Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption

Enver TATLISU, (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Gülname TURAN (İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Endüstri Ürünleri Tasarımı Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi
5 2
Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 217 - 233 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336 İndeks Tarihi: 10-05-2023

Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption

Öz:
The relationship between people and the objects is the determinant factor of the relationship between life and human experience. Human-object relationship since the last couple centuries has been organized predominantly under the influence of modern foundations such as production-consumption dichotomy or instrumental understanding of technology. Rational capitalist strategies, which became the economic standard in the same period, has ruptured this relationship in order to satisfy speed, efficiency and profit ambitions of capitalist companies by conspicuous consumption of mass produced products. In this relationship, the product is reduced to a mere consumption object, the human being to a mere consumer and they are put apart. Such separation of human and object is, in the context of this study, conceptualized as GAP. Aim of the present study is to reveal ways of bridging this GAP by proposing conceptual models as alternatives for fixed models of industrial design activity, i.e. finished product and user. Research data were obtained based on extensive literature reviews in the fields of design, engineering, arts, humanities and philosophy and applied design studio projects. In this paper, the conceptualization of the research background is presented through theoretical discussions. The research findings contribute directly and inclusively to the fields of design research, practice and education as the proposed model in the context of this research may provide more sustainable, indigenous and developable paths for design activity.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • AGLC. (2020). Liquor Manufacturer Handbook. St.Albert: Alberta.
  • Becker, G. S. (1965). A Theory of the Allocation of Time. Economic Journal, 75, 493–517.
  • Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer produc- tion and virtue. Journal of Political Phi- losophy, 14(4), 394–419.
  • Bijker, W., Carlson, W. B., & Pinch, T. (2008). Living in a Material World. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. Chicago: Uni- versity of Chicago Press.
  • Brouwer, J., & Mulder, A. (2008). Dick Raaymakers: A Monograph. Rot- terdam: V2.
  • Callon, M. (1999). Actor-Network Theory—The Market Test. The Socio- logical Review, 47(1_suppl), 181–195.
  • Callon, M. (2010). Afterword. In Between reason and experience: essays in technology and modernity (pp. 219– 226). London: MIT Press.
  • Calvano, E. (2007). Destructive Cre- ation. (Working Paper No. 653) SSE/ EFI Working Paper Series in Econom- ics and Finance. https://ideas.repec. org/p/hhs/hastef/0653.html
  • Campbell, C. (2005). The craft con- sumer: Culture, craft and consumption in a postmodern society. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5(1), 23–42. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1469540505049843
  • Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum. Indianapolis: Sams.
  • de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Dewey, J. (1934). A Common Faith. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Dougherty, D. (2012). The Maker Movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/inov_a_00135
  • Dunne, A. (1999). Hertzian Tales. Electronic Products, Aesthetic Expe- rience, and Critical Design. Critique. Retrieved from http://mitpress.mit. e du/c at a log/item/defau lt.asp?t- type=2&tid=10771&mlid=592
  • Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2001). Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Ob- jects. Basel: Birkhauser.
  • Dusi, D. (2015). Digital Environ- ments and the Fading of the Pro- duction-Consumption Dichotomy: Prosumption As a Comprehensive Approach. Innovative Issues and Ap- proaches in Social Sciences, 8(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.12959/issn.1855- 0541.iiass-2015-no1-art05
  • Featherstone, M. (2007). Consum- er culture and postmodernism. Lon- don: SAGE Publications https://doi. org/10.4135/9781446212424
  • Frens, J. W. (2006). Designing for Rich Interaction : Integrating Form, Interaction and Function. [Doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology]. https://doi.org/10.6100/ IR608730
  • Fry, T. (2015). Design: On the Ques- tion of “The Imperative.” Design and Culture, 7(3), 417–422. https://doi.org /10.1080/17547075.2015.1105713
  • Giaretta, E. (2005). Ethical product innovation: In praise of slowness. TQM Magazine, 17(2), 161–181. https://doi. org/10.1108/09544780510583236
  • Guiltinan, J. (2009). Creative de- struction and destructive creations: Environmental ethics and planned obsolescence. Journal of Business Eth- ics, 89(SUPPL. 1), 19–28. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10551-008-9907-9
  • Gunkel, D. J. (2005). Editori- al: Introduction to hacking and hacktivism. New Media and So- ciety, 7(5), 595–597. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444805056007
  • Harrod, T. (1999). The Crafts in Brit- ain in the 20th Century. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Hasdoğan, G. (1996). The role of user models in product design for assessment of user needs. Design Studies, 17(1), 19–33. https://doi. org/10.1016/0142-694X(95)00007-E
  • Hatch, M. (2014). The maker move- ment manifesto: rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw-Hill Ed- ucation.
  • Heidegger, M. (1971). The Origin of the Work of Art. In Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In The Ques- tion Technology, and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row.
  • Holland, J. H. (1999). Emergence: From chaos to order. Massachusetts: Da Capo Press.
  • Holton, R. J. (1983). Max Weber, “Rational Capitalism,” and Renaissance Italy : A Critique of Cohen. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 166–180.
  • Hummels, C., & van Dijk, J. (2015). Seven Principles to Design for Embod- ied Sensemaking. Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tan- gible, Embedded, and Embodied Interac- tion - TEI ’14, (January), 21–28. https:// doi.org/10.1145/2677199.2680577
  • Ironmonger, D. (2000). Household production and the household econo- my. (Research Paper No. 833) Univer- sity of Melbourne Department of Eco- nomics.
  • Slade, G. (2008). Made to Break: Technology and Obsolescence in Amer- ica. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press
  • Kalberg, S. (1980). Max Weber’s Types of Rationality: Cornerstones for the Analysis of Rationalization Processes in History. The Amer- ican Journal of Sociology, 85(5), 1145–1179. https://doi.org/10.1358/ dof.1989.014.02.79253
  • Kurien, C. T. (1996). Rethinking Eco- nomics: Reflections Based on a Study of the Indian Economy. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
  • Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Law Insider. (2006). Finished Li- censed Product Definition https://www. lawinsider.com/dictionary/finished-li- censed-product.
  • Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The Pro-Am Revolution: How enthusi- asts are changing our economy and soci- ety. London: Demos.
  • Lennon, M. J. (2021). Drafting Tech- nology Patent License Agreements (2nd ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer.
  • Limei, N., & Haoming, Z. (2016). Design with public: a research of par- ticipatory approach in built environ- ment. In Cumulus: Open Design for E-very-thing Proceedings.
  • Malinauskaite, J., & Erdem, F. B. (2021). Planned Obsolescence in the Context of a Holistic Legal Sphere and the Circular Economy. Oxford Jour- nal of Legal Studies, 41(3), 719–749. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa061
  • Manzini, E. (2015). Design when Ev- erybody Designs. An Introduction to De- sign for Social Innovation. London: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.13128/ Techne-21142
  • Massanari, A. L. (2010). Designing for imaginary friends: Information ar- chitecture, personas and the politics of user-centered design. New Media and Society, 12(3), 401–416. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444809346722
  • Matsuyama, K. (2002). The rise of mass consumption societies. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 1035–1070.
  • Mattila-Wiro, P. (1999). Economic Theories of The Household: A Critical Review. (Working Paper No: 159) UNU World Institute for Development Eco- nomics Research. https://www.wider. unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp159.pdf
  • May, S. (2011). Ecological Modern- ism and the Making of a New Working Class. In A. Parr & M. Zaretsky (Eds.), New Directions in Sustainable Design (pp. 37–52). New York: Routledge.
  • Mueller, G. H. (1982). Socialism and Capitalism in the Work of Max We- ber. British Journal of Sociology, 33(2), 151–171.
  • Nofal, E., Reffat, R. M., & Moere, A. Vande. (2017). Phygital Heritage: an Approach for Heritage Communica- tion. Online Proceedings from the Third Immersive Learning Research Net- work Conference, 220–229. https://doi. org/10.3217/978-3-85125-530-0-36
  • Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-computer Interaction. London: Lawrance Erl- baum Associates.
  • Norman, D. A. (1988). The Design of Everyday Things. New York: Double- day.
  • Papanek, V. (1985). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Chicago: Academy Chicago Publishers.
  • Petrović, E., & Perkins, N. (2016). Materials in Furniture Design: To- wards a new conceptual framework. ii International Journal of Interior Archi- tecture+ Spatial Design, 4(1), 56-63.
  • Prestholt, E. (2014). The many faces of industrial designers: Educating a hy- brid of an engineer and an artist. Nor- wegian University of Science and Tech- nology, Department of Product Design, 3, 1–12.
  • Pruitt, J. & Grudin, J. (2003). Per- sonas: practice and theory. In Confer- ence on Designing for User Experiences (DUX ‘03) (pp. 1–15). New York.
  • Pruitt, J. & Adlin, T. (2006). The per- sona lifecycle. Keeping people in mind throughout product design. San Fran- cisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Raizman, D. (2003). History of mod- ern design: graphics and products since the Industrial Revolution. London: Laurence King Publishing.
  • Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2016). In- volving Consumers: The Role of Digital Technologies in Promoting ‘Prosump- tion’ and User Innovation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12, 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016- 0390-8
  • Ritzer, G. (2016). Honoring Ed- ward Tiryakian As a Metasociologist: a Metaconceptual Analysis of Prosump- tion and Related Concepts. In R. Rob- ertson & J. Simpson (Eds.), The Art and Science of Sociology: Essays in Honor of Edward A. Tiryakian (pp. 131–147). Anthem Press.
  • Rönkkö, K., Hellman, M., Kilander, B., & Dittrich, Y. (2004). Personas is not applicable: Local Remedies Inter- preted in a Wider Context. In Clement, Andrew, Besselaar & Peter Van den (eds.) PDC 2004 - Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory De- sign July 27-31, 2014, Toronto, Ontario Canada. (pp. 112-120). https://doi. org/10.1145/1011870.1011884
  • Schwind, V., & Henze, N. (2020). Anticipated User Stereotypes System- atically Affect the Social Acceptability of Mobile Devices. In NordiCHI ‘20 Conference Proceedings October 25–29, 2020, Tallinn, Estonia. (pp.1-12). https:// doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420113
  • Slater, D. (1997). Consumer Cul- ture and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Slater, D. (2018). Markets, material- ity and the ‘new economy.’ In Market relations and the competitive process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Smart, B. (2010). Consumer Society. London: SAGE Publications. https:// doi.org/10.1515/9781503619630-005
  • Stephanidis, C. (2001). User interfac- es for all: Concepts, methods, and tools. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Taoka, Y., Kagohashi, K., & Mou- genot, C. (2016). Living labs and co-de- sign for social innovation: mapping the European model to Asian societies. In Cumulus: Open Design for E-very-thing Proceedings. November 21-24, 2016, Hong Kong. (pp. 312-317).
  • Taylor, P. A. (2005). From hackers to hacktivists: Speed bumps on the global superhighway? New Media and Society, 7(5), 625–646. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444805056009
  • Thiébaud (-Müller), E., Hilty, L. M., Schluep, M., Widmer, R., & Faulstich, M. (2018). Service Lifetime, Storage Time, and Disposal Pathways of Elec- tronic Equipment: A Swiss Case Study. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 22(1), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jiec.12551
  • Toffler, A. (1981). The Third Wave. New York: Bantam Books.
  • Turner, P., & Turner, S. (2011). Is stereotyping inevitable when design- ing with personas? Design Studies, 32(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. destud.2010.06.002
  • Vinsel, L. (2017). Regulatory en- forcement as sociotechnical systems maintenance Critical Studies of Inno- vation. In Critical Studies of Innovation (pp. 257–275). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratiz- ing Innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Watson, M., & Shove, E. (2008). Product, competence, project and practice: DIY and the dynamics of craft consumption. Journal of Con- sumer Culture, 8(1), 69–89. https://doi. org/10.1177/1469540507085726
  • Weber, M., Parsons, T., & Tawney, R. H. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. (6th ed.). New York: Scribner.
  • Wilson, G. T., Smalley, G., Suck- ling, J. R., Lilley, D., Lee, J., & Mawle, R. (2017). The hibernating mobile phone: Dead storage as a barrier to ef- ficient electronic waste recovery. Waste Management, 60, 521–533. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.023
  • Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. (2012). An introduction to Orga- nizational Communication. Creative Commons 3.0. Retrieved from https:// 2012books.lardbucket.org/pdfs/an-in- troduction-to-organizational-commu- nication.pdf
  • Ylä-Mella, J., Keiski, R. L., & Pon- grácz, E. (2022). End-of-Use vs. End- of-Life: When Do Consumer Electron- ics Become Waste? Resources, 11(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/resourc- es11020018
  • Young, J. (2018). German Philoso- phy in the Twentieth Century: Weber to Heidegger. New York: Routledge.
APA TATLISU E, TURAN G (2022). Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. , 217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
Chicago TATLISU Enver,TURAN Gülname Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. (2022): 217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
MLA TATLISU Enver,TURAN Gülname Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. , 2022, ss.217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
AMA TATLISU E,TURAN G Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. . 2022; 217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
Vancouver TATLISU E,TURAN G Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. . 2022; 217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
IEEE TATLISU E,TURAN G "Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption." , ss.217 - 233, 2022. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
ISNAD TATLISU, Enver - TURAN, Gülname. "Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption". (2022), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
APA TATLISU E, TURAN G (2022). Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
Chicago TATLISU Enver,TURAN Gülname Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 19, no.3 (2022): 217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
MLA TATLISU Enver,TURAN Gülname Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.19, no.3, 2022, ss.217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
AMA TATLISU E,TURAN G Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(3): 217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
Vancouver TATLISU E,TURAN G Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022; 19(3): 217 - 233. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
IEEE TATLISU E,TURAN G "Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption." A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 19, ss.217 - 233, 2022. 10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
ISNAD TATLISU, Enver - TURAN, Gülname. "Bridging the GAP between product and user: Design of product-by-structures & design for prosumption". A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 19/3 (2022), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.5505/itujfa.2022.40336
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
24-04-2024 6:56

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları