Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 25 Sayı: Suppl/2 Sayfa Aralığı: 38 - 45 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 İndeks Tarihi: 05-05-2023
Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements
Öz: Objectives: This study investigated the mechanical properties of laminate veneers to determine their resistance to the shear force of three different types of cement used in the restorations. Materials and Methods: Laminate veneers were prepared using standard tooth preparation methods for 30 extracted maxillary central incisors. To standardize the depth, guide burs were used to prepare a depth of 0.5 mm from the buccal angle. The samples were allocated into three randomized groups (n = 10): Group A (resin using the total etch method and Variolink Esthetic DC resin cement), Group B (resin using the PANAVIA F2.0 self-etch method), and Group C (self-adhesion bonded with Rely X U200 resin cement). The prepared specimens were stored in distilled water for one week before being thermal cycled for 500 cycles in 5°C and 55°C water. A shear test was used to determine the resistance of the veneers to the bonding. The obtained data were evaluated statistically. Results: The values of the shear bond strength were statistically significant depending on the type of resin cement used (p < 0.05). The specimens that were cemented using the total-etch method had the lowest shear force value (18.79 ± 4.48 MPa). The obtained data were statistically evaluated using the Tukey multiple comparison test (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The type of cement is a highly effective factor in the bonding between fixed prosthetic restorations and the abutment tooth, and the cement used must have sufficient resistance to shear forces.
Anahtar Kelime: Değişik Rezin Simanlarla Yapıştırılan Laminate Veneerlerin Makaslama Kuvvetine Karşı Dirençlerin İncelenmesi
Öz: Amaç: Kullanılan simanların mekanik özelliklerinin bilinmesi restorasyonların başarısı için önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı; laminate veneerlarde kullanılan simanların makaslama kuvvetine karşı dirençlerinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada 30 adet herhangi çürük ve restorasyon olmayan çekilmiş maksiller santral diş standart bir şekilde prepare edildikten sonra IPS e.max Press (Ivoclar) laminate veneerlar hazırlandı. Derinliği standardize etmek için bukkal açıdan 0,5 mm'lik bir derinlik hazırlamak için derinlik kılavuz frezi kullanıldı. Rasgele olacak şekilde dişler üç gruba ayrılarak (n=5); Grup A: Total etch yöntemi kullanılarak Variolink Esthetic DC (Ivoclar Vivadent) rezin, Grup B: Self etch yöntemi kullanılarak Panavia F2.0 (Kuraray) rezin, Grup C: Self adeziv RelyX U200 (3M ESPE) rezin simanla preparasyon yapılan dişlere simante edildi. Simantasyon işleminden sonra 1 hafta distile suda bekletip 5 ile 55 °C suda 500 döngü termal siklus işlemine tabi tutularak makaslama testi ile bağlanma dirençleri değerlendirildi. Elde edilen veriler Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi ile istatiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmada kullanılan rezin simanların, makaslama kuvvetlerinin karşı dirençlerinin anlamlı farklılık (p˂0.05) gösterdiği istatistiksel olarak saptandı. En düşük makaslama kuvveti değeri; Total-etch ile simante edilen örneklerde (18.79±4.48 MPa) elde edildi. Self-etch ve self adeziv yöntem ile restore edilen örneklerde anlamlı fark (p>0.05) görülmedi. Sonuçlar: Sabit protetik restorasyonlar ve dayanak diş arasındaki bağlantıda siman son derece etkili bir faktör olup, kullanılan simanın makaslama kuvvetlerine karşı yeterli direnç göstermesi gerekir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
- 1. Ahrari F, Heravi F, Rashed R, Zarrabi MJ, Setayesh Y. Which factors affect dental esthetics and smile attractiveness in orthodontically treated patients? J Dent (Tehran, Iran). 2015;12(7):491.
- 2. Yavuz Ö, Toksavul S, User A. Tüm seramik kronların kırılma dayanıklılıklarının seramometal restorasyonlarla karşılaştırılması. Ege Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg. 1999;20:102- 110.
- 3. Potiket N, Chiche G, Finger IM. In vitro fracture strength of teeth restored with different all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(5):491-495.
- 4. Beall AE. Can a new smile make you look more intelligent and successful? Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):289-297.
- 5. Bailey SJ, Swift Jr EJ. Effects of home bleaching products on composite resins. Quintessence Int. 1992;23(7).
- 6. Calamia JR, Calamia CS. Porcelain laminate veneers: reasons for 25 years of success. Dent Clin North Am. 2007;51(2):399-417.
- 7. Magalhães APR, Cardoso PdC, de Souza JB, Fonseca RB, Pires de Souza FdCP, Lopez LG. Influence of activation mode of resin cement on the shade of porcelain veneers. J Prosthodont. 2014;23(4):291-295.
- 8. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller K-A, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl K-H, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(3):161-167.
- 9. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater. 2007;23(1):71-80.
- 10. Liao T, Li K, Breder K. Flexural strength of ceramics ground under widely different conditions. J Mater Process Technol. 1997;70(1-3):198-206.
- 11. Otani A, Amaral M, May LG, Cesar PF, Valandro LF. A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP. Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):648-656.
- 12. Scherrer SS, Cesar PF, Swain MV. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e78- e93.
- 13. Toman M, Toksavul S, Akin A. Bond strength of all- ceramics to tooth structure: using new luting systems. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(5):373-378.
- 14. Naranjo J, Ali M, Belles D. Comparison of shear bond strength of self-etch and self-adhesive cements bonded to lithium disilicate, enamel and dentin. Tex Dent J. 2015;132(11):914-921.
- 15. Guarda GB, Gonçalves LS, Correr AB, Moraes RR, Sinhoreti MA, Correr-Sobrinho L. Luting glass ceramic restorations using a self-adhesive resin cement under different dentin conditions. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010;18:244-248.
- 16. Kim J-H, Chae S, Lee Y, Han G-J, Cho B-H. Comparison of shear test methods for evaluating the bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(8):745-752.
- 17. St-Georges AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift Jr EJ, Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(6):551-557.
- 18. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(4):410- 416.
- 19. Conrad HJ, Seong W-J, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98(5):389-404.
- 20. Scientific Documentation Monobond Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent AG Research & Development, March 2009; https://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zoolu- website/media/document/1001/Monobond+Plus.
- 21. Scientific Documentation SpeedCEM Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent AG Research & Development, May 2016; https://www.ivoclarvivadent.com/zoolu- website/media/document/36822/SpeedCEM+Plus.
- 22. Elsayed A, Younes F, Lehmann F, Kern M. Tensile bond strength of so-called universal primers and universal multimode adhesives to zirconia and lithium disilicate ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(3):221-228.
- 23. Tanış MÇ, Akay C, Akçaboy TC, Şen M, Kavaklı PA, Sapmaz K. In vitro shear bond strength between fluorinated zirconia ceramic and resin cements. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10(3):205-210.
- 24. Yang L, Chen B, Xie H, Chen Y, Chen Y, Chen C. Durability of resin bonding to zirconia using products containing 10- methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(4):279-287.
- 25. Cho J, Chen Y, Min B, Kim H, Kwon O, Shon K, et al. Effects of essential oils supplementation on growth performance, IgG concentration and fecal noxious gas concentration of weaned pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2005;19(1):80-5.
- 26. Subaşı MG, İnan Ö. Influence of surface treatments and resin cement selection on bonding to zirconia. Lasers Med Sci. 2014;29(1):19-27.
- 27. Reis A, Grandi V, Carlotto L, Bortoli G, Patzlaff R, Accorinte MdLR, et al. Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin. J Dent. 2005;33(7):549-559.
- 28. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic? J Can Dent Assoc. 2003;69(11):726-732.
- 29. Zhang C, Degrange M. Shear bond strengths of self- adhesive luting resins fixing dentine to different restorative materials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2010;21(5):593-608.
- 30. Gundogdu M, Aladag L. Effect of adhesive resin cements on bond strength of ceramic core materials to dentin. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21(3):367-.
- 31. Sokolowski G, Szczesio A, Bociong K, Kaluzinska K, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, et al. Dental Resin Cements— The Influence of Water Sorption on Contraction Stress Changes and Hydroscopic Expansion. Mater. 2018;11(6):973.
- 32. Pekkan G, Hekimoglu C. Evaluation of shear and tensile bond strength between dentin and ceramics using dual- polymerizing resin cements. J Prosthet Dent . 2009;102(4):242-252.
- 33. Strub JR, Beschnidt SM. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11(6).
| APA | DUYMUŞ Z, Arslan E (2022). Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. , 38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| Chicago | DUYMUŞ Zeynep,Arslan Emel Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. (2022): 38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| MLA | DUYMUŞ Zeynep,Arslan Emel Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. , 2022, ss.38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| AMA | DUYMUŞ Z,Arslan E Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. . 2022; 38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| Vancouver | DUYMUŞ Z,Arslan E Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. . 2022; 38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| IEEE | DUYMUŞ Z,Arslan E "Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements." , ss.38 - 45, 2022. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| ISNAD | DUYMUŞ, Zeynep - Arslan, Emel. "Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements". (2022), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| APA | DUYMUŞ Z, Arslan E (2022). Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 25(Suppl/2), 38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| Chicago | DUYMUŞ Zeynep,Arslan Emel Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25, no.Suppl/2 (2022): 38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| MLA | DUYMUŞ Zeynep,Arslan Emel Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , vol.25, no.Suppl/2, 2022, ss.38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| AMA | DUYMUŞ Z,Arslan E Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2022; 25(Suppl/2): 38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| Vancouver | DUYMUŞ Z,Arslan E Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal . 2022; 25(Suppl/2): 38 - 45. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| IEEE | DUYMUŞ Z,Arslan E "Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements." Cumhuriyet Dental Journal , 25, ss.38 - 45, 2022. 10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
| ISNAD | DUYMUŞ, Zeynep - Arslan, Emel. "Examination of the Shear Force Resistance of Laminate Veneers Adhered with Different Resin Cements". Cumhuriyet Dental Journal 25/Suppl/2 (2022), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1187835 |
