Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 264 - 273 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 İndeks Tarihi: 07-04-2023
Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training
Öz: Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effects of simulation-based obstetrics training on students' professional development and examine students' anxiety and technology readiness. Material and Methods: The study was quasi-experimental and performed with 3rd -year students in Midwifery Department (n=60) between September 2018 and January 2019. Students attended a 14-week simulation-based delivery training. In the pre-and post-training periods, the data were collected by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Tendency Scale for the Use of Technology. Results: Students reported that simulation-based delivery training improved their "professional skills" (95%) and "professional internalization" (93.4%). They stated that there was a positive effect on "anxiety in the working environment" (93.3%) in post-training. Since no significant differences were observed in scores of the Tendency Scale for the Use of Technology and STAI in pre-and post-training periods (p>0.05), it was thought that they were not potential barrier factors in the training. Conclusion: The ensuring of professional development was achieved by using simulation-based training in the study. However, technology readiness and anxiety levels were stable in pre-and post-training periods.
Anahtar Kelime: Simülasyona Dayalı Doğum Eğitimi Uygulanmasında Öğrencilerin Kaygı Durumları ve Teknolojik Hazırbulunuşluklarının İncelenmesi
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, simülasyona dayalı normal doğum dersinin öğrencilerin mesleki gelişimleri üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmek ve öğrencilerin kaygı durumları ile teknolojiye hazır bulunuşluk durumlarını incelemektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırma yarı deneysel bir çalışma olup Eylül 2018-Ocak 2019 tarihleri arasında Marmara Üniversitesi Ebelik Bölümü üçüncü sınıf öğrencileri (n=60) ile yürütülmüştür. Öğrenciler, gerçek hayat senaryolarını kapsayan 14 haftalık simülasyona dayalı normal doğum dersine katılmıştır. Veriler, eğitim öncesi ve sonrası dönemde Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri (STAI) ve Derste Teknoloji Kullanımına Yönelik Eğilim Ölçeği ile değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: Öğrenciler, simulasyona dayalı normal doğum eğitiminin, “mesleki becerilerini” (%95) ve “mesleği içselleştirmelerini” (%93.4) geliştirdiğini bildirmiştir. Eğitim sonrasında “çalışma ortamındaki kaygı” (%93.3) durumuna yönelik olumlu gelişme olduğunu belirtmişlerdir. Eğitim öncesi ve sonrasında; Derste Teknoloji Kullanımına Yönelik Eğilim Ölçeği puanı ile Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri (STAI) puanı arasında fark tespit edilmemiştir ve bu eğitim için olası engelleyici faktörler olmadıkları görülmüştür (p>0.05).Sonuç: Çalışmada simülasyona dayalı normal doğum eğitiminin mesleki gelişime katkı sağladığı bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, teknolojiye hazırbulunuşluk ve kaygı düzeylerinin eğitim öncesi ve sonrası benzer düzeyde olduğu saptanmıştır.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher. 2013;35(10):1511-30.
- 2. Kaasik-Aaslav U, Kotkas E, Paul I, Koorep M, Dragunevitš S. The use of simulation in professional learning based on examples of nursing education in Tallinn Health Care College. GPH-International Journal of Health Sciences and Nursing. 2019;2(05):01-22.
- 3. Bogossian FE, Cant RP, Ballard EL, Cooper SJ, Levett Jones TL, McKenna LG, et al. Locating “gold standard” evidence for simulation as a substitute for clinical practice in prelicensure health professional education: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2019;28(21-22):3759-75.
- 4. Hall K, Tori K. Best practice recommendations for debriefing in simulation-based education for Australian undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2017;13(1):39-50.
- 5. Martins JCA, Baptista RCN, Coutinho VRD, Fernandes MID, Fernandes A. Simulation in nursing and midwifery education. Denmark: World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe; 2018.
- 6. Kunst EL, Mitchell M, Johnston AN. Using simulation to improve the capability of undergraduate nursing students in mental health care. Nurse Education Today. 2017;50:29-35.
- 7. Brewin J, Tang J, Dasgupta P, Khan MS, Ahmed K, Bello F, et al. Full immersion simulation: Validation of a distributed simulation environment for technical and non technical skills training in Urology. BJU international. 2015;116(1):156-62.
- 8. MacKinnon K, Marcellus L, Rivers J, Gordon C, Ryan M, Butcher D. Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: A systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 2015;13(1):14-26.
- 9. Bragard I, Farhat N, Seghaye M-C, Karam O, Neuschwander A, Shayan Y, et al. Effectiveness of a high-fidelity simulation-based training program in managing cardiac arrhythmias in children: A randomized pilot study. Pediatric emergency care. 2019;35(6):412-8.
- 10. WHO. Transforming and scaling up health professionals’ education and training: World Health Organization guidelines 2013: World Health Organization; 2013.
- 11. IOM. Redesigning continuing education in the health professions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2010.
- 12. Stein C. The effect of clinical simulation assessment on stress and anxiety measures in emergency care students. African Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2020;10(1):35-9.
- 13. Montgomery J. Medical Simulation Technology: What Is It and How Does It Help? Journal of Pediatric Surgical Nursing. 2016;5(4):107-11.
- 14. Yucel C, Hawley G, Terzioglu F, Bogossian F. The effectiveness of simulation-based team training in obstetrics emergencies for improving technical skills: a systematic review. Simulation in Healthcare. 2020;15(2):98-105.
- 15. Bingöl FB, Bal MD, Karakoç A, Aslan B. Ebelik Öğrencilerinin Doğum Simülasyon Eğitimi Deneyimleri. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;11(4):711-8.
- 16. Oner N, LeCompte WA. State-trait anxiety inventory handbook: Bogazici University Publications; 1983.
- 17. Gunuc S, Kuzu A. Tendency scale for technology use in class: Development, reliability and validity. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education. 2014;10:863-84.
- 18. Spielberger CD, Sydeman SJ, Owen AE, Marsh BJ. Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1999.
- 19. Alanazi AA, Nicholson N, Thomas S. The use of simulation training to improve knowledge, skills, and confidence among healthcare students: A systematic review. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice. 2017;15(3):2.
- 20. Steadman RH, Huang YM. Simulation for quality assurance in training, credentialing and maintenance of certification. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology. 2012;26(1):3-15.
- 21. Smith R, Gray J, Raymond J, Catling-Paull C, Homer CS. Simulated learning activities: Improving midwifery students' understanding of reflective practice. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2012;8(9):e451-e7.
- 22. Catling C, Hogan R, Fox D, Cummins A, Kelly M, Sheehan A. Simulation workshops with first year midwifery students. Nurse education in practice. 2016;17:109-15.
- 23. Alinier G, Hunt WB, Gordon R. Determining the value of simulation in nurse education: study design and initial results. Nurse education in practice. 2004;4(3):200-7.
- 24. Sari D, Baysal E, Başak T, Taskiran N, Unver V. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Different Simulators in Developing Urethral Catheterization Skills in Nursing Students. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2021;8(3):285-92.
- 25. Deegan M, Terry L. Student midwives' perceptions of real-time simulation: A qualitative phenomenological study. British Journal of Midwifery. 2013;21(8):590-8.
- 26. Martins JCA, Baptista RCN, Coutinho VRD, Mazzo A, Rodrigues MA, Mendes IAC. Self-confidence for emergency intervention: Adaptation and cultural validation of the Self-confidence Scale in nursing students. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem. 2014;22(4):554-61.
- 27. Nguyen HB, Daniel-Underwood L, Van Ginkel C, Wong M, Lee D, San Lucas A, et al. An educational course including medical simulation for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: An evaluation for medical student training. Resuscitation. 2009;80(6):674-9.
- 28. Terzioglu F, Kapucu S, Ozdemir L, Boztepe H, Duygulu S, Tuna Z, et al. Simülasyon yöntemine ilişkin hemşirelik öğrencilerinin görüşleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2012;19(1):16-23.
- 29. Estriegana R, Medina-Merodio J-A, Barchino R. Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Computers & Education. 2019;135:1-14.
- 30. Negrão Baptista RC, Amado Martins JC, Carneiro Ribeiro Pereira MF, Mazzo A. High-Fidelity Simulation in the Nursing Degree: Gains perceived by students. Revista de Enfermagem Referência. 2014;4(1).
- 31. Kuznar KA. Associate degree nursing students' perceptions of learning using a high-fidelity human patient simulator. Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 2007;2(2):46-52.
- 32. Ohtake PJ, Lazarus M, Schillo R, Rosen M. Simulation experience enhances physical therapist student confidence in managing a patient in the critical care environment. Physical therapy. 2013;93(2):216-28.
- 33. Gordon M, Box H, Farrell M, Stewrt A. Non-technical skills learning in healthcare through simulation education: Integrating the SECTORS learning model and complexity theory. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning. 2015;1(2):67-70.
- 34. Norris G. The midwifery curriculum: Introducing obstetric emergency simulation. British Journal of Midwifery. 2008;16(4):232-5.
- 35. Szpak JL, Kameg KM. Simulation decreases nursing student anxiety prior to communication with mentally ill patients. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013;9(1):13-9.
- 36. Bambini D, Washburn J, Perkins R. Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: Communication, confidence, clinical judgment. Nursing education perspectives. 2009;30(2):79-82.
- 37. Hayden JK, Smiley RA, Alexander M, Kardong-Edgren S, Jeffries PR. The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal, randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2014;5(2):3- 40.
- 38. Yilmaz FT, Kelleci M, Aldemir K. The Effect of High Fidelity Simulation Training on Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills in Nursing Students in Turkey. Educational Research in Medical Sciences. 2018;7(2).
- 39. Merién A, Van de Ven J, Mol B, Houterman S, Oei S. Multidisciplinary team training in a simulation setting for acute obstetric emergencies: A systematic review. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010;115(5):1021-31.
- 40. Yee B, Naik VN, Joo HS, Savoldelli GL, Chung DY, Houston PL, et al. Nontechnical skills in anesthesia crisis management with repeated exposure to simulation-based education. Anesthesiology: The Journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists. 2005;103(2):241-8.
- 41. Lewis R, Strachan A, Smith MM. Is high fidelity simulation the most effective method for the development of non-technical skills in nursing? A review of the current evidence. The open nursing journal. 2012;6:82.
- 42. Heafner T. Using technology to motivate students to learn social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. 2004;4(1):42-53.
- 43. Mason R, Rennie F. E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education: Routledge; 2008.
- 44. Kirkley D, Johnson AP, Anderson MA. Technology support of nursing excellence: The magnet connection. Nursing Economics. 2004;22(2):94-9.
- 45. LeBlanc VR, Manser T, Weinger MB, Musson D, Kutzin J, Howard SK. The study of factors affecting human and systems performance in healthcare using simulation. Simulation in Healthcare. 2011;6(7):24-9.
- 46. Sørensen JL, van der Vleuten C, Rosthøj S, Østergaard D, LeBlanc V, Johansen M, et al. Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: A randomised educational trial. BMJ open. 2015;5(10).
- 47. Pardue KT, Morgan P. Millennials considered: A new generation, new approaches, and implications for nursing education. Nursing education perspectives. 2008;29(2):74-9.
- 48. Sarmasoglu S, Dinç L, Elçin M. Using standardized patients in nursing education: Effects on students’ psychomotor skill development. Nurse Educator. 2016;41(2):1-5.
- 49. Cobbett S, Snelgrove-Clarke E. Virtual versus face-to- face clinical simulation in relation to student knowledge, anxiety, and self-confidence in maternal- newborn nursing: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Education Today. 2016;45:179-84.
- 50. Dearmon V, Graves RJ, Hayden S, Mulekar MS, Lawrence SM, Jones L, et al. Effectiveness of simulation-based orientation of baccalaureate nursing students preparing for their first clinical experience. Journal of Nursing Education. 2013;52(1):29-38.
- 51. Megel ME, Black J, Clark L, Carstens P, Jenkins LD, Promes J, et al. Effect of high-fidelity simulation on pediatric nursing students’ anxiety. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2012;8(9):419-28.
- 52. Jowsey T, Petersen L, Mysko C, Cooper-Ioelu P, Herbst P, Webster CS, et al. Performativity, identity formation and professionalism: Ethnographic research to explore student experiences of clinical simulation training. PloS one. 2020;15(7):e0236085.
- 53. Katz NT, Sacks BH, Hynson JL, Heywood M, Williams M, Sokol J. Improving paediatric advance care planning: Results of a learning needs analysis and simulation based education programme. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2020.
- 54. Tabatabai S. COVID-19 impact and virtual medical education. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2020;8(3):140-3
| APA | AYYILDIZ S, Candereli Z, KILIÇ AKSU P, ÇATAR R, kitapci o, Sisman Kitapci N, KÖKSAL L, Demirgöz Bal M, Mumcu G (2022). Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. , 264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| Chicago | AYYILDIZ Seda,Candereli Zehra Ozge,KILIÇ AKSU PINAR,ÇATAR RAMAZAN OZGÜR,kitapci okan cem,Sisman Kitapci Nur,KÖKSAL LEYLA,Demirgöz Bal Meltem,Mumcu Gonca Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. (2022): 264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| MLA | AYYILDIZ Seda,Candereli Zehra Ozge,KILIÇ AKSU PINAR,ÇATAR RAMAZAN OZGÜR,kitapci okan cem,Sisman Kitapci Nur,KÖKSAL LEYLA,Demirgöz Bal Meltem,Mumcu Gonca Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. , 2022, ss.264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| AMA | AYYILDIZ S,Candereli Z,KILIÇ AKSU P,ÇATAR R,kitapci o,Sisman Kitapci N,KÖKSAL L,Demirgöz Bal M,Mumcu G Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. . 2022; 264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| Vancouver | AYYILDIZ S,Candereli Z,KILIÇ AKSU P,ÇATAR R,kitapci o,Sisman Kitapci N,KÖKSAL L,Demirgöz Bal M,Mumcu G Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. . 2022; 264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| IEEE | AYYILDIZ S,Candereli Z,KILIÇ AKSU P,ÇATAR R,kitapci o,Sisman Kitapci N,KÖKSAL L,Demirgöz Bal M,Mumcu G "Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training." , ss.264 - 273, 2022. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| ISNAD | AYYILDIZ, Seda vd. "Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training". (2022), 264-273. https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| APA | AYYILDIZ S, Candereli Z, KILIÇ AKSU P, ÇATAR R, kitapci o, Sisman Kitapci N, KÖKSAL L, Demirgöz Bal M, Mumcu G (2022). Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(3), 264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| Chicago | AYYILDIZ Seda,Candereli Zehra Ozge,KILIÇ AKSU PINAR,ÇATAR RAMAZAN OZGÜR,kitapci okan cem,Sisman Kitapci Nur,KÖKSAL LEYLA,Demirgöz Bal Meltem,Mumcu Gonca Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi 9, no.3 (2022): 264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| MLA | AYYILDIZ Seda,Candereli Zehra Ozge,KILIÇ AKSU PINAR,ÇATAR RAMAZAN OZGÜR,kitapci okan cem,Sisman Kitapci Nur,KÖKSAL LEYLA,Demirgöz Bal Meltem,Mumcu Gonca Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.9, no.3, 2022, ss.264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| AMA | AYYILDIZ S,Candereli Z,KILIÇ AKSU P,ÇATAR R,kitapci o,Sisman Kitapci N,KÖKSAL L,Demirgöz Bal M,Mumcu G Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 9(3): 264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| Vancouver | AYYILDIZ S,Candereli Z,KILIÇ AKSU P,ÇATAR R,kitapci o,Sisman Kitapci N,KÖKSAL L,Demirgöz Bal M,Mumcu G Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 9(3): 264 - 273. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| IEEE | AYYILDIZ S,Candereli Z,KILIÇ AKSU P,ÇATAR R,kitapci o,Sisman Kitapci N,KÖKSAL L,Demirgöz Bal M,Mumcu G "Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training." Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, 9, ss.264 - 273, 2022. 10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
| ISNAD | AYYILDIZ, Seda vd. "Assessment of Students' Anxiety Level and Technology Readiness in a Simulation-Based Obstetrics Training". Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi 9/3 (2022), 264-273. https://doi.org/10.31125/hunhemsire.1229918 |
