Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 185 - 202 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 İndeks Tarihi: 10-05-2023
Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies
Öz: As construction technologies are taken into consideration in design processes, one of the factors determining the direction of the development of construction technologies is the actions within the detail design process. This mutual effect emerges as an architectural design-construction interaction. This study aimed at finding an answer to the question: “In the near future, when the newly developed 3D printing technology is used in a widespread manner as architectural construction technology, what effect will it have on the detail design process for architectural construction?”. For this purpose, the “Delphi-Expert opinion method”, which is a forecast method, was used in this study. With this method, questions were posed to selected academicians and architects, as experts who had different levels of experience, ranging from 2 to 50 years, in detail design, about the research question. As a remarkable result of using the Delphi method, regarding the use of 3D printing technology, they stated that joints and additional elements will almost disappear and the details will be “simplified” when compared to today. Finally, the results obtained using the Delphi method were applied to the details of the intersection area following the “research through design” and “prototyping” methods. With this study, the future use of 3D printing technology as a building technology was examined through the construction-design interaction and the possible effective development aspects of this technology were foreseen by experts. The applicability of the study results was demonstrated by transforming these predictions into new design sub-processes and applying them to a sample.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Allen, E. & Rand, P. (2016). Architec- tural detailing: function, constructibility, aesthetics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
- Altun, M. C. & Türkay, I. (2015). “4+9”: Tipik Bölge Detayı Tasarımı için Bir Destek Aracı ve Kullanılabilirliği. 2. Ulusal Yapı Kongresi ve Sergisi Yapı Üretimi, Kullanımı ve Koruma Süreçleri. Tmmob Mimarlar Odası, Ankara Şubesi, Ankara. 3-5 Haziran.
- Amer, M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23-40.
- Anderson, M., & Anderson, P. (2007). Prefab prototypes: site-specific design for offsite construction. Princeton Ar- chitectural Press.
- Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. US: Springer.
- Artuğ, S. (2020). Mimari Yapım Te- knolojileri – Detay Tasarımı Etkileşimi- nin 3B Baskı Teknolojileri Bağlamında Uzman Görüşü Yöntemi ile Belirlenme- si. (Msc). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Aygün, M., Çetiner, İ. & Göçer, C. (1999). Yapı Elemanlarında Seçenek Üretimi ve Değerlendirilmesi, İNTAG 108, TÜBİTAK, Ankara, (Basılmış Rapor).
- Buhring, J. & Koskinen, I. (2017). Beyond forecasting: a design-inspired foresight approach for preferable fu- tures.7th International Congress of the International Association of Societies of Design Research (IASDR 2017). Cincin- nati, USA 31 October – 3 November 2017.
- Camburn, B., Viswanathan, V., Linsey, J., Anderson, D., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., ... & Wood, K., (2017). Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines. Design Science, 3.
- Caneparo, L. & Cerrato, A. (2014). Digital Fabrication in Architecture, En- gineering And Construction. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
- Craveiroa, F., Duartec, J. P., Bartoloa, H., & Bartolod, P. J. (2019). Additive manufacturing as an enabling technol- ogy for digital construction: A perspec- tive on Construction 4.0. Automation in Construction 103 (2019) 251–267.
- Dalkey, N. (1969). An Experimental Study of Group Opinion: The Delphi Method, Futures I, 408-420.
- Demirbaş, C.V. & Polat, S. (2010). Ulusal teknoloji öngörü çalışmaların- da uzmanlık seviyesinin sonuçlara etkisinin araştırılması. Itü dergisi/d mühendislik Cilt: 9, Sayı:5, 68-74.
- Emmitt, S. (2007). Design manage- ment for architects. Chichester, England: Wiley Blackwell.
- Emmitt, S. (2012). Architectural Tech- nology. England: Wiley Blackwell. Emmitt, S. & Gorse, C. A. (2014). Barry’s advanced construction of build- ings (Third edition) Wiley-Blackwell.
- Eser, L. (1977). Geleneksel ve Gelişmiş Geleneksel Yapı. İstanbul: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Mimarlık Fakültesi.
- Eser, L. (1982). Ön yapım endüstrileşmiş yapı. İstanbul: İTÜ
- Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art, Re- search Papers, 1(1).
- Friberg, C. (2010) Moving into the field of the unknown. In Friberg, C. et al (eds.) At the intersection between art and research. NSU Press, Malmo.
- Gao, J. & Fischer, M. (2008). Frame- work and Case Studies Comparing Im- plementations and Impacts of 3d/4d Modelling Across Projects, Technical Report (Report no. TR172). Stanford, CA: Center for Integrated Facility Engi- neering, Stanford University.
- Gaynor, G. (1996). Handbook Of Technology Management, McGrawHill, USA
- Gibson, I., Rosen, D. & Stucker, B. (2015). Additive Manufacturing Tech- nologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing. [elec- tronic resource]. New York: Spring- er New York. Retrieved from http:// search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?di- rect=true&db=cat01696a&A N=itu. b2125220&lang=tr&site=eds-live
- Gordon, T., Helmer, O. (1964). Long- range Forecasting Study (P-2982). Cali- fornia: The RAND Corporation.
- Hager, I., Golonka, A., & Putanowicz, R. (2016). 3d Printing of Buildings and Building Components as the Future of Sustainable Construction?. Procedia En- gineering, 151(Ecology and new building materials and products 2016), 292-299. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.357
- Hauschild, M., Karzel, R., Hellstern, C., Kollmann, N. & Schönbrunner, E. (2011). Digital processes : planning, de- sign, production. Basel : Birkhaüser ; Munich : Edition Detail : Institut fur Internationale. Retrieved from http:// search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?di- rect=true&db=cat01696a&AN=itu. b2655133&lang=tr&site=eds-live
- Herriott, R. (2019). What Kind of Research is Research Through Design?. International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference 2019-De- sign Revolutions. United Kingdom: Manchester Metropolitan University, September 02-05.
- Houde, S. & Hill, C. (1997) What do prototypes prototype?, in Handbook of Human-Computer.
- Jantsch, E. (1967). Technological fore- casting in perspective: a framework for Technological forecasting, its technique and organisation; a description of activ- ities and an annotated bibliography. Par- is: OECD
- Kang, D., Jang, W., Lee, H., & No, H. J. (2013). A review on technology fore- casting methods and their application area. International Journal of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering. Vol:7, No:4, 2013. pp.591 -595.
- Keating, S. J., Leland, J. C., Cai, L. & Oxman, N. (2017). Toward site-specif- ic and self-sufficient robotic fabrication on architectural scales. Science Robotics, 2 (5), 1-15.
- Keeney, S., Hasson, F. & McKenna, F. (2011). The Delphi Technique in Nurs- ing and Health Research. United King- dom: John Wiley & Sons.
- Kızılyaprak, N. & Altun, M. C. (2011). Analysis of Building Element Design Methods. Architectural Engineering Conference (AEI), (pp 490-498). Oak- land, California, United States; March.
- Kocovic, P. (2017). 3d printing and its impact on the production of fully func- tional components : emerging research and opportunities. Hershey, Pennsylva- nia : IGI Global. Retrieved from http:// search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?di- rect=true&db=cat01696a&AN=itu. b2531112&lang=tr&site=eds-live
- Kolarevic, B. (2003). Architec- ture in the digital age : design and manufacturing. New York, NY : Spon Press. Retrieved from http:// search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?di- rect=true&db=cat01696a&AN=itu. b1129091&lang=tr&site=eds-live
- Koskinen, I. & Frens, J. (2017). Re- search prototypes. Archives of design re- search. (30-3), 5-14.
- Landeta, J., Barrutia, J. & Lertxun- di, A. (2011). Hybrid Delphi: A meth- odology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(9), 1629–1641. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009
- Micallef, J. (2015). Beginning Design for 3d Printing. Berkeley, CA:Apress
- Mishra, S., Deshmukh, S. G., & Vrat, P. (2002). Matching of technological forecasting technique to a technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(1), 1 -27.
- Müller, F.O. (1990). Methodik des Konstruierens und Wahl der Baustof- fe. In: E. Cziesielski, ed. Lehrbuch der Hochbaukonstruktionen, Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner, pp.7-25.
- Naboni, R. & Paoletti, I. (2015). Advanced Customization in Architec- tural Design and Construction. [elec- tronic resource]. Springer Internation- al Publishing. Retrieved from http:// search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?di- rect=true&db=cat01696a&AN=itu. b2125427&lang=tr&site=eds-live
- Newton, P., Hampson, K., & Droge- muller, R. (ed.) (2009). Technology, de- sign and process innovation in the built environment. London; New York: Spon Press.
- Özkan, E. (1976). Yapım sistemler- inin seçimi için bir yöntem. İstanbul: İTÜ.
- Porter, A. L., Cunningham, S. W., Banks, J., Roper, A. T., Mason, T. W., & Rossini, F. A. (2011). Forecasting and management of technology. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
- Ramadurai, B. & Becattini, N. (2013). Classification of technology forecasting weaknesses and integrability analyses. Retrieved from http://www. format-project.eu/deliverables/pub- lic-reports-and-white-papers/deliver- able-2.5/at_download/file
- Redwood B., Schöffer, F. & Garret B. (2017). The 3d Printing Handbook: Technologies, design and applications. 3d Hubs B.V. Basel : Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Rich, P. & Dean, Y. (1999). Principles of Element Design. Oxford: Architectur- al Press.
- Rosen, H. J. (1998). Construction specifications writing : principles and procedures (4th ed.). John Wiley.
- Sarakinioti, M. V., Turrin, M., Kon- stantinou, T., Tenpierik, M., & Knaack, U. (2018). Developing an integrat- ed 3d-printed façade with complex geometries for active temperature control. Materials Today Communi- cations, 15, 275-279. doi:10.1016/j.mt- comm.2018.02.027
- Shang, G., Jin, R., Lu, W. (2019). Design for manufacture and assembly in construction: a review. Building Re- search & Information, 1-13.
- Sharma, P. (2018). Towards An Or- chestration Of Forecasting Methods To Devise Strategies For Design. (PhD The- sis). The University of Texas at Dallas.
- Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T. & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Informa- tion Technology Education, 6.
- Smith, R. E. (2010). Prefab architec- ture: a guide to modular design and con- struction. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
- Staib, G., Dörrhöfer, A., & Rosenthal, M. (2008). Components and Systems: Modular Construction–Design, Struc- ture, New Technologies. Basel: Birkhäus- er.
- Şener, H. (1986). Endüstrileşmiş binada açık ve yarı açık sistemler : endüstrileşmiş binada tasarlama yak- laşımları ders notları.
- Tan, T., Lu, W., Tan, G., Xue, F., Chen, K., Xu, J., ... & Gao, S., (2020). Construc- tion-Oriented Design for Manufacture and Assembly Guidelines. Journal of Construction Engineering and Manage- ment, 146(8).
- Türkmenoğlu, S. B. (2017). Contribu- tion of futures studies to industrial design undergraduate education: Implementa- tion of long-range future-oriented design (LFD) methodology. (Doktora Tezi), İs- tanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilim- leri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
- Wensveen, S., Matthews, B., (2014). Prototypes and prototyping in design research. In Paul A. Rodgers and Joyce Yee (Ed.), Routledge Companion to De- sign Research (pp. 262-276) London: Routledge
- Woensel, R., Oirschot, T., Burgmans, M., Mohammadi, M. & Hermans, K. (2018). Printing Architecture: An Overview of Existing and Promising Additive Manufacturing Methods and Their Application in the Building In- dustry. The International Journal of the Constructed Environment 9 (1): 57-81. doi:10.18848/2154-8587/CGP/ v09i01/57-81.
- Woudenberg, F. (1991). An Evalua- tion of Delphi. Technologıcal Forecastıng And Socıal Change, 40, 131-150.
- Wu, P., Wang, J. & Wang, X. (2016). A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Automa- tion In Construction, Vol. 68, Pages 21 -31. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005
- Yossef, M. & Chen, A. (2015). Appli- cability and Limitations of 3d Printing for Civil Structures. Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Confer- ence Presentations and Proceedings, 237- 246.
| APA | ARTUĞ S, ALTUN M (2022). Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. , 185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| Chicago | ARTUĞ Sühan,ALTUN M. Cem Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. (2022): 185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| MLA | ARTUĞ Sühan,ALTUN M. Cem Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. , 2022, ss.185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| AMA | ARTUĞ S,ALTUN M Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. . 2022; 185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| Vancouver | ARTUĞ S,ALTUN M Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. . 2022; 185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| IEEE | ARTUĞ S,ALTUN M "Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies." , ss.185 - 202, 2022. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| ISNAD | ARTUĞ, Sühan - ALTUN, M. Cem. "Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies". (2022), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| APA | ARTUĞ S, ALTUN M (2022). Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| Chicago | ARTUĞ Sühan,ALTUN M. Cem Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 19, no.3 (2022): 185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| MLA | ARTUĞ Sühan,ALTUN M. Cem Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.19, no.3, 2022, ss.185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| AMA | ARTUĞ S,ALTUN M Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(3): 185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| Vancouver | ARTUĞ S,ALTUN M Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(3): 185 - 202. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| IEEE | ARTUĞ S,ALTUN M "Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, ss.185 - 202, 2022. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
| ISNAD | ARTUĞ, Sühan - ALTUN, M. Cem. "Determination of architectural construction technologies - detail design interaction with the expert opinion method in the context of 3D printing technologies". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 19/3 (2022), 185-202. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.91129 |
