In this study, we aim to investigate inflation persistency in Turkey, which has experienced significant changes in monetaiy policy regime in the last 30 years, and to find out if the policies that were implemented have been effective in this process or not. Inflation persistency has aroused as an issue due to the difficulties in reducing the inflation rate, which seems to be taken under control since 2003, to a desired level such as below % 4-5,To reduce the inflation rate to a desired level and to keep it stable there by applying appropriate economic policies depends on how low the inflation persistency is. Therefore, it is important to know the structure and the level of the persistency of inflation rate and also it necessitates investigating inflation persistency according to econometrics. With (his aim I conducted a study which has four parts. First part has the summaiy of economic policies and price movements in the time period thai was investigated to have a better understanding of the structure of the inflation persistency. Second pail is the summaiy of literature review. Third part shows the method, data collection and analysis. Conclusion section has the data evaluation.We can define inflation persistence as inflation's tendency to turn its average long term level slowly. When inflation has a high persistency, centra! bank needs to apply more effective policies than the time periods when it had low persistency in order to get inflation closer to the targeted level.Inflation persistency can be estimated by using a variety of econometric methods. If these estimates are done by considering the structural breaks in the sequence, then we could gel more reliable results. Therefore, our study has been conducted by considering structural breaks. However, the dates of structural hrealcs can he both taken exogenous!)' and endogenously from the data. In this study, in order to determine structural breaks points more objectively, they were taken as endogenously.In this study, irtr used univariate time series method because we aimed to understand if (he shocks that were effecting inflation series were permanent or not by examining the form behavior of the series. Therefore, we adopted Bai-Perron method which is used when there are structural breaks in the inflation series because the test makes it possible to have more than one break and it accepts break points endogenously so it is different from other methods.In our study, ire tried to determine the structural change periods of the inflation rate in Turkey by using quarterly data from I9S2 to 2010. According to thesuggested method, during the analysis phase we firstly need to determine the structural change number in the series. Bai-Perron suggest to use SupF T(l) and Sup T{ll+1) test statistics to determine structural change number during the analysis, minimum obsen'ation number between the estimated structural change points was chosen as h=ll when maximum breaking number is 8 and e=0.10. All methods are implemented in the GA ÖSS program.As a result, sequential test results have shown that there are 4 structural change period in inflation rate series in Turkey. These periods were estimated by minimizing the sum of squared residuals of general model. Also, confidence inten>al is calculatcd fur these estimated periods and they are all presented in tables.Considering the time periods that was analyzed, it has been seen that there were structural changes in the average of inflation rate series in Turkey during J987:03, 1993:04, 1998:01 and 2001:04. According to these stmctural change dates, the time between the 19S2 and third quarter of 1987 is called as first period; second period is the time between the last quarters of 19S7 and 1993; third period is the time from the first quarter of 1994 to the first quarter of 1998; fourth period is the time from the second quarter of 1998 till the fourth quarter of2001; and finally the time after 2002 is called as fifth period.The data that have been found is parallel with the internal and external cyclical economic occasions. When analysis results were evaluated according to this, it um seen that the economic policies that were applied to reduce the inflation until 2004 have not been permanently effective.$hat {delta} _{l,j} $ and $hat {delta} _{2,j}$ (j=l,...,5) coefficients show average of inflation rate and thevalue of AR coefficient in eveiy sub period respectively. On the other hand, these$hat {delta} _{2,j}$ coefficients which show the value ofAR coefficients in the estimated modelare actually the coefficients which show the change İn the inflation persistence in terms of periods. These coefficients were evaluated in terms of periods and as a result of structural tests, they were found statistically meaningful only after the fourth stmctural change period. This proves that compared to the previous period, there was a considerable change in the inflation persistency in the last period. When (he coefficients that were obtained from the results of the analysis were considered as a whole, İt was seen that with the effect from external conjecture inflation has started to he under control in this period when ire transferred to implicit inflation targeting and also, İn this period inflation persistency has started to break. However, in order to reduce the inflation to a desired level and to keep it stable there, inflation persistency should continue to decrease for a while.