Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

bilgin, ahmet burak; UTKU, EMIN

doi:10.14744/eer.2022.80664

Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

EMIN UTKU, (Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi, Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Göz Hastalıkları Kliniği, Antalya, Türkiye)

Ahmet Burak BİLGİN (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Hastanesi Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Antalya, Türkiye)

European eye research

1 0

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 54 - 61 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/eer.2022.80664 İndeks Tarihi: 05-05-2023

Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

Öz:

Purpose: The objective of the study was to evaluate the factors affecting visual prognosis and to analyze optical coherence tomography findings after successful pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: Forty-one eyes of 41 patients who underwent PPV for RRD for the 1st time between December 2010 and July 2013 were included in the study with a retrospective design. Patients were divided into two groups according to visual acuity: Group 1 consisted of 24 patients with improved final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after post-operative 6th month; Group 2 consisted of a total of 17 patients: 14 patients with stable final BCVA and 3 patients with deteriorated final BCVA after the post-operative 6th month. Correlation between preoperative and postoperative variables was assessed. Results: The mean follow-up period was 16.93±7.5 (range, 7–36) months. While 26 (63.4%) patients had macula-off RRD, 15 (36.6%) patients had macula-on RRD. Pre-operative BCVA (p<0.001) and post-operative BCVA (p=0.002) was significantly better in eyes with macula-on RRD. Pre-operative and post-operative BCVA were found to have positive correlation (p<0.001, r=0.58). The number of eyes with intact photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment (IS/OS) junction, disrupted IS/OS junction, foveal epiretinal membrane (ERM), and parafoveal ERM was 8 (33.3%), 2 (8.3%), 1 (4.2%), and 13 (54.2%) in Group 1, while it was 2 (11.8%), 3 (17.6%), 2 (11.8%), and 10 (58.8%) in Group 2, respectively. Conclusion: Pre-operative BCVA and absence of macular detachment are important prognostic factors in patients with RRD.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Schmidt JC, Rodrigues EB, Hoerle S, Meyer CH, Kroll P. Primary vitrectomy in complicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment-- A survey of 205 eyes. Ophthalmologica 2003;217:387– 92.
2. Wolfensberger TJ, Gonvers M. Optical coherence tomography in the evaluation of incomplete visual acuity recovery after macula-off retinal detachments. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;240:85–9.
3. Schocket LS, Witkin AJ, Fujimoto JG, Ko TH, Schuman JS, Rogers AH, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography in patients with decreased visual acuity after retinal detachment repair. Ophthalmology 2006;113:666–72.
4. Matsui A, Toshida H, Honda R, Seto T, Ohta T, Murakami A. preoperative and postoperative optical coherence tomography findings in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment ınvolving the macular region. ISRN Ophthalmol 2013;2013:1–6.
5. Wakabayashi T, Oshima Y, Fujimoto H, Murakami Y, Sakaguchi H, Kusaka S, et al. Foveal microstructure and Visual acuity after retinal detachment repair. Imaging analysis by fourier- domain optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2009;116:519–28.
6. Benda PZ, Vratanar B, Petrovski G, Gavrić AU, Matović M, Gornik A, et al. Prognostic factor analysis of visual outcome after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Clin Med 2020;9:3251.
7. Suzuki N, Kunikata H, Aizawa N, Abe T, Nakazawa T. Predicting visual outcomes for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with optical coherence tomography. J Ophthalmol 2014;2014:269837.
8. Pastor Jimeno JC, Fernández I, De La Rodríguez Rúa E, Coco R, Colmenares MR, Sánchez-Chicharro D, et al. Surgical outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments in phakic and pseudophakic patients: The retina 1 project--report 2. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:378–82.
9. Kim JD, Pham HH, Lai MM, Josephson JW, Minarcik JR, Von Fricken M. Effect of symptom duration on outcomes following vitrectomy repair of primary macula-off retinal detachments. Retina 2013;33:1931–7.
10. Gerding H, Hersener A. Anatomical and functional results of primary pars plana vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013;230:409–12.
11. Van De Put MA, Croonen D, Nolte IM, Japing WJ, Hooymans JM, Los LI. Postoperative recovery of visual function after macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. PLoS One 2014;9:e99787.
12. Ehrlich R, Niederer RL, Ahmad N, Polkinghorne P. Timing of acute macula-on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 2013;33:105–10.
13. Chang CJ. Apoptotic Photoreceptor cell death after traumatic retinal detachment in humans. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:880-6.
14. Arroyo JG, Yang L, Bula D, Chen DF. Photoreceptor apoptosis in human retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:605– 10.
15. Hagimura N, Suto K, Iida T, Kishi S. Optical coherence tomography of the neurosensory retina in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:186–90.
16. Lecleire-Collet A, Muraine M, Menard JF, Brasseur G. Predictive visual outcome after macula-off retinal detachment surgery using optical coherence tomography. Retina 2005;25:44–53.
17. Karacorlu M, Muslubas IS, Hocaoglu M, Arf S, Ersoz MG. Correlation between morphological changes and functional outcomes of recent-onset macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: Prognostic factors in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1275–83.
18. Nakanishi H, Hangai M, Unoki N, Sakamoto A, Tsujikawa A, Kita M, et al. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of the detached macula in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 2009;29:232–42.
19. Seymenoğlu G, Şahin BÖ, Top CG, Kayikçioğlu O, Başer E. Evaluation of macula with optical coherence tomography in patients with decreased visual acuity after successful retinal detachment surgery.Turk Oftalmoloiji Derg 2012;42:274–9.
20. Shimoda Y, Sano M, Hashimoto H, Yokota Y, Kishi S. Restoration of photoreceptor outer segment after vitrectomy for retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:284–90.
21. Qureshi MH, Steel DH. Retinal detachment following cataract phacoemulsification-a review of the literature. Eye (Lond) 2020;34:616–31.
22. Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Friedrichs W, Helbig H, Kellner U, Korra A, et al. Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1996;234:561–8.
23. Speicher MA, Fu AD, Martin JP, von Fricken MA. Primary vitrectomy alone for repair of retinal detachment following cataract surgery. Retina 2000;20:459–64.

APA	UTKU E, bilgin a (2022). Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. , 54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
Chicago	UTKU EMIN,bilgin ahmet burak Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. (2022): 54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
MLA	UTKU EMIN,bilgin ahmet burak Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. , 2022, ss.54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
AMA	UTKU E,bilgin a Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. . 2022; 54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
Vancouver	UTKU E,bilgin a Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. . 2022; 54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
IEEE	UTKU E,bilgin a "Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment." , ss.54 - 61, 2022. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
ISNAD	UTKU, EMIN - bilgin, ahmet burak. "Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment". (2022), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.14744/eer.2022.80664

APA	UTKU E, bilgin a (2022). Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. European eye research, 2(2), 54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
Chicago	UTKU EMIN,bilgin ahmet burak Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. European eye research 2, no.2 (2022): 54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
MLA	UTKU EMIN,bilgin ahmet burak Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. European eye research, vol.2, no.2, 2022, ss.54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
AMA	UTKU E,bilgin a Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. European eye research. 2022; 2(2): 54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
Vancouver	UTKU E,bilgin a Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. European eye research. 2022; 2(2): 54 - 61. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
IEEE	UTKU E,bilgin a "Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment." European eye research, 2, ss.54 - 61, 2022. 10.14744/eer.2022.80664
ISNAD	UTKU, EMIN - bilgin, ahmet burak. "Evaluation of the factors affecting visual outcome after successful pars plana vitrectomy surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment". European eye research 2/2 (2022), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.14744/eer.2022.80664