FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES

SEN, CEYLAN; GÜLER, GÜRSEL

FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES

Ceylan GÜLER, (Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Bölümü, Yozgat, Türkiye)

Gürsel GÜLER (Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenliği Bölümü, Yozgat, Türkiye)

Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi

4 3

Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 13 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 09-09-2023

FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES

Öz:

In this study, it was aimed to examine the argumentation structures of 5th-grade middle school students, while they were structuring geometric concepts in argumentation-based activities of geometric shapes. To this end, 7 fifth-grade students studying in a public middle school were included in the study. In the study, five geometry tasks involving activities based on materials of geometric shapes were carried out. The geometry tasks were structured based on argumentation, and the argumentation structures of students in the processes of structuring geometric concepts were analyzed. In the study, the argumentation structures of source-structure, spiral-structure, and reservoir-structure emerged from the student discussions and communications. According to these results, teaching activities structured based on geometric shapes and materials were observed to be effective in revealing students' different argumentation structures.

Anahtar Kelime: argumentation structures quadrangles middle school students

GEOMETRİK ŞEKİL DENİZİNDE ÖĞRENCİLERİN ARGÜMANTASYON YAPILARI

Öz:

Bu çalışmada, ortaokul 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin argümantasyon temelli geometrik şekil etkinliklerinde geometri kavramlarını yapılandırırken ortaya çıkan argümantasyon yapılarını incelemek hedeflenmiştir. Bu amaçla, bir devlet ortaokulunda öğrenim görmekte olan 7 beşinci sınıf öğrencisi çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Çalışmada, geometrik şekil oluşturma materyallerine dayalı etkinlikleri kapsayan beş geometri görevi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Geometri görevleri argümantasyon temelli olarak yapılandırılmış ve öğrencilerin geometri kavramlarını yapılandırma süreçlerinde argümantasyon yapıları ortaya konulmuştur. Çalışmada, öğrencilerin karşılıklı konuşma ve tartışmaları sistematik olarak incelenmiş ve bu inceleme sonucunda kaynak-yapı, spiral-yapı ve rezervuar-yapı argümantasyon yapıları ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu sonuçlara göre, geometrik şekil oluşturma materyallerine dayalı olarak yapılandırılan öğretim etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin farklı argümantasyon yapılarını ortaya çıkarmada etkili olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelime: argümantasyon yapıları dörtgenler ortaokul öğrencileri

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Antonini, S., & Martignone, F. (2011). Argumentation in exploring mathematical machines: A study on pantographs. In Ubuz, B. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2, (pp. 41- 48). Turkey.
Cervantes-Barraza, J. A., & Cabañas-Sánchez, G. C. (2018). Argumentos formales y visuales en argumentaciones colectivas [Formal and visual arguments in primary geometry class]. Educación Matemática, 30(1), 148-168. https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3001.06
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098- 237X(200005)84:3<287::AID- SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
Erkek, Ö., & Işıksal Bostan, M. (2019). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ global argumentation structures. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 613-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018- 9884-0
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill.
Heinze, A., & Reiss, K. (2007). Reasoning and proof in the mathematics classroom. Analysis, 27(2-3), 333-357. https://doi.org/10.1524/anly.2007.27.2- 3.333
Hitchcock, D., & Verheij, B. (2005). The Toulmin model today: Introduction to the special issue on contemporary work using Stephen Edelston Toulmin’s layout of arguments. Argumentation, 19, 255- 258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503- 005-4414-y
Hunter, R., & Anthony, G. (2011). Learning to “friendly argue” in a community of mathematical inquiry (Teaching and learning research initiative report). New Zealand Educational Research Council.
Knipping, C. (2008). A method for revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. ZDM Mathematics Education, 40(3), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008- 0095-y
Knipping, C., & Reid, D. (2013). Revealing structures of argumentations in classroom proving processes. In A. Aberdein, & I. J. Dove (Eds.), Logic, epistemology, and the unity of science (pp. 119-146). Springer.
Kosko, K. W., Rougee, A., & Herbst, P. (2014). What actions do teachers envision when asked to facilitate mathematical argumentation in the classroom? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(3), 459–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013- 0116-1
Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229-269). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lampert, M., & Cobb, P. (2003). Communication and language. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to NCTM’s principles and standards (pp. 237-249). NCTM.
Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19-44). Ablex.
Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 87-113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:10140310048 32
Mason, L. (1996). An analysis of children's construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951839960090 404
Ministry of National Education. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) [Mathematics curriculum: Elementary and middle schools 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8th grades)]. Talim Terbiye Kurul Başkanlığı.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM. Rumsey, C. (2012). Advancing fourth-grade students' understanding of arithmetic properties with instruction that promotes mathematical argumentation [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Illinois State University.
Solar, H., & Deulofeu, J. (2016). Condiciones para promover el desarrollo de la competencia de argumentación en el aula de matemáticas [Conditions to promote the development of argumentation competence in the mathematics classroom]. Bolema, 30(56), 1092-1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980- 4415v30n56a13
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 313- 340. https://doi.org/10.1080/1098606080222 9675
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, J. (2002). Mechanical linkages, dynamic geometry software, and argumentation: Supporting a classroom culture of mathematical proof [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Melbourne.
Walter, J. G., & Barros, T. (2011). Students build mathematical theory: Semantic warrants in argumentation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 78(3), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.007/S10649-011- 9326-1
Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21(4), 423-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732- 3123(02)00143-8
Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/749877

APA	SEN C, GÜLER G (2023). FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. , 1 - 13.
Chicago	SEN CEYLAN,GÜLER GÜRSEL FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. (2023): 1 - 13.
MLA	SEN CEYLAN,GÜLER GÜRSEL FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. , 2023, ss.1 - 13.
AMA	SEN C,GÜLER G FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. . 2023; 1 - 13.
Vancouver	SEN C,GÜLER G FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. . 2023; 1 - 13.
IEEE	SEN C,GÜLER G "FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES." , ss.1 - 13, 2023.
ISNAD	SEN, CEYLAN - GÜLER, GÜRSEL. "FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES". (2023), 1-13.

APA	SEN C, GÜLER G (2023). FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi, 13(1), 1 - 13.
Chicago	SEN CEYLAN,GÜLER GÜRSEL FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi 13, no.1 (2023): 1 - 13.
MLA	SEN CEYLAN,GÜLER GÜRSEL FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi, vol.13, no.1, 2023, ss.1 - 13.
AMA	SEN C,GÜLER G FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi. 2023; 13(1): 1 - 13.
Vancouver	SEN C,GÜLER G FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES. Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi. 2023; 13(1): 1 - 13.
IEEE	SEN C,GÜLER G "FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES." Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi, 13, ss.1 - 13, 2023.
ISNAD	SEN, CEYLAN - GÜLER, GÜRSEL. "FIFTH-GRADE STUDENTS’ ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURES IN THE POOL OF GEOMETRIC SHAPES". Araştırma Temelli Etkinlik Dergisi 13/1 (2023), 1-13.