Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis

ELİFNUR GÜZELCE, (Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Hamidiye Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Emre Tokar, (Gazi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Özgül KARACAER (Gazi Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Annals of Medical Research
1 0
Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 45 - 51 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235 İndeks Tarihi: 03-04-2023

Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis

Öz:
Aim: The effects of implant locations and prosthesis design (palate less, full palate) on stress values of the implant and bone in maxillary overdenture prostheses were examined and compared with finite element analysis. Materials and Methods: Full palate and palate less four implant supported finite element overdenture models have created with different implant locations (bilateral lateral-1. premolar, canine- 2. premolar, 1. premolar -1. Molar). Static loads have applied with food stuff method on 1. Molar region. Von mises stress on implants and implant parts, maximum and minimum principal stress generated in peri-implant bone have calculated with finite element analysis method (FEA). Results: As a result, it was observed that the palate less design creates more stress on the implants and bone compared to the full palate design. In addition, stress formation was observed to be higher in models with implant positions are posterior. Conclusion: In implant supported overdentures (ISO), palatal coverage ensures more balanced distribution of stresses occurring around the implants and implant parts, regardless of the location of the supporting implants.
Anahtar Kelime: Dental implants Denture Finite element analysis

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Laurito D, Lamazza L, Spink MJ, et al. Tissue-supported dental implant prosthesis (overdenture): The search for the ideal pro- tocol. A literature reviews. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012;3:2-10.
  • 2. Thomason JM, Feine J, Exley C, et al. Mandibular two implant- supported overdentures as the first-choice standard of care for edentulous patientsnts-The York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J. 2009;22:185-86.
  • 3. Mizuno Y, Takahashi T, Gonda T, et al. Mechanical analysis of a palateless denture. Int J Prosthodont. 2013;26:419-22.
  • 4. Takahashi T, Gonda T, Tomita A, et al. Influence of palatal coverage, and implant distribution on denture strain in max- illary implant overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31:43-8.
  • 5. Cleave RJ. Maxillary insufficiency implant and tooth-retained maxillary overdenture: a clinical case report. J Oral Implantol. 2000;26:29-33.
  • 6. Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. A comparison between 4 and 6 implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture: 1-year results from a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25:560–6.
  • 7. El-amier, Nesma, et al. Effect of implant location on palateless complete overdenture retention: An in vitro study. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. 2018;9:30-3.
  • 8. Zhang H, Sone M, Yamamoto H, et al. Influence of experimental palatal plate on mandibular position during continuous phona- tion. J Prosthodont Res. 2009;53:38-40.
  • 9. Strain JC. The influence of completed dentures upon taste per- ception. J Prosthet Dent 1952;2:60-67.
  • 10. Shannon IL, Terry JM, Nakamato RY. Palatal coverage and parotid flow rate. J Prosthet Dent. 1970;24:601-7.
  • 11. Takahashi T, Mizuno Y, Gonda T, et al. Metal reinforcement of a complete maxillary denture without a palate: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28:188-90.
  • 12. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. Osseointegration for elderly patients: the Toronto study. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:559-68.
  • 13. Patil PG, Seow LL, Uddanwadikar R, et al. Biomechanical be- havior of mandibular overdenture retained by two standard im- plants or 2 mini-implants: A 3-dimensional finite element anal- ysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:138.
  • 14. Koca OL, Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A. Three-dimensional finite- element analysis of functional stresses in different bone locations produced by implants placed in the maxillary posterior region of the sinus floor. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;93:38-44.
  • 15. Kim MJ, Hong SO. Finite element analysis on stress distribution of maxillary implant-retained overdentures depending on the Bar attachment design and palatal coverage. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8:85-93.
  • 16. Bonnet AS, Postaire M, Lipinski P. Biomechanical study of mandible bone supporting a four-implant retained bridge: fi- nite element analysis of the influence of bone anisotropy and foodstuff position. Med Eng Phys. 2009;31:806-15.
  • 17. Lewis S, Sharma A, Nishimura R. Treatment of edentu- lous maxillae with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:503–8.
  • 18. Kappel S, Klotz AL., Eberhard L, et al. Maxillary implant over- dentures on two or four implants. A prospective randomized cross-over clinical trial of implant and denture success and sur- vival. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32:1061-71.
  • 19. Cavallaro JS, Tarnow DP. Unsplinted implants retaining max- illary overdentures with partial palatal coverage: Report of 5 consecutive cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22:808- 14.
  • 20. Calvert G, Lamont T. Four implant bar-connected implants suf- ficient to support a maxillary overdenture. Evid Based Dent. 2013;14:49-50.
  • 21. Sadowsky SJ. Treatment considerations for maxillary implant overdentures: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:340- 48.
  • 22. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, et al. Occlusal considerations in im- plant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16:26-35.
  • 23. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, et al. Magni- tude, and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants sup- porting fixed prostheses: an in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:465-75.
  • 24. Takahashi T, Gonda T, Mizuno Y, et al. Influence of palatal coverage, and implant distribution on implant strain in max- illary implant overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31:36-42.
  • 25. Damghani S, Masri R, Driscoll CF, et al. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107:358-65.
  • 26. Elsyad MA, Elsaadawy MG, Abdou AM, et al. Effect of different implant positions on strain developed around four implants sup- porting a mandibular overdenture with rigid telescopic copings. Quintessence Int. 2013;44:679-86.
  • 27. Osman RB, Ma S. Prosthodontic maintenance of overdentures on zirconia implants: 1-year results of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27:461-8.
  • 28. Dudley J. Maxillary implant overdentures: current controversies. Aust Dent J. 2013;58:420-3.
  • 29. Nishimura Y, Takahashi T, Gonda T, et al. Influence of implant distribution and palatal coverage on the strain of splinted im- plant and overdenture in maxillary implant overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021;36:281-8.
  • 30. Ozan O, Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S. Biomechanical Comparison of different ımplant ınclinations and cantilever lengths in all-on-4 treatment concept by threedimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2018;33: 64-71.
APA GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU E, Tokar E, KARACAER ö (2023). Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. , 45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
Chicago GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU ELİFNUR,Tokar Emre,KARACAER özgül Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. (2023): 45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
MLA GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU ELİFNUR,Tokar Emre,KARACAER özgül Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. , 2023, ss.45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
AMA GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU E,Tokar E,KARACAER ö Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. . 2023; 45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
Vancouver GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU E,Tokar E,KARACAER ö Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. . 2023; 45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
IEEE GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU E,Tokar E,KARACAER ö "Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis." , ss.45 - 51, 2023. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
ISNAD GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU, ELİFNUR vd. "Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis". (2023), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
APA GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU E, Tokar E, KARACAER ö (2023). Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. Annals of Medical Research, 30(1), 45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
Chicago GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU ELİFNUR,Tokar Emre,KARACAER özgül Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. Annals of Medical Research 30, no.1 (2023): 45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
MLA GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU ELİFNUR,Tokar Emre,KARACAER özgül Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. Annals of Medical Research, vol.30, no.1, 2023, ss.45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
AMA GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU E,Tokar E,KARACAER ö Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. Annals of Medical Research. 2023; 30(1): 45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
Vancouver GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU E,Tokar E,KARACAER ö Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis. Annals of Medical Research. 2023; 30(1): 45 - 51. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
IEEE GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU E,Tokar E,KARACAER ö "Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis." Annals of Medical Research, 30, ss.45 - 51, 2023. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
ISNAD GÜZELCE SULTANOĞLU, ELİFNUR vd. "Comparison of the effects of implant locations and overdenture designs on the implants and bone stress: A finite element analysis". Annals of Medical Research 30/1 (2023), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2022.08.235
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 6:21

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları