Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 75 - 79 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/eer.2022.49469 İndeks Tarihi: 05-05-2023

Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy

Öz:
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare the effect of biometric formulas used in calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power on target refraction when planning cataract surgery in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), or epiretinal membrane (ERM). Methods: The study was carried out in the Ege University Medicine Faculty Department of Ophthalmology after obtaining local ethics committee approval. Sixty-two eyes with cataracts and ERM, AMD, or DME that increased retinal thickness were included in the study group. Fifty-four eyes with cataracts and no retinal pathology were included in the control group. Lens power calculations based on measurements obtained with optical and ultrasound biometers were made using the SRK-T, Holladay 2, Hoffer Q, Haigis, and Barrett Universal 2 formulas and the results were compared. Results: In the study group, 31 eyes (50%) had DME, 16 (26%) had AMD, and 15 (24%) had ERM. The mean of arithmetic deviations from target refraction was lowest with the Barrett Universal 2 formula (p>0.05). When the Haigis formula was used, there was a significant deviation in both the study and control groups, while only the control group showed a significant deviation with the Hoffer Q formula (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of absolute deviations (p>0.05). Conclusion: In cataract patients with maculopathy and increased retinal thickness, the likelihood of inaccurate IOL power calculation was lowest with the Barrett Universal 2 and highest with the Haigis formula. These results should be further examined in larger patient series.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Wang O, Jiang W, Lin T, Wu X, Lin H, Chen W. Meta-analysis of accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in short eyes. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2018;46:356–63.
  • 2. Cooke DL. Cooke TL. Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas. J Cataract Refrect Surg 2016;42:1157–64. 3. Sheard R. Optimising biometry for cataract surgery. Eye 2014;28:118–25.
  • 4. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: A review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85:472–85.
  • 5. Xia T, Martinez EC, Tsai ML. Update on intraocular lens formulas and calculation. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2020;9:186– 193.
  • 6. Olsen T. Soruces of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:125–9.
  • 7. Holladay JT. Ultrasound and optical biometry. Cataract Refract Surg Today Eur 2009;2009:18–9.
  • 8. Kielhorn I, Rajan MS, Tesha PM, Subryan VR, Bell JA. Clinical assessment of the Zeiss IOLMaster. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:518–22.
  • 9. Hitzenberger CK, Drexler W, Dolezal C, Skorpik F, Juchem M, Fercher AF, et al. Measurement of the axial length of cataract eyes by laser Doppler interferometry. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:1886–93.
  • 10. Schmid GF, Papastergiou GI, Nickla DL, Riva CE, Lin T, Stone RA, et al. Validation of laser Doppler interferometric measurements in vivo of axial eye length and thickness of fundus layers in chicks. Curr Eye Res 1996;15:691–6.
  • 11. Kim SY, Lee SH, Kim NR, Chin HS, Jung JW. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using a swept-source optical biometer. PLoS One 2020;15:0227638.
  • 12. Rong X, He W, Zhu Q, Qian D, Lu Y, Zhu X. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with extreme myopia: Comparison of Barrett universal II, Haigis, and Olsen formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2019;45:732–7.
  • 13. Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology 2018;125:169–78.
  • 14. Kuthirummal N, Vanathi M, Mukhija R, Gupta N, Meel R, Saxena R, et al. Evaluation of Barrett universal II formula for intraocular lens power calculation in Asian Indian population. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020;68:59–64.
  • 15. Vega Y, Gershoni A, Achiron A, Tuuminen R, Weinberger Y, Livny E, et al. High agreement between Barrett universal II calculations with and without utilization of optional biometry parameters. J Clin Med 2021;10:542.
  • 16. Roberts TV, Hodge C, Sutton G, Lawless M, Contributors to the Vision Eye Institute IOL Outcomes Registry. Comparison Hill-radial basis function, Barrett Universal and current third generation formulas for the calculation of intraocular lens power during cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017;46:240–6.
  • 17. Kane XJ, Heerden VA, Atik A, Petsoglou C. İntraocular lens power formula accuracy: Comparison of 7 formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2016;42:1490–500.
  • 18. Connell JB, Kane XJ. Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2019;4:e000251.
APA Teker M, DEĞİRMENCİ C, AFRASHI F, Egrilmez S (2022). Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. , 75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
Chicago Teker Mehmet Esat,DEĞİRMENCİ Cumali,AFRASHI FILIZ,Egrilmez Sait Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. (2022): 75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
MLA Teker Mehmet Esat,DEĞİRMENCİ Cumali,AFRASHI FILIZ,Egrilmez Sait Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. , 2022, ss.75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
AMA Teker M,DEĞİRMENCİ C,AFRASHI F,Egrilmez S Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. . 2022; 75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
Vancouver Teker M,DEĞİRMENCİ C,AFRASHI F,Egrilmez S Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. . 2022; 75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
IEEE Teker M,DEĞİRMENCİ C,AFRASHI F,Egrilmez S "Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy." , ss.75 - 79, 2022. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
ISNAD Teker, Mehmet Esat vd. "Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy". (2022), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.14744/eer.2022.49469
APA Teker M, DEĞİRMENCİ C, AFRASHI F, Egrilmez S (2022). Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. European eye research, 2(2), 75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
Chicago Teker Mehmet Esat,DEĞİRMENCİ Cumali,AFRASHI FILIZ,Egrilmez Sait Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. European eye research 2, no.2 (2022): 75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
MLA Teker Mehmet Esat,DEĞİRMENCİ Cumali,AFRASHI FILIZ,Egrilmez Sait Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. European eye research, vol.2, no.2, 2022, ss.75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
AMA Teker M,DEĞİRMENCİ C,AFRASHI F,Egrilmez S Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. European eye research. 2022; 2(2): 75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
Vancouver Teker M,DEĞİRMENCİ C,AFRASHI F,Egrilmez S Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy. European eye research. 2022; 2(2): 75 - 79. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
IEEE Teker M,DEĞİRMENCİ C,AFRASHI F,Egrilmez S "Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy." European eye research, 2, ss.75 - 79, 2022. 10.14744/eer.2022.49469
ISNAD Teker, Mehmet Esat vd. "Comparison of intraocular lens power calculation formulas in patients with cataract and maculopathy". European eye research 2/2 (2022), 75-79. https://doi.org/10.14744/eer.2022.49469