Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 4 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1 İndeks Tarihi: 04-05-2023

Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report

Öz:
Objective: This study aimed to present the data of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) whose detailed information was stored in the Urologic Cancer Database- Prostate, Urooncology Association, Turkey with the title of “Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021.” Materials and Methods: Patient data between 1995 and 2020 were retrospectively scanned. The age of the patients, their distribution according to age groups, symptoms during diagnosis, examination findings [digital rectal examination (DRE)], prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, biopsy methods in the diagnosis, metastatic disease rates, treatment methods, and progression rates at follow-up were examined. These results were compared with the results of the previous report, namely “Prostate Cancer Incidence (Incidence) in Turkey,” by the Urooncology Association in Turkey in 2009. Results: This study analyzed the data of 5040 patients from 19 different centers. The mean patient age was 63.6 (37-97) years. The age distribution examination revealed that most patients (49.8%) were aged 60-69 years. Of the patients, 51.8% were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis. The presence of symptoms was determined in 88.6% in 2009 data. The DRE of patients revealed that 25% of patients had malignancy findings. The PSA distribution examination revealed a >10 ng/mL PSA value in 37.5% of patients. With the increasing use of magnetic imaging resonance (MRI) in PCa diagnosis over the years, increased MR-fusion biopsy rates have been observed. Considering the biopsy data, 91% of patients were diagnosed with a classical transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy, whereas 9% were diagnosed with MR-Fusion biopsy. Fusion biopsies revealed that 23% of patients with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 lesion and 57% with PI-RADS 5 lesion were diagnosed with cancer. Of the patients, 8.9% of patients had metastases during the initial diagnosis. This rate was 17% in 2009 data. The treatment methods examination after the diagnosis revealed that 73.9% of patients had undergone radical prostatectomy. This rate was 51.8% in 2009. Robotic and laparoscopic approaches, which are among the surgical modalities, have increased over the years. However, the most frequently applied modality in our country was open radical prostatectomy with 62.6%. Considering the follow-up data after treatment, 8.9% of patients had progression, of which 62.6% was biochemical, 30.2% was radiological, and 6.9% was a clinical progression. Conclusion: Technological advancements for PCa diagnosis (MRI and MR-guided biopsies) are becoming a routine part of daily practice compared to the results of the “Prostate Cancer Incidence in Turkey” project in 2009. The comparative study results revealed that the rate of symptomatic and metastatic disease decreases at the time of diagnosis, and laparoscopic and robotic surgery methods are used at increasing rates for localized disease.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2017. National Cancer Institute, 2020.
  • 2. Zorlu F, Zorlu R, Divrik RT, et al. Prostate cancer incidence in Turkey: an epidemiological study. 2014;15:9125-9130.
  • 3. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-381.
  • 4. Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019;95:103208.
  • 5. Reback J, McKinney W, Den Van Bossche J, et al. pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas 1.0. 3. Zenodo, 2020.
  • 6. McKinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference: Austin: TX; 2010. p. 51-56.
  • 7. Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 2020;17:261-272.
  • 8. Kluyver T, Ragan-Kelley B, Pérez F, et al. Jupyter Notebooks-a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows. 2016. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/403913/1/STAL9781614996491-0087. pdf
  • 9. Eser S, Zorlu F, Divtik RT, et al. Incidence and epidemiological features of cancers of the genitourinary tract in Izmir between 1993-2002. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2009;10:491-496.
  • 10. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics for hispanics/ latinos, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:283-298.
  • 11. Cózar JM, Miñana B, Gómez-Veiga F, et al. Prostate cancer incidence and newly diagnosed patient profile in Spain in 2010. BJU Int 2012;110:701-706.
  • 12. Grivas N, Hastazeris K, Kafarakis V, et al. Prostate cancer epidemiology in a rural area of North Western Greece. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:999-1002.
  • 13. Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, et al. Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:529-534.
  • 14. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:168-172.
  • 15. Bratan F, Niaf E, Melodelima C, et al. Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study. Eur Radiol 2013;23:2019-2029.
  • 16. Le JD, Tan N, Shkolyar E, et al. Multifocality and prostate cancer detection by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: correlation with whole-mount histopathology. Eur Urol 2015;67:569-576.
  • 17. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, et al. EAU - ESTRO - ESUR - SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer 2020. European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2020 Edition. Vol presented at the EAU Annual Congress Amsterdam 2020. Arnhem, The Netherlands: European Association of Urology Guidelines Office; 2020.
  • 18. Lowrance WT, Eastham JA, Savage C, et al. Contemporary open and robotic radical prostatectomy practice patterns among urologists in the United States. J Urol 2012;187:2087-2092.
  • 19. Öbek C, Doğanca T, Demirci E, et al. The accuracy of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in primary lymph node staging in high-risk prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:1806-1812.
  • 20. Klingenberg S, Jochumsen MR, Ulhøi BP, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/ CT for Primary Lymph Node and Distant Metastasis NM Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Nucl Med 2021;62:214-220.
APA Şahin B, Celik S, Tinay I, Eskicorapci S, Aslan G, Sozen T, Ataus S, Türkeri L (2022). Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. , 1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
Chicago Şahin Bahadır,Celik Serdar,Tinay Ilker,Eskicorapci Saadettin,Aslan Guven,Sozen Tevfik Sinan,Ataus Suleyman,Türkeri Levent Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. (2022): 1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
MLA Şahin Bahadır,Celik Serdar,Tinay Ilker,Eskicorapci Saadettin,Aslan Guven,Sozen Tevfik Sinan,Ataus Suleyman,Türkeri Levent Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. , 2022, ss.1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
AMA Şahin B,Celik S,Tinay I,Eskicorapci S,Aslan G,Sozen T,Ataus S,Türkeri L Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. . 2022; 1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
Vancouver Şahin B,Celik S,Tinay I,Eskicorapci S,Aslan G,Sozen T,Ataus S,Türkeri L Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. . 2022; 1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
IEEE Şahin B,Celik S,Tinay I,Eskicorapci S,Aslan G,Sozen T,Ataus S,Türkeri L "Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report." , ss.1 - 4, 2022. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
ISNAD Şahin, Bahadır vd. "Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report". (2022), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
APA Şahin B, Celik S, Tinay I, Eskicorapci S, Aslan G, Sozen T, Ataus S, Türkeri L (2022). Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, 21(1), 1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
Chicago Şahin Bahadır,Celik Serdar,Tinay Ilker,Eskicorapci Saadettin,Aslan Guven,Sozen Tevfik Sinan,Ataus Suleyman,Türkeri Levent Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. Üroonkoloji Bülteni 21, no.1 (2022): 1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
MLA Şahin Bahadır,Celik Serdar,Tinay Ilker,Eskicorapci Saadettin,Aslan Guven,Sozen Tevfik Sinan,Ataus Suleyman,Türkeri Levent Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, vol.21, no.1, 2022, ss.1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
AMA Şahin B,Celik S,Tinay I,Eskicorapci S,Aslan G,Sozen T,Ataus S,Türkeri L Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. Üroonkoloji Bülteni. 2022; 21(1): 1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
Vancouver Şahin B,Celik S,Tinay I,Eskicorapci S,Aslan G,Sozen T,Ataus S,Türkeri L Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report. Üroonkoloji Bülteni. 2022; 21(1): 1 - 4. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
IEEE Şahin B,Celik S,Tinay I,Eskicorapci S,Aslan G,Sozen T,Ataus S,Türkeri L "Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report." Üroonkoloji Bülteni, 21, ss.1 - 4, 2022. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1
ISNAD Şahin, Bahadır vd. "Turkey Prostate Cancer Map 2021: Turkish Urooncology Association Prostate Cancer Database Report". Üroonkoloji Bülteni 21/1 (2022), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.4274/uob.galenos.2021.2021.11.1