Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model

Kızılkaya, Mehmet; Aydın, Pelin

doi:10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120

Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model

Pelin AYDIN, (Erzurum Bölge Eğitimi ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Anesteziyoloji Bölümü ve Reanimasyon, Erzurum, Türkiye)

Mehmet Kızılkaya (Amasya Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Anesteziyoloji Bölümü ve Canlandırma, Amasya, Türkiye)

Eurasian Journal of Medicine

2 0

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 54 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 274 - 280 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120 İndeks Tarihi: 06-05-2023

Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model

Öz:

Objective: The most efficient recruitment maneuver (RM) for oxygenation in patients under mechanical cir- culatory support with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has not been described yet. In this study, we have evaluated the effects of three recruitment maneuvers on oxygenation and intracranial pressure. Materials and Methods: 20 sheep have been randomly grouped as follows: ARDS control, ARDS+TV(Tidal Volume), ARDS+CPAP(Continuous Positive Airway Pressure), ARDS+PEEP(Positive End Expiratory Pressure). Arterial blood gas tests have been done before ARDS, after ARDS, and 5,10, and 30 minutes after the maneuver. Intracranial pressures had been followed up. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in Pa02 (Partial arterial oxygen pressure) values in all groups 5 minutes after RM (P < 0,01). There was a statistically increase in Pa02 values in all groups 10 and 30 minutes after the RM (P < 0,01). TV group had significantly more increase in PaO2 increase at the 30th the other groups (P < 0,01). CPAP group had more increase in intracranial pressures just after the RM and at 5 and 10 minutes after the RM. This increase was statistically significant (P < 0,01). All groups had similar intracranial pressure values 30 minutes after the RM. There was no statiscally signifciant difference between the groups (P > 0,05). Conclusion: ICP monitorisation should be carried out in patients with ARDS while performing recruitment maneuvers.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

1. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526-2533. [CrossRef]
2. Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, et al. Inci- dence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(16):1685-1693. [CrossRef]
3. Pelosi P, D’Onofrio D, Chiumello D, et al. Pulmo- nary and extrapulmonary acute respiratory dis- tress syndrome are different. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2003;42:48s-56s. [CrossRef]
4. Shaver CM, Bastarache JA. Clinical and biological heterogeneity in acute respiratory distress syn- drome: direct versus indirect lung injury. Clin Chest Med. 2014;35(4):639-653. [CrossRef]
5. Albert RK. The role of ventilation-induced sur- factant dysfunction and atelectasis in causing acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(7):702-708. [CrossRef]
6. Nanchal RS, Truwit JD. Recent advances in understanding and treating acute respiratory distress syndrome. F1000Res. 2018;20(7): F1000Res. [CrossRef]
7. Constantin JM, Jaber S, Futier E, et al. Respiratory effects of different recruitment maneuvers in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2008;12(2):R50. [CrossRef]
8. Tusman G, Böhm SH, Sipmann FS, Maisch S. Lung recruitment improves the efficacy of ventilation and gas exchange during one-lung ventilation anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(6):1604-1609. [CrossRef]
9. Rocco PR, Pelosi P, de Abreu MG. Pros and cons of recruitment maneuvers in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2010;4(4):479-489. [CrossRef]
10. Xia F, Pan C, Wang L, et al. Physiological effects of different recruitment maneuvers in a pig model of ARDS. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20(1):266. [CrossRef]
11. Constantin JM, Futier E, Cherprenet AL, et al. A recruitment maneuver increases oxygenation after intubation of hypoxemic intensive care unit patients: a randomized controlled study. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R76. [CrossRef]
12. Mercado P, Maizel J, Kontar L, et al. Moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: hemodynamic and cardiac effects of an open lung strategy with recruitment maneuver ana- lyzed using echocardiography. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(10):1608-1616. [CrossRef]
13. Alessandri F, Pugliese F, Ranieri VM. The role of rescue therapies in the treatment of severe ARDS. Respir Care. 2018;63(1):92-101. [CrossRef]
14. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. JAMA. 2016;315(8):788- 800. [CrossRef]
15. Cherian SV, Kumar A, Akasapu K, Ashton RW, Aparnath M, Malhotra A. Salvage therapies for refractory hypoxemia in ARDS. Respir Med. 2018;141:150-158. [CrossRef]
16. Constantin JM, Godet T, Jabaudon M, Bazin JE, Futier E. Recruitment maneuvers in acute res- piratory distress syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(14):290. [CrossRef]
17. Keenan JC, Formenti P, Marini JJ. Lung recruit- ment in acute respiratory distress syndrome: what is the best strategy? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(1):63-68. [CrossRef]
18. Hall JE, Hall ME. Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th Edition, Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2021:491-501.
19. Matuschak GM, Lechner AJ. Acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathophysiology and treatment. Mo Med. 2010;107(4):252-258.
20. Chiumello D, Algieri I, Grasso S, Terragni P, Pelosi P. Recruitment maneuvers in acute res- piratory distress syndrome and during general anesthesia. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82(2): 210-220.
21. Stahl CA, Möller K, Schumann S, et al. Dynamic versus static respiratory mechanics in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syn- drome. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(8):2090-2098. [CrossRef]
22. Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, et al. Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(4):327- 336. [CrossRef]
23. Borges JB, Okamoto VN, Matos GF, et al. Revers- ibility of lung collapse and hypoxemia in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;174(3):268-278. [CrossRef]
24. Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, et al. Ventila- tion strategy using low tidal volumes, recruit- ment maneuvers, and high positive end-expira- tory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299(6):637-645. [CrossRef]
25. Hodgson CL, Tuxen DV, Bailey MJ, et al. A posi- tive response to a recruitment maneuver with PEEP titration in patients with ARDS, regardless of transient oxygen desaturation during the maneuver. J Intensive Care Med. 2011;26(1):41-49. [CrossRef]
26. Pelosi P, Goldner M, McKibben A, et al. Recruit- ment and derecruitment during acute respira- tory failure: an experimental study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(1):122-130. [CrossRef]
27. Cruces P, Donoso A, Valenzuela J, Díaz F. Res- piratory and hemodynamic effects of a step- wise lung recruitment maneuver in pediatric ARDS: a feasibility study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013;48(11):1135-1143. [CrossRef]
28. Bein T, Kuhr LP, Bele S, Ploner F, Keyl C, Taeger K. Lung recruitment maneuver in patients with cer- ebral injury: effects on intracranial pressure and cerebral metabolism. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(5):554-558. [CrossRef]
29. Borsellino B, Schultz MJ, Gama de Abreu MG, Robba C, Bilotta F. Mechanical ventilation in neu- rocritical care patients: a systematic literature review. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2016;10(10):1123- 1132. [CrossRef]
30. Videtta W, Villarejo F, Cohen M, et al. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:93-97. [CrossRef]
31. Boone MD, Jinadasa SP, Mueller A, et al. The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure and cerebral hemodynamics. Neurocrit Care. 2017;26(2):174-181. [CrossRef]
32. Frisvold SK, Robba C, Guérin C. What respira- tory targets should be recommended in patients with brain injury and respiratory failure? Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(5):683-686. [CrossRef]
33. Nemer SN, Caldeira JB, Azeredo LM, et al. Alveolar recruitment maneuver in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and acute respiratory distress syndrome: A comparison of 2 approaches. J Crit Care. 2011;26(1):22-27. [CrossRef]
34. Chen H, Zhou J, Lin YQ, Zhou JX, Yu RG. Intrac- ranial pressure responsiveness to positive end- expiratory pressure in different respiratory mechanics: a preliminary experimental study in pigs. BMC Neurol. 2018;18(1):183. [CrossRef]

APA	Aydın P, Kızılkaya M (2022). Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. , 274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
Chicago	Aydın Pelin,Kızılkaya Mehmet Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. (2022): 274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
MLA	Aydın Pelin,Kızılkaya Mehmet Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. , 2022, ss.274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
AMA	Aydın P,Kızılkaya M Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. . 2022; 274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
Vancouver	Aydın P,Kızılkaya M Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. . 2022; 274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
IEEE	Aydın P,Kızılkaya M "Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model." , ss.274 - 280, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
ISNAD	Aydın, Pelin - Kızılkaya, Mehmet. "Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model". (2022), 274-280. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120

APA	Aydın P, Kızılkaya M (2022). Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54(3), 274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
Chicago	Aydın Pelin,Kızılkaya Mehmet Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54, no.3 (2022): 274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
MLA	Aydın Pelin,Kızılkaya Mehmet Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol.54, no.3, 2022, ss.274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
AMA	Aydın P,Kızılkaya M Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(3): 274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
Vancouver	Aydın P,Kızılkaya M Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model. Eurasian Journal of Medicine. 2022; 54(3): 274 - 280. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
IEEE	Aydın P,Kızılkaya M "Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model." Eurasian Journal of Medicine, 54, ss.274 - 280, 2022. 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120
ISNAD	Aydın, Pelin - Kızılkaya, Mehmet. "Effects of Recruitment Maneuvers on Oxygenation and Intracranial Pressure in the Experimental ARDS Model". Eurasian Journal of Medicine 54/3 (2022), 274-280. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2022.21120