Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 337 - 343 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31362/patd.972916 İndeks Tarihi: 25-04-2023
Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital
Öz: Purpose: It was aimed to evaluate the results and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in a second stage state hospital by a surgeon after Urology residency.Materials and methods: Between January 2019 and January 2020, PCNL was applied to 102 renal units in 97patients with kidney stones in a second stage state hospital. Standard PCNL was performed in all patients in the prone position with a 26 Fr rigid nephroscope and pneumatic lithotripter. The data of the patients were collected retrospectively. Success rates, length of stay, and complications were evaluated in the light of the literature.Results: The average age of 97 patients who underwent PCNL was 41.7±10.5 (8-71) and 54 (55.7%) of thesepatients were male and 43 (44.3%) were female. Access was provided to 102 renal units. 42 (41.2%) of themwere left and 60 (58.8%) were right. The mean stone surface area was 8.3±5.5 (2-34) cm2 and the numberof stones per patient was 2.4. Operation time was measured as 85>32 (40-170) minutes. The duration offluoroscopy was observed as 1.2±0.2 (0.5-9) minutes. The stone free rate was achieved in 86 (84.3%) of 102cases. Including clinically insignificant residual fragments (>4 mm), the overall success rate was 93.1%. Thehospital stay of the patients was 2.7 (1-11) days. The number of patients with major and minor complications was 21 (20.6%).Conclusion: We thought that PCNL can be applied safely and effectively in 2nd stage state hospitals withacceptable complications and success rates in line by the literature.
Anahtar Kelime: Uzmanlık eğitimi sonrasi perkütan nefrolitotominin 2. basamak ilçe devlet hastanesinde uygulanabilirliği
Öz: Amaç: Bu çalışmada; uzmanlık eğitimi sonrasında perkütan nefrolitotomiyi (PNL) 2. basamak ilçe devlethastanesinde gerçekleştiren bir cerrahın başarı oranları ve karşılaşılan komplikasyonları değerlendirmekamaçlandı.Gereç ve yöntem: Ocak 2019 ile Ocak 2020 tarihleri arasında böbrek taşı olan 97 hastadaki 102 renal üniteye2. basamak devlet hastanesinde PNL uygulandı. Tüm hastalara standart PNL 26 Fr rijit nefroskop ve pnömotik litotriptör kullanılarak prone pozisyonda uygulandı. Hastaların verileri retrospektif olarak toplandı. Başarı oranları, yatış süreleri, karşılaşılan komplikasyonlar literatür eşliğinde değerlendirildi.Bulgular: PNL yapılan 97 hastanın yaş ortalaması 41,7±10,5 ve bu hastaların 54’ü (%55,7) erkek, 43’ü (%44,3)kadındı. 42’si (%41,2) sol, 60’ı (%58,8) sağ böbrek olmak üzere 102 renal üniteye giriş sağlandı. Ortalamataş yükü 8,3±5,5 cm2 ve ortalama taş sayısı 2,4 olarak tespit edildi. Operasyon süresi ortalama 85±32 dakika olarak ölçüldü. Skopi süresi ortalama 1,2±0,2 dakika olarak izlendi. Toplam 102 vakanın 86’sında (%84,3) taşsızlık sağlandı. Klinik önemsiz rezidüel fragmanlar (>4 mm) da dahil edildiğinde genel başarı oranı %93,1 idi. Hastaların hastanede kalış süresi 2,7 (1-11) gün olarak izlendi. Majör ve minör komplikasyon görülen hasta sayısı 21 (%20,6)’di.Sonuç: PNL uzmanlık eğitimi sonrası 2. basamak ilçe devlet hastanelerinde literatürle uyumlu komplikasyon ve başarı oranları ile güvenli ve etkin bir şekilde uygulanabileceğini düşünmekteyiz.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol 1976;10:257-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/216818 05.1976.11882084
- 2. Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2016;69:475-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2015.07.041
- 3. De la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, PierreConort P. Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy a critical review. Eur Urol 2008;54:994- 1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.052
- 4. Bayar G, Kadihasanoglu M, Aydin M, Sariogullari U, Tanriverdi O, Kendirici M. The effect of stone localization on the success and complication rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J 2014;11:1938- 1942. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v11i06.2507
- 5. Bıçaklıoğlu F, Koparal MY, Bulut EC. Perkütan nefrolitotomi’ye 2. basamak devlet hastanesinde başlamak güvenli ve etkin mi?: ilk 60 vaka. Kocaeli Med J 2019;8:115-124. https://doi.org/10.5505/ ktd.2019.05826
- 6. Tefekli A, Karadag MA, Tepeler K, et al. Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 2008;53:184-190. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.06.049
- 7. Ramakumar S, Segura JW. Renal calculi: percutaneous management. Urol Clin North Am 2000;27:617-622. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70111-7
- 8. De La Rosette JJ, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol 2011;25:11-17. https://doi. org/10.1089/end.2010.0424
- 9. Skolarikos A, Alivizatos G, De La Rosette JJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its legacy. Eur Urol 2005;47:22-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2004.08.009
- 10. Benli E, Keleş İ, Geçit İ, et al. Perkütan Nefrolitotripsi Deneyimimiz. Van Med J 2012;19:102-107.
- 11. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 2005;173:1991-2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/01. ju.0000161171.67806.2a
- 12. De La Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP, et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:246-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. eururo.2012.03.055
- 13. Ganpule AP, Bhattu AS, Desai M. PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc. World J Urol 2015;33:235-240. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1415-1
- 14. Ketsuwan C, Pimpanit N, Phengsalae Y, Leenanupunth C, Kongchareonsombat W, Sangkum P. Peri-operative factors affecting blood transfusion requirements during PCNL: a retrospective non-randomized study. Res Rep Urol 2020;12:279-285. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU. S261888
- 15. Zumrutbas AE, Toktas C, Baser A, Tuncay OL. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in rare bleeding disorders: a case report and review of the literature. J Endourol Case Rep 2016;2:198-203. https://doi. org/10.1089/cren.2016.0105
- 16. Kervancioglu S, Gelebek Yilmaz F, Erturhan S. Endovascular management of vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Vasa 2014;43:459- 464. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000393
- 17. Yalçin V, Önder AU, Demirkesen O, Önal B, Kalkan M, Kural AR. Böbrek taşlarının tedavisinde perkütan nefrolitotomi. Turk J Urol 2002;28:194-200.
- 18. Fareed R, Shamim H. The pattern of day case (ambulatory) percutaneous (PCNL): a descriptive retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital. Nephro-Urol Mon 2021;13:e103332. https://doi. org/10.5812/numonthly.103332
- 19. Pai A. Ambulatory management of renal stone disease. Ambulatory Urology and Urogynaecology 2021:159- 165. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119052258.ch13
| APA | sevim m, Alkis O, Kartal I, Aras B (2022). Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. , 337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| Chicago | sevim mehmet,Alkis Okan,Kartal Ibrahim,Aras Bekir Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. (2022): 337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| MLA | sevim mehmet,Alkis Okan,Kartal Ibrahim,Aras Bekir Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. , 2022, ss.337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| AMA | sevim m,Alkis O,Kartal I,Aras B Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. . 2022; 337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| Vancouver | sevim m,Alkis O,Kartal I,Aras B Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. . 2022; 337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| IEEE | sevim m,Alkis O,Kartal I,Aras B "Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital." , ss.337 - 343, 2022. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| ISNAD | sevim, mehmet vd. "Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital". (2022), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.972916 |
| APA | sevim m, Alkis O, Kartal I, Aras B (2022). Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, 15(2), 337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| Chicago | sevim mehmet,Alkis Okan,Kartal Ibrahim,Aras Bekir Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi 15, no.2 (2022): 337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| MLA | sevim mehmet,Alkis Okan,Kartal Ibrahim,Aras Bekir Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, vol.15, no.2, 2022, ss.337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| AMA | sevim m,Alkis O,Kartal I,Aras B Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi. 2022; 15(2): 337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| Vancouver | sevim m,Alkis O,Kartal I,Aras B Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi. 2022; 15(2): 337 - 343. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| IEEE | sevim m,Alkis O,Kartal I,Aras B "Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital." Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi, 15, ss.337 - 343, 2022. 10.31362/patd.972916 |
| ISNAD | sevim, mehmet vd. "Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy after urology residency training in the 2nd stage state hospital". Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi 15/2 (2022), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.31362/patd.972916 |
