Yıl: 2023 Cilt: 73 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 70 - 84 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007 İndeks Tarihi: 10-05-2023

The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm

Öz:
Cultural ecosystem services are ecosystem services developed on landscape aesthetics as the basis of recreation and tourism. The sharing paradigm produces the possibility of integration of the economic, spatial, and social contexts of cultural ecosystem services with cultural route planning. This study focuses on how to develop a good relationship between ecosystem services, which are named as the earth’s aggregative by the sharing paradigm, and the cultural routes that put our aggregative into circulation globally. In this context, route-planning setup is suggested as a conjoint tool between ecosystem services and tourism. The aim of this study is to develop a design setup with an analysis technique to determine cultural routes with an ecosystem services approach at the provincial scale of Malatya and to evaluate the developed route set up within the scope of sharing paradigm. This study can raise awareness of connecting ecosystem services with sustainable tourism for the quality of human life and the conservation of biodiversity. In addition, it is a guide on how awareness can be integrated into the tourism planning process. The method of the research has based on determining cultural ecosystem values, clustering cultural ecosystem values and the realization of the route setup by using the corridor and network analyzes in the Geographical Information Systems software. For each action to provide a curative and supportive cultural ecosystem service, the interconnectedness between actions needs to be evaluated based on knowledge, on the ground plane, and on the possibility of benefit.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Arcidiacono, A., & Ronchi, S. (2021). Challenges for contemporary spatial planning in Italy. Towards a new paradigm. In. Cities and Nature (p. 1–16). Springer. [CrossRef]
  • Aslan, A., & Kozak, M. (2019). Neoliberal collaboration of tourism academia and industry: The case of destination governance. In. Tourism, Hospitality and Event Management (p. 15–26). Cham. [CrossRef]
  • Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., & Schoon, M. L. (2015). Principles for building resilience. Cambridge University Press.
  • Butterfield, B. J., Camhi, A. L., Rubin, R. L., & Schwalm, C. R. (2016). Tradeoffs and compatibilities among ecosystem services. Advances in Ecological Research, 54, 207–243. [CrossRef]Chan, K. M. A., Satterfield, T.,& Goldstein, J. (2012). Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74, 8–18. [CrossRef]
  • Chubb, M., & Chubb, H. (1981). One third of our time? An introduction to recreation behaviour and resources. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • Cooper, C. (2015). Managing tourism knowledge. Tourism Recreation Research, 40(1), 107–119. [CrossRef]
  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. [CrossRef]
  • CRS (2017). Culture Routes in Turkey-Long Distance Hiking Trails for All. Culture Route Society. Retrieved from http: //cul turer oute- sintu rkey. com. • Czepczynski, M. (2008). Cultural landscapes of post-socialist cities: Representation of powers and needs. Ashgate.
  • Daily, G. C. (2013). Nature’s services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems (1997) (pp. 454–464). Yale University Press.
  • Daniel, T. C., Muhar, A., Arnberger, A., Aznar, O., Boyd, J. W., Chan, K. M., Costanza, R., Elmqvist, T., Flint, C. G., Gobster, P. H., Grêt-Regamey, A., Lave, R., Muhar, S., Penker, M., Ribe, R. G., Schauppenlehner, T., Sikor, T., Soloviy, I., Spierenburg, M., Taczanowska, K., et al. (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23), 8812–8819. [CrossRef]
  • Davis, P. H., Mill, R. R., & Tan, K. (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean islands (Vol. 10). Edinburgh University Press.
  • de Groot, R. S., Wilson, M. A., &Boumans, R. M. J. (2002). A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41(3), 393–408. [CrossRef]
  • Deng, X., Li, Z., Huang, J., Shi, Q., Li, Y., Zhang, R., & Huang, J. (2015). Reviews on impact assessments of land-use change on key ecosystem services. In. Springer Geography (pp. 1–35). Springer. [CrossRef]
  • Di Pietro, L., Mungion, R. G., & Renzi, M. F. (2013). Cultural technology district: A model for local and regional development. Current Issues in Tourism, 17(1), 1-17.
  • Dickinson, D. C., & Hobbs, R. J. (2017). Cultural ecosystem services: Characteristics, challenges and lessons for urban green space research. Ecosystem Services, 25, 179–194. [CrossRef]
  • Du Preez, C. C., van Huyssteen, C. W., Kotzé, E., & van Tol, J. J. (2020). Ecosystem services in sustainable food systems: Operational definition, concepts, and applications. In The role of ecosystem services in sustainable food systems (pp. 17–42). Academic Press.
  • Dunning, K. H. (2021). Adaptive governance of recreational ecosystem services following a major hurricane. Ecosystem Services, 50, 101324. [CrossRef]
  • Durance, I., Bruford, M. W., Chalmers, R., Chappell, N. A., Christie, M., Cosby, B. J., Noble, D., Ormerod, S. J., Prosser, H., Weightman, A., & Woodward, G. (2016). The challenges of linking ecosystem services to biodiversity. Advances in Ecological Research, 54, 87–134. [CrossRef]
  • Esmail, B. A., & Geneletti, D. (2020). Ecosystem services for urban water security: Concepts and applications in sub-Saharan Africa. Springer Nature. • Faggetter, R. (2001). The Great Ocean Road: From where to where? Paper presented at the Australia ICOMOS Making Tracks Conference, Alice Springs.
  • Feighery, W. G. (2011). Consulting ethics. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 1031–1050. [CrossRef]
  • Fesenmaier, D. R., & Xiang, Z. (2017). Introduction to tourism design and design science in tourism. Tourism on the Verge (pp. 3–16). Springer. [CrossRef]
  • Geneletti, D., Cortinovis, C., Zardo, L., & Adem Esmail, B. A. (2020). Applying ecosystem services to support planning decisions: A case study. Springer- Briefs in Environmental Science (pp. 43–56). Springer. [CrossRef]
  • General Directorate of Meteorology (2021). Malatya. Retrieved from https ://ww w.mgm .gov. tr/ve rideg erlen dirme /il-v e-ilc eler-istat istik .aspx ?k=un defin ed&m= MALAT YA
  • Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. (2007). The shared landscape: What does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landscape Ecology, 22(7), 959–972. [CrossRef]
  • Görmüş, S. (2017). Kültürel Peyzaj Değerlerini Korumak için Yeni bir Yaklaşım: Kültürel Rotalar. Plant Peyzaj ve Süs Bitkiciliği Dergisi, 7(25), 122–130 • Görmüş, S., Yılmaz, B., & Cengiz, S. (2021). Turizm Yönetim planlaması: Rota- Malatya [Tourism Managament Planning: Route Malatya]. İnönü Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Grunewald, K., & Bastian, O. (2015). Ecosystem services (ES): More than just a vogue term? In Ecosystem services–concept, methods and case studies (pp. 1–11). Springer.
  • Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2014). The ecosystem approach as a framework for understanding knowledge utilisation. Environment and Planning C. 32(2), 301–319. [CrossRef]
  • Haines-Young, R., & Potschin-Young, M. (2018). Revision of the common international classification for ecosystem services (CICES V5.1): A policy brief. One Ecosystem, 3. [CrossRef]
  • Innocenti, A. (2018). Archaeology and Cultural Routes: A relationship to develop. Archeostorie. Journal of Public Archaeology, 2, 75–88.
  • Karakuş, Ş. (2009). Flora of Tohma Valley [Master Thesis]. Inonu University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Biology.
  • Karakuş, Ş. (2016). Flora of Malatya [Ph.D. Thesis]. Inonu University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences Department of Biology.
  • Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı (2021). Türkiye turizm Stratejisi [Turkey tourism strategy]. Retrieved from https ://ww w.ktb .gov. tr/Ek lenti /906,ttst ratej isi20 23pdf .pdf? 0 Erişim tarihi: 02.03.2007.
  • Ma, J. I. A. N. Y. U., Gao, J., & Scott, N. O. E. L. (2017). Introduction: Creating memorable experiences. Visitor Experience Design. CABI series in tourism management research 3–12).
  • McGuigan, J. (2005). Neo-liberalism, culture and policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(3), 229–241. [CrossRef]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Synthesis. Island Press
  • National Biodiversity Inventory and Monitoring Project (2016). Malatya İli Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Envanter İzleme Çalışması. Ulusal Biyolojik Çeşitlilik Envanter ve İzleme Projesi. Retrieved from https ://bo lge15 .tari morma n.gov .tr/M enu/7 2/Mal atya- Ili-U lusal -Biyo lojik -Cesi tlili k-Env anter -Izle m-Cal ismas i
  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2009). The impact of culture on tourism. OECD.
  • Özhatay, N., & Kültür, Ş. (2006). Check-list of additional taxa to the supplement flora of Turkey III. Turkish Journal of Botany, 30, 281–316.
  • Raymond, C. M., Bryan, B. A., MacDonald, D. H., Cast, A., Strathearn, S., Grandgirard, A., & Kalivas, T. (2009). Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 68(5), 1301–1315. [CrossRef]
  • Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Cumming, G. S., Elmqvist, T., Hejnowicz, A. P., & Polasky, S. (2013). Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social-ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(5), 268–273. [CrossRef]
  • Richards, G. (2007). Cultural Tourism: Global and local perspectives. Haworth Press.
  • Saito, O., & Ryu, H. (2020). What and how are we sharing? The academic landscape of the sharing paradigm and practices: Objectives and organization of the book. In. Science for Sustainable Societies (pp. 1–19). Springer. [CrossRef]
  • Schill, B., & Schill, B. (1997). Moseying along the heritage trail: Find peace, quiet and antiquity around New Jersey’s Delaware Bay. Trailer Life, 57(6), 63–83
  • Scholte, S. S. K., Todorova, M., Van Teeffelen, A. J. A., & Verburg, P. H. (2016). Public support for wetland restoration: What is the link with ecosystem service values? Wetlands, 36(3), 467–481. [CrossRef]
  • Soyak, M. (2013). Uluslararası Turizmde Son Eğilimler ve Türkiye’de Turizm Politikalarının Evrimi Marmara Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi [The Recent Trends in the International Tourism and the Evolution of Tourism Policies in Turkey]. Journal of Marmara Social Research. Retrieved from http: //ope nacce ss.ma rmara .edu. tr/bi tstre am/ha ndle/ 11424 /3571 /2013 - 1.pdf ?sequ ence= 1&isA llowe d=y
  • Stebbings, E., Hooper, T., Austen, M. C., Papathanasopoulou, E., & Yan, X. (2021). Accounting for benefits from natural capital: Applying a novel composite indicator framework to the marine environment. Ecosystem Services, 50, 101308. [CrossRef]
  • TEEB (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Available at: https://portals.iucn.org/library/ sites/library/files/documents/2010-051.pdf
  • TEEB (2021). Ecosystem services. TEEB. Retrieved from http://teebweb.org/ • Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (2020). Ürün Raporu: Kayısı [Product Report: Apricot]. TEPGE YAYIN NO: 316, ISBN: 978-605-7599-42-1.
  • Terzić, A., Bjeljac, Ž., Jovičić, A., & Penjišević, I. (2014). Cultural route and ecomuseum concepts as a synergy of nature, heritage and community oriented sustainable development ecomuseum ibar valley in Serbia. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(2), 1–16. [CrossRef]
  • Timothy, D. J., & Boyd, S. W. (2015). Tourism and trails: Cultural, ecological and management issues (Vol. 64). Channel View Publications.
  • Tribe, J., & Liburd, J. J. (2016). The tourism knowledge system. Annals of Tourism Research, 57, 44–61. [CrossRef]
  • Türkiye Istatistik Kurumu (2021). Malatya. Retrieved from https ://bi runi. tuik. gov.t r/med as/?k n=95& local e=tr
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2012). UNESCO world heritage and sustainable tourism programme: Action plan 2013–2015. UNESCO.
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2016). World heritage journeys in the European Union. UNESCO. Retrieved from http: //whc .unes co.or g/en/ activ ities /875/
  • UNWTO (2022). 2017 International Year of Sustainable Tourism for Development website. Retrieved from https ://ww w.unw to.or g/tou rism4 devel opmen t2017
  • Winfield, D. (1977). The northern routes across Anatolia. Anatolian Studies, 27, 151–166. [CrossRef]
APA Gormus s, Yilmaz B, cengiz s (2023). The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. , 70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
Chicago Gormus sevgi,Yilmaz Bulent,cengiz serhat The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. (2023): 70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
MLA Gormus sevgi,Yilmaz Bulent,cengiz serhat The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. , 2023, ss.70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
AMA Gormus s,Yilmaz B,cengiz s The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. . 2023; 70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
Vancouver Gormus s,Yilmaz B,cengiz s The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. . 2023; 70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
IEEE Gormus s,Yilmaz B,cengiz s "The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm." , ss.70 - 84, 2023. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
ISNAD Gormus, sevgi vd. "The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm". (2023), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
APA Gormus s, Yilmaz B, cengiz s (2023). The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. FORESTIST, 73(1), 70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
Chicago Gormus sevgi,Yilmaz Bulent,cengiz serhat The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. FORESTIST 73, no.1 (2023): 70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
MLA Gormus sevgi,Yilmaz Bulent,cengiz serhat The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. FORESTIST, vol.73, no.1, 2023, ss.70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
AMA Gormus s,Yilmaz B,cengiz s The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. FORESTIST. 2023; 73(1): 70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
Vancouver Gormus s,Yilmaz B,cengiz s The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm. FORESTIST. 2023; 73(1): 70 - 84. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
IEEE Gormus s,Yilmaz B,cengiz s "The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm." FORESTIST, 73, ss.70 - 84, 2023. 10.5152/forestist.2022.22007
ISNAD Gormus, sevgi vd. "The Integration of Cultural Ecosystem Services and Cultural Routes Based on the Sharing Paradigm". FORESTIST 73/1 (2023), 70-84. https://doi.org/10.5152/forestist.2022.22007