material tend to use metacognitive strategies at higher levels. In line with the findings, specific suggestions were made for science teachers to help development of adaptive motivational beliefs and effective strategy use.

Anahtar Kelime: metacognitive strategy goal orientation self efficacy

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Baundra, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84.191-215.
Baundra, A. & Shunk (1981). Cultivating competence, self-eficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4.586-598.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.
Bouffard-Bouchard, T., Parent, S., & Larivée, S. (1993). Self-regulation on a concept-formation task among average and gifted students. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 115-134
Case, J. G. (2002). Metacognitive development as a shift in approach to learning: an in-depth study. Studies in Higher Education, 27 , 459-470.
Coutinho, S., A. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success. Educate Journal, 7, 39-47.
Eccles, J.& Wigfield, A. (2002.). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology,53, 109–132.
Elliot, A., J.& Harackiewicz, J., M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: a mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology, 70 , 461-475.
Elliot, A.J.& Church, M.A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232
Eliot, A.J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychlogist, 34.169-189
Eliot, A.J.& Thrash, T.M. (2001). Achievement goals and hierarchical of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13,139-156
Elliot, A., J.,& McGredor, H., A. (2001). A 2*2 Achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology, 80 , 50-519.
Elliot, A., J.& Reis, H., T. (2003). Attachment and exploration in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology, 85 , 317-331.
Flavell, J. H. (1976) Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence , 231-236. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitivedevelopmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 906-911.
Flavell, j.H. (1992). Cognitive deveiopment: Past, present, and future. Developmental Psychology, 28, 998-1005.
Forrest-Pressley, D. L. & Waller, T. G. (1984). Cognition, metacognition and reading. New York: Springer-Verlag)
Hoy, A. W. (2004). What do teachers know about self-efficacy? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitudetreatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology - Monograph, 74, 657-690.
Linnenbrink, E.A. & Pintrich P.R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymetric bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78
Margolis, H. & Mccabe, P. (2003). Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. Preventing School Failure, 47(4):162–169
Middlebrooks, A. (1996). Effects of goal orientation on metecognitive activity. Annual Meating of the American Educational Research Association. Newyork, 8-12 April.
Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliot, J., Gregson., M., Higgins., S., Miller, J., & Newton, D. P. (2005).Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 116-125
Paulsen, M. B., & Feldman, K. A. (2005). The conditional and interaction effects of epistomological beliefs on the self-regulated learning of college students: Motivational strategies. Research in Higher Education, 46, 731–768.
Pintrich, P., R. (1999). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, , 92-104.
Pintrich, P.R.(2000a). An achevement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory and research. Contemporary Educational Pyschology,25,92-104.
Pintrich, P.R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. theory into practice, 41, 219-225.
Printrich, P.,R.& Schunk, D., H. (2002). Motivation in education: theory, research and applications. Ohio: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Pintrich, P. R., Conley& Kemper, (2003). Current issues in achievement goal theory and research. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 319-337.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychological Review, 7, 351-371.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistomological beliefs research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 293–319.
Shih (2005). Role of achievement goals in children’s learning in Taiwan. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 310-319
Shim, S.& Ryan, A. (2005). Changes in self efficacy, challenge avoidance, and intrinsic value in response to grades: The role of achievement goals. The Journal of Experimental Education, 73(4), 333-349
Sungur, S. (2007). Modeling the relationships among students’ motivational beliefs, metacognitive strategy use, and effort regulation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 51, 315–326.
Sungur, S. & Şenler, B. (2009). An analysis of Turkish high school students’ metacognition and motivation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 15, 45-62.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Veenman, M.V.J., Van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2005). Attaining Self Regulation: A Social Cognitive Perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39). Burlington, MA: Elseiver Academic Press.

APA	KAHRAMAN N, SUNGUR S (2011). The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. , 3 - 10.
Chicago	KAHRAMAN Nurcan,SUNGUR Semra The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. (2011): 3 - 10.
MLA	KAHRAMAN Nurcan,SUNGUR Semra The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. , 2011, ss.3 - 10.
AMA	KAHRAMAN N,SUNGUR S The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. . 2011; 3 - 10.
Vancouver	KAHRAMAN N,SUNGUR S The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. . 2011; 3 - 10.
IEEE	KAHRAMAN N,SUNGUR S "The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use." , ss.3 - 10, 2011.
ISNAD	KAHRAMAN, Nurcan - SUNGUR, Semra. "The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use". (2011), 3-10.

APA	KAHRAMAN N, SUNGUR S (2011). The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(160), 3 - 10.
Chicago	KAHRAMAN Nurcan,SUNGUR Semra The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. Eğitim ve Bilim 36, no.160 (2011): 3 - 10.
MLA	KAHRAMAN Nurcan,SUNGUR Semra The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.36, no.160, 2011, ss.3 - 10.
AMA	KAHRAMAN N,SUNGUR S The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2011; 36(160): 3 - 10.
Vancouver	KAHRAMAN N,SUNGUR S The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2011; 36(160): 3 - 10.
IEEE	KAHRAMAN N,SUNGUR S "The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use." Eğitim ve Bilim, 36, ss.3 - 10, 2011.
ISNAD	KAHRAMAN, Nurcan - SUNGUR, Semra. "The contribution of motivational beliefs to student' metacognitive strategy use". Eğitim ve Bilim 36/160 (2011), 3-10.