Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı

Mustafa BULUŞ (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Bölümü, Denizli, Türkiye)
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri
5 0
Yıl: 2011 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 529 - 546 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-07-2022

Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı

Öz:
Bu çalışmada öğretmen adaylarında denetim odağının amaç yönelimlerini ve her iki yönelimin birlikte akademik başarıyı yordamadki rolü incelenmiştir. Araştırmaya Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi'nde farklı alanlarda öğrenim gören toplam 270 öğrenci katılmıştır. Veri toplama araçları olarak Amaç Yönelimleri ve Öğretmen Denetim Odağı Ölçekleri, verilerin analizinde korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, denetim odağı ve akademik başarının öğrenme amaç yönelimi ile pozitif, başarısızlıktan kaçınma amaç yönelimi ile de negatif düzeyde ilişkili olduğunu ve denetim odağının öğrenme ve başarısızlıktan kaçınma amaç yönelimlerini anlamlı olarak yordadığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca denetim odağı ve amaç yönelimlerinin birlikte akademik başarı varyansına katkıları anlamlı bulunmuştur. Araştırmada elde edilen sonuçlar eğitimciler açısından tartışılmış ve önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Goal orientations, locus of control and academic achievement in prospective teachers: An individual differences perspective

Öz:
The aim of this study is to investigate the role of the prospective teachers' locus of control in goal orientations and of both orientations in academic achievement. The participants were 270 undergraduate students studying in different majors at the Faculty of Education in Pamukkale University. Goal Orientations and Locus of Control Scales were used to gather the data. Pearson Correlation and regression analyses were performed to analyze the data. Results showed that mastery goal orientation was positively and avoidant goal orientation was negatively related with locus of control and academic achievement. A positive relationship was found between locus of control and academic achievement. In the study regression analyses indicated that mastery and avoidance goal orientations were predicted by locus of control and academic achievement was predicted by goal orientations and locus of control together. Implications of the findings were discussed and suggestions were given for the educators.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Ablard, K. E., & Lipschultz, R. E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students: Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 94-101.
  • Abouserıe, R. (1994). Sources and Levels of Stress in Relation to Locus of Control and Self Esteem in University Students. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 14(3), 323-331.
  • Alderman, M.K. (1990). Motivation for at-risk students. Educational Leadership, 48(1), 27-30.
  • Ames, C. (1992). Classroom: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.
  • Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1981). Competitive versus individualistic goal structures: The salience of past performance information for causal attributions and affect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 411-418.
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Student learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
  • Anderman, E. & Young, A. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811-831.
  • Anderson, A., Hattie, J. & Hamilton, R.J. (2005). Locus of Control, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation in Different Schools: Is moderation the key to success?. Educational Psychology, 25(5), 517.
  • Archer, J. (1994). Achievement goals as a measure of motivation in university students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 430-446.
  • Brdar, I, Rijavec, M. & Loncaric, D. (2006). Goal orientations, coping with school failure and school achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(1), 53-70.
  • Chan, D.W. (2008). Goal orientations and achievement among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 19(1), 37–51.
  • Cheng, Y. C. (1994). Locus of control as an indicator of Hong Kong teachers’ job attitudes and perceptions of organizational characteristics. Journal of Educational Research, 87(3), 180-188.
  • Chubb, N.H., Fertman, C.I. & Ross, J.L. (1997). Adolescent Self-Esteem and Locus of Control: A Longitudinal Study of Gender and Age Differences. Adolescence, 32, 113-130.
  • Church, M., Elliot, A..J. & Gable, S. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43-54.
  • Czubaj, C. (1996). Maintaining teacher motivation. Education, 116(3), 372-378.
  • Diener, C., & Dweck, C. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451-462.
  • Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
  • Dweck, C. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048.
  • Eccles, J.S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievementrelated decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135 - 172.
  • Eccles, J.S. & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the achiever: The structure of adolescents’ academic achievement relatedbeliefs and self-perceptions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215 - 225.
  • Elliot A.J. & Church, M.A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
  • Elliot, A. & McGregor, H. (1999). Text anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628-644.
  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meditational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
  • Elliot, A., McGregor, H. & Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563.
  • Elliot, A.J. & McGregor, H. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
  • Elliot, A.J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
  • Elliot, E. S, & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
  • Fenollar, P., Roma’n, S. & Cuestas, P.J. (2007). University students’ academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 873–891.
  • Fox, K., Goudas M., Biddle, S., Duda, J., & Armstrong, N. (1994). Children’s task and ego goal profiles in sport. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 253-261.
  • Gelbal, S. (1994). P Madde Güçlük İndeksi ile Rasch Modelinin b Parametresi ve Bunlara Dayalı Yetenek Ölçüleri Üzerine Bir Karşılaştırma, Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Grant, H. & Dweck, C.S., (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 541–553.
  • Greene, B. & Miller, R. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181-192.
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330.
  • Hawkes, B.B. (1991). Teacher Locus Of Control: Who’s Responsible?. Education, 111(4), 475-479.
  • Ho, I.T. & Hau, K.T. (2008). Academic achievement in the Chinese context: The role of goals, strategies, and eff ort. International Journal of Psychology, 43(5), 892–897.
  • Hsieh, P., Sullivan, J.R. & Guerra, N.S. (2007). A Closer Look at College Students: Self Efficacy and Goal Orientation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18(3), 454-476.
  • Kalechstein, A. D. & Nowicki, S. Jr., (1997). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between control expectancies and academic achievement: An 11 year follow-up to Findley and Cooper. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 123(1), 27-56.
  • Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330-358.
  • Gutman, L.M. (2005). How student and parent goal orientations and classroom goal structures influence the math achievement of African Americans during the high school transition. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(8), 1891-1902.
  • Lau, K.L. & Lee, J. (2008). Examining Hong Kong students’ achievement goals and their relations with students’ perceived classroom environment and strategy use. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 357–372.
  • Lawrence, I.M. (1998). Deconstructing Locus of Control: Implications for Practitioners. Journal of Counseling & Development, 76(3), 251-261.
  • Levin, M. E. & Levin, J. R. (1991). A critical examination of academic retention programs for at-risk minority students. Journal of College Student Development, 3, 323-332.
  • Linnenbrink, E.A. (2005). The Dilemma of Performance- Approach Goals: The Use of Multiple Goal Contexts to Promote Students’ Motivation and Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 197–213.
  • Lorenz, J.R. (2000). A Study of Early Childhood Preservice Teachers’ Locus of Control and Self Concept as Compared to Their Approach to Discipline. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science With a Major in Home Economics. The Graduate College University of Wisconsin-Stout Menomonie, WI 54751. Retrieved March 9, 2011 from http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/lib/ thesis/2000/2000lorenzj.pdf .
  • Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientation and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523.
  • Meece, J.L. & Holt, K. (1993). A Pattern Analysis of Students’ Achievement Goals, Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 582 – 590.
  • Meece, J.L., Wigfield, A. & J.S. Eccles, J.S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60 - 70.
  • Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718.
  • Midgley, C. & Urdan, T. (1995). Predictors of middle school students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Early Adolescence, 15, 389-411.
  • Midgley, C. & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61-75.
  • Midgley, C., Middleton, M. & Kaplan, A. (2001). Performanceapproach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77-86.
  • Miller, R.B., Behrens, J.T., Greene, B.A., & Newman, D. (1993). Goals and perceived ability: Impact on student valuing, selfregulation and persistence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 2-14.
  • Nelson, E. S. & Mathias, K. E. (1995). The relationships among college students locus of control, learning styles and selfprediction of grades. Education Research and Perspectives, 22(2), 110-117.
  • Nolen, S. B. & Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Motivation and studying in high school science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 27,115-126.
  • Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
  • Norton, J.L. (1997). Locus of control and reflective thinking in preservice teachers. Education, 117(3), 401-410.
  • Nunn, G. D. (1987). Concurrent validity between children’s locus of control and attitudes toward home, school, and peers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 1087-1089.
  • Nunn, G. D. (1988). Concurrent validity between the Nowicki- Strickland locus of control scale and the state-trait anxiety inventory for children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 435-438.
  • Öner, N. (1997). Türkiye’de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler. İstnbul: Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Özdamar, K. (1997). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi I. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Özgüngör, S. (2006). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Amaç Tarzlarının ve Öğretmenlerinin Özerklik Destekleyici Davranışlarına İlişkin Algılarının Öğrencinin Motivasyonu ve Akademik Davranışlarıyla İlişkisi. Türk PDR Dergisi, 25, 27-36.
  • Pajares, F., Britner, S. L., & Valiante, G. (2000). Relation between achievement goals and self-beliefs of middle school students in writing and science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406-422.
  • Parkay, F.W., Greenwood, G., Olejnik, S., & Proller, N. (1988). A study of the relationships among teacher efficacy, locus of control, and stress. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21 (4), 13-22.
  • Pigge, F.L. & Marso, R.N. (1990, october). The influence of Personality Type, Locus of control and Personal Attributes upon Changes in Anxiety, Attitude, and Confidence of Prospective Teachers During Training. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association. Chicago, Illinois.
  • Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
  • Pintrich, P. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544-555.
  • Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and selfregulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
  • Rose, J.S. & Medway, F.J. (1981). Janet S Rose ve Frederic J Medway Teacher loc, teacher behavior and student behavior as determinants of student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 74(6), 375-81.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1-28.
  • Sadowski, C. J., Blackwell, M. W., & Willard, J. L.(1986). Locus of Control and Student Teacher Performance. Education, 105(4), 391-393.
  • Sadowski, C.J. & Woodward, H.R. (1983). Teacher locus of control and classroom climate: A cross-lagged correlational study. Psychology in the Schools. 20(4), 506-509.
  • Sadowski, C.J., Taylor, R. C., Woodward, H. R., Peacher, R. K., & Martin, B. J.(1982). The reliability and validity of a Likerttype locus of control scale for teachers. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 12, 32. (Ms. No. 2475).
  • Seifert, T. L. (1995). Academic goals and emotions: A test of two models. The Journal of Psychology, 129, 543-552.
  • Senior, S. A. M. (2002). The relationships among psychosocial developmental status, self-esteem, locus of control, and teacher efficacy for teachers from preservice to experienced. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of the Pacific, California, United States. Retrieved March 9, 2011 from http://proquest. umi.com/pqdweb?did=726458701&sid=2&Fmt=2&clientId=6 3518&RQT=309&VName=PQD .
  • Shapiro, D. H., Schwartz, C. E., & Astin, J. A. (1996). Controlling ourselves, controlling our world: Psychology‘s role in understanding positive and negative consequences of seeking and gaining control. American Psychologist, 51, 1213-1230.
  • Skaalvik, E. (1997). Self-enhancing and self-defeating ego orientation: Relations with task and avoidance orientation, achievement, self-perceptions, and anxiety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 71-81.
  • Smith, K. E. (1997). Student teachers’ beliefs about developmentally appropriate practice: pattern, stability, and the influence of locus of control. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12 (2) , 221-243.
  • Somuncuoğlu, Y. & Yıldırım, A. (1999). Relationships between Achievement Goal Orientations and Use of Learning Strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 92(5), 267-278.
  • Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 482-497.
  • Tapola, A. & Niemivirta, M. (2008). The role of achievement goal orientations in students’ perceptions of and preferences for classroom environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 291–312.
  • Urdan, T., Midgley, C. & Anderman, E. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101-122.
  • Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6 49 - 78.
  • Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J.S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265 - 310.
  • Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68 - 81.
  • Wolters, C., Yu, S. & Pintrich, P. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211-238.
APA Buluş M (2011). Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. , 529 - 546.
Chicago Buluş Mustafa Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. (2011): 529 - 546.
MLA Buluş Mustafa Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. , 2011, ss.529 - 546.
AMA Buluş M Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. . 2011; 529 - 546.
Vancouver Buluş M Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. . 2011; 529 - 546.
IEEE Buluş M "Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı." , ss.529 - 546, 2011.
ISNAD Buluş, Mustafa. "Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı". (2011), 529-546.
APA Buluş M (2011). Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(2), 529 - 546.
Chicago Buluş Mustafa Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 11, no.2 (2011): 529 - 546.
MLA Buluş Mustafa Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, vol.11, no.2, 2011, ss.529 - 546.
AMA Buluş M Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2011; 11(2): 529 - 546.
Vancouver Buluş M Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 2011; 11(2): 529 - 546.
IEEE Buluş M "Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı." Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11, ss.529 - 546, 2011.
ISNAD Buluş, Mustafa. "Öğretmen adaylarında bireysel farklılıklar perspektifinden amaç yönelimleri,denetim odağı ve akademik başarı". Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri 11/2 (2011), 529-546.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
22-04-2024 16:28

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları