Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

bala, oya; Aisa, Amira; Akgul, Sinem

Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Amira Aisa, (Gazi Üniversitesi/Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı, Ankara)

Oya BALA, (Gazi Üniversitesi/Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı, Ankara)

Sinem Akgul (Gazi Üniversitesi/Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı, Ankara)

Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi

7 0

Yıl: 2022 Cilt: 43 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 17 - 26 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 10-05-2023

Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:

Introduction: Aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of ten different resin composites. Methods: 60 samples were prepared for each resin composites. Plexiglass molds (8mm diameter and 2 mm depth) were used. The samples were divided into five subgroups according to polishing systems. Group 1: control (no polishing), Group 2: Clearfil Twist Dia, Group 3: Pogo, Gropu 4: Sof-Lex and Group 5: Super Snap. Surface roughness measurements were performed from three different points using a profilometer and surface roughness values were recorded. The obtained data were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test (Bonferroni correction) at 95% confidence interval. Results: Significant differences were observed between the surface roughness of polishing subgroups in each resin composites (p<0.05). Except for Geanial and Gradia Direct, all resin composites shown significantly lower roughness values in the control group (p<0.05). Also, it was determined that there was a significant difference between the roughness values of the tested resin composites in all polishing groups (p<0.05). Discussion and Conclusion: The properties of the resin composite used should also be considered while applying the finishing and polishing processes in aesthetic restorations.

Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

Chen MH. Update of dental nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 549-560.
Hosoya Y, Shiraishi T, Odatsu T, Nagafuji J, Kotaku M, Miyazaki M, Powers JM. Effects of polishing on surface roughness, gloss, and color of resin composites. J Oral Sci 2011; 53: 283-291.
Barakah HM, Taher NM. Effect of polishing systems on stain susceptibility and surface roughness of nanocomposite resin material. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 625-631.
Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei LEI, Powers JM. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005; 17: 102-108.
Da Costa, JB, Ferracane J, Paravina RD, Mazur RF, Roeder L. The effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of various resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007: 19: 214-224.
Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 45-52.
Reis AF, Giannini M, Lovadino JR, Ambrosano GM. Effects of various finishing systems on the surface roughness and staining susceptibility of packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 12-18.
Aytac F, Karaarslan ES, Agaccioglu M, Tastan E, Buldur M, Kuyucu E. Effects of novel finishing and polishing systems on surface roughness and morphology of nanocomposites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016; 28: 247-261.
Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of-the-art review. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 379-397.
Rimondini L, Farè S, Brambilla E, Felloni A, Consonni C, Brossa F, Carrassi A. The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 556-562.
Yadav RD, Raisingani D, Jindal D, Mathur R. A comparative analysis of different finishing and polishing devices on nanofilled, microfilled, and hybrid composite: A scanning electron microscopy and profilometric study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2016; 9: 201-208.
Ehrmann E, Medioni E, Brulat-Bouchard N. Finishing and polishing effects of multiblade burs on the surface texture of 5 resin composites: Microhardness and roughness testing. Res Dent Endod 2019; 44: e1-12.
Nair V, Sainudeen S, Padmanabhan P, Vijayashankar L, Sujathan U, Pillai R. Three-dimensional evaluation of surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing. J Conserv Dent 2016; 19: 91- 95.
Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 534-543.
Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 44-50.
Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NHF. Comparison of methods for measuring surface roughness of ceramic. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 421- 427.
Jones CS, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The in vivo perception of roughness of restorations. Br Dent J 2004; 196: 42-45.
Barbosa SH, Zanata RL, de Lima Navarro MF, Nunes OB. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins. Braz Dent J 2005; 16: 39-44.
Bala O, Arısu HD, Yıkılgan İ, Arslan S, Güllü A. Evaluation of surface roughness and hardness of different glass ionomer cements. European J Dent 2012; 6: 79-86.
Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998; 42: 613-627.
Marghalani HY. Effect of filler particles on surface roughness of experimental composite series. J App Oral Sci 2010; 18: 59-67.
Antonson SA, Yazici AR, Kilinc E, Antonson DE, Hardigan PC. Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dentistry 2011; 39: e9– e17.
Roeder LB, Powers JM. Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 109-112.
Erdemir U, Yildiz E, Eren MM, Ozsoy A, Topcu FT. Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials. J Dent Sci 2013; 8: e160- 169.
St Georges AJ, Bolla M, Fortin D, Muller-Bolla M, Thompson JY , Stamatiades PJ. Surface finish produced on three resin composites by new polishing systems. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 593-597.
Kılıç V, Gök A. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of various bulk-fill and nano-filled resin-based composites: An atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy study. Micros Res Tech 2021; 84: 2058-2067.
Kemaloglu H, Karacolak G, Turkun LS. Can reduced step polishers be as effective as multiple step polishers in enhancing surface smoothness? J Esthet Restor Dent 2017; 29: 31-40.
Türkün LS, Türkün M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 203-211.
Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 185-192.
Gömleksiz S, Gömleksiz O. The effect of contemporary finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of bulk fill resin composite and nanocomposites. J Esthet Rest Dent 2022; 1-9.
Yap AUJ, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/ polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 275-279.
Venturini D, Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Effect of polishing techniques and time on surface roughness, hardness and microleakage of resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 11- 17.
Jang JH, Kim HY , Shin SM, et al. Clinical effectiveness of different polishing systems and self- etch adhesives in class V composite resin restorations: two-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Oper Dent 2017; 42: 19e-29.
St-Pierre L, Martel C, Crepeau H, V argas MA. Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resins: polishability of composite resins. Oper Dent 2019; 44: e122-132.
Marigo L, Rizzi M, Torre LG. 3-D surface profile analysis: different finishing methods for resin composites. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 562-568.
Setcos CJ, Tarim B, Suzuki S. Surface finish produced on resin composite by new polishing system. Quintessence Int J 1999; 30: 169-173.
Özgünaltay G, Yazici AR, Görücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 218-224.
Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 262-266.
Magdy NM, Kola M Z, Alqahtani HH, Alqahtani MD, Alghmlas AS. Evaluation of surface roughness of different direct resin-based composites. J Inter Soc Preven Commun Dent 2017; 7: 104-109.
Paolone G, Moratti E, Goracci C, Gherlone E, Vichi A. Effect of Finishing Systems on Surface Roughness and Gloss of Full-Body Bulk-Fill Resin Composites. Materials 2020; 13: 1-9.
Turssi CP, Ferracane JL, Serra MC. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 641-648.

APA	Aisa A, bala o, Akgul S (2022). Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. , 17 - 26.
Chicago	Aisa Amira,bala oya,Akgul Sinem Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. (2022): 17 - 26.
MLA	Aisa Amira,bala oya,Akgul Sinem Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. , 2022, ss.17 - 26.
AMA	Aisa A,bala o,Akgul S Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. . 2022; 17 - 26.
Vancouver	Aisa A,bala o,Akgul S Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. . 2022; 17 - 26.
IEEE	Aisa A,bala o,Akgul S "Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi." , ss.17 - 26, 2022.
ISNAD	Aisa, Amira vd. "Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi". (2022), 17-26.

APA	Aisa A, bala o, Akgul S (2022). Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 43(3), 17 - 26.
Chicago	Aisa Amira,bala oya,Akgul Sinem Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 43, no.3 (2022): 17 - 26.
MLA	Aisa Amira,bala oya,Akgul Sinem Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, vol.43, no.3, 2022, ss.17 - 26.
AMA	Aisa A,bala o,Akgul S Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi. 2022; 43(3): 17 - 26.
Vancouver	Aisa A,bala o,Akgul S Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi. Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi. 2022; 43(3): 17 - 26.
IEEE	Aisa A,bala o,Akgul S "Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi." Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, 43, ss.17 - 26, 2022.
ISNAD	Aisa, Amira vd. "Farklı Polisaj Sistemlerinin Rezin Kompozitlerin Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü Üzerine Etkisinin In vitro Olarak Değerlendirilmesi". Ege Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi 43/3 (2022), 17-26.