Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 11 - 16 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818 İndeks Tarihi: 10-05-2023

Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Öz:
Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate a possible relationship between maxillary sinus volume (MSV) and the diameter and length of the nasolacrimal canal (NC) using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) data. Methods: In this retrospective study, CBCT scans of 93 patients were evaluated. The maxillary sinuses and NCs were evaluated separately using Fujifilm-Synapse 3D software. 186 measurements of NC and maxillary sinuses were made in 93 patients. Results: The total mean patient age was 38.2 ± 15.2 years. There were no significant differences between genders in terms of MSV, length, and diameter of NC. No statistically significant differences were found between the two sides in terms of MSV, length, and diameter of NC. While a negative correlation was detected between MSV and NC diameter, a positive correlation was found between MSV and NC length. Discussion and Conclusion: As the maxillary sinus medial wall forms the lateral border of the nasal cavity, the recognition and preservation of the nasolacrimal canal is essential for better postoperative results in surgical procedures to be applied to this area. In our study, it was found that as MSV increased, the diameter of the NC decreased and its length increased.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Lawrenson JG, Douglas RH. Orbit and Accessory Visual Apparatus. In: Gray H, Standring S. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 41st Ed., Elsevier Limited, New York, 2016, 666-85.
  • Imre A, Imre SS, Pinar E et al. Transection of nasolacrimal duct in endoscopic medial maxillectomy: implication on epiphora. J Craniofac Surg 2015; 26: 616-9.
  • Bartley GB. Acquired lacrimal drainage obstruction: an etiologic classification system, case reports, and a review of the literature. Part 1. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 8 :237-42.
  • Fasina O, Ogbole GI. CT assessment of the nasolacrimal canal in a black African population. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 29: 231-3.
  • Yazici B, Hammad AM, Meyer DR. Lacrimal sac dacryoliths: predictive factors and clinical characteristics. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1308-12.
  • Kalabalık F, Ertaş ET. Investigation of maxillary sinus volume relationships with nasal septal deviation, concha bullosa, and impacted or missing teeth using cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol 2019; 35: 287-95.
  • Kosko JR, Hall BE, Tunkel DE. Acquired Maxillary Sinus Hypoplasia: A Consequence of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery? Laryngoscope 1996; 106: 1210-3.
  • Demir UL, Akca ME, Ozpar R, Albayrak C, Hakyemez B. Anatomical correlation between existence of concha bullosa and maxillary sinus volume. Surg Radiol Anat 2015; 37: 1093-8.
  • Ali A, Kurien M, Selvaraj KG. Correlation of the ethmoid infundibulum to the medial orbital wall in maxillary sinus hypoplasia: “Infundibular lateralization” a diagnostic CT finding. Ear Nose Throat J 2007; 86: 744-7.
  • Maestre-Ferrín L, Galán-Gil S, Carrillo-García C, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Radiographic findings in the maxillary sinus: comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 341-6.
  • Duman SB, Duman S, Bayrakdar IS, Yasa Y, Gumussoy I. Evaluation of radix entomolaris in mandibular first and second molars using cone-beam computed tomography and review of the literature. Oral Radiol 2020; 36: 320-326.
  • Ali MJ, Paulsen F. Etiopathogenesis of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: what we know and what we need to know. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 35: 426-33.
  • Janssen AG, Mansour K, Bos JJ, Castelijns JA. Diameter of the bony lacrimal canal: normal values and values related to nasolacrimal duct obstruction: assessment with CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 845-50.
  • Lee H, Ha S, Lee Y, Park M, Baek S. Anatomical and morphometric study of the bony nasolacrimal canal using computed tomography. Ophthalmologica 2012; 227: 153-9.
  • Altun O, Dedeoğlu N, Avci M. Examination of nasolacrimal duct morphometry using cone beam computed tomography in patients with unilateral cleft lip/palate. J Craniofac Surg 2017; 28: e725-8.
  • Tschopp M, Bornstein MM, Sendi P, Jacobs R, Goldblum D. Dacryocystography using cone beam CT in patients with lacrimal drainage system obstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 30: 486-91.
  • Bulbul E, Yazici A, Yanik B, Yazici H, Demirpolat G. Morphometric evaluation of bony nasolacrimal canal in a caucasian population with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a multidetector computed tomography study. Korean J Radiol 2016; 17: 271-6.
  • Shigeta K, Takegoshi H, Kikuchi S. Sex and age differences in the bony nasolacrimal canal: an anatomical study. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125: 1677- 81.
  • Tassoker M, Magat G, Lale B, Gulec M, Ozcan S, Orhan K. Is the maxillary sinus volume affected by concha bullosa, nasal septal deviation, and impacted teeth? A CBCT study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277: 227-233.
  • Demirtas O, Kalabalik F, Dane A, Aktan AM, Ciftci E, Tarim E. Does Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Affect the Maxillary Sinus Volume? Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2018; 55: 168-72.
  • Akyüz S, Yıldırım FN, Ersöz N, Başak HS, Karaman CZ. Evaluation of Maxillary Sinus and Nasolacrimal Canal Relationship via Paranasal Sinus Tomography Imaging. Eur J Rhinol Allergy 2019; 2: 71-4.
  • Belgin CA, Colak M, Adiguzel O, Akkus Z, Orhan K. Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276: 1493-9.
  • Thayyil S, Schievano S, Robertson NJ et al. MaRIAS(Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study) Collaborative group. A semi-automated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72: 321-6.
  • Weissheimer A, de Menezes LM, Sameshima GT, Enciso R, Pham J, Grauer D. Imaging software accuracy for 3-dimensional analysis of the upper airway. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 142: 801-13.
  • Szabo BT, Aksoy S, Repassy G, Csomo K, Dobo- Nagy C, Orhan K. Comparison of hand and semiautomatic tracing methods for creating maxillofacial artificial organs using sequences of computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Int J Artif Organs 2017; 40: 307-12.
APA yeşiltepe s, Saglam H, DUMAN S, BAYRAKDAR I, Yasa Y, dedeoğlu n (2022). Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. , 11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
Chicago yeşiltepe selin,Saglam Hande,DUMAN SUAYIP BURAK,BAYRAKDAR Ibrahim Sevki,Yasa Yasin,dedeoğlu numan Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. (2022): 11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
MLA yeşiltepe selin,Saglam Hande,DUMAN SUAYIP BURAK,BAYRAKDAR Ibrahim Sevki,Yasa Yasin,dedeoğlu numan Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. , 2022, ss.11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
AMA yeşiltepe s,Saglam H,DUMAN S,BAYRAKDAR I,Yasa Y,dedeoğlu n Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. . 2022; 11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
Vancouver yeşiltepe s,Saglam H,DUMAN S,BAYRAKDAR I,Yasa Y,dedeoğlu n Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. . 2022; 11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
IEEE yeşiltepe s,Saglam H,DUMAN S,BAYRAKDAR I,Yasa Y,dedeoğlu n "Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography." , ss.11 - 16, 2022. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
ISNAD yeşiltepe, selin vd. "Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography". (2022), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
APA yeşiltepe s, Saglam H, DUMAN S, BAYRAKDAR I, Yasa Y, dedeoğlu n (2022). Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 43(3), 11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
Chicago yeşiltepe selin,Saglam Hande,DUMAN SUAYIP BURAK,BAYRAKDAR Ibrahim Sevki,Yasa Yasin,dedeoğlu numan Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 43, no.3 (2022): 11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
MLA yeşiltepe selin,Saglam Hande,DUMAN SUAYIP BURAK,BAYRAKDAR Ibrahim Sevki,Yasa Yasin,dedeoğlu numan Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, vol.43, no.3, 2022, ss.11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
AMA yeşiltepe s,Saglam H,DUMAN S,BAYRAKDAR I,Yasa Y,dedeoğlu n Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi. 2022; 43(3): 11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
Vancouver yeşiltepe s,Saglam H,DUMAN S,BAYRAKDAR I,Yasa Y,dedeoğlu n Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi. 2022; 43(3): 11 - 16. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
IEEE yeşiltepe s,Saglam H,DUMAN S,BAYRAKDAR I,Yasa Y,dedeoğlu n "Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography." Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 43, ss.11 - 16, 2022. 10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818
ISNAD yeşiltepe, selin vd. "Evaluation of Relationship Between Maxillary Sinus Volume and Nasolacrimal Canal Dimension Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography". Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 43/3 (2022), 11-16. https://doi.org/10.5505/eudfd.2022.26818